User Profile: jacevenable

Member Since: May 29, 2012


  • [3] December 19, 2014 at 7:05pm

    Who pays for porn?

  • May 18, 2014 at 3:10pm

    Sadly, the only use the Left has for an educated African Americans is for them to carry the Progressive Agenda to the ignorant ones. That means spreading the propaganda of government assistance and obedience to the ones in power. The African American Community is in bad shape today, and it’s only getting worse, yet they shun any voice that is contrary to that doctrine. Why else would they blindly follow Democrats who, have a horrible racist history, horrible governing, and continued lack of progress for that demographic, yet enthrall their community with hopes of more welfare, assistance, minimum wage hikes and that ever lingering and ever illusive pipe dream of…REPARATIONS? An educated Black Conservative, is public enemy number one.

  • April 15, 2014 at 4:47am

    Every single car should have a dash cam in it. And all LEO actions need to be recorded for evidence, to protect both the civilian and LEO.

  • March 28, 2014 at 5:33am

    They are only when it’s convenient, if Colbert was, Limbagh, Hannity, or Beck. It would be very convenient for outrage.

  • January 1, 2014 at 7:23am

    $75K in damages? Add a couple more zero’s for an arm and they can deal from there.

    Responses (9) +
  • June 24, 2013 at 11:56am

    Not BCM’s. Uppers on the website are sold out, complete rifles and BCG’s are driving a premium on Gunbroker. Also lots of the higher quality tactical type handguns are unobtanium like CZ75 SP01′s and FNX-45 Tacticals. Also Nodak Spud has a running back order months long on both lower and upper receivers. So, maybe by the end of Summer the whole panic will finally bottom out. (fingers crossed).

  • May 3, 2013 at 2:27am

    Almost every major science fiction, novel, movie, or story has some element, if not the whole story based on this concept. For once I agree with the UN. Stop this now before it ever gets started. If we keep going down this road it will happen.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 29, 2013 at 11:01am

    Their true goal isn’t to just break down marriage. Their goal is to “assign” fathers legally to children of single mothers. The end game is to legally make single unattached men, become financially responsible for children not of their own. We’ve seen a taste of this in CA and various cases, were the system is trying to hold men financially responsible “for the good of the child”. For feminists, this is a force of emasculation, female empowerment and ultimately a means to control more private wealth. That’s why we heard of Melissa Harris-Perry of MSNBC talking about children belonging to the community. In their utopia, children of single mothers, deserve a huge entitlement at the expensive of the most productive wealth earners, and if it became matriarchal enough, assignment of a “sponsor”. All in the name of wealth redistribution, the welfare of the child, and equality…blah, blah, blah.

  • July 21, 2012 at 8:46pm

    Sorry California, my sympathy meter is low. Time to start writing your Senators and Congressman…oh, wait. They don’t really care.

  • July 21, 2012 at 12:06am

    What I am starting to hear and see on Google is that this guy was part of the OWS “Black Bloc”.

    “Occupy Black Bloc Member James E. Holmes”

    Any truth to this?

  • July 14, 2012 at 11:21pm

    Somebody else helped “facilitate” your business, yes. But someone working 12-16 hours a day, giving up paychecks, working weekends, holidays and making sacrifices to build something for themselves is something, a Community Organizer and a heritage fraud, will never understand. The Left loves to laud the crap that comes of these two idiots mouths. One of them never worked a day in his life, in a 9-5 job, and the other saw fit to fraudulently misrepresent herself so she could advance herself through life based on the struggles of another race. These two need to learn one simple lessen, STOP ATTACKING YOUR POTENTIAL VOTERS!!!

  • June 14, 2012 at 10:48pm

    Fun fact: Canada just dropped their long gun registry because it didn’t save lives, but it did manage to was about $2 Billion. And it did not save a single life.

    I can’t couch S.E. and she is getting the typical Liberal, guerilla arguing tactical but.

    Point #1 anti-gun tactic, “It will save lives.” No, it will not.

    Point #2 anti-gun tactic, “This is corporate profits over lives.” No, it’s about wasting tax payer money, establishing, an un-Constitutional gun database, and it will not save lives. see Point #1

    Point #3 anti-gun tactic, “You’re and extremist and paranoid.” No, you’re engaging in demagoguery and personal attacks because I refuted your false logic.

    Point #4 anti-gun tactic “It’s not about gun control.” Yes, it is. It isn’t about trace stamping, it’s about a gun registry. It’s always been about gun registry. This is just another tactic to get their foot in the door. It’s always been about personal rights and privacy. A gun registry turns your right to have a gun into a privilege that can be taken at anytime. And because it’s in a database at anytime, it opens you up to “probable cause” for search and seizure without a warrant.