TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying imissmyamerica's 10 most recent comments.

• ‘Answer My Question!’: Angry Piers Morgan Berates Gun Advocate Over How Many Bullets an AR-15 Can Fire in One Second (Featuring TheBlaze’s Will Cain)

  December 20, 2012 at 1:36pm

  Piers Morgan is an idiot. He can’t see past his own security needs b/c it’s all about him!

  All the anti-gun rights arguments are “who needs a weapon that lethal outside of the military?” I prefer to describe these weapons as effective. Especially when you have countries speaking out against our citizens freedom to own weapons for protection. Why are they being critical? B/C if they succeed in disarming American citizens along with our military being weakened by the current administration, we become ripe for attack and takeover by countries who seek to come to our shores and impose their socialist, communist, fascist, dictatorial and radical ways on the common citizens. They’ve already bought their way into our representatives and presidents back pockets and bank accounts. Our so-called leaders no longer have the average citizens best interest at heart. They all want a global way of life here. It’s looking a lot more realistic that the average AMERICAN citizens may need to fight beside what military we have left if we are ever invaded. But that would never happen RIGHT?

• ‘Answer My Question!’: Angry Piers Morgan Berates Gun Advocate Over How Many Bullets an AR-15 Can Fire in One Second (Featuring TheBlaze’s Will Cain)

  December 20, 2012 at 1:25pm

  Piers Morgan can’t seem to get process the fact that being the entertainment personality he is, he can spew all his attitude and anyone be damned, but he also has armed security to protect him from any psycho that doesn’t like what he has to say. What I don’t see many pointing out is if we were to be invaded by a terrorist country or element, I guess in Morgans mind we being the little people in that little person Piers Morgan’s opinion and don’t warrant the ability to protect ourselves against an invasion.

  All the anti-gun rights arguments are “who needs a weapon that lethal outside of the military?” I prefer to describe these weapons as effective. Especially when you have countries speaking out against our citizens freedom to own weapons for protection. Why are they being critical? B/C if they succeed in disarming American citizens along with our military being weakened by the current administration, we become ripe for attack and takeover by countries who seek to come to our shores and impose their socialist, communist, fascist, dictatorial and radical ways on the common citizens. They’ve already bought their way into our representatives and presidents back pockets and bank accounts. Our so-called leaders no longer have the average citizens best interest at heart. They all want a global way of life here. It’s looking a lot more realistic that the average citizens may need to fight beside what military we have left if we are ever invaded. But that would never ha