User Profile: HonorTheOath


Member Since: April 18, 2013


  • [1] August 28, 2014 at 1:36pm

    The UN troops used inside the continental US would more than likely be composed of Russian, Chinese, French, Indian, etc. forces. More “Red Dawn” than “Rambo.”

  • August 28, 2014 at 9:42am

    I feel very deeply for this misguided woman. She just signed her son’s death warrant. She increased the value of his public execution ten fold. Side note: is a propagandist for the enemy really “an innocent civilian?” I know he was probably pulling for ISIL from over there, but to ISIL he is just a shill for the Great Satan. ISIL is not a signatory to any of the “laws of armed conflict” but even if they were . . . how did we treat Tokyo Rose, Goebbels, and Riefenstahl? Were they just “innocent civilians?”

  • [5] August 28, 2014 at 9:33am

    Hmmm. Mitt Romney was right after all. Anyone who doesn’t think the kleptocracy that is modern Russia is behind the “Russian Mafia” attacks has their head in the sand. This is Putins’ work for sure.

    Responses (1) +
  • [16] August 28, 2014 at 9:31am

    Anyone else notice Glenn now has two or three liberals/progressives writing the articles? The quality and objectivity of the writing has cratered. Not sure how much longer I will participate. I can get MSM bias anywhere. I’m not a Glenn Basher (we do have a bunch of anti-Glenn trolls as regulars here) but man he is slipping.

    Responses (3) +
  • [11] August 28, 2014 at 9:29am

    Wow. Her Mom/Dad had better insist on being with her every second she is involved in that show. Yes, I know the biblical foundation for allowing her to participate in Cheating With the Stars (same reason why a true evangelist goes to the strip clubs, bars and casinos- it’s where the sinners are), but to throw a 17 year old into the lion’s den like that is incredibly risky. Wish her well. She will need to be very strong.

  • [1] August 27, 2014 at 5:01pm

    Wow. Shockingly wrong. I would like to direct you tot eh actual Constitution itself. . . which you have obviously never read. You can skip ahead to the so-called “Bill of Rights” (of which the 2d is just one) and that oughta gob-smack ya right there. But that would ignore the rest of the document, which is just chock-full of all kinds of divvying up of rights between the Citizen and The State (both local and federal).

    Of course, since you are an obvious troll, I should have just ignored you.

    “PLONK!” as we used to say back when we were inventing the interweb.

  • August 27, 2014 at 4:55pm

    Actually, yes, yes they were! The revolution was not fought by old men. 12 year olds would have been assigned to the artillery BECAUSE of their age and experience. Artillery is a REMF job. Too young for Infantry, but they can swab a bore and pack powder. Many of them did.

  • [7] August 27, 2014 at 4:34pm

    Sooooooo . . . your argument is “Since we waste so much money on **** we have no business wasting money on, we are unable to afford to pay for the one single CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY of the federal government.”

    Hmm. After rereading that, I think it’s a pretty pithy summary of your argument.

  • [-2] August 27, 2014 at 4:26pm

    Stop with the personal opinions. Science knows when the fetus becomes human. We can test for humanity (sentience) on a case by case basis. If it’s a fetus- it’s a medical procedure. If it’s a human- it’s murder. Late term abortionists are murderers. Not all abortionists- but late term is murder beyond any doubt.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 27, 2014 at 4:23pm

    Science is a bitch. At 15 weeks (on the average) that “bunch of cells” is a sentient human being. We have the technology and tools to assess sentience now. We have tools developed in studying “lower” life forms and have no problem at all claiming “A Dolphin/Whale/Dog/Cat/Fill In The Blank has sentience, so they have rights!” These same people generally support abortion . . . if it was a baby dolphin they would be outraged. Since it’s a baby human, crickets. Side Bar: “Viability” is BS. The baby is a sentient human being long before “viability.” Those making the “viability” argument are pro-euthenasia . . . whether they know it or not. If an adult coma victim is no longer “viable” should we kill them? It cuts both ways. Viability is a flawed test of “humanity.” Sentience is not. Theologically, sentience is when the soul enters the body. Loss of sentience occurs as the soul flees. Only the hypocrites fail to see this.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 25, 2014 at 4:40pm

    Shoot to stop. Of course, the officer could have stopped him with one shot if he hadn’t just been beaten. As it was, the thug was so dangerous it took 6 ROUNDS JUST TO STOP HIM!

    Not to sound condescending, but you do understand that right? The fact that it took 6 shots to stop the attacker does not support the “innocent victim gunned down” false narrative you are trying to sell. Would have been a lot easier for you to sell that evil lie if the LEO dropped him with one shot from behind. The fact that the autopsy supports the exact opposite should at least slow your agitprop down, right?

  • August 25, 2014 at 4:36pm

    Projection. As usual.

  • [1] August 25, 2014 at 4:15pm

    Don’t feed the commie trolls . . .

  • [2] August 25, 2014 at 4:15pm

    You replied to your own comment a little too quickly JRook. OUTED!

  • [2] August 25, 2014 at 4:14pm

    TROLL ALERT! Very transparent. The poster is a liberal union thug. The Blaze is rampant with these goobs. Glenn, you are being “Tea Partied!”* Saddest thing is . . . many of our brothers believe it. It’s easier to just believe anything that fits your own prejudices, no matter how ree-donkulous it might be.

    *Tea Party: (v) To misrepresent yourself as a member of a group you dislike, and acting churlishly so as to bring dishonor and hate onto the members of the group: See SEIU, “Tea Party Racists Dump Black Vet From Wheelchair,” “Tea Party Members Shout Racist Comments,” “Tea Party Displaying Racist Signage,” etc.

  • August 25, 2014 at 2:02pm

    Yes, the irony abounds. If a reporter willingly gets in the way of an attack (volunteering to be a “human shield” for Hamas for example), do they deserve to be considered an innocent bystander . . . Or enemy combatant?

  • August 25, 2014 at 1:59pm

    As a not-so-side comment, the whole notion of “civilian” (sic) casualties needs to be re-examined. Especially in light of the current asymmetrical warfare environment. Was Foley a “civilian?” Is a bomb-maker in the Gaza a “civilian?” What about a worker at a US military depot or employee of a defense contractor? Cue the haters . . . But a very strong case could be made for the validity of ISIL command to consider news “reporters” (including the questionable “freelance” ones) to be enemy combatants. Yeah, I know this hurts. And it pains me to say it. Pull the executioner into the Hague and he would win the case I fear. He was simply executing a spy. Perfectly legal. Again, I do not agree with this interpretation personally, but of course my personal opinion is of little relevance.

  • [2] August 25, 2014 at 1:47pm

    BS. It is against the law to loiter near “critical infrastructure.” We used to be able to fish under bridges . . . Now it’s a heavy fine and jail time. Throw the book at this turd.

  • August 24, 2014 at 11:17am

    Have you ever read what he posts about non-progressives on the Daily Kos?

    And you *still* think he’s any kind of a “decent” human being?


  • [2] August 24, 2014 at 11:14am

    Rollins is an execrable human being. Check out anything he says regularly about non-progressives (like GOP and Tea Party). Then apply what you understand about the psychological construct “projection.”

    Yeah, Rollins is an evil bstard.