User Profile: Hzurdaddy

Member Since: December 13, 2011

CommentsDisplaying Hzurdaddy's 10 most recent comments.

  • And, if the school doesn’t take this charge seriously, I predict the case will be sent to the U.S. D.O.J., where she will be reprimanded for acting NOT-stupidly, and then punished with an appointment to the Dept of Education–but no higher than 4th or 5th from the top, ‘cuz THAT would be suspect…

  • I wonder how many people have considered the possibility that the purpose of falsely-reporting the poll numbers may be so that when Obama wins in a “Putin” (That’s landslide–in English) everyone will ignore any allegations of voter fraud. The mantra of the “guide-lapdogs” will be: “See, we told you so”; while the mantra of the blind will be: “Of course Romney LOST, they told us he was going to”!

    Just as our government has been setting (desensitizing) the World-stage into accepting the necessity of any possible future crackdown (SLAUGHTER?) of the “TEA-mericans”, with 4-years of the constant “they’re-just-a-bunch-of-violent-racists” narratives, they have been doing the same with voter I.D., the 2nd Amendment, the 1st Amendment, conservatives in general, typical racist-grandmothers in general, clingers in general, and the U.S. Constitution in general.

    We’ve been analyzing their words, but have we been analyzing the audiences to whom these words were directed? Anytime a word or phrase sounds a little off, allow your imagination to play with it. Why did they use THAT word or phrase, and to that particular audience? Start thinking like they do, and you might find that those words/phrases will be sounding slightly different, maybe even slightly sinister.

    Here’s the rule for hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, defensive-driving, conspiracy theories, and life-in-general:

    Hope for the best… Prepare for the worst!

  • I wonder how many people have considered the possibility that the purpose of falsely-reporting the poll numbers may be so that when Obama wins in a “Putin” (That’s landslide–in English) everyone will ignore any allegations of voter fraud. The mantra of the “guide-lapdogs” will be: “See, we told you so”; while the mantra of the blind will be: “Of course Romney LOST, they told us he was going to”!

    Just as our government has been setting (desensitizing) the World-stage into accepting the necessity of any possible future crackdown (SLAUGHTER?) of the “TEA-mericans”, with 4-years of the constant “they’re-just-a-bunch-of-violent-racists” narratives, they have been doing the same with voter I.D., the 2nd Amendment, the 1st Amendment, conservatives in general, typical racist-grandmothers in general, clingers in general, and the U.S. Constitution in general.

    We’ve been analyzing their words, but have we been analyzing the audiences to whom these words were directed? Anytime a word or phrase sounds a little off, allow your imagination to play with it. Why did they use THAT word or phrase, and to that particular audience? Start thinking like they do, and you might find that those words/phrases will be sounding slightly different, maybe even slightly sinister.

    Here’s the rule for hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, defensive-driving, conspiracy theories, and life-in-general:

    Hope for the best… Prepare for the worst!

  • I wonder how many people have considered the possibility that the purpose of falsely-reporting the poll numbers may be so that when Obama wins in a “Putin” (That’s landslide–in English) everyone will ignore any allegations of voter fraud. The mantra of the “guide-lapdogs” will be: “See, we told you so”; while the mantra of the blind will be: “Of course Romney LOST, they told us he was going to”!

    Just as our government has been setting (desensitizing) the World-stage into accepting the necessity of any possible future crackdown (SLAUGHTER?) of the “TEA-mericans”, with 4-years of the constant “they’re-just-a-bunch-of-violent-racists” narratives, they have been doing the same with voter I.D., the 2nd Amendment, the 1st Amendment, conservatives in general, typical racist-grandmothers in general, clingers in general, and the U.S. Constitution in general.

    We’ve been analyzing their words, but have we been analyzing the audiences to whom these words were directed? Anytime a word or phrase sounds a little off, allow your imagination to play with it. Why did they use THAT word or phrase, and to that particular audience? Start thinking like they do, and you might find that those words/phrases will be sounding slightly different, maybe even slightly sinister.

    Here’s the rule for hurricanes, earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, defensive-driving, conspiracy theories, and life-in-general:

    Hope for the best… Prepare for the worst!

  • Three OTHER words: New-speak!

  • “SHE” thinks she does have a job, Joe. (HINT: It may rhyme with ‘Joe)

  • Whether comparing Biden to Wazzup-Schultz, or comparing Wazzup-Schultz to Biden, isn’t that the textbook-definition of Conundrum?

  • Those dudes are like: “Hey, Didn’t we just sit through 4-days of Standards and Practices classes? WTF, Rosie?!?

  • Well-said, SUPERMANS DAD! I had just done the math myself and was going to make a similar comment about 7-rounds. As for some of the other commenters: Decisions are always made in real time; while second-decisions are usually made much, much later. Second-guesses are, by definition, always After-the-Fact…

  • The Iranian “Twelvers”–Amah-Dinner-Jacket is one–believe that the 12th Imam will return to rule the earth with Sharia Law in the middle of the bloodiest battle of humankind that brings about the total destruction of Israel. That’s my over-simplified way of answering: YES, Barry will be there…