The idea that you should always go to jail for civil disobedience is silly and shows an infantile stage of moral development. You should go to jail when that will further your cause more than alternative actions. In this case, the federal government is trying to suppress telling the American people what the Obama and company are doing to them. The fact is that the Chinese, Russians, etc., had already known what the NSA was doing. The only ones in the dark were the American people. I suspect some of the posters here are actually working for the NSA.
June 20, 2013 at 10:57pm
The problem with OReilly is that he wants approval more than anything else. Just watch him preen and kiss ass. He can’t be trusted. If he wants Mexicans to love him, he will kiss up. But he has no inner core of character.
I think that he just feels sorry for the illegals that ARE working hard but he ignores the fact that there are drug cartels inside our country, and he ignores that terrorists sneak across the border and he ignores the fact that Schumer, Durbin, Mewnendez, and the rest of the liars took the stage with Richard Trumka last week (or two weeks ago) on C-Span to show their "solidarity" on the amnesty bill. Now Bill O'Reilly, how can you say you "look out for the folks" and yet you know better than this? Two plus two equals four, Bill O'Reilly, and it always will! Fool!
 December 16, 2012 at 3:53pm
Before he initiated his atrocities, Hitler instituted a gun control law that is the model for proposed laws in the US. Then he proceeded to kill 11 million or more unarmed civilians. I don’t now the answer, but disarming folks so Jamie Foxx can propose killing all the white people doesn’t seem like a solution to me.
December 15, 2012 at 7:15pm
How about this? The shooter’s parents were divorced! Of course the Hollywood adulterers wouldn’t recognize this as a cause of teenage rage. But what if he had known the love of a caring father and had seen love and self-control between his parents modeled on a daily basis? We have had guns since the beginning of this country. Why have the crimes against children gotten worse? This was an attempt to make adults suffer.
 December 13, 2012 at 11:19pm
The kids who won deserved every point they won by. The losers didn’t deserve any more points than they got. The losers can go on to happy lives if they can avoid becoming whining Democratic Union thugs.
December 11, 2012 at 7:57am
Most, if not all, cases of genocide have begun with increasingly open declarations of intent to kill the victims of the eventual genocide. This happened in Germany in the 1930s, and in Rawanda, for example. Only after it is no longer taboo to speak about, does genocide become a real possibility. White people should start an anti defamation league.
It is more difficult when you outnumber the folks want to commit genocide plus you are well armed. At least you can go down with a fight and not be led like lambs to the slaughter.
October 24, 2012 at 10:22pm
Glenn’s Hypothesis: The ambassador was running guns to Muslim Brotherhood folks throughout the middle east.
Why were they doing this?
My hypothesis: The Brotherhood aims for the establishment of the Caliphate. Obama is sympatico with the Brotherhood and their desire for the Caliphate. Therefore, the President is supporting the transfer of guns to the Brotherhood.
Even the Russians are reporting that the Syrian rebels (aka the Muslim Brotherhood) now possess American tactical weapons which they have received from the US.
That's not the way knowledge works at all. Knowledge isn't democratic. When people hold positions contrary to our best knowledge about how the world works, they're most likely wrong. If, in the odd case, that they're right, it was in most cases pure luck.
August 17, 2012 at 8:17pm
How can there be any doubt that Jesus is opposed to stealing? I can only assume that Jesus is against Democratic robbery. Caring for the poor is primarily the responsibility of freely acting individuals. The compulsory welfare state is slavery which Jesus is against, too.
Blessed are the Poor, for theirs is the Kingdom of Heaven.
A camel is more likely to pass thorugh the eye of a needle than a rich man get into Heaven.
Jesus of Nazareth
What about that is complicated? The poor go to Heaven and the the rich go somewhere else.
And I bet you think he was talking abut a sewing needle.
He was talking about a sewing needle, the context makes that clear. He had just tole him if he wanted to get into Heaen he had to give all his money to the poor. It's after he was hesitant to do that that Jesus made the comment about rich men never getting into Heaven.
You should sit down and read the Bible.
17 As Jesus started on his way, a man ran up to him and fell on his knees before him. “Good teacher,” he asked, “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”
18 “Why do you call me good?” Jesus answered. “No one is good—except God alone. 19 You know the commandments: ‘You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal, you shall not give false testimony, you shall not defraud, honor your father and mother.’[d]”
20 “Teacher,” he declared, “all these I have kept since I was a boy.”
21 Jesus looked at him and loved him. “One thing you lack,” he said. “Go, sell everything you have and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”
22 At this the man’s face fell. He went away sad, because he had great wealth.
23 Jesus looked around and said to his disciples, “How hard it is for the rich to enter the kingdom of God!”
24 The disciples were amazed at his words. But Jesus said again, “Children, how hard it is[e] to enter the kingdom of God! 25 It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the ki
August 16, 2012 at 10:49pm
He is a hate filled man. One really has to pity people like him. His life is over. He can’t do a real job. He can’t create anything real. He is just a soft version of the new black panthers. These people are lost. Think of the fact that when they are old and senile, the people they hate will be paying for their care.
August 15, 2012 at 1:41pm
Biden’s comment is an incitement to race riot.
August 15, 2012 at 1:14pm
Biden’s comments are a clear incitement to race rioting. Simple minded folks like the new black panthers (see Blaze above), or the liberal who shot a guard at a conservative think tank in DC this morning, will be motivated by Biden to riot or engage in domestic terrorism. I think Biden knows this but is taking a calculated risk that he can blame the rioting on conservatives. Conservative Americans had better start yelling before it happens. Many German Jews didn’t take Hitler’s incitements to anti-Jewish violence seriously. Look where it got them.
August 14, 2012 at 3:12pm
Another adjunct “professor”! Just like our self-admittedly crack head president, Obama.
July 21, 2012 at 7:51am
Here is a question: Did the psycho believe in God?
July 17, 2012 at 7:31am
For those who assume that an international treaty (the UN for example) could not override the US Constitution, please read Art. 6, Paragraph 2 of the US Constitution.
All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
June 25, 2012 at 7:03am
Boyd9 — you don’t understand. Matt Kibb is not promoting anarchy. He is promoting HETERARCHY. The same is true of Ron Paul. Heterarchy is what the founders were attempting to establish and preserve. No reason to be a moderate about heterarchy.
June 23, 2012 at 1:30pm
If this kid wants to do those things at his own expense, I don’t much care. In fact, I might help him out in one or two cases. But he wants to put me in jail if I don’t give him money to support his favorite charities.
So, he is a moral cannibal, like most Democratics.
June 14, 2012 at 7:50am
What we need is some scientific evidence. The closest I could find was the following from a piece by Tucker Carlson in the Daily Beast:
‘The most comprehensive study of American sexual behavior ever undertaken (published by the University of Chicago and marketed under the notably non-arousing title The Social Organization of Sexuality) found that, in fact, “having a religious affiliation was associated with higher rates of orgasm for women.” The devout are actually having better sex than the rest of us.’
So if by the “right” they means religious folks, chances are irreligious liberals are the ones doing the projecting.
June 10, 2012 at 5:39pm
There is a problem with the web page. It marks me as not registered, when I am and can find evidence for it on other systems, plus the fact is that I voted in the recent primary.
I really think those who say it is working may be lefties trying to keep Glenn’s project from having an effect. Or, it may work for them and they naively assume it will work for others. They should shut up if they are really interested in the Activate project.