User Profile: ImChiquita


Member Since: March 16, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [2] July 18, 2014 at 9:19am

    O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh.

    Matthew 12:34

    Responses (1) +
  • [18] July 18, 2014 at 8:21am

    As a former SBUX Partner, EVERY hire is told about the no-tattoo policy.

    Two things stick out in this story:
    1. Why now? Why all of a sudden does upper management want her to “shape up or ship out”? What got her in trouble first and foremost? Unless she worked when the DMs stopped by on the way to their meeting and one of them noticed the tattoo…

    2. It’s Michigan. I BELIEVE that a SBUX union is entrenched there, so this is just another attempt at extortion.

    What the sad creature doesn’t understand is that she’s gone public with her attitude and behavior of a corporation’s dress code policy. If she attempted to climb the ladder of success, how many people will remember her as “the girl who refused to adhere to dress code”?

  • [2] July 15, 2014 at 11:39pm

    “Bush created the TSA as a knee-jerk reaction.”

    No, he didn’t.
    He created them because 9/11 was the paradigm shift. It was intended.

  • [1] July 15, 2014 at 1:21pm

    Ah, Satan, you sly dog, you. STILL using “Yea, hath God said…?”

    Well, I give you some props. It IS working. Obviously mankind hasn’t picked up on your sly twist of words where God spoke them.

    The GREAT FALLING AWAY comes before the revealing of the AntiChrist, and the falling away (John 6:66, e.g.) is the fruit of apostasy. Apostasy is where churches are far more interested in pleasing the world instead of God.

    “He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches….” (Revelation 2:7 AND 11 AND 17 AND 29 AND 3:6 AND 13 AND 22)

    Romans 3:4
    God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar, as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.

  • [2] July 14, 2014 at 10:37am

    They never even tried to give it up, only conceal it.

  • [1] July 14, 2014 at 10:26am

    Revelation 3

    3 And unto the angel of the church in Sardis write; These things saith he that hath the seven Spirits of God, and the seven stars; I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead.

    2 Be watchful, and strengthen the things which remain, that are ready to die: for I have not found thy works perfect before God.

    3 Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee.

    4 Thou hast a few names even in Sardis which have not defiled their garments; and they shall walk with me in white: for they are worthy.

    5 He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels.

    6 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches.

  • July 11, 2014 at 10:48pm

    You DO realize that God told us to PRAY for Israel?

    That the Battle of Armageddon is to DEFEND Israel from enemy attack, wiping out much of humanity?

    …Or did you skip that part in Revelation?

  • June 27, 2014 at 9:46am

    That doesn’t mean that if you have tattoos you are condemned to hell. If you are saved after you tatted up, what a powerful testimony.

    But as we are to follow the Old Testament while we are still saved by grace, we are to refrain from looking and behaving like the rest of the world. Which means, the rest of us shouldn’t get tattoos.

    By the way, don’t focus ONLY on vs. 28. Leviticus 19 is powerful.

  • [2] June 27, 2014 at 9:43am

    The reason “marking” our bodies isn’t mentioned in the New Testament is because Jesus not only fulfilled the Old Testament prophecies, but as He was sinless, obeyed every commandment God ever placed upon the Hebrews and those who turned to the faith. (As mentioned, Leviticus 19:28)

    Did anyone else read ALL of Leviticus 19? Or just what this article posted (vs. 28)? Because Leviticus 19:19 AND 19:37 both state, “Ye shall keep my statutes.” Which means, “From now until I say STOP, this is what you obey.”

    Jesus did not need to verbally say, “By the way, newcomers to the church, uh, don’t – just don’t get tattoos” BECAUSE it was a given.

    Just like in math, when this (1) is given in multiplication, you know that the number is only 1 x itself. So why would Jesus need to keep repeating what God already laid out for us?

    That is where the New Testament comes in: warning the Church to NOT be like the world. Our bodies are the physical portrayal of the temple of God and we are to keep our bodies holy. We are to live as if we are foreigners, emigrants, guests of this world – but not immerse ourselves in it.

    1 I beseech you therefore, brethren, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice, holy, acceptable unto God, which is your reasonable service. 2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what is that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 27, 2014 at 9:24am

    I’m punk! :)

  • June 27, 2014 at 9:22am

    You are correct: tattoos are not the mark of the beast.

    But please clarify: how is the mark of the beast delusional, when the Book of Revelation CLEARLY explains:

    Revelation 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
    17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

    Revelation 14:11 And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

    Revelation 16:2 And the first went, and poured out his vial upon the earth; and there fell a noisome and grievous sore upon the men which had the mark of the beast, and upon them which worshipped his image.

    Revelation 19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.

    As God, the Holy Spirit is not the author of confusion or delusion. To say that the mark is “delusion” for those without a relationship with the Holy Spirit is a lie.

  • June 27, 2014 at 9:09am

    Really? “….with teeth!”

    What does the NSA have on our politicians? Because THAT’s why there isn’t any teeth on any kind of legislation.

  • [5] June 27, 2014 at 9:06am

    More and more law enforcement employees have an US vs. THEM mentality, which makes our dogs fair game, in their opinion.

    Consider, however, the future (and the present, where it’s already happened): if cops aren’t held accountable for killing innocent dogs, what makes anyone believe that they’ll be accountable for killing innocent civilians?

    Remember, society used to say, “No American would be ordered to shoot another American” when we discussed the fall of America. Well, I present to you our law enforcement.

  • [1] June 27, 2014 at 8:51am

    In response to XGP, you mention that you’ve had actual “experience in dealing with these kinds of situations.”

    Which uniform do/did you wear? Because mail carriers get attacked all the time but they’re not shooting dogs. The worst (for the carrier) is having to deal with the stitches and trip to the hospital; the worst for the dog-owner is permanently having to pick up their mail at the post office while picking up the medical tab, and perhaps even putting their dog down if Animal Control says so.

    Someone posted only a few hours ago (so it was after your post) where they did a Missing Amber search for yesterday and guess what? There wasn’t one.

    How is the canine’s execution justified then? And what’s with the smirk on the cop? There’s no sense of guilt but there’s certainly one of elitism.

    Considering that family-dog-shot-by-cops is nearly a daily story, you SHOULD be asking, “What the heck is going on?!” instead of “I wasn’t trained to be a chew toy, oh, and hey, it sucked when I had to do it myself.”

  • June 27, 2014 at 8:40am

    …I’m waiting for your point….

  • June 27, 2014 at 8:37am

    Or spends hours on Pinterest.

    Or even LifeHack.

  • [3] June 27, 2014 at 8:36am

    That sucks!

    I’m so sorry. :(

    No dog deserves that. And your father was FAR more a man than that cop.

  • June 27, 2014 at 8:33am

    Wait…are you talking about the man in the video?

    Because if you’d read the article, you’d know he’s employed as a chef.

    ….or were you just trying to start an argument?

  • [1] June 27, 2014 at 8:23am

    I don’t know about the others, Indy, but I certainly appreciate it.

    Keep us informed with the truth!

  • [2] June 27, 2014 at 8:12am

    You’re not a dog owner, either.

    Otherwise you would know that Weimaraners are not aggressive.
    Otherwise you would know that EVERY. Single. Canine ever born has it written in their genetic code to protect their “pack” property. That is why they bark at passers-by, at the postman, at the UPS truck: dogs are letting the outsiders know that they at least ONE of the pack is on duty to protect the “territory.”

    Big dogs do NOT equal big bites. If the cop was a hero, then he would have paused and backed out of the yard and shut the gate before “being mauled.”

    All the cop had to do was tell the dog in a cheery voice, “Hey, pal. Come ‘ere. How you doin’?” and the dog would have probably rolled over, belly up. Or pranced around, waiting to play.

    Shooting the dog in the head is an execution and the first clue that your cop-hero doesn’t know a fracking thing about dogs.

123 To page: Go