User Profile: jimbo_from_suwanee


Member Since: February 22, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [17] March 3, 2015 at 12:48pm

    It has been a long time since a leader of a country has stood in that spot, made strong pro-America statements, and negative radical Islam statements. I have not heard a world leader care enough to try to encourage me in many years.

  • [1] March 3, 2015 at 7:48am

    That’s a good point. Israel DOES monitor their boarders, and as I understand it, it is harder to knock them off their high horses on stances like that. Maybe Kerry can talk to Hamas? The other Muslims secretly hate Palestinians anyway (it is the reason they use them has cannon fodder against Israel). So, if they ever nuke Israel they’ll take out the Palestinians too. Maybe a nice Tyrannical Progressive Community within the Gaza Strip? How happy they would be to live in the middle of a bunch of practitioners of the “Religion of Peace”?

  • [-2] March 3, 2015 at 12:18am

    If the claim of the Inglorious Butterflies were true and this was about hurting homosexual hedonist for the heck of it, the business owners would not be doing any business with them. This is targeting and attacking Christians in order to get them to compromise their values. Muslims crucify those who will not bow a knee to their religion and Inglorious Butterflies destroy the business of those who will not be a part of their hedonistic ceremony, but their hearts and motivations are EXACTLY the same. I am surprised that Inglorious Butterflies do not yell, “Allahu Akbar” when they walk into Christian business that they are targeting and attacking.

  • [-2] March 3, 2015 at 12:09am

    The difference is one is custom cake themed for a wedding and the other is a custom cake themed for a Hedonist Religious Ceremony. It is not about the cake, it is about the government holding a gun to the head of the artisan and making them “perform” for the Inglorious Butterflies. When it is a custom work of art, it is participating or endorsing. If it were not, the artists would not have given up their business over it. They were brave enough to not take the 30 pieces of silver. It is religion. It is not about what you think it is…It is about what those who believe think ..

  • [10] March 2, 2015 at 11:58pm

    Funny how liberals who went to Ivy League schools and protested soldiers want to judge how they conduct combat while they sit safely far away.

    Funny how Comrade President judges BiBi when all he does is complement the Muslims who want to nuke Israel while he sits safely far away.

    Any deal that allows Iran to keep any plutonium capability SHOULD include a clause that Kerry, Tweedledum (Marie Harf), Tweedledee (Jen Psaki ), Comrade President, and all their families must live out the rest of their lives in Israel if Iran EVER develops a nuke. They would see it from BiBi’s shoes then.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] March 2, 2015 at 11:32pm

    Sorry, but I have know many artists and every work they do is special to them and sometime they will not produce art that does not match their moral standard…and the cake looks pretty because an artisan produced it. Thanks for proving the point!

  • [-1] March 2, 2015 at 8:33pm

    No, it is just another custom cake. If they can be forced to create a custom cake for a hedonistic religious service, why can’t the government force them to create a custom cake depicting a hedonist act. Just another custom cake. RIGHT? It is just baking a cake? right?

  • [1] March 2, 2015 at 8:11pm

    So, if you make custom cakes in a market place and you are a Christian, can the homosexual use the power of Comrade President and his DOJ to force that person to create a custom cake that depicts gay porn if an Inglorious Butterfly requests it? Hmmm? It is just a custom cake? Is that out of bounds? I wonder…


    Does an artist have the right to decide by his or her own morals and religious standards what a personal expressions of art that he or she will or is able to create and remain true to his or her personal standard?

    In this case a standard that has been true for over at least 3,500 years. The Inglorious Butterflies have only recently migrated into this area of morality and have tried to politically weaponize it against Christians.

  • [-1] March 2, 2015 at 7:59pm

    Then use Betty Croker!


    Is the Christian a talented artisan who must bow a knee to hedonism so the Inglorious Butterflies can feel better about themselves?

    Custom made works of art regardless of the media is PERSONAL and therefore works created by an artist can have personal moral boundaries of the artist. An artist should not be forced to create religious items that are counter to their beliefs. If they make custom cakes for the public, then they could be forced to create a custom cake depicting gay porn by your standard!

    Artists have a right to say, I don’t create art depicting that act or in support of that type of religious service. If they are not kicking Inglorious Butterflies out of the store, are selling them display items that are in the store, and making them other cakes that do not violate their moral standard then civil rights of the homosexuals are NOT being attacked. Part of the artist (his or her work) is there and that means part of the artist is endorsing and participating the hedonist religious event. By protecting this hedonist religious ceremony OVER the religious beliefs (which have been held by God’s people for at least 3,500 years) the government is going over the line of the ESTABLISHMENT clause of the constitution and making Hedonism the established and protected religion of this Socialist Oligarchy of America.

  • [2] March 2, 2015 at 2:45pm

    Minor correction…1787 was the constitution and 1791 was when the first amendment was adopted along with the other 10 amendments of the Bill of Rights.

    Or as Comrade President calls them…Those damn rules that keep trying to restrict my power.

  • March 2, 2015 at 1:05pm

    Hmmmm…If the fellowship after the I do-s are not an integral part of the hedonist religious service, then why is it important enough to sue over?

    Christians STRONGLY consider the whole event, fellowship, and activities related as religious. (You are confusing religious with worship). Conscripting people to endorse any part of a religious ceremony that deeply violates their moral character is violating religious liberty.

  • March 2, 2015 at 12:45pm

    Regardless of the media in which it is expressed…Personal artistic expression is being conscripted by the government. Not just any artistic expression, but this is a work which will be a center piece item used in the Hedonistic religious ceremony. No artist should be forced to produce art by the government.

    If it is just about a cake, about the photos, and about flowers, then go to Wal-Mart and purchase a Betty Crocker cake mix, I cheap digital camera, and flowers at the flower stand.

    If that is not good enough, then it is about a skilled Christian artisan being conscripted by government into Hedonist Religious Services.

  • [2] March 2, 2015 at 12:07pm

    If one has a business and he or she is forced to remove a product that constitutes a huge % of his or her revenue, the sole proprietor may or may not have enough revenue to maintain the business.

    I have not looked the P and L for this business, but I think if I did I would see that the % of revenue lost for not being able to sell the service of this type of artistic expression lowers the business’s revenue to the point it could not remain financially viable.

  • [1] March 2, 2015 at 11:53am

    Not similar at all. There is zero evidence that anyone for any demographic reason or group is being denied services or turned away. There are ZERO signs that say, “Homosexuals not allowed”.

    This is about people being conscripted by the government to do works that are personal expressions of art which are center pieces of a Hedonist Religious Ceremony. If a Christian made a living by interpretative dance, could an Inglorious Butterfly make that Christian dance at its Hedonist Religious Service? By your standard yes.

    If a Christian has a custom tee-shirt shop could a Inglorious Butterfly force that Christian to create a tee shirt that depicts porn? It is just another custom shirt, so by your standards the government can force them to make it, or shut down the business.

    Moral standards held by people for at least 3,500 years are being defined as political, and people are being told by government to “worship Baal”.

  • [32] March 2, 2015 at 11:22am

    This is establishing Hedonism as the official protected religion of people who have businesses that based to any degree upon custom art services.

    Would this be different:

    Inglorious Butterfly: I want a custom cake depicting gay porn for a party I am having.

    Christian Baker: I do create custom cakes, but that type of cake would violate my moral standards as a Christian.

    Inglorious Butterfly: Yoo-Hoo, Comrade President….

    Comrade President: Let me be clear, if you are in business in the public you cannot deny people service.

    Christian: I cannot.

    Comrade President: Well, you didn’t build this, and we need to spread things around. We have to get you off your high horse so you respect and endorse hedonism too. Just make the gay porn cake.

    Inglorious Butterfly: Yeah! The future does not belong to those who refuse to endorse my hedonism!

    Comrade President: That right…Good point.

    Christian: I cannot…Would either of you like to purchase some of the cupcakes in the display?

    Comrade President and Inglorious Butterfly: Get out of this store and we’ll take the keys….

    What is different than what is happening now?

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] March 2, 2015 at 11:10am

    No one is being turned away from any bakery, photo shop, or florist.

    Custom cakes, professional photography, and flower arrangements are personal artistic expressions. If there were Inglorious Butterflies being turned away from stores and not allowed to purchase things in the display case or being denied a service of a custom cake that is not a center piece in a Hedonist Religious Service then you would have a point.

    Christians STRONGLY consider a wedding (civil or within a church) as a religious ceremony. A Christian should not be forced to create personal artistic works that are center pieces of hedonist religious ceremonies by conscription by the government. This is forced religious participation PERIOD.

  • [1] March 2, 2015 at 10:49am

    The Inglorious Butterflies are buying birthday cakes, pop-overs, and sweet rolls. Therefore, people are not being turned away from stores based on any demographic.

    This is forcing the creation of personal artistic expressions so Christians endorse and participate in Hedonist Religious Ceremonies.

    This would be no different that a gay porn themed custom cake request being refused by a Christian baker. By your standard and the standard of the tyrannical Comrade President if you make custom cakes, you would be forced by law to provide that service too.

    This is the government conscripting artist service and expression for Hedonist religious ceremonies.

  • [9] March 2, 2015 at 9:02am

    God is pleased when people do not participate do not participate in pagan activities (in this case a Hedonist religious ceremonies).

    It is not about the Inglorious Butterflies. It is about the Christian people who are being forced to participate in these Hedonistic ceremonies or loose their business. This is the same as bow your knee to Baal or else command that Jezebel and Ahab did during their rule.

    Responses (18) +
  • [6] March 2, 2015 at 8:41am

    The book of history which will written about this subject and time will be titled:

    Comrade President and the Inglorious Butterflies

    The book will start…Hedonism had become the premier religion in the USA and the Comrade President began using the power of his government to force artists to endorse and participate in Hedonist religious ceremonies with conscripted works of art to be used in those ceremonies. A group of radical Homosexuals called the Inglorious Butterflies attacked Christian artists who were business owners refused to bow a knee and participate in the Hedonist religious services. This resulted in many Christians loosing their business until the time of the revolution began….

    Responses (1) +
  • [29] March 2, 2015 at 8:29am

    Please strike Iran while BiBi is speaking to congress! I cannot think of a better way to demonstrate you will not allow your right to exist to be denied by any dictator from any country.

    Thank you!

    Someone who does not want a nuclear armed Iran.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love