User Profile: hrankta

hrankta

Member Since: October 12, 2010

Comments

123
  • [3] January 23, 2015 at 9:20am

    Anyone who puts someone in a choke hold simply for LEGALLY carrying a gun deserves to be shot!

    As someone who has been in a store as it was robbed at gunpoint, only an ignorant fool would say the need to carry a gun is an irrational fear!

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] January 14, 2015 at 9:18am

    If it isn’t the pigs, it’s the avocados! Yet another reason I eat at Qdoba instead.

    Responses (3) +
  • [30] January 12, 2015 at 11:52am

    There may be moderate Muslims, but there is NO moderate Islam!

    And Mohammed could very well be the False Prophet from the book of Revelation!

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] January 5, 2015 at 4:35pm

    Brunch Lives Matter! No justice no toast!
    First, they came for my gun, and I said nothing. Then they came for my brunch.
    Seriously, what does this accomplish? I’ll bet they went into liberal gentrified neighborhoods to do this.

  • [6] December 10, 2014 at 3:51pm

    Texas Penal Code
    § 38.02. FAILURE TO IDENTIFY. (a) A person commits an
    offense if he intentionally refuses to give his name, residence
    address, or date of birth to a peace officer who has lawfully
    arrested the person and requested the information.

    He offered to give them his information. This was clearly an unlawful arrest. They also don’t have the right to erase your videos.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] December 5, 2014 at 9:13am

    Eric Garner was alive when the EMS crew got there.

    Second video, shown to the grand jury, but withheld by the media:
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=419_1417692224#X7K69CUmxSeVUyDG.01

  • December 4, 2014 at 9:30pm

    Manslaughter? No. One has to be engaged in an unlawful act for manslaughter to a charge. This was an accidental killing.

  • [11] December 4, 2014 at 9:29pm

    Here’s a video that showed what happened AFTER the first video ended:
    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=419_1417692224#X7K69CUmxSeVUyDG.01

    He was still alive when the EMS showed up! That tells me something other than the chokehold killed him. Maybe only using one set of handcuffs? He was a very big man! When you use the arms to stretch the chest muscles and the diaphragm, much like in Crucifixion, you can’t breathe.

    I wonder if that was taken into account, because he was obviously alive when the EMS showed up!

  • [5] December 3, 2014 at 8:14pm

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Eric_Garner
    “The final autopsy report in Garner’s death showed that Garner did not have any drugs or alcohol in his system and had no head trauma. The New York Times reported that the autopsy suggested his obesity and health problems caused his fatal heart attack.”

  • [14] December 3, 2014 at 7:53pm

    No, he shouldn’t have. The alleged choke hold only lasted a few seconds. He switched to a different hold (seat belt hold or something). The guy died of a heart attack while resisting arrest! The bottom line, don’t resist arrest when you are a biscuit away from a heart attack!

    Responses (6) +
  • December 3, 2014 at 6:38pm

    He didn’t choke him to death. The guy died from a heart attack while resisting arrest. Bottom line: don’t resist arrest, especially when you are a biscuit away from a heart attack!

  • December 3, 2014 at 5:02pm

    The ALLEGED choke hold only lasted a few seconds. He wasn’t choked out. Banned by NYPD doesn’t mean it was unlawful.

  • [11] December 3, 2014 at 4:56pm

    He wasn’t choked to death for selling cigarettes. He died of a heart attack while resisting arrest! Tragic, but it doesn’t even meet the criteria for involuntary manslaughter, since the cop wasn’t acting unlawfully.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] December 3, 2014 at 4:44pm

    And remember, he died of a heart attack. He was not choked out.

  • December 3, 2014 at 4:43pm

    He died of a heart attack while resisting arrest. This was at best an accidental killing.

  • [4] December 3, 2014 at 4:29pm

    He died of a heart attack. He wasn’t choked to death.

    Responses (4) +
  • [4] December 3, 2014 at 4:23pm

    Accidental killing: a death caused by a lawful act done under the reasonable belief that no harm was likely to result. Bloody shame, but I kind of think the grand jury got this one right. The cop didn’t meant to kill him, the guy just happened to die while resisting arrest.
    Bottom line, if a cop tells you that you are under arrest, don’t resist.

    Responses (4) +
  • [3] December 3, 2014 at 4:22pm

    Not Involuntary Manslaughter, as the police officer was not involved in an unlawful act. This was an accidental killing: a death caused by a lawful act done under the reasonable belief that no harm was likely to result. Bottom line, if a cop tells you that you are under arrest, don’t resist.

  • [3] December 1, 2014 at 1:07pm

    This one doesn’t.

  • [7] December 1, 2014 at 12:51pm

    Eh, we’ll see who’s right on the other side of that last breath.

    Responses (2) +
123