### User Profile: Horatius_at_the_Bridge

Member Since: October 25, 2012

• [6] October 20, 2016 at 9:46am

Gold Star family. I choose to serve out-of-uniform.
I stand. I agree.
I thank you all!

• [6] August 22, 2016 at 10:09am

May I please have the honor of establishing that distance?

• [3] August 16, 2016 at 11:58am

I wonder what, exactly, you would tolerate as religious wear?
Roman collars?
Yarmulkes?
Temple Garments?
Prayer shawls?
Habits?
Do any of these Judeo/Christian clothes oppress you? It is not the clothing which makes a man, it is the heart.

• [1] June 17, 2016 at 3:59pm

If you click on the video you can see Jerry Miculek hitting several 0.12 splits and even a 0.10.
A (very well-trained and practiced) human can pull a (highly engineered and terrifically gunsmithed) trigger at that speed- just not for very long. And certainly a mere mortal cannot pull a stock trigger that fast.
Bump-stocks are a different matter. Does anyone know the effective firing rate for any of the bump-stocks out there?

• [3] April 20, 2016 at 10:09am

Excellent analysis!
To pile on, the F is a different hue and the tip used appears to have been smaller.

• [11] March 8, 2016 at 2:40pm

Amen! Yes, yes, a thousand times, yes.

• [4] February 17, 2016 at 5:07pm

Sorry VCV, I noticed you said you had seen the author’s explanation. If the author intended the answer to be 15 , then he/she is simply wrong. If the rules for the fruits change from line to line then the ‘equation’ is insoluble. In order to have a solution, consistent rules must apply. If two halves represents two and four bananas represents four, one apple cannot represent ten. On the other hand, if an apple represents ten because it is defined by Eq.1 and four bananas represents four because it is defined by Eq.2, then three bananas is undefined (as has been stated elsewhere). Mathematics is not fiction, there is no poetic license.

• [3] February 17, 2016 at 4:24pm

Pun = +1.
Renown/Renowned = +5!

##### Responses (1) +
• February 12, 2016 at 10:54am

It is. All major blood collectors (and most of the small ones) have instituted voluntary deferrals. Our company has had a deferral in place for more than a week. Most of these currently take the form of asking the donors to ‘self-defer’ for 28 days following travel to the Caribbean, Mexico, Central or South America. This will likely become a mandated deferral soon.

• [1] February 12, 2016 at 10:43am

Yes- by specialized testing. Unfortunately there is no screening test for Zika. We in the blood industry must use travel-based deferrals in these situations. Those travel-based deferrals lead to a great many healthy donors being asked not to donate (such as military personnel who were based in Europe). It is unfortunate but necessary until more robust methods for dealing with these pathogens is available.
If you can, please donate blood on a regular basis. It really is that important.
GPG

• [7] January 27, 2016 at 3:56pm

Why not? Denying the obvious seems to work for quite a few of our politicians…

• [1] January 22, 2016 at 2:11pm

Craig- If you ever need brain surgery (and I sincerely hope you don’t) you would be well advised to seek out the best Neurosurgeon you can find. This highly entitled woman is training to be a neurologist which is a significant (and substantial) difference.
And to all those folks who hope that she loses her license, I think you’re out of luck. She may well lose her Residency slot but it usually takes much more than this in order to forfeit a medical license.

• [24] January 12, 2016 at 5:41pm

TT, please allow me to join one of your thoughts to one of Mr. Walsh’s:
Baby Boomers did not require a degree and could get into certain fields without one but now those degrees are required [because those 'requirements' were] created by dumb hiring managers who think it’s more important for a data entry clerk to spend four years learning about feminism and gender theory than gaining actual work experience.
I believe his point was that the Baby Boomers did those jobs very well without a degree, so why did a degree suddenly need to be a ‘requirement’? Is it right to require something that doesn’t necessarily impact the performance of the task?
I think if you reread the piece you would find that you agree with Mr. Walsh more than you originally thought (even, perhaps, to your greater discomfort.)

##### Responses (1) +
• December 10, 2015 at 9:52am

Ms. Voss- I appreciate that you take the time and interest to read (and comment) on other’s responses to your work. If other Blaze contributors do the same they must be doing it under a nom de plume (or would that be nom de guerre?) Thank you.
As for Bruce Jenner, he certainly used his own strength and fortitude to become an elite athlete. Unfortunately for your piece, I don’t think a lot of Blaze readers recognize any such person as ’Kendall Jenner.’

• [2] November 12, 2015 at 4:32pm

Perhaps every officer who fails a physical test should have the opportunity to patrol the streets on foot, exclusively.

• [65] November 10, 2015 at 11:29am

He’s white
That means he has privilege; therefore he must resign.
If he resigns, he has no privilege (because it did not protect or ‘privilege’ him).
They want him to admit he has ‘privilege’ by proving that he doesn’t, in fact, have ‘privilege’.
Did I get that right?

##### Responses (1) +
• [2] November 6, 2015 at 9:30am

Wow! According to the headline the police chief said this was “the ‘Most Abhorrent, Cowardly, Unfathomable Crime’ He’s Ever Witnessed”. He “witnessed” the crime … and yet he didn’t do anything to intervene?

Editors, Blaze. Editors.

##### Responses (1) +
• [6] November 2, 2015 at 5:25pm

Love the first line of this story: “1,000 people and elected officials”. A lot of the ‘elect’ sure don’t deserve to be called people anymore.

• September 21, 2015 at 10:15am

Well, in light of the new information, this may have been just another set-up. Perhaps tigers don’t change their stripes after all.
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.

• [3] September 16, 2015 at 12:15pm

Rider- As the only non-(public school)teacher in my family, I understand your anger.
What concerns me is that I agree with CAIR, for once (and probably only once.) Their reaction to this factually outrageous act has been quite mild in comparison to their typical manufactured outrage scenario. If they turn over a new leaf and actually become reasonable, we’ll have to re-write the rules we currently operate under. I do not believe that reason will break out in this country anytime soon, though.