User Profile: jamespubliusmadison

jamespubliusmadison

Member Since: August 06, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] October 20, 2014 at 12:47pm

    Wendy’sHere – Right, the two token liberals here can’t even agree on whether nor not there is any mention of homosexuality in the Bible. One’s probably never read the Bible, or doesn’t understand what sodomy means, and the other clearly interprets the book to fit his own ideology. Homosexual acts are a sin, no more or less than prostitution, adultery, etc. except they (homosexuals) are committing to it for a lifetime without repent. They should be welcomed into the church just like any other person, and treated the same, but unless the church is willing to compromise on every other sin, same sex marriage should never be allowed.

  • [2] October 17, 2014 at 2:02pm

    You make some fine points, albeit completely off topic. There was no mention in the article of whipping people into a frenzy in order to benefit an agenda. Recently FOX news has been whipping everyone into a frenzy over Ebola, and they’re not completely wrong in doing so. If the disease isn’t controlled in America, we could see thousands of deaths, if not more. The people in government need to be held accountable if they’re not doing everything to prevent that scenario. Russell Brand, however, wasn’t referring to any of this. He was accusing FOX of manipulating statistics to fit their point of view. It’s okay when MSNBC, CNN, ABC, NBC, CBS, etc. to do the same because it fits his point of view. We all know the numbers can be manipulated to make the case for anyones point of view, so this is a useless debate.

  • October 16, 2014 at 2:07pm

    For compassion to prevail

  • October 16, 2014 at 2:03pm

    Compassion is the right answer, but you can’t reason with an angry mob. When these useful idiots awaken to find out they’ve been sold down the river by their “allies” and the other side wants their head will it be too late?

  • [2] October 16, 2014 at 1:29pm

    All the lies in the world couldn’t ensure Jay Carney was protected from Ebola like the global elites, so he’s in the same boat as us now. Should we sell him down the river, or show him compassion like the Christians the Obama administration wants and needs eliminated in order to complete the fundamental transformation. Whether that means death from Ebola or forced denial (the muslim way)…

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] October 16, 2014 at 12:16pm

    Yes, they need to be held accountable, but this is the worst possible time to start attacking all we have in place for combatting infectious diseases. We all know the government can’t run anything, but who’s going to take their place on such short notice in the middle of an ebola scare? We should start turning this job over to private companies who’s employees actually have to prove their worth, rather than rely on people who are paid with our (taxpayer) money no matter how poor their job performance. The government provides no incentive to do anything well, much like socialism. At least we have people in the private sector (this nurse), willing to speak out without fear of reprimand…

  • [5] October 16, 2014 at 12:00pm

    Why do we transport these people to major population centers (Omaha, Atlanta, etc.), instead of setting up a facility at a remote location in order to reduce the risk of the disease spreading, rather than the complete opposite? They also just happen to be in red states, much like the delivery of illegal immigrants… coincidence?

  • [1] October 15, 2014 at 4:23pm

    Feldman also said on a separate occasion, “If someone is speaking from the pulpit and it’s political speech, then it’s not going to be protected.”

    So the 1st amendment spells out that leaders of faith can only speak about religious matters within the church? They can’t have an opinion about politics (which can encompass basically every aspect of life) shaped by a holy book (which is essentially a guide on how to live life), or else face consequences from a government sworn to uphold the Constitution (liberty)?

    Responses (1) +
  • [21] October 14, 2014 at 1:34pm

    Why are there majority and minority whips in the Senate? Aren’t Senators suppose to vote for what’s in the best interest of their state, not what’s in the best interest of their political party?

    Responses (5) +
  • [2] October 14, 2014 at 1:29pm

    Of course America is sexist (more so than racist) once we’ve had a black president for two terms and the Democrat’s next most electable candidate for president is a woman. This is some real clever reverse psychology on Alex Baldwin’s part, but the left will predictably use it… LOL

  • [-10] October 6, 2014 at 7:56pm

    Class Act? BS. Who’s in this for the attention, that little girl or the Patriots cheerleaders/organization, because this gesture isn’t going to cure her cancer? Hate on my comment all you want, but this is the same as all the idiots who wear pink for breast cancer “awareness” (like we didn’t know it existed, and pink has cancer curing capabilities), and worse yet, the ice bucket challenge…

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] October 6, 2014 at 7:52pm

    The-Monk

    You forget who’s running things. They get training over there and then the Muslim in Chief welcomes them back so they can declare jihad on America. The people within the administration are intelligent regardless of their ideology. The FBI director might have to follow the policies they set, but he also knows what the consequences are. Why do we let them off the hook with incompetence as an excuse? These are intentional tactics designed to threaten all of us…

  • [1] October 2, 2014 at 11:40am

    Did anyone continue reading after it was attributed to Piers Morgan?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 1, 2014 at 12:35pm

    Just as long it doesn’t have Browns (Cleveland) in it. The U.S. Patent office would have to reject the name due to it’s offensive towards Spanish speaking people…

  • [5] October 1, 2014 at 12:32pm

    Great! Since they don’t want anyone to buy cigarettes, they’ll stop taxing something that is so harmful to us they need to make it undesirable to consumers. No? Perhaps our representatives will use the money to pay for lifelong smokers inevitable cancer treatments. No? Then the government should never be our moral authority. Down with Progressivism!

  • [-2] September 29, 2014 at 7:31pm

    Waste of time!

  • [6] September 28, 2014 at 10:03pm

    If Obama had a son…

    Responses (1) +
  • [11] September 22, 2014 at 3:13pm

    Regardless of whether or not you believe in GOD, it doesn’t take a college diploma to figure out Socialism has an abysmal (never works) track record:

    GOD | The Bible (freewill) + The Constitution (liberty) + Capitalism (free market) = Economic Prosperity for everyone

  • [2] September 22, 2014 at 2:37pm

    Exactly. You would first need to prove renewable energies can be profitable before making such a drastic move. Unless they know something everyone else doesn’t? It’s more likely they’ve “progressed” and have more money than they know what to do with, so it doesn’t matter. They can now become the generation that lost the family fortune…

  • [10] September 22, 2014 at 2:26pm

    Saul Alinsky dedicated his book to Lucifer. If Hillary is a fan of his and is looking forward to the fulfillment of Revelation, it would obviously be on the side of evil. Socialism is evil. It’s about control, not liberty. Control is also forcing someone to take the mark of the beast in order to buy or sell goods. A libertarian socialist is an oxymoron. I’m not sure if you’re completely uniformed, indoctrinated, or just stupid…

123 To page: Go