User Profile: jdgalt


Member Since: December 30, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [-1] September 1, 2014 at 9:50pm

    You’re doing it wrong, guys. This is what LN2 is for.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] August 31, 2014 at 2:50pm

    The point of giving him press coverage is to wake up the leftards who watch CNN to the fact that Muslims are the enemy!

    Of course, if CNN anchors are too PC ever to draw that conclusion, then they might as well not bother.

  • [-5] August 31, 2014 at 2:48pm

    There are abuses at Gitmo, and some innocent people too. And even this Choudary may not deserve to be there. But he sure needs to be surveilled.

  • [4] August 31, 2014 at 2:45pm

    I’m sure there are Muslims (and probably even Palestinians) who feel that way. I’m also sure they’re keeping a low profile, because if they speak up, Hamas will likely shoot them.

    Responses (1) +
  • August 31, 2014 at 2:43pm

    I can just see ‘em on the Jerry Springer show…

  • [26] August 30, 2014 at 10:40pm

    I’ll bet they gave better value for the money than the bureaucrats do.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] August 19, 2014 at 8:14pm

    Why? Because we expect justice, or at least visible progress toward reform. If you won’t lead us there, we’ll follow someone who will, even if it’s Alex Jones.

    Responses (4) +
  • [3] August 18, 2014 at 11:19pm

    “I’ll get you, my pretty, and your little dog, too!”

    Responses (1) +
  • [38] August 18, 2014 at 8:38pm

    That does indeed seem to be what Glenn is saying.

    Mr. Schweikart, you’re full of it. The feds have already fired the first shot — multiple times in fact. We didn’t even have to provoke it, as the colonial Americans did by throwing rocks at soldiers from the middle of a peaceful crowd to cause the so-called Boston Massacre.

    And having the vote means nothing when the system is rigged, and used to persecute and ruin people for engaging in politics if they’re not of the ruling party. Our courts aren’t neutral, our elections aren’t fair, and our police aren’t answerable to us and have declared war on us.

    And when the government is at war with the people, that’s what John Locke said makes revolution both rightful and necessary.

    So far, only one side is shooting in this war, and it’s them, not us. Let them offer peace if they still want it.

    Responses (2) +
  • [-1] August 18, 2014 at 5:00pm

    The crucifixion is merely a lesson to all of us: “Don’t torture and kill people for peacefully promoting a belief system, even if it disagrees with your own.” It’s amazing how many people can look at the cross, with or without a depiction of Jesus on it, and fail to learn that lesson.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] August 18, 2014 at 4:55pm

    It’s circular reasoning. “Objective morals” don’t exist any more than God does. All moral codes are made up by someone and are nothing more than tastes.

    Which isn’t a reason not to have them — just don’t get so conceited as to assume they come from any source but the human who thought them up.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-10] August 16, 2014 at 11:18pm

    Those gun owners were innocent. The cop is not.

    Responses (6) +
  • [-13] August 16, 2014 at 11:09pm

    Good for KSDK! When a police officer commits murder and his department whitewashes it, the public deserves to know that address. I hope there are pickets there 24/7 until the department fires him. And at the chief’s home, too.

    Responses (8) +
  • [6] August 16, 2014 at 6:21pm

    Maybe this would be a good time to introduce a law in Texas stripping prosecutors of their legal immunity from being charged with malicious prosecution. Because this isn’t the first time they’ve done it.

  • [-5] August 15, 2014 at 3:35pm

    A strong-arm robbery is certainly cause for the police to have arrested Mr. Brown. It is NOT cause for anyone, cop or victim, to shoot to kill. This is why the police have tear gas and Tasers.

    It also doesn’t seem to be relevant to the actual shooting, since Officer Darren Wilson didn’t know about the robbery when he confronted Brown. I’d like to hear what his actual reasons were for killing him.

    Responses (4) +
  • August 15, 2014 at 2:25am

    Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. Holder deserves credit for this one, even if it’s too little and too late.

  • [2] August 13, 2014 at 12:46pm

    It ought to be. And I hope the jury will be.

  • [1] August 10, 2014 at 11:06pm

    Even if the civil rights laws stand, discrimination is hard to prove unless the business person doing it is so brainless as to say so out loud. There are thousands of possible reasons why I might not want to hire or do business with someone — and only about a dozen of those reasons have ever been banned. I can always just say I turned you down “because I think you sound like a horse’s neck.” Good luck getting that banned, or proving that it wasn’t my real reason.

  • [1] August 10, 2014 at 11:00pm

    This is why the Constitution has a clause guaranteeing the validity of contracts. Laws that ban private discrimination of any kind are unconstitutional as well as wrong. The 14th Amendment, correctly read, grants government ONLY the authority to force government itself, at all levels, to be color-blind. Nothing more.

  • August 9, 2014 at 9:36pm

    This is the Oregon bakery story all over again, and I predict the same result. Yes, you have the right to refuse to do business with anyone you consider to be immoral. But so do your opponents, and there are a lot more pro-gay people out there than anti-gay people.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go