We are witnessing first hand the rise of National Socialism in the USA. So many touchpoints on that (including Smoot-Hawley and “abuse of the other”) historians will look back on it in dismay.
“Never Again” indeed . . . the resurgence of anti-semitism (although NOT “the hated other” TODAY) should be troubling enough.
We have the caudillo (chauvismo) rising, union thuggery, fear, hate, tribalism . . . all backed by OFA/CPUSA and following the Alinsky plan to a “T.”
While I do find it amusing that illegals immigrants from latin america (who destroy their own societies with this very crap) will now become the victims of it, many innocent, good people will be crushed under the bootheels of the brownshirts and that should tear at all of our hearts.
Honor (misnomer) - Wow! That posting was so full of liberal baloney I wanted to slap it between two slices of pumpernickel and slather it with mayo! Nazi, anti-Semitism, Chavismo (I guess that's what you meant), Communist, thug, tribalist, bootheels of brownshirts. Do you know what you sounded like there? You sounded like a Berkley radical from 1967! Congratulations!
You've obviously been asleep for 28 years if you are finally questioning it - good grief go back to sleep
 May 5, 2016 at 8:45pm
Smoot-Hawley- now THAT’s the ticket!
Just what we need to being us out of this recessin by god!
Protectionism, with just the rght amount of xenophobia!
Long Live the Union! Look for the Union label!
National Socialism- now *there’s* a plan we can all get behind!
Almost every country we trade with has some form of tarrifs on foreign products that would destroy their domestic industries.
Try selling beef or cars in China or Japan.
You can't do it.
Americans are the only ones who must be raped on trade & immigration the "free traders" said so.
It was easy credit that caused the 1929 crash.
The whole world was overextended after the roaring Twenties.
Interest was so low, credit was so easy, everybody was borrowing money to speculate on stocks.
Wait till the current bubble pops, in this era of "Free Trade".
 May 5, 2016 at 8:42pm
Yeah. National Socialism, with just the right amount of xenophobia and big- gubmint cronyism.
Sounds familiar but I just can’t seem to place it . . . I hear the boots marching; where’d I put that armaband?
I took an oath to support and defend THE CONSTITUTION of the Unitd States of America.
I did NOT swear an oath to ANY political party, strongman, or caudillo. I did NOT swear an oath to uphold unions, the majority of ‘murricans, democracy, or populism.
It is patently obvious. I hear the boots. I see the armbands. We are seeing Germany, 1934.
National Socialism is NOT what the Constitutin of the United States of America is founded on.
I know you are angry. I know you are confused. I know you are frustated. I know you think National Socialism is the answer.
Smoot-Hawley Round 3 is not the answer. Economics is NOT a “zero sum” game, no matter what your union brothers say. The answer to “Obamunism” is NOT “Trumpism.” Crony socialism does not work better just because it is YOUR Tribe recieving the spoils.
Dear God in heaven please reach the souls of these fallen brethren. They are NOT beyond redemption.
(rounding up and including all benefits it works out to be less than $10/hr)
April 30, 2016 at 11:04am
Yes, “evil” as in “we will do anything our lawyers tell us so we can remain profitable and in business.” Evil as in “Look at this great “smart gun tech” we have developed and are trying to sell.
Evil gun makers? See Ruger, Smith & Wesson . . . ?
 April 30, 2016 at 11:02am
Fox news just did a stupid puff piece on that quisling rentseeker (oxygen thief) pushing his “smart ring” technology.
No challenge, no “fair and balanced,” no questions about the technology . . . just an advertisement for how wonderful the system was.
[for the record, ALL of these technologies define "fail-safe" as "when in doubt, do NOT fire." Yeah. Whose safety does this ensure? The thug with the knife/bat/chainsaw/fists/zip gun that's who.]
April 30, 2016 at 10:57am
Good thing the gun didn’t have an electronic “safety” system.
Fox News just did a puff piece on that hoplophobe pushing his “safety ring technology” again.
Shameful. Tucker Carlson was the only one who asked any questions about it. They did not present ANY kind of rebuttal to the stupid claims made by the company CEO . . .
Quisling rentseeker. These oxygen thieves are willing to sell YOUR LIFE to line THEIR POCKETS.
 April 30, 2016 at 10:52am
Fellow Blazers: click on the poster’s alias/avatar and see when they joined.
If they haven’t been a member since before January 2016, odds are very good they are PAID TROLLS.
The site has been under coordinated attack since last Christmas.
Well then, where's my check?
Oh, yeah, "odds are"...
*chuckle* Odds are you're correct.
Nothing new under the sun.
We battle not against flesh and bone, And evil will flourish if good men do nothing.
most of the newer sign-ups are merely long-time regular commenters that got their old accounts banned for writing naughty words and the like.
 April 30, 2016 at 10:50am
Back in the early 70s the LGBT movement targeted the Catholic Church. They perceived (rightfully so) that the Catholic Church represented a powerful force standing in the way of their overarching goal of “acceptance” of their lifestyle choices. They developed a plan (the “Stonewall Protocol” or some such; maybe “Pontiac Accords” whatever) that specifically laid out how to infiltrate seminaries and begin “chickenhawking” altar boys. We all know “the rest of the story.” The Catholic Chuirch today has ZERO moral standing among the public on ANYHTING (let alone marriage, ***** theory, alternative lifestyles, etc.). To see how successfully the activists took down the church, just read the comments on this thread.
The Church of Jesus Christ LDS is under similar attack. “Rape Culture” is just a TOOL that can be used as part of a larger STRATEGY to take down the church’s moral standing.
False accusations of “Rape” are critical to creating the PERCEPTION that “rape culture” actually exists. The MSM jumps on ANY accusation (hey, Duke Lacrosse players?) and the exoneration get buried. There is NO DUE PROCESS for the young men destroyed by these false accusations. Hey, “ya gotta break some eggs to make an omelette” or BAMN is the justification for these activists.
Hey Glenn- YOUR WEBSITE IS UNDER ATTACK BY PAID SOROS/OFA/CPUSA TROLLS! You need to start posting the “Member Since [date joined Blaze]” in the HEADER OF EVERY POST. $$$$$$$$ are being spent to drive the memes . .
One of my thoughts after reading the article was that a way to assess the rules would be to see how they might be applied If the situation were somewhat reversed:
The woman said she was told that if she became pregnant she could be thrown out of school.
What might something equivalent look like?
Mr XY Dean of students is attacked and robbed. He calls for help and the school President regards him with some sympathy, but takes note of his bloody face and reminds him that the school has a Strict no fighting policy, and if x--rays reveal any broken bones he is going to loose his job.
I also note that the school is against abortion, but has a policy which as much as it may encourage silence/secrecy regarding rape may also encourage means to keep the consequences of rape a secret . Opposing abortion while enforcing penalties against victims of assault who cannot keep all the medical consequences hidden, seems to undermine an important part of their stated values.
I also note that this aspect of the story ( the alleged policy) is not noted as confirmed as existing or having existed in the past. The school has said that they are looking into things, but has not spoken on what their existing policies actually are.
...Thank you PGmike for the information. ( reply posted under Freedom.Friend)
I hadn't gotten into the comments yet when I wrote mine. Your explanation makes sense.
Complete garbage. Not only is your conspiracy theory completely nonsensical (so, LGBT folks devoted their lives to the priesthood knowing that the church would cover-up pedophilia for decades?), but you use it as an argument to discredit young women who have been sexually assaulted. It would be laughable if it wasn't so harmful. The irony is that you deny the existence of rape culture while willfully perpetuating it.
It boggles the mind that you would have the nerve to claim "honor" in any sense.
Total horsecrap. It's conspiracy theory lunacy.
"False accusations of “Rape” are critical to creating the PERCEPTION that “rape culture” actually exists." The only thing required for "rape culture" to exist is rape. I find it interesting that you would use the Duke Lacrosse Players as proof that false rape accusations are widespread. Do you give all the cases where men denied the rape charge and were then found guilty, equal weight?
[-14] April 29, 2016 at 10:07am
Too bad. The kid is only 11, so HE won’t be going to jail even though he broke the law.
The family, however, is on the hook for all medical bills plus pain and suffering.
Shooting a fleeing, unarmed criminal in the back IS against the law.
The other 11 rounds went somewhere . . . the family is legally liable for every single one of them.
F**K your Liberal law - Break in my house and they will carry you out
That depends on the state. Here in Texas if someone breaks into your house you have a free kill card whether they are armed or not. The same applies to a person's outside property, with some limits during daylight hours but night time is a different story. Home invasion and convenience store robbery are dangerous occupations here. If the scumbag is shot/killed during the commission of a crime neither him or his family can sue the shooter.
The thing is that you can't trust one who breaks into your home. He may have been pretending to leave in order to trick the kid so that he could get control of the gun. He already told the kid he was going to kill him. In the 1960's, Richard Speck killed 8 students nurses in Chicago, telling each one he wasn't going to hurt them, & they believed him. He took each out of the apartment and killed each one. One escaped death by hiding under a bed; fortunately, Speck lost count of the number of girls in the apartment.
In Michigan you can shoot a fleeing felon. You break into my house you are not getting away. Front or back, I don't care, I'll take my chances.
Regrettably, this is probably true. I cringe every time I read something like this.
People need to learn – if you shoot someone who is running away then you are not legally right. Even the police cannot do it in Alabama.
None of what you said is necessarily true at all.
 April 29, 2016 at 4:55am
“Member since March 18″ says it all.
PAID OFA/CPUSA TROLL.
Hey Glenn- YOU NEED TO INCLUDE “MEMBER SINCE [Date Joined Blaze]” in every header.
YOUR SITE HAS BEEN TARGETTED BY PAID TROLLS!
[-1] April 29, 2016 at 4:49am
You do realize this is just street theater . . . The global sociofascist movement is PAYING PEOPLE TO PRETEND TO BE TRUMP/CRUZ SUPPORTERS *AND* TRUMP/CRUZ PROTESTERS, RIGHT?
If you don’t understand that basic fact you are worse than naive. You are a tool of the enemies of the constitution- wittingly or unwittingly; it doesn’t matter.
 April 29, 2016 at 4:44am
The Blaze should add “Member since [date joined Blaze]” to every header.
That would help us avoid the OFA/CPUSA trolls.
The trolls posing as Trump (or Cruz) supporters will only increase in number.
Hillary is paying millions (on top of the Soros and Obama/OFA millions already being spent) for “social media presence” so the sociofascist trolling will only get worse . . .
WAKE UP GLENN- “YOUR” SITE IS BEING OVERWHELMED BY ASTROTURF TROLLS!!!
I did not watch the video as I don't care who they are voting for.
The important thing I get from this is the people of Virginia made a choice - commit a crime and you lose the right to vote.
One guy decided otherwise. He executive orders this there is nothing he cannot executive order.
The only reason why we know they're voting for Trump is because its TheBlaze, and TheBlaze will stop at nothing to paint him and his supporters in as negative of a light as possible.
Sick, dishonest journalism.
Yo mickey, not withstanding the lack of random selection, I'm not sure whether it would be the T or F test that would be used in this instance. What I am sure about is that regardless of which one it is a "sample" of 5 would provide no statistical relevance relative to what a population of 200,000 might do. Seriously, don't you get tired of posting stuff with the sole intent of getting cheap comments from zealots on both sides of an insignificant issue. My advice, get a real job and do something productive.
So we can come to some conclusion based on an interview with five white "ex-felons?" I don't think so.
26 : I think ' the people ' are going to reach the end of their rope during this new Age of Trickle Down Executive Over-Reach. From Obama on down...
I believe the point was that most would have thought they be voting for hillary (dem) do to all the media rhetoric?
Honor...Correct. TheBlaze is starting to be run like TMZ. Can't just give you the news. Gotta get you with gotcha crap.
They only spoke to the white felons, my bet is all the black felons will either vote Hillary or be back in prison by November.