User Profile: jdgalt


Member Since: December 30, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • [1] July 31, 2014 at 5:35pm

    Oh, and thanks for the tip about Red Robin. I’m headin’ there for a Monster Meal! Yum!

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 31, 2014 at 5:33pm

    Dear Blaze staff, please stop helping nanny-statist scare mongers like so-called CSPI spread their scares. They are out to take away even more of our freedom.

    Instead, I suggest you bookmark sites like consumerfreedom dot com, junkscience dot com, and iwf dot org, which tell the real stories, and check out every scare with them before passing it on. They are true friends of liberty.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 30, 2014 at 2:27pm

    The notion that one day for no reason, “God” appeared out of nowhere and created the world is neither more sensible, nor more plausible, than the notion that one day for no reason, the world appeared out of nowhere. Either way, something had to be first, unless the world has been here forever.

    Meanwhile you have introduced the unnecessary entity “God” without any evidence at all. Didn’t William of Occam say something about that?

    Responses (2) +
  • [4] July 30, 2014 at 2:22pm

    Dawkins is right on all counts, and his opponents should be laughed out of town as “professional victims.”

    Responses (1) +
  • [10] July 30, 2014 at 12:14am

    The Constitution doesn’t authorize the feds to concern themselves with any form of discrimination, unless it’s discrimination by government.

  • [33] July 30, 2014 at 12:12am

    It should tell neither.

    And while we’re at it, we need adults-only housing re-legalized yesterday. I have no kids, why should I have to put up with neighbors who let theirs run around outdoors and scream all day? Until a child is old enough to accept that screaming is for emergencies only, his/her parents have no business letting him/her out of their home.

    Responses (4) +
  • July 27, 2014 at 3:23pm

    Demonrats don’t get that way (I won’t call it “liberal”) by listening to their parents. They’re indoctrinated into it by NEA educators. So there is no need for demonrat adults to go to the trouble and expense of having children of their own: they can just brainwash yours!

  • [1] July 27, 2014 at 3:19pm

    It’s open and shut, but against the plaintiff. She is unwilling to write prescriptions that are part of the job. Therefore, she won’t do the job. Next!

  • July 27, 2014 at 3:10pm

    The system already allows those punishments. But to apply them, he has to be prosecuted after he leaves office. Impeachment alone wouldn’t be enough even if we got a conviction.

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] July 27, 2014 at 3:07pm

    The House won’t impeach right now for a good reason: The Clinton impeachment showed that in any impeachment trial, Democrat members of the Senate will simply vote their politics, rather than the truth, every time. They have no honor or shame. Therefore, impeachment would be a complete waste of time unless it happens when we have a 2/3 majority in the Senate.

    This does not mean Obama will or should go unpunished for corruption and exceeding his powers. It just means that in 2016 we *must* elect a Republican president, whose administration will PROSECUTE Obama and send him to prison!!!

  • July 27, 2014 at 2:08pm

    Prohibition shows that Americans are not going to stop using the substances they like. It’s against human nature.

    The government needs to make those drugs available at every Rite Aid and Walgreens, so that their consumers don’t have to fund evil cartels.

  • [1] July 26, 2014 at 4:42pm

    With all the heavy equipment the feds have been selling to local cops, if this sheriff can’t defend himself against gang bangers, he needs to be replaced anyway. I predict he beats them.

  • [7] July 26, 2014 at 4:30pm

    How soon we forget.

    A century ago, the US also had the problem of Mexican gangs crossing the border and committing crimes here. (Does the name Pancho Villa ring a bell?) The President complained to Mexico City and was told, “these are rebel warlords, and we can’t control them.”

    So he sent General Pershing and 2,500 cavalry to sack the city of Chihuahua.

    And the problem went away.

    It sounds to me like the Mexicans have forgotten this lesson. Let’s do it again, and do a better job, so it will stick longer this time.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] July 25, 2014 at 11:04pm

    Even today it is a prison offense there to call that genocide a genocide. *Who’s* a Holocaust denier?

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 11:03pm

    You mean tell them to get stuffed, right?

  • [1] July 25, 2014 at 11:00pm

    “The whole world” does NOT believe Israel is wrong. The UN General Assembly, a club of dictators, says so, but most people know better.

    This story shows why we need to kick the Turks out of NATO immediately, before we are forced to take their side against Israel. If the other NATO countries won’t cooperate in this, *we* need to pull out. Now.

    Turkey has not been our friend for a decade or more anyway. Their participation in the Gaza flotilla, sponsorship of the Muslim Brotherhood, taking the Russian side in the Russia/Georgia war, and their continued occupation of northern Cyprus are each good reasons to give them the heave-ho, if not to go to war with them!

    We also need to pull the US out of the UN and kick the UN out of the US.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 25, 2014 at 10:20pm

    That would make it a two-run homer, not a double.

  • July 25, 2014 at 10:19pm

    You have to wonder if this guy just took an unlucky hit on the head, or if something more serious is wrong (eg, he was bribed to throw the game or he’s on dope).

    Ultimately, every ball player knows that his promotion from the minor leagues is a round trip ticket. It sure sounds like this guy is going to get his return trip sooner than he thought, no matter which explanation is the correct one.

  • July 24, 2014 at 11:32pm

    There’s a difference, even if you refuse to see it. Muslims blame a woman for anything a man does to her, including rape. We don’t blame women for anything, we just exercise our right to free speech. Deal with it.

  • July 24, 2014 at 11:29pm

    This has nothing to do with how women dress. It’s about our right to free speech vs their alleged right not to hear things that hurt their poor little feelings. Grow up, woman!

123 To page: Go