User Profile: jimbo_from_suwanee

jimbo_from_suwanee

Member Since: February 22, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [3] September 4, 2015 at 4:51pm

    Is it any wonder a document that claims that a Creator grant inalienable rights to all men equally, sums up those right with:

    Life (God breathes life…)

    Liberty (Freewill…)

    Pursuit of happiness (John 10:10 The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.)

    Amazing insight in the Declaration!

  • [3] September 4, 2015 at 4:38pm

    Really, G. Gorgon Liddy spent many years in prison for contempt of congress.

  • [29] September 4, 2015 at 4:37pm

    So, a group of judges who were not elected changes the definition of a key word that drastically impacts the function of her role as an elected official, and also without legislative action changes federal, state, and local laws. This word was changed to make the religion of Hedonism’s definition of the word the US standard, and the change went against the hundreds of years old secular definition of the word. Then another judge, uses this Hedonist Definition of a word to order a Christian to do something she NEVER promised to do (because she took her oath with the assumption of the hundreds of years old secular definition of the word), and this order violates her religion.

    Does the judge’s order sound just in that scenario?

    Why are Muslims never order to do these things?

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] September 4, 2015 at 4:36pm

    Fair Tax fixes that well spring.

  • [3] September 4, 2015 at 2:50pm

    That is a reasonable assumption WhiteFang. We see history being whitewashed today in a so called free society. How much more so in a that monarchy/dictatorship/theocracy would history be re-written to favor pharaoh who was consider one of their gods?

  • [51] September 4, 2015 at 2:42pm

    …and he is secretly qu@@r as a football bat.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] September 4, 2015 at 2:01pm

    So, a group of judges who were not elected changes the definition of a key word that drastically impacts the function of her role as an elected official, and also without legislative action changes federal, state, and local laws. This word was changed to make the religion of Hedonism’s definition of the word the US standard, and the change went against the hundreds of years old secular definition of the word. Then another judge, uses this Hedonist Definition of a word to order a Christian to do something she NEVER promised to do (because she took her oath with the assumption of the hundreds of years old secular definition of the word), and this order violates her religion.

    Does the judges order sound just in that scenario?

    Why are Muslims never order to do these things?

  • [5] September 4, 2015 at 1:46pm

    Wow, I thought that the Supreme Court ruled on businesses and public accommodation, or was that in China or the former Soviet Union is get all those socialist nations mixed up these days.

  • [10] September 4, 2015 at 1:33pm

    But, the lady in Kentucky got throw in jail for this…. So, you fire people in this situation? You don’t throw them in jail?

    Responses (7) +
  • [2] September 4, 2015 at 1:30pm

    If they are purposely looking 300 years out of time, then yeah I would say an understatement of the year.

    Who were the Pharaohs in the 1,600 BC – 1,500 BC range?

    Responses (5) +
  • [4] September 4, 2015 at 1:25pm

    WayTruthLife777: So, that we do not become those who we despise, before we execute our “Declaration Duty” and water the tree of liberty, we must attempt to execute upon this:

    US Constitution, Article. V.
    The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution, when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths of the several States, or by Conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress; Provided that no Amendment which may be made prior to the Year One thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any Manner affect the first and fourth Clauses in the Ninth Section of the first Article; and that no State, without its Consent, shall be deprived of its equal Suffrage in the Senate.

    The ballot rebellion of Fall 2014 was quelled by the Tyrant-in-Chief and the Cowardly Republicans pets of Washington. So, we have done and won in that duty, but the Oligarchy quelled it. We must support the Liberty Amendments. If the Oligarchy quells that then a free people have a “… duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” If they quell the Article 5 revolt, we will cry out, “Molon Labe”!

  • [-1] September 4, 2015 at 12:37pm

    If the law changed after she took the oath that is forcing her to do something abominable to her beliefs, I think that the “so help me God.” part of the oath becomes a bit more important to her.

    What if the law had changed after she took the oath to allow Muslim pedophiles get a licence to have sex with children so they could follow the example of the false prophet Muhammad (cursed be his unholy name) who raped his nine year old so called wife?

    Could someone say, “I cannot participate in that.” ?

  • September 4, 2015 at 11:10am

    Paul who wrote Romans 13, disobeyed the government when the laws of government were not in agreement with God’s laws, statues, and ordinances.

    Leviticus 18:24-29 (NKJV)

    ‘Do not defile yourselves with any of these things; for by all these the nations are defiled, which I am casting out before you. For the land is defiled; therefore I visit the punishment of its iniquity upon it, and the land vomits out its inhabitants. You shall therefore keep My statutes and My judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations, either any of your own nation or any stranger who dwells among you (for all these abominations the men of the land have done, who were before you, and thus the land is defiled), lest the land vomit you out also when you defile it, as it vomited out the nations that were before you. For whoever commits any of these abominations, the persons who commit them shall be cut off from among their people.

  • [2] September 4, 2015 at 11:05am

    History always repeats…

    2 Kings 17:16 (NKJV)

    So they left all the commandments of the Lord their God, made for themselves a molded image and two calves, made a wooden image and worshiped all the host of heaven, and served Baal.

  • [4] September 4, 2015 at 10:23am

    Oh, the Socialist Oligarchy of America (formerly called the United States of America) is currently at war with Christians not with Muslims.

  • [3] September 4, 2015 at 10:00am

    There are more whites killed each year by cops. Do you know why whites don’t get upset when cops? Whites don’t care the color of the thug, we are more for pro good aim by the cops.

    Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson! Nice shooting Officer Wilson!

  • [4] September 4, 2015 at 9:57am

    #blackthugslie

  • [-1] September 4, 2015 at 9:49am

    Revelation 13:16-17 (NKJV)

    He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

  • [6] September 4, 2015 at 9:42am

    Was Zappa’s statement:

    You can use your biblical names all you want. It won’t change the illegal nature of your cause.

    …about the story above?

    OR

    Was he quoting a pro-slave proponent speaking of an abolitionist named Abraham or Issac after the Dred Scott decision?

  • September 4, 2015 at 9:33am

    That’s why I like about coaches in baseball and fastpitch. If a b or f coach sees a batter who hits home runs while balancing on his or her head, does the coach correct the mechanics to the textbook version? NO, he goes out and buys thicker more comfortable pads for the inside of the player’s helmet.

    In the last year that Teebow played full time as QB in the NFL, he went more games into the post season than other quarterbacks with “good” mechanics that season.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love