User Profile: HonorTheOath


Member Since: April 18, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • [2] September 28, 2014 at 8:01am

    You are obviously an intelligent and objective person. Please google the words “deliberate” and “accidental” and save yourself some public embarrassment in the future.

    You’re welcome.

  • [5] September 28, 2014 at 7:53am

    Socialism of any stripe requires fascism to implement. No surprise socialists/progressives are big believers in coercion and force.

    Hey, when your organizing philosophy is obviously and patently evil (“from each, to each” and all that) the whole halo of hatred (modern tribalism and “collective salvation”) that comes along with it should be no surprise to any thoughtful and/or educated person.

    “Why are all the racist/sexist/homophobic people progressives” is one of those self-answering questions . . . .

  • [43] September 28, 2014 at 7:14am

    One thought immediately hit me: FINALLY! With all the bogus claims of racism, sexism, etc. we are force-fed every day we FINALLY see a REAL . . . Not made up, not self-inflicted, but ACTUAL . . . we have spotted a unicorn here! An actual case of bigotry and hatred.

    The only bigger shocker would be to find out this toad of a shopkeeper was actually politically conservative. Naw. That would be a case of Elvis riding a Unicorn. Betcha the guys a progressive or at least a DNC voter. Probably worships Wilson and Roosevelt.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] September 23, 2014 at 1:59pm

    ????? A couple of phone calls could have ruled in/out the butterfly hypothesis. Oh well- can’t let reality get in the way of a good “story!”

    What, no news organization had any interest in what the cloud was? Just call a few folks and ask “hey, did you see a big cloud of butterflies on day/time?” Apparently, that is too much work for a “journalist” . . .

  • [3] September 19, 2014 at 11:41am

    Ok folks you can keep score of this one at home. Just tally up how many times the fascist progressive in any discussion ignores questions just to spew talking points, interrupts the other guest, supports the murder of preborn innocents . . . now check your tally sheet. Hmmm . . . . psychological projection at work AGAIN!

  • [1] September 19, 2014 at 11:39am

    How many million unborn murdered? See, psychological projection again!

  • [5] September 19, 2014 at 11:38am

    Dude, the book “Rules for Radicals” (by his running buddy Alinsky) is dedicated to Satan . . .

    Responses (1) +
  • September 19, 2014 at 11:36am

    See how psychological projection works? Rose Ellen says “Andrea Tantaros is another hideous brain washed propagandist.” Now, all the objective evidence shows that Andrea Tantaros is a pleasant, intelligent, rational person who makes cogent arguments during open discussion. The evidence also clearly shows . . . that Rose-Ellen is the hideous, brain washed propagandist. Too easy when they follow the same old trite template going back to the dawn of time. Accuse your enemy of the crimes you yourself commit. See Clintons, Political Dynasty.

  • [-1] September 19, 2014 at 11:33am

    DEFCON- you are spot on but realize fascist progressives like zac are driven by psychological projection; in order to justify their evil crazy impulses they have to “project” their own sickness on others. External validation and all that (” . . . if conservatives are as evil as I am, then any evil I do is justified . . . ). So while you are 100% right, the pushback will be along the lines of “Nanny Nanny Boo Boo, Conservatives Are A Pooh Pooh.” Just like their hero, the terrorist murderer Ayers.

  • [1] September 19, 2014 at 11:27am

    See what I mean about “psychological projection?” ‘Course they may be a bit of confirmation bias at work here but ever since I figgered this out in the 1980s it just shouts out every time a progressive/totalitarian opens their mouth or types away.

    Whenever a fascist/socialist accuses someone else of X, you can bet the farm that they themselves are totally guilty of X.

    Socrates they ain’t; their lives (and beliefs) never having been “self examined.”

  • [4] September 19, 2014 at 11:24am

    “Psychological Projection.” Classic. We can certainly discuss WHY “progressives” and “socialist/totalitarians” exhibit this behavior on a scale orders of magnitude greater than “conservatives” and “libertarians,” but the observable evidence is clear.

    Whenever a leftist accuses a non-leftist of X, you can bet the house on the fact that the accuser is chock-full-of X . . .

  • [2] September 18, 2014 at 2:36pm

    We know ISANA is working with the cartels in northern mexico. ISANA (Caliphate in North America) is our ISIL (caliphate in the levant) and ISIS (caliphate in Syria) “franchise.” While many of the 20+ year old “teenagers” (they are told to claim to be 14 years old) are standard-issue sleepers (which is bad enough) those to young to work as sleepers have been weaponized. Syria, ex-Soviet (now Russian) client state, has access to whatever bioweapons the Russians have. Rev Wright has done thing right: Obamas chickens have indeed come home to rest!

  • [1] September 18, 2014 at 1:58pm

    That the administration is as corrupt as the most ridiculous third world dictatorship: I’m not surprised.

    That Glen hires writers who don’t know the difference between “plum” and “plumb” . . . now *that’s* shocking!

  • [11] September 9, 2014 at 5:57pm

    You forgot “infecting the younger aged terrorists with deadly diseases” part of the tactic. Not all of them are sleepers. Some are active weapons.

  • [1] September 9, 2014 at 5:56pm

    Enjoying Colorado?

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] September 9, 2014 at 5:55pm

    Too late! Can you say “Benghazi?” How about “Fast and Furious?” Both government programs with the purpose of arming terrorists. Benghazi directly armed the ISIL; F&F armed the cartels who are now arming ISINA (Islamic State In North America). You don’t think the cartels are working with ISINA?

  • [4] September 9, 2014 at 5:53pm

    When people make comments this ignorant, I just have to wonder what they do for a living . . .

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] September 9, 2014 at 5:51pm

    Turboprops. But yeah, he used 1950s era terminology. Bet he even calls a “magazine” a “clip.”

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] September 9, 2014 at 5:48pm

    Yawn. If a tree falls . . .

    Y’all don’t get it. Until citizens push back, this never happened. Who cares? Nobody.

    Responses (1) +
  • [23] September 9, 2014 at 5:45pm

    And Paneras? You gonna take responsibility for my safety, since you prevent me from protecting myself? No? Why not? Anyone who takes away my ability to defend myself is now LEGALLY AND MORALLY LIABLE for my protection.

    Responses (4) +
123 To page: Go