TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying IntegrityFirst08's 10 most recent comments.

• This Video of an Officer Slamming a Drunk Woman Led to Him Being Fired, Charged With Battery

  August 22, 2012 at 6:18pm

  In reply to phillipwgirard.

  Ranger your dealing with Paul bots. They are annoying i know.

• This Video of an Officer Slamming a Drunk Woman Led to Him Being Fired, Charged With Battery

  August 21, 2012 at 2:59pm

  In reply to phillipwgirard.

  @V15, you said

  “Yes, I’ve re-watched the video a few times but I still believe the officer used excessive force. If she had hit him, then I would have said, “okay, he handled the situation well”

  So if a 100 lbs drunk woman took a swing at the 200+ lbs trained officer you think it would be ok for him to ALLEDGEDLY swing her face first into the side of a car????

  NO WAY. Slamming someone head into something can KILL them. your on record stating that a tiny drunk girl should get her head slammed into a car because she takes a swing at the officer.

  The fact of the matter is the officer DIDNT swing her into the car, she was drunk and stumbles face first. Havent you ever seen drunk people before, they dont have any equilibrium, hence the line test. She obviously fell into that car but the officer was holding her arm so now his carreer and life are over.

  See you tried to validate slamming a humans head into a car. Use of force is not a complex idea but that is not on it anywhere. you obviously think it should be.

  The officer DID not throw this woman into the car, she was drunk and fell into it. It is not ok nor is it ever ok to slam someones head face first into a car. unless your v15.

• This Video of an Officer Slamming a Drunk Woman Led to Him Being Fired, Charged With Battery

  August 21, 2012 at 2:43pm

  In reply to phillipwgirard.

  Truth1000,

  Internet gamer, basement blogger, self appointed intellectual, master of all thing in thin blue ink.

  You’re argument is garbage calling all cops “Pigs” and stating that they all “abuse power and eventually get caught”. You’re argument would be broken to pieces on both side of the spectrum left and right.

  Do you occupy wallstreet or your parents basement?

• This Video of an Officer Slamming a Drunk Woman Led to Him Being Fired, Charged With Battery

  August 21, 2012 at 2:18pm

  In reply to phillipwgirard.

  I cant believe they fired this guy for that. What rangerp is saying is exactly correct. I guess if she was resisting he could have just went to the ground with her. HOWEVER we can sit here and scruitinize what this officer did in split seconds for days and days. He didnt slam this womans head into the car she stumbled as the officer was trying to gain compliance.

  This is just crazy, they even charged this officer. I cant even believe this ****. the only abuse was the booze this woman drank and the potential family or innocent she could have killed had this officer not stopped her.

  RP some people cant see and never will.

• Think You Know George Zimmerman? This New Timeline and Profile Could Change the Perception (and the Case)

  April 27, 2012 at 5:30pm

  In reply to PATRIOTMAMA.

  GTLOGIC – I want you to read this and explain it to me. This is from the BAIL hearing for zimmerman. His Attorney questioned the LEAD INVESTIGATOR on the case on a few things.

  “Investigator Dale Gilbreath testified that he does not know whether Martin or Zimmerman threw the first punch and that there is no evidence to disprove Zimmerman’s contention he was walking back to his vehicle when confronted by Martin. The affidavit says “Zimmerman confronted Martin and a struggle ensued.”

  So Gilbreath’s Affitdavit states Zimmerman confronted Martin and a struggle ensued. Yet Gilbreath was asked if he had any evidence to support that claim and he did not. Zimmermans report of the incident was that TM confronted him as he was walking back to his car. Gilbreath was asked if he had any evidence to disprove his statement and he did not.

  There are some facts. An Affitdavit is to include all FACTS about an incident and leave out NONE. IMPARTIAL and TOTAL.

• Think You Know George Zimmerman? This New Timeline and Profile Could Change the Perception (and the Case)

  April 27, 2012 at 5:20pm

  In reply to PATRIOTMAMA.

  @ GTLOGIC – Whos not going by the facts of the case? If you look at the facts of the case then you would come to understanding that there will be an aquittle.

  GT you make the case that Travon Martin (TM) was defending himself against a stalker. So the case for self defense for TM is what? Did Zimmerman chase him down and attack him? I think you need to state the facts as you know them to support your claims. Just by the fact that you believe he will be aquitted makes me think your straight emoitionally driven in this case and refuse to look objectivly at facts.

  Your charge, “that the only thing that is important to you people is Zimmerman’s repuation rather than ANOTHER PERSON IS DEAD!!!”

  This is not the case with the vast majority here. People here are tired of libs looking at this case emotionally rather than with just the facts. Fact of the matter is that its the justice system and the American people ability to abide by it that is one of the things that makes this country great. Trial in the media is not the American justice system.

  We are not worried about Zimmermans reputaion, we are worried about a MAN getting a fair trial. You, Me, and any other US citizen. If its found that Zimmerman acted lawfully, which it looks like he did then Set him free. If there is some kind of EVIDENCE that states he did not. LOCK him up.

  You sir have no evidence to support your claim of zimmerman stalking and confronting TM.

• When You Ask Protesters if Illegals Should be Allowed to Vote, You Get These Answers…

  April 27, 2012 at 3:12pm

  In reply to disenlightened.

  Dont you have to take a test in English to become a citizen? Almost half of the people on the video didnt speak nor understand english.

  Funny thing about this is its all about the money. They dont care about our culture or history or why we became the most prosperous country in human history. They just want their peice and if they can change America into something more beneficial to them in the process then it doesnt matter what or who they trample on to do it.

  So they can stand right in front of us and state that we are ravaging your country of its honor and wealth and we arnt even citizens and we cant even deport them properly.

  We are in trouble, mostly because these politicians are scared of loosing the latino vote. If all the CITIZENS of this country would freaking vote it wouldnt matter and we could do what the law says without fear of loosing a lationo voter.

• Think You Know George Zimmerman? This New Timeline and Profile Could Change the Perception (and the Case)

  April 26, 2012 at 9:04pm

  In reply to PATRIOTMAMA.

  @ PATTY HENERY – You are marvelous.

  YOU WROTE, “IF I had to guess, I’d say that Zimmerman
  continued to follow fearing the kid would get away and he called out to the kid something like “I’m going to get you” and the kid charged him, not thinking he was armed and Zimmerman shot him. Then ‘hurt his head”… or the kid realized he was being followed, hid behind a bush and jumped Zimmerman.”

  Quite a story there.

  THEN you wrote, “THIS IS PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHAT HAPPENS WHEN PEOPLE on all sides go too far and instead of seeking solutions..”

  Um… exactly ^^^^^^.

  Do you see that you fabricated an entire story to try and convict someone of a murder? You fabricated quotes, actions and coverups to help your cause. This is a real case with real implications.

  I thin Patty should be a journalist who agrees?

• Think You Know George Zimmerman? This New Timeline and Profile Could Change the Perception (and the Case)

  April 26, 2012 at 7:34pm

  In reply to PATRIOTMAMA.

  VOTEBUSH12 – do you read? Where is the evidence? WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE THAT HE CONFRONTED MARTIN? If the LEAD investigator doesnt have it, how do you?

• Think You Know George Zimmerman? This New Timeline and Profile Could Change the Perception (and the Case)

  April 26, 2012 at 7:30pm

  In reply to PATRIOTMAMA.

  This is from another blog on theblaze. Alan Dershowitz on Meg Kelly:

  “This affidavit,” he said, “submitted by the prosecutor in the Florida case is a crime. It’s a crime. If she in fact knew about ABC News’ pictures of the bloody head of Zimmerman and failed to include that in the affidavit, this affidavit is not the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.”[...]

  “The prosecution’s goal, Dershowitz explained, is to present all the details and evidence of the case in order to pursue justice, not merely to seek justice solely for one side of the case. And “you don’t indite based on false information,”.

  This with the initial questioning comming from Zimmermans council has proven that this man WILL NOT get a fair trial.