User Profile: In the O.C.

In the O.C.

Member Since: December 02, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [2] August 21, 2014 at 11:39pm

    So, if the policeman is convicted, but sentenced for anything less than what Brown’s parents and the entire black community of Ferguson (and beyond), and Eric Holder & Obama & the DA are satisfied with, short of torture, hanging, tar & feathering, it will never be enough or “fair” to anyone – it will be “racist.” And don’t say it won’t be that way, either. The black community wants blood. Lots of it. That policeman & his family should stay hidden. And if they get out of this alive, they better be planning right now to move to Canada. Zimmerman was stupid not to have left & look at how much trouble he’s gotten into. The policeman’s career is essentially over. If the opportunity comes, I hope they move to a safe place, because they’ll never be safe now where they are. What a shame.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 21, 2014 at 8:09pm

    Oh well, at least Keweli can’t claim the interviewer was racist. Or can he?

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] August 19, 2014 at 9:25am

    WATTS REVISITED 2014 – is the black community proud now? Just look at the what the ones causing the problem have done to their own community – because they’re “MAD.” Looting is helpful to their cause? Destroying businesses of innocents makes their “point”? Throwing rocks at the certain media they usually LOVE makes their case? Undeniable ignorance. The rioters talk among themselves, convincing themselves this is the right way to go. But it isn’t. They are USEFUL IDIOTS used by the Left now, for this “current event.” What a shame they are too stupid to care – too stupid to see it.

  • August 18, 2014 at 11:15am

    Is it time to vote yet?

  • [7] August 16, 2014 at 11:24am

    Welcome to Watts, circa 2014. Ain’t it grand?

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 4, 2014 at 5:38pm

    YES, and YES.

  • July 7, 2014 at 6:17pm

    You know, if everyone who wanted answers and photographs and interviews all got together en masse and converged upon just ONE of these illegal alien way-stations – just said “we’re not going to play your game” and “this is about the U.S. and the People – not you”, and “you’re NOT going to tell us what to say or not say” and “we’re reporting the TRUTH, you ****** idiots!” – the government could not stop everyone short of becoming like Nazi Germany! Alas, it won’t happen because there are too few with the guts to do it – so we’re screwed – because a Truth Telling Media and professionals willing to stand up to bullies – is essentially a thing of the past. And we are screwed, not to mention the illegals they are USING for Obama’s agenda.

  • [5] July 6, 2014 at 1:22pm

    Fredrick’s Whitfield was a very much out of her depth interviewing Joan Rivers. She thought she could create a atmosphere of “gotcha” during the interview by being cutesy & antagonistic w/an experienced, hard core comedienne of Joan Rivers stature & her “don’t b.s. me, I’m too smart for that” insight. IWhitfield did NOT come off well, instead appearing as the insipid person she clearly is, which fits so well on CNN. I’m not a fan of Rivers, but she was there to push her book, not to be ambushed by some know-nothing interview GIRL. Good for Joan staying as long as she did. I would have walked off before that.

  • [2] July 5, 2014 at 12:02pm

    Just a thought: Do you think she perhaps has access to people and knowledge that you and I don’t have, and maybe even inside information you and I don’t have? What constitutes proof, in your opinion? You say “appearance and actions do not constitute proof.” Would it require actually seeing Obama in a compromising or flagrant situation that would convince someone – perhaps you? In spite of the fact that Joan Rivers has years of experience in how to keep her name in the public eye, I doubt very much she would have made an off-handed comment like this about the guy she VOTED for unless she had a darn good information that it was accurate. Plus, she has seen what making comments like this has done to others’ careers and livelihoods were she were not aware of its impact or know intrinsically what such a comment would engender. She’s not a neophyte by any stretch of the imagination. I think she KNEW she was telling the truth.

  • [4] July 5, 2014 at 11:34am

    Joan Rivers has been in show business for years and years, has and does work with people of the gay persuasion every day (or close to it). She officiated at a gay wedding very recently. There is no evidence that she is against “gayhood”. Based on those facts alone, and including the fact that she is a Democrat of the Big Left, there is no reason to surmise she (1) has any anti-gay agenda on any level or for any reason whatsoever, or (2) is without any experience or exposure to gays.

    That being said, she (and many others) have well-operating “gaydar”, and it’s working. She KNOWS the truth about Obama. She’s discussed it with others, it’s obvious. She has made an educated decision on who she KNOWS Obama is and sees no reason to hide it when EVERYONE knows the truth – even the ones who don’t WANT to know the truth. And when you see the Left speaking truth, look out. All hell’s going to break loose, or something close to it. In this case, the Haters and Untruth Lovers of the Left have already begun their work.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] June 24, 2014 at 1:38am

    I fear that the CRIMINALS have succeeded in covering up the crime(s) perpetrated by those in and out of power. Lerner was always expendable. But the ones AT THE TOP are the ones getting their asses covered. It has to be OBAMA’s name on the emails. It goes STRAIGHT to Obama and the White House. It is OBAMA who gave the okay: they know it, we know it, and they KNOW we know it. No wonder they’re all dumping everything the have. THIS COUNTRY has been corrupted. THE ONES RUNNING IT ARE CORRUPTED. Unless we really DO turn to God Almighty and repent, we are lost. This is the final result of the Presidency of Barack Hussein Obama. It’s evil, pure & simple.

  • June 23, 2014 at 12:22pm

    Just wondering – in your accusation that “beckies don’t give ‘anyone’ the benefit of the doubt” – WHAT are you referring to – exactly? And WHY do you automatically make the assumption that suggesting to wait for evidence of this allegation of “potential child molestation”, you correlate your accusation? You must have some example as collateral to your accusation. Or is it that you just don’t like people who listen to/agree with Glenn Beck on a host of OTHER subjects? Let’s hear it – let’s see it. Now. If you can.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 21, 2014 at 6:33am

    I thought Greta was a Liberal, like Shep and Bechtel and Williams. Isn’t Obama her guy? I’m even beginning to wonder about Megyn now. O’Reilly? Pffft!

    Responses (1) +
  • [17] June 19, 2014 at 3:29am

    Liars. All lists. Reading this story convinces me even more that President Obama is probably the guy at the top of the chain they are protecting. Lerner is expendable: Obama is not. The plot thickens, and it smells real bad. Find those emails. Get a forensics expert – whatever it takes.

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] June 17, 2014 at 6:16pm

    Sue them all. Sue them all. Sue them all. Sue the CRAP out of all. Leave no stone unturned – leave no one unnamed in the lawsuit(s). SUE THEM ALL.

  • [1] May 30, 2014 at 7:23pm

    Wow. Sad. Shocking. Complex. A mess. Odd. Will the parents pay for the sex reassignment surgery later on? Can’t do it before she/he is 18, I figure. No prom dress for her/him. Oh well, it’s the millennium, after all. Get on board. Having fun yet?

  • May 24, 2014 at 4:09am

    Curiouser and curiouser.

  • [2] May 24, 2014 at 3:57am

    Wow, it sure can be helpful having like-minded and corrupt judges in one’s pocket when certain election laws gets in the way of 85-year-old “candidates” who want to run again but who can’t quite play by the rules. Yes siree, Bob. It sure is handy. Oh, to be a Democrat/Progressive and never having to worry. It must be grand!

  • May 20, 2014 at 9:15am


  • May 19, 2014 at 9:04am

    Certainly by this point in time of the Obama Administration and Obama himself, NO ONE with a functioning brain could possibly believe – actually BELIEVE – that Obama gets “madder than Hell” at anything beyond his golf swing not being what he wants it to be. He’s a rube. A phoney. He’s only out for himself. He’s an arrogant POS twit, and a worthless President.

    Nuuuupe. You can’t convince me he gives a CRAP about any problem surfacing at the VA. This is going to be another photo op, somehow, and they’ll figure out a way to make it happen. None of the other problems even gave him a headache, and neither will this one. He’s bought and paid for. Besides, Valerie Jarrett runs things in the White House. She’s got the power. Obama is just a figurehead.

123 To page: Go