I'm a realist, they ALL lie or if you prefer a softer word, they pander for the vote.
If you are a Cruz supporter then i will tell you even his hands are not clean in this soap opera we are all witnessing.
2013 Ted said in a Senate meeting, he would not give citizenship to illegals but would pull them out of the shadows and make them legal.
ibanrfknm- why would he make them legal if like he says NOW THAT HE'S RUNNING FOR PREZ) he will follow the law and deport?
Oh and i want to point out, that tactic of saying he would not make them citizens is an age old Democrat tactic they throw in to show THEY are compromising, do you really believe that in a few years they would not start spewing their Bleeding Heart garbage about how these hard working law abiding immigrants who are contributing to society should enjoy all the same rights as any other Americans?
 February 27, 2016 at 4:30pm
“…noting that a considerable percentage of Donald Trump supporters actually oppose the Emancipation Proclamation.” I want him to back up that BS.
Trump is not against the blacks, just a stupid statement from the Democrats. Well, if they read more about the Clintons & especially Hillary she uses the N word all the time, just ask Bill or the White House staff.
it gives the judiciary, mostly the supreme court, the ability to determine whether laws or constitutional or not. and that ruling would depend on how the judges interpret what the constitution says
Don't know who else you would ask! It sure doesn't give judicial interpenetration to the Executive or Legislative. I sure don't agree with their track record over the years but that is their job.
Actually, it really does. It gives the Judiciary the right and obligation to interpret the meaning to determine if it is in fact legal within the confines of the Constitution. If the law is written is such a manner as to be confusing or contradictional to other laws, it must be interpreted to understand the meaning to consider not if it is a legally binding order or law, but whether it is defined as legal under the Constitution.
The problem with most modern day liberals is that they consider the Constitution as a living document, able to be rewritten to establish a more modern reflection of societies morals, yet the Constitution never has allowed for this, only allowing a measure in which to create newer amendments that may better reflect the changing morals of the American citizenry.
Since this is supposed to test knowledge of the Constitution the question is poorly worded. The power to “interpret the meaning of laws” is not expressly granted to the Supreme Court. Rather, judicial review was assumed by John Marshall in the case of Marbury v. Madison wherein the Court ruled for the first time that a previous act of Congress was unconstitutional.
 February 12, 2015 at 11:00am
Obviously you didn’t watch the video to clearly see a small holstered hand gun on his side.