The Brooks Ranches

User Profile: horseman43

horseman43

Member Since: December 18, 2012

Comments

  • February 9, 2014 at 1:59pm

    “……..these guys are going to be on ‘World’s Dumbest Criminals.’ I mean you gonna’ steal something and then wear it, that is crazy in the same area.”

    They beat, maim and murder white people in mob attacks, then post them on the Hip Hop channel.

    This group wasn’t unusually dumb. They’re just the black norm.

  • February 9, 2014 at 1:51pm

    Thomas Sowell and many others including Glen Beck have stated that we more likely than not will have civil upheaval in this country. In fact it has been warned about so frequently either as innuendo by the less brave or outright assertion by those with courage it’s hard to understand how anybody would need a delineation of why it will occur.

    So many threats and dangers are converging at one time from racial hostility to economic collapse a miracle would have to occur to stop our rush toward large scale conflict.

    But to the naysayers, and those who hate to hear of it, because it scares them so greatly, let me say that you won’t have to take anybody’s word for it, nor will you need proof because it will on be unfolding right in front of your yes.

    All you have to do is wait. It’s gone too far now to stop it. And being in denial, because it soothes your fears means only that you will be among those who are not prepared and will go down first.

  • January 31, 2014 at 2:34pm

    Don’t be fooled yet again, my friends.

    These people back Obama 150% without question.

    They’re criticizing him, hoping to intimidate him into thinking h’s losing support if he doesn’t come up with more free money and benefits for them.

  • [1] January 30, 2014 at 11:14am

    I didn’t read the story and truly wonder why anybody did since this freak of nature is so far out in La La land she’s not worth reading or watching.

  • January 30, 2014 at 11:04am

    Maybe people have a tendency to jump to conclusion on any mob attacks on a lone, aged or female victim, because about 99% of such attacks are black on white.

    Have you not been following the news? Have you not read Colin Flaherty’s columns? http://www.wnd.com/author/cflaherty

    He’s keeping track of them and you should be glad he is, because it could keep your kid from getting maimed, seriously injured, disfigured for life or killed.

  • April 24, 2013 at 10:10pm

    HP:
    “V@ginal sex is contrary to nature. You are using the birth canal for your own debauched pleasure. That (part of the female anatomy) was intended as an exit, not an entrance. ”

    Hahahahaha!

    “Your linkage between being gay and drug/alcohol addiction is so absurd it is laughable.”

    Homosexuality is a learned trait the practice of which becomes an addiction. The condition affects the same centers in the brain as addictions. And addictions and homosexuality both are the result of mental disorders, just exactly like pedophilia and bestiality.

    Homosexuality is the result of various trauma in life that occurred at an early age. Nobody is born that way. Until the APA was bombarded with intimidation and harassment night and day by homosexuals in 1973 it was always properly recognized as a mental illness for thousands of years. The APA changed the designation just to shut homosexuals up, the same reason people are agreeing to homosexual marriage. They’re tired of listening to the deplorable whining.

    “You cannot change your sexual orientation, I tried for several years, but am still gay.”

    You didn’t seek counsel and I’m pretty sure you didn’t really want to either. Most do not, just like other sexual deviants….and addicts.

    If there is one thing for certain that the average person has learned about homosexuality, it is that its adherents will exaggerate, distort and lie shamelessly in an attempt to flim flam people into believing it isn’t a m

  • March 15, 2013 at 5:24pm

    Harrypotter
    Horseman:
    “You clearly are delusional. And quite probably trying to mask and repress your own latent homosexuality. ”

    Do you have any facts or logic to support your own claims or do you feel as if your assertions are proof enough, but you require everyone else to give irrefutable examples?

    “If you had any facts or logic to support your claims, I might be inclined to listen to you. But you are just spouting ignorance and bigotry at the moment.”

    Really?

    You mean as you do?

    When a matter is common knowledge no examples or proof is necessary.

    But I can cite many examples. However, you won’t even intelligently address the issues I’ve raised, preferring instead to expect people to believe your uneducated word is all that is necessary to prove your point.

    You harm little children, and millions of us resent you deeply for it. You are a disciple of the Father of Lies, just as Pope Francis described you. And the people who do not condemn you for it are complicit in the spread of your evil.

    What goes around comes around.

  • March 15, 2013 at 5:12pm

    HarryPotter
    Posted on March 14, 2013 at 4:32pm
    Horseman:
    “LOL. This was the funniest, most ignorant comment I have seen all day.”

    If you want someone to believe I’m wrong, then why don’t you provide an argument against my claims instead of just asserting I’m wrong as if people are supposed to take you seriously just on the basis of your assertions?

    The abuses that occur against children by homosexuals are horrendous and amount to the worst child abuse in the history of the world.

    Russia outlawed homosexuals using propaganda on young people, which is what we’re going to have to do here in order to put a stop to the evil they perpetrate. You might have fooled a few gullible white weenies into buying your ludicrous claims, but you’re still child abusers and the worse disseminators of diseases throughout our communities on planet earth.

    You should be ashamed for the misery you inflict on helpless children who are forever damaged by
    your perverted evil.

  • March 14, 2013 at 4:00pm

    mtncougar
    Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:48am
    Re: Horseman43
    “the vast majority of homosexuals are pedophiles”

    :Seriously, sometimes I’m embarrassed to be a conservative.”

    Actually, you shouldn’t be embarrassed to be a conservative you should be embarrassed to be so shallow you feel as if someone else’s remarks reflect badly on you, especially since you exhibit a total lack of knowledge in the field of perversions.

    “This kind of crap lies has been spread about homosexuals since I’ve been alive. ”

    And you’re still in denial about it?

    Methinks thou dost protest too much. The comment wouldn’t bother a normal straight person.

  • March 14, 2013 at 3:48pm

    HarryPotter
    Posted on March 14, 2013 at 1:35pm
    Spackard:

    “Did you even read my post? You didn’t make any mention of what I said, you only repeated the false arguments that were made earlier. ”

    I didn’t read your post either, just down to the above quote, and the reason for it is because you’re screwy, and you say nutty things that don’t make sense. You’re obviously a homosexual activist who comes on here, pretending facts aren’t facts and you draw invalid parallels to one thing and another that has no logical comparison, and one example is trying to inanely convince people here that heterosexual males having sex with female children is the same as homosexuals wanting to have sex with male children.

    As our new Pope wrote: “Same sex marriage is the machination of the Father of Lies.”

    And you are one of his spokesmen.

  • March 14, 2013 at 3:33pm

    HarryPotter
    Horseman:
    “That is the most ignorant and stupid comment I’ve seen on here today. Congratulations.” Homosexuals are people who attracted to their own gender. Pedophiles are people attracted to
    children.”

    “Ignorant and stupid” by your measure means anything sane, intelligent, well-informed and logical, which you despise.

    Homosexuals prefer young boys. That they might have relationships with other adults is simply because they can’t get in a position to abuse them, like the boy scouts or priesthood. What they’re doing is settling on what they deem to be “second-best.”

    “To assume that all gay men want to abuse boys would be like assuming all straight men wanted (sic) to abuse little girls.”

    It’s not the same at all. Homosexuals are basically beset with mental disorders that have skewed their thinking so badly and damaged their thought processes so greatly they’re handcuffed with the desire for same sexes. They prefer boys, but they’ll accept men when they can’t get boys. That’s why so many of them want to adopt. They want a child to abuse and taint with their vile perversions, so they can render him as mentally skewed as themselves.

    Heterosexual men desiring female children are beset with a mental aberration, but the ones that are that way are not equivalent to homosexuals who want little boys because they’re of the same sex.

    It’s not even close to the same thing. You know that, but you’re in denial..

  • March 14, 2013 at 12:56am

    I saw that Hubbard interview and my first thought was how odd it was that he seemed so irate over a statement that had to be stretched a bit in order to get the meaning he allegedly drew from it, prompting him to go to such extremes in condemning O’Reilly.

    He acted as if he were a lawyer and was defending a murder one case for a close relative, which was odd also, particularly when the basic issue was one of defending children. The only other people I’ve seen act in the same way over anything about homosexuals are homosexuals.

    Colorado is getting a lot of black eyes lately due to their extreme left wing legislature. First they’re trying to impose absurd firearms restrictions, then next up pops some liberal hack who defends a homosexual politician who has shown a bias for homosexual marriage over all other things, just as all of them do.

    I really believe homosexuals like the Speaker don’t want to impose tight restrictions on child molestors, because the vast majority of homosexuals are pedophiles. That’s why they try to force their way into orgs like the Boy Scouts and the priesthood. It might be him that could be prosecuted under Jessica’s Law some day and he knows it.

    They used to say California is the land of fruits and nuts, but I think they’re going to have to include Colorado in that description also.

  • March 10, 2013 at 2:35pm

    This guy is part of the nation’s black leadership and self-appointed elitists.

    IMHO I think they base their stance on two things: 1) They see the DHS buying 2 billion rounds of ammo and 27 armored personnel carriers, obviously expecting large scale civil upheaval that could snowball into racial conflict. 2) The know that 200 million whites in this country are armed to the teeth and if a conflict should occur their numbers would be literally overwhelmed. Those that wouldn’t come out on the downside of combat casualties would lose many when the shelves in their urban areas are emptied and there was nothing to eat.

    Russdell Simmons and company would be reduced to an insignificant minority. He very definitely wants white people disarmed, as do ALL the black leaders.

  • February 27, 2013 at 7:14pm

    I don’t think I’ve ever met anyone who likes communism or any type of totalitarian government who lived outside of an urban area.

    It’s always the panty-waist effeminates who want to live under what they perceive as a protective shield, and besides being the limp-wristed variety, they have a definite lack of worldliness about life in general.

    And to a man they are naive and lack ordinary wisdoms most people are born with.

    And as The Jerk pointed out, Lew more likely than not had Jewish parents who bought into communism. And it was probably a result of their gullibility that they did so.

    And when their little bundle of joy arrived, they embarked on the usual procedure of poisoning him with mind control and mental conditioning, assuring him that there would NEVER be another Holocaust if little Lew lived in a worker’s paradise. He couldn’t think objectively if his life depended on it.

    Hollywood is rife with the same types of hate-mongers. They’re just exactly like a sect or a cult and just as whacky.

  • February 17, 2013 at 7:02pm

    That’s got to be one of the ugliest kids I’ve ever seen.

  • February 16, 2013 at 5:11pm

    “Touré — said the NRA chief’s rhetoric is full of racial undertones and argued that there would be no “national conversation” about guns if Newtown shooter had shot up a black school.”

    This kind of rhetoric is just plain anti-white hate.

    He’s lucky he’s saying it about whites rather than Hispanics or other people, because they’re not cowardly like whites. They would be looking to take his racist head off.

    Whites aren’t only wimpish, they’re disunited and easy to defeat. Half of them accuse the other half of being racist for anything thery say and in that way help the racists like this Toure run them over the coals at will.

  • February 16, 2013 at 1:01pm

    “I offer no excuses for my conduct.”

    Good.

    Now do your time like a good boy and maybe you can get married again while you’re in the slammer.

  • February 16, 2013 at 12:53pm

    “A Georgia teacher was suspended after he pretended to shoot first-graders to teach them about the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre.”

    Why did he feel as if it was his job toi tech children about anything other than academic subjects to try to help them get an education?

    The one and ONLY answer to these ghastly situations is to home school any way you possible can.

    It’s possible to teach kids what they learn in public schools from 3rd to the 8th grade in about a year and a half. The rest of the time spent there is a waste.

  • [1] February 16, 2013 at 12:45pm

    Tigress1
    Posted on February 15, 2013 at 3:45pm
    “The one fact that Progressives don’t want you to know: Diversity CREATES conflict.”

    Yes, that’s a fact of life. And it’s a provable fact of life.

    Just go to any school cafeteria and note that, for the most part, people are split into various groups, because they prefer people like themselves.

    Another example is the mass exodus in white neighborhoods when Afros move in. The citizens speak volumes about wanting to live amid people just like themselves.

    And listen to the minority groups speak in terms that consider themselves independent from the rest of society separately. They ALWAYS refer to “we” indicating they regard themselves as separate from everybody else.

    And finally just look at the fights between Afros and Hispanics/Asians/Muslims, or any non-black, that are reported constantly. The above fight is more the norm than the exception.

    If there is one single multicultural society in the history of the world that has endured, I must have missed it, and I have a minor in history.

  • February 15, 2013 at 4:34pm

    RIGHTUNITE
    “The first people were of Asian descent! NOT INDIAN! ”

    At one time it was determined that Asians were the only people to have colonized the Americas.

    They came across the Bering Strait….which was then connected by land…….and populated the Americas.

    But new evidence has surfaced in recent years that indicated people in the regions of France and Spain were here thousands of years before that. They were identified as Solutreans. The exact same kinds of tools were found along the East coast of the US that were found in Europe thousands of years ago.

    http://www.bostonglobe.com/ideas/2012/03/17/did-solutreans-settle-america-first/9xYYgZLa4iTkGzG4rcM3nM/story.html

    Also pre-dating indians was a skeleton of a Caucasoid which was dubbed Kennewick Man.
    http://www.mnh.si.edu/arctic/html/kennewick_man.html

    It was difficult to conduct DNA testing, because the indians didn’t want to hear it, but the reconstruction looks definitely Caucasian, and maybe with a touch of ancient Ainu. But he definitely isn’t Asian.

    “Since evidence of a prehistoric white male having lived in the New World is an affront to the idea that Asiatic Indians are native to the Americas, Amerindian tribes demanded that they be awarded the remains to prevent scientific studies from being conducted. Pursuant to federal law—the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 (NAGPRA)—, skeletons of Amerindians are to be given to their descendants.”