Obama admits Jesus was a person who lived in biblical times, which is easy for anyone to admit, as it's fact. As you say, Obama says nothing about Jesus being more than that. He thinks because he mentions Jesus, that lets him off the hook. NOT.
December 26, 2015 at 1:02pm
The pope is the successor to Peter responsible for caring for Christ’s Church.
The pope has the power to forgive sin.
Peter did not have the authority to forgive sins. Only God does and the people of Jesus' time understood this. When Jesus said that he forgave the sins of the cripple, the religious people of the time understood rightly that only God can forgive sins. Jesus being God's son and therefore equal to God did have that power. Peter did not and neither does any Pope.
[-1] June 29, 2014 at 12:37pm
Jasper – I agree, if you break the law you should provide the info for them to write the ticket.
However, throwing someone down for not producing an ID, for not cowering to the supposed authority or for a jaywalking offence is stupid.
The cop should be fired.
June 29, 2014 at 12:34pm
You are entitled to rights.
 June 29, 2014 at 12:32pm
” It’s in the DNA. The democrats have convinced them all that they deserve special treatment”
You contradicted yourself. If it’s in the DNA then being convinced is not necessary.
June 29, 2014 at 12:30pm
Creep as a racist, you do not understand the difference between statistics and a generalization. I suggest you look it up.
Actually, the statistics show that blacks commit hugely disproportionate levels of violent crime over all other racial groups. The generalization comes in that most of us know instinctively that a very large number of blacks are dysfunctional and have strong proclivities toward violence.
Sorry, but blacks have proven to the entire world the "content of their character" as MLK once said. And that's exactly why whites avoid them and have strong suspicions about their character. It's the character issue, not the pigmentation issue!
Racist has nothing to do with it. Ignorance does and ignorance is cureable with knowledge. However, why is it racist to point out a fact that is proven by statistics nationwide?
bluffcreek1967, really? "Sorry, but blacks have proven to the entire world the “content of their character”"? You say that like white people haven't been far more violent and criminally menacing, all around the world, for the last couple hundred years. I mean, when was the last time a black man dropped a couple of nuclear bombs on cities and kill a couple hundred thousand people?
June 29, 2014 at 12:27pm
It is not true because you do not know the people or the facts.
 June 29, 2014 at 12:23pm
 June 29, 2014 at 12:23pm
I believe she was making a statement.
The cop could well get fired and the dept required to take training on how to treat their citizens with respect.
Therefore, her actions may have exactly the consequences she wants.
 June 29, 2014 at 12:20pm
Even a whore deserves to be respected by the police.
Even you do.
June 29, 2014 at 12:17pm
 June 29, 2014 at 12:16pm
Tuk you are pathetic.
Even if I accepted your made up lies (bearing false witness), she still deserves her rights. The cop should be fired.
June 29, 2014 at 12:09pm
You point is stupid.
Yes. It’s just a word that shows that that person is a racist. It doesn’t matter if anyone hears it or is offended. The person who attacks another person based on race is a racist. Period.
Your theory that someone who does not agree with a racist is a racist as well is nonsense.
 June 29, 2014 at 11:51am
It is disgusting – but it is not a national law.
If it is a law to have to present ID in that state, it is a horrible state law.
Doesn't seem to be mentioned anywhere in my dogeared copy of The US Constitution...case closed...State Laws that violate the Bill of Rights are null and void by being unconstitutional and requiring self-incrimination and violation of Right to Privacy as well as barring a citizen from Fair Passage that is precisely what an archaic law requiring ID is...
This POS Rent-a-cop needs an attitude adjustment
Do you have a link for that?
This is what I can find on Arizona law, and neither require ID unless you're operating a vehicle on state roads.
I agree wholeheartedly!
Were I on the jury I would work to nullify this charge. Jury nullification is still a valid form of saying this law is ridiculous and should be ignored.
Her attitude and everything else about her is not the issue here. Being rude and obnoxious is not a crime....well unless the cops decide to say it is.
Whether she was stopped unconstitutionally and denied her God given natural rights to walk on a public street IS the issue.
IF we still used the Founding Documents to apply to our laws as they should be, this would be a non-issue.
 June 29, 2014 at 11:49am
And none of that is grounds for police to push her around for a violation as minor as jaywalking.
This cop represents the problem in this country – not the solution.
Again with the labeling?
So just how are you any better than those you are labeling?
Is it because you are supposedly defending blacks that makes it ok for you?
Isn't that hypocritical? It's ok for you but not for them?
How is calling someone a racist loser any different than calling someone a sheboon or any other term that has been used?
Can't you make a point without doing that? Bet you can if you try.
Calling someone a racist or any other name serves no purpose it just detracts from what you are trying to say.
[-4] June 29, 2014 at 11:18am
1) Required to show an ID – welcome to nazi germany, your papers please
2) Using force against a jaywalker – total misuse of power
3) The Blaze has devolved into a haven for racists. You people are disgusting and when you become the minority and people beat you for standing up for your rights, I’ll be laughing at you.
So you want to live in a place where people are beaten because they stand up for what they believe?
Wow, that's quite a public admission. Sounds like you're actually a fan of places like Nazi Germany. You would fit right in.
Just how do you determine a racist? Sounds like it's anyone that differs with your views. So just what does that make you if WE use the same criteria you use towards you?
inblack: You are well-named. Am sure that describes your tattoos , your hoodie, and the rest of your outfit ! Always interesting to hear from the Far Far Left : the Anarchy , I Hate Everybody Including Mom and Da, The Police, and myself crowd ! Always itching for a fight. Always angry about something ! Obama's Useful Tools just hoping for that Revolution he is nudging us toward !
Who exactly are "you people?" Are you making a generalization based on presumed race? Well, by your own definition that's racist as "The person who attacks another person based on race is a racist. Period."
Indeed, The Blaze has devolved into a haven for racists and for Insurrectionists. The Southern Poverty Law Center and the United States Department of Justice monitor this site closely. Hopefully, our next Leader will make some much-needed Corrections.
Yes. We know you will….along with a few shots of your own. This is exactly what the average middle class tax payer is afraid of…….your INSANITY.
January 21, 2014 at 3:26pm
If they shot criminals rather than coddling them they wouldn’t have to set up nanny cams around the city. Oakland is a hell hole and the people do not assist the police. I don’t care what they do, but Oakland deserves it either way. My solution is to never go to Oakland.