TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying Hopestar-B-COHIPER's 10 most recent comments.

• Anti-Gay Bias or Fair Punishment? New Details Emerge About High School Student’s Lesbian Relationship With a Minor

  May 24, 2013 at 12:43pm

  In reply to Ultra_C_.

  Yes, the LAW IS THE LAW….

  Yes, this country has become a country of LAWS rather than a country of JUSTICE.

  Like the Bible says, there is a time and a season for all things….. But, guess, that in this country there is only time for LEGALISM and NO TIME FOR LOVE LET ALONE JUSTICE.

• Anti-Gay Bias or Fair Punishment? New Details Emerge About High School Student’s Lesbian Relationship With a Minor

  May 24, 2013 at 12:38pm

  In reply to Fitzquigad.

  Tell me what foods you dislike; ie. foods that the very thought of makes you want to upchuck.

  Once we all know what foods will make you upchuck, every member of this board will come to your home, and force upon you their correct, proper, good and healthy value of good food until you enjoy eating those foods that you are wrongfully hateful of.

  We will teach you proper and correct eating habits.

  Get the point?

  Homosexuality is chemistry, just like for the most part a person’s like and dislike of foods is chemistry. For some people, certain foods, (like red cabbage, for me) not only makes me want to upchuck when I smell it cooking, but red cabbage will KILL ME IF I EAT IT!!!!!!

• Anti-Gay Bias or Fair Punishment? New Details Emerge About High School Student’s Lesbian Relationship With a Minor

  May 24, 2013 at 12:31pm

  In reply to hebashen.

  They did a stupid thing?

  In the 1800′s the left hand of a southpaw was tied behind their back in order to force them to use their right hand because it was know that the left hand was the tool of the devil. By the early 1900′s it was discovered that psychological damage was done to south paws forced to use their right hand . For a south paw, using the left hand is NORMAL; but for a south paw to use the right hand is NOT-NORMAL and causes mental damage.

  In the 1950′s, it was discovered that more than a few people (including 30 year olds) who were labeled as ‘retarded’ could be cured of retardation by making them crawl on their hands and knees and not allowing them to walk on their feet. Why did this cure them? Simple, the old adage of ‘you must crawl before you walk’ is true. Parents who FORCED their child to walk instead of letting their child learn to walk at their own time resulted in mental retardation. Such mental retards, when forced back onto their hands and knees caught up with their peers in a few years.

  Sex is no different. The result of sexual studies are incomplete as of yet. But their is indications that certain psychological problems per capita have increased among people proportionally as the age of first sexual activity has increased due to the application and thence the increase in the age of legal sex.

  Nature intended sex for the young; not for the old and withered. Deny the young sex, you increase their mental instability.

• Anti-Gay Bias or Fair Punishment? New Details Emerge About High School Student’s Lesbian Relationship With a Minor

  May 24, 2013 at 12:08pm

  The law never should have been. Anyone who is sexually aware should be allowed to engage in the activities that attracts them.

  The problem is that most, if not all sexually aware people (up to and including 100 years of age) have never been taught what sex is, how to handle it, the need to be responsible with sex and how to be safe with sex.

  Some people never become sexually aware (usually called frigid or impotent or eunuch) but, others become aware at a very young age including 8 and 9 year olds. My oldest son did not become sexually sexually aware (interested) until the age of 19. My youngest son became sexually aware at the age of 10 and his oldest brother teased his younger brother because of the younger brother’s stash of nude women pictures (ie.Playboy); of which my oldest son did not become interested in until he was 19.

  Every person is different. The law does not and can not (because of the ACLU) take into account the variances of individual sexual chemistry. Courts of legalism can not take into account these variances because of the ACLU – and neither can judges or juries because of the ACLU. Thus, in cases like this, miscarriages in Justice are done.

  WE are now a nation of LEGALISM and no longer a nation of JUSTICE!!!!!!!!!

  In times past when our courts were courts of JUSTICE and not just COURTS of LEGALISM justice would have been done in a case like this and the two young women would have been left alone by the authorities.

• Baby vs. fetus: A question of morality, not ‘terminology’

  May 5, 2013 at 10:58am

  Fetus or Baby (ie. child)????

  The Bible seems to indicate (Genesis) that only after God breathes the breath of Life into a person is that person then an image of God. In Genesis, God does not breathe the breath of life into a ‘human animal’ until after it has been born and is up and around and breathing oxygen.

  Religious people should note that God did not breathe the breathe of life into any animal except the human animal (ie. sentient being) and that the breath of life entered into ‘humans’ only after birth and not while the human was in the womb.

  Thus, for the religious, humans while in the womb are fetuses whereas humans out of the womb and breathing oxygen, the fetus becomes a baby, child or whatever.

  Even John the Baptist, while yet a fetus spoke with God. Fetuses cannot speak, but the soul (breathe of life) while still in heaven and not on earth (womb, or after birth) can, and does, as do all souls, speak with (communicate back and forth) with God.

  None, while on earth (except The Christ and Moses) are able or to hear the Voice of God. But we all shall be able to hear His voice when we return to heaven. God, always hears us, be we in heaven or on Earth but He does not and can not hear us while we are in Hell (the Grave). And all on earth go to Hell upon death; none shall escape Hell’s hold.

  Upon the resurrection, some who are raised from Hell will receive eternal life and some will receive painless eternal death when cast into the lake of fi

• School Tries to Clarify Anti-Bullying Presentation That Had Students ‘Pretend They Were Lesbians’

  May 4, 2013 at 8:54pm

  In reply to righthearted.

  Neither you, nor I know what was really taught, said or done in that workshop. All we know is what people have said about it, and I fear most of those anti-post msgs were exaggerations of the work shop and some perhaps were homophobic out and out lies.

  Having seen, first hand, on more than a few occasions, bigotry and hatred sanctioned and executed violence towards people of one group or another I have to say that unlike the song in South Pacific, we have to un-teach our children to hate. They have already been taught to hate and if workshops like this help the un-teaching of hate, then I’m all for it.

• School Tries to Clarify Anti-Bullying Presentation That Had Students ‘Pretend They Were Lesbians’

  May 4, 2013 at 8:48pm

  In reply to greenteaandrainydays.

  greenteaandrainydays

  Thank you. At last a voice of reason, intelligence, Agape.

  Your post was a breath of fresh air amongst the posts of hatred, ignorance and bigotry.

  Thank you

• School Tries to Clarify Anti-Bullying Presentation That Had Students ‘Pretend They Were Lesbians’

  May 4, 2013 at 8:39pm

  In reply to TheGrtDcptn.

  Iranian? Pakistan?

  If so, you wold think he would be a homophober… LOL

• School Tries to Clarify Anti-Bullying Presentation That Had Students ‘Pretend They Were Lesbians’

  May 4, 2013 at 8:37pm

  In reply to Gonzo.

  BigMick

  Read C.S. Lewis’ Screwtape letters. Also read his Science Fiction Trilogy

  And also read Nygren’s book Agape and Sherril’s (sp), Johnston (sp) etc. definitions of Eros and Agape..

• School Tries to Clarify Anti-Bullying Presentation That Had Students ‘Pretend They Were Lesbians’

  May 4, 2013 at 8:30pm

  In reply to Vickie Dhaene.

  naughtycal….

  Toughen up?

  If kids who are bullied today did what I did to a bully back in the 1950′s, that kid would be, at the least expelled, and at the worst put into prison and the bully would go scot-free.

  Back in 1959, I did not get expelled, but the bully did.

  Times change don’t they. Today, those who are bullied when they fight back get punished, the bullies walk free. Is it just me, or is there something wrong with our American Justice.

  It looks like Justice has a different meaning today.