User Profile: JDale

JDale

Member Since: September 27, 2010

Comments

  • [3] May 7, 2014 at 12:29am

    Oh no — we won’t be that lucky. First, the world hates us too much for us to just become another “3rd world” country. We will have to be taught a lesson. We will have to be humbled.

    Second, only idiots believe that we will be able to humbly bow and pray (my apologies to Mr. Beck, since this is what he advocates) and somehow they will leave us alone, or we will be allowed to survive or build our own “communities” apart from their disastrous “villages”, Agenda 21 communities and FEMA Camps and be left alone. Beck — and anyone with a grain of sense knows better.

    We aren’t losing a generation — this generation is being turned against us, and everything we’ve previously known. And our nation is being turned into a powder magazine and flooded with gasoline. And the Left is waiting for the right time to strike that last match.

    When they do, they think — they KNOW — most of this younger generation, hostile, unbound by traditional moral and ethical restraints, will come hunting “those to blame.” And “those to blame” will be EVERYONE the Press, the Progressives and Hollywood has been demonizing for at least a generation. And the instigators are BETTING on US STILL hesitating, holding back, having compassion, seeing our children, our students, our “next generation,” instead of the monsters they’ve created.

    And AFTER the rampages, THEN Washington, DC will ride in, “restore order,” and offer “peace and security,” and expect everyone to gr

  • April 18, 2014 at 7:17pm

    The Courts are bought. Especially the SCOTUS. They are just playing for time now. At some point, the deal will go down, and the ultimatum will be given — and gun owners will turn in their weapons — or they will have their bank accounts frozen, their tax refunds held, their wages garnished to pay the “fines,” and if they want to get uppity, their children will be taken by “Social Services” because they are endangered by living with an armed and non-compliant parent, and THEN, if they are STILL not compliant, they will be raided, “indefinitely detained,” their property seized, their weapons permanently taken — and the Government will think of whatever else they need to as the need arises.

    Please, don’t say it can’t happen. It’s already started.

    Oh — but Glenn says you should pray and meditate about it — and DON’T resist! Those guns you have? KEEP THEM! It’s your RIGHT — but don’t USE them to, you know, actually DEFEND yourself against tyranny. Yeah…. Cause Glenn wants to be CONSISTENT about that whole “Rights” and “Liberties” thing….

  • April 18, 2014 at 7:08pm

    And Glenn might get mad at you if you even mention “shooting,” too.

    Better pray and meditate about this.

  • April 17, 2014 at 1:16am

    Following Glenn’s logic, applying the same standard’s he applied to the Nevada situation — these gun owners are out of line. They are breaking the law! They need to surrender those weapons! Sure, it’s in the Constitution, and their government is breaking the Constitution — but to resist the government, ESPECIALLY with a GUN, is just WRONG! No, we should be Gandhi. No guns. Pray. Let the Courts handle it.

    What could possibly go wrong?

  • April 16, 2014 at 1:33am

    …..And while I believe in prayer, and I know the need of revival in our land, that does not preclude the requirement God demands of US to DEFEND our families, our Liberties, and our Property. It also does not require us to sit down as pacifists and allow tyrants to run roughshod over us.

    During the Revolutionary War era, there were men just like Glenn Beck, whom many of the Founders had a very difficult time dealing with. The Quakers, primarily of Pennsylvania, called themselves “pacifists,” and refused to defend themselves, nor their neighbors, against the British. They would give little more than lip service to the cause of independence from the British Crown — because they would harshly criticize any who were willing to rise to the actual DEFENSE of Liberty and Individual Rights against Tyranny.
    The Founders had little more than disdain for such men.

    At this point, I can muster little more than disdain for Glenn Beck. His false portrayal of the Bundy’s, those who supported them, and stood down the BLM, and their supporters, is DEPLORABLE, and serves only to STRENGTHEN the enemies of the Constitution, and of Liberty itself.

  • April 16, 2014 at 1:28am

    This is a false dichotomy, and is blatantly unfair to the majority of people who were at the Bundy Ranch this last week, and indeed, to Patriots who are willing to stand up to an out-of-control, tyrannical Federal Government that is quickly eliminating the options of a free people to protect their liberties, their families, and their property by Constitutional and other means.

    I have never been so thoroughly disgusted with Glenn in the over 12 years I’ve listened to him. He has made ANYONE who believes in defending themselves against belligerent, unlawful Federal Agents out to be no better than Bill Ayers. He has pointed to extremists and painted practically everyone at the Bundy Ranch with a broad brush — and labelled them nearly all of them as “out of line.”

    The only violence, the only real threat of violence, that came out of Nevada last week was from agents of the Federal Government. Yet, Glenn is defending — the Federal Government, and he is attacking a few armed civilians on a bridge who thought it wise to “cover” those under the bridge — after a whole week of being under Federal Sniper targeting?!

    I am being very charitable when I say that Glenn Beck has seriously lost his way. He is obviously not thinking clearly, nor realistically about what the American People are up against, or the kinds of enemies these people actually are. He just does not understand what they are capable of……

  • April 16, 2014 at 1:22am

    This is a false dichotomy, and is blatantly unfair to the majority of people who were at the Bundy Ranch this last week, and indeed, to Patriots who are willing to stand up to an out-of-control, tyrannical Federal Government that is quickly eliminating the options of a free people to protect their liberties, their families, and their property by Constitutional and other means.

    I have never been so thoroughly disgusted with Glenn in the over 12 years I’ve listened to him. He has made ANYONE who believes in defending themselves against belligerent, unlawful Federal Agents out to be no better than Bill Ayers. He has pointed to extremists and painted practically everyone at the Bundy Ranch with a broad brush — and labelled them nearly all of them as “out of line.”

    The only violence, the only real threat of violence, that came out of Nevada last week was from agents of the Federal Government. Yet, Glenn is defending — the Federal Government, and he is attacking a few armed civilians on a bridge who thought it wise to “cover” those under the bridge — after a whole week of being under Federal Sniper targeting?!

    I am being very charitable when I say that Glenn Beck has seriously lost his way. He is obviously not thinking clearly, nor realistically about what the American People are up against, or the kinds of enemies these people actually are. He just does not understand what they are capable of. And while I believe in prayer, and I know the need of reviva

  • April 15, 2014 at 6:31pm

    LOL! Yeah, if you support the BLM in all this, like Beck, you’re no Conservative at all. You’re a Loyalist. You talk a good game, but in the end, you’ll side with the DC Federal System when your back is against the wall — or maybe before. And apparently, you’ll be more than willing to put a bunch of other Constitutional Conservatives backs “against the wall” for standing up to them.

    Oh — and Mr. Beck has decided he doesn’t want to be your friend. Boo hoo. I hope the Man in the Moon ain’t hidin’ his eyes from this “truth.”

  • April 13, 2014 at 5:02pm

    It is not for you — or me — to judge “when it is time to stand at the bridge of Concord.”

    The British didn’t wait for “the right moment” spiritually. So, what if the Federal Government decides to take your Ranch, or your retirement savings, or your children, before “the time” is “right”?

    Will you shrug and let it go?

    Will you hit your knees and pray earnestly — and quit there?

    The enemy isn’t going to ask you if it’s convenient spiritually nor chronologically when he decides it’s time to bring the attack. And as far as God is concerned — you, me and the nation should “be prepared in season and out of season,” and “this know, that if the goodman of the house had known what hour the thief would come, he would have watched, and not have suffered his house to be broken through.”

    I pray for revival regularly. But I also am prepared to defend Liberty — now. We don’t get the choice of timing. That is in the Lord’s hands.

    I would suggest, the way things are unfolding, that you pray harder.

  • April 13, 2014 at 4:43pm

    Matthew 5:38-45 speaks of personal relationships, and of relationships within the Church, between Christians, or in “the kingdom of God.” It has nothing to do with politics in a Republic — or the preservation/restoration of one.

    Job 1:20-21 is true — no matter what happens, in any case, in any circumstances.

    John 18:36-38 — We are not trying to establish Christ’ kingdom, we are trying to RESTORE our Constitutional Republic.

    Daniel 3:15-18 — Daniel was addressing Israel, who was in captivity to Babylon. The United States is meant to be a Republic, NOT in captivity to ANYONE. Courage and a willingness to sacrifice is shown in our stand AGAINST despots who would lord it OVER us: “Resistance to tyranny IS obedience to God” ~ Thomas Jefferson; “Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty” ~ John Philpott Curran.

    Joshua 23:5-11 — God DID will that the enemies of Israel were driven out before them — but only in a FEW cases (the EXCEPTIONS) like Jericho, did God Himself collapse the walls miraculously. Rather, God usually command Joshua to send Israel’s ARMIES to FIGHT.

    Exodus 14:13 — We are utterly helpless for salvation EXCEPT by FAITH in the Lord Jesus ANYWAY (Ephesians 2:8-9). HE is our ONLY hope. This verse is not merely about our current temporal circumstance, but about our spiritual condition.

    NO ONE argues we need a spiritual revival (except atheists). But to abstain from self-defense while awaiting it is suicide. God knows HIS time. Hi

    Responses (1) +
  • April 13, 2014 at 4:29pm

    Amen. Excellent post, plex806.

  • April 11, 2014 at 9:43am

    Pat & Stu are SO wrong on this this morning, it’s MIND-BOGGLING –

    The Federal Government does not OWN Gold Butte. The Butte was grazed by Rancher long before Nevada was a State, long before they were in the Union, and LONG before there WAS a “BLM.”

    The BLM “seized” the Gold Butte in 1993 FROM the State, and demanded fees started being paid directly to them. They had “managed” the land before, now they (the Fed Gov’t) claimed to OWN the Land. Cliven Bundy REFUSED to recognize such language or ownership. GOOD FOR HIM! IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL!

    And he STOPPED paying his “Maintenance Fees” when the BLM STOPPED managing the RANGE where his cattle grazed! HE WAS NOT THE INSTIGATOR! THEY WERE!

    The Fed’s RESPONDED by trying to TAKE his land and Cattle in 1998 by abusing the Endangered Species Act and using the Desert Tortoise as an excuse (it is NO accident this all happened under the Clinton Regime. It cooled under the Bush Admin – a Western President).

    The BLM — an Agency with NO Law Enforcement authority — has marched in like the Gestapo. It’s this man’s life. Pat & Stu were just asked, “how long do we roll over?” Their response was, “there are a lot of inappropriate laws.” Would that response have worked when speaking to Patrick Henry on March 25, 1775, just before his “Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death” speech? How about Capt. John Parker just before Lexington & Concord – April, 1775?

    That’s the tree Pat & Stu barking up, to

    Responses (2) +
  • February 27, 2014 at 9:31am

    Connecticut will not confiscate many weapons from their Citizens — even if they decide to try and enforce that policy on a large scale. If they do, they will create a scenario reminiscent of Lexington & Concord in 1775 — because one of the things the Redcoats were after what the Minuteman Militia’s gun powder, ammunition, and muskets if they could find them. What they found was a bunch if Irate citizens who were willing to shoot back.

    There are enough Americans — Patriots — who still believe in Liberty enough to stand up to tyrants. And the Governments of this nation have come to believe that they are our masters, not our servants. That is an EXTREMELY dangerous pedestal for the Governments to place themselves upon. Cooler heads had better prevail in Connecticut — and beyond — and fast, or the Governments on this nation are going to cross a red line very soon that they can’t UN-cross.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 22, 2014 at 11:25pm

    How about these 4 words:

    OVER. MY. DEAD. BODY.

    No?

    Well, maybe these 5 words then?

    FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS.

    I think that clarifies the Second Amendment MUCH better than the Justice’ suggestion of his additional six words…..

  • October 11, 2013 at 9:59am

    I’m sorry. Forgive me. But you’re an idiot.

  • September 22, 2013 at 6:55pm

    Delay, delay, delay some more and then elect Establishment Republicans, who will leave ObamaCare in place and EXPAND it?! Please.

    DEFUND. NOW. Last Chance. We’re already just about over the cliff. We may not avoid it anyway. But better to slam on brakes and HOPE we don’t go over than to punch the excelerator.

  • September 22, 2013 at 5:54pm

    She doesn’t have to worry about denying me. I won’t apply for it. I won’t comply with it. If I suddenly am without insurance, I won’t go to the exchanges looking for one of their “Government approved” policies.” I will not fill out aqny “new” forms giving them information about myself, my home, my possessions, and other information they are NOT entitled to under the Constitution. I WILL NOT pay the “fines” on my income tax forms. If the Dr’s refuse to see me, and the hospitals refuse to treat me, I will ask them if I place the number ’666′ on my forehead or forearm, would I then be able to gain access to healthcare? And, finally, if they arrest me and take me to jail, I will ask me if I get my “Free” healthcare in the pokey?

  • August 30, 2013 at 7:20pm

    Wow. Vallely sure did change his tune quick — and 180 degrees! Just a day or 2 ago, he was saying the rebels were probably the ones that actually launched the Chemical Attack, not Assad’s regime. NOW he’s saying we should support the Free Syrian Army? They are merely one SMALL part of the Rebel opposition. MOST are Islamic Extremists, and hardly ANY, including the FSA, are dedicated to the principles of Liberty, nor do they share any substantial mutual interests with out nation.

    What our Federal Government OUGHT to do is keep us OUT of the Syrian Conflict. The ONLY way we should EVER be involved is if it spreads much wider and threatens the lives of our citizens, our economic interests in the region, or our [real] Allies there. NONE of the above is the case right now.

    HANDS OFF….

  • August 14, 2013 at 5:13pm

    On Hoover’s BEST day back in the 1950′s and 1960′s did he have “500,000″ people bugged. He couldn’t dream of having that kind of wiretapping technology nor manpower 50 years ago. He had to allocate resources a bit more responsibly and realistically back then. NOWADAYS, it’s easy, because there are NO limits — not technologically, not practically, not with regard to manpower, and certainly not with something pesky like the Constitution.

    That said, Mr. Oliver, it’s nice to see you waking up to find the snake you all have elevated to the most powerful office in the world. It’s just a bit late now. Any suggestions about what we can do to get all your Leftist buddies to give a rats a$$ about the 4th Amendment? They seem to care very little about the other ones…. The 1st, 2nd, and 10th in particular….?

    At any rate, good morning. Glad you’re “awake.” Try not to fall back into your Leftist Utopian stupor again….

  • July 2, 2013 at 5:28pm

    It’s videos like this that persuade me that we will probably live in a true Police State with a direct dictatorial rule straight from Washington, DC in short order. These “Cops” had no apparent problem with the Music until they saw the camera — THEN they were perturbed. This man DID NOT resist violently, and could have been uncuffed to calm his dog, but instead, they SHOT his dog. These cops are NOT law officers, they are violators of of this man’s rights, they are inhumane, they are bullies with a badge. Had they shot my dog like that, they’d have had to shoot me, too. There is NO EXCUSE for such abuse among “PEACE Officers” in this nation. Yup, if this type of attitude and these kinds of actions dominate our police forces across the nation today, we’ll be a true “Police State” before long — but truly Free Men won’t sit still for it very long.