Are you disappointed that he wasn't hanging around with commies and doing cocaine instead?
Wow, of all of the bigoted, disgusting, low down... Oh, my bad, I'm refering to almost every comment you've made on this site. So, if others don't agree with something then it's racist and an egregious act but, if you don't agree with something then it's OK to make fun of someone's faith or race. Go back to your bridge, Troll!
lol, Obama was 3 at the time, don't think he was doing either of those things.
That's all you have knucklehead? Go smoke some more.
JMcstupid - In his OWN words, he was doing that, take the blinders off moron.
But you can't be sure, can you?
Obama still is three .. ... actually more like two .. all about him and what he wants. If he doesn't get it ... or is challenged or questioned .. he has a two year old temper fit ... and people die.
How bigotted of you! What makes you better than anyone else that allows you the high road to mock another religion. If it is taboo to mock Jews, Catholics, Evangelicals, Christians, Muslims, Hindus, etc. then show some respect to the millions of Mormons around the world that hold what you mocked as sacred.
You may have been trying to be funny . . . but you fail miserably when you denigrate a fellow human being because of their religious beliefs. And by the way, Mitt looks like a nice young man then and a nice adult now coupled with a generous personality, great family and integrity you will never have based on your comment.
lmao, hes a such a spoiled little brat who didn't work for nothing and had everything handed to him.
This thread starter can be an Obama Liberal or a Paul Liberal-tarian. Both sides of the Liberal coin have said the same thing regarding Romney.
Time - Agreed, both groups are idiots and equally dangerous.
JARHEAD 88. Liberals are killing this country... Liberal-tarians (of the Paul stripe just want their chance to finish it off). They're not in competition with us (Conservatives) but rather each other and like coked-up sociopaths... will selfishly feed their own need until the end.
September 12, 2012 at 11:16am
lol. Tony Perkins you are an anti gay bigoted clown. No one is listening!
Are you people kidding me? ARE YOU KIDDING ME? Is your god really that petty? “Oh no! They didn’t say my name in a speech about a terrorist attack! :(” You guys should really give this stuff a rest, it makes you religious nuts look even worse.
Welcome to Beck's Blaze home of the petty attacks against the President.
then stay out of it
You shall not bow down yourself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD your God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
Is a jealous and vain god worthy of worship? I rather worship a god of truth, of justice and knowledge, than one that places any worth in vanity.
En, I think you're referring to this,
September 10, 2012 at 6:26pm
Go Daddy was a strong supporter of SOPA.
September 10, 2012 at 1:31pm
“Asians will take pictures of themselves defecating.” “Grinny Chinaman…” Obviously you guys didn’t read his comment.
September 10, 2012 at 10:39am
It never ceases to amaze me that on every article on the blaze, I can scroll down and see shining examples of the wingnut racism you guys always like to deny exists.
September 6, 2012 at 9:27pm
Palin should be mocked. She is a national embarrassment.
The Dallas Cowboys had a great time with your mother last night.
Like Piglosi, Barbie Boxer, Maxine Waters, Sheila Jackson Lee and Debbie Wasserman Schultz (just to name a few) aren't a total embarrassment to the country to say nothing of the female gender!
As long as the mocking comes from total poo sees like yourself, well................. Mock away numnuts!
LOL 13th. The Houston Texans told me the same thing.
JMCC.... You know because? Feeling a little superior today? Are you an example of the best your parents could produce?
Beats the Hell out of President Sea Hag
(Insert your favorite Democrat Woman's Name Here)
I know I saw pics and vids of you at the dnc saying you wanted to KEEEEL Romney,
YOU should be criticized! YOU are national embarrassment! May you feel what it's like to walk in Sarah's shoes for just a day in this really sick country full of despicable hate filled people on the left!
September 6, 2012 at 1:27am
Bill Clinton killed it! Charles/Republicans are totally clueless. They don’t have a leg to stand on.
This was like Brutus nominating Julius Caesar for a second term, setting him up to fail. If Clinton has an ounce of brains he must know that Obama will destroy the economy and America's standing in the world. Come to think of it, Bill Clinton was just as clueless as Obama but was bailed out on domestic economics by Newt Gingrich and the tech revolution that came along in spite of Clinton's tax increases. At the end he left Bush with a surplus but also a recession and a weakened intel apparatus that led directly to 9/11.
Internationally Clinton emboldened Bin Laden by refusing to respond to Al Qaeda attacks, refused to take Bin Laden from Sudan and refusing to give the CIA permission to shoot when they had Bin Laden in their sights in Afghanistan.
are you kidding me?? the republicans have more legs then the Rockets. obummer and allllllllllllllll the dnc is the ones with now legs to stand on. man you are so far out in left field, you're sitting in the bleachers. so close in fact that those in the bullpen are screaming for you to STFU. idiot lemming
We don't have A leg to stand on, we have two, but you need to stop crawling in the dirt of democratic promises. They lure with great swelling words of vanity, through the lusts of the flesh, and through much wantonness, but if you have any notion of self preservation at all, you will escape from them.
Off your bath salts?
@JMCClena Really? Wah wa wa wah. Do we have to bring Clint back? Ha ha ha. Charles said what I told a Paulie not long ago. Mudville. The Mighty Obama has struck out.
@jmcclena: Bill Clinton killed it! Charles/Republicans are totally clueless. They don’t have a leg to stand on.
Charles knows what Clinton was/is doing. When the DNC is over may just present/expose a set-up by the Clinton's for O's political demise.
@AMERICANEAGLE1392: Interesting choice of characters. Ceasar and Brutus.
Could Clinton be thinking of the fastest path for hilliary may be a second O term?... An opportune exposure of some high crime and misdemeanor, an impeachment of O, and selection of hilliary (like Nixon tags Ford)?
Nah... Way to tin hat-like. Bill wouldn't think this way. No, it is way to silly to think that the C's are setting the big O up for a Brutus maneuver. No, Bill and hilliary have no history of planning and cover-up. They would never use O's Chicago political tactics against himself.
...yes an interesting and entertainng choice of characters you have Eagle.
"I found Bill's speech a little hard to swallow." Comment from Monica Lewinsky, overheard by Hillary Clinton.
August 31, 2012 at 4:40pm
haaaaaaaaaaaa! it is all of the beckbots wild conspiracy theories and manufactured controversies all rolled into one poorly done painting! this guy is even on the birther bandwagon. pretty laughable.
Over the past 150 years, from the days the democrats were pimping universal slavery, through hitler, through present, all these theories you guys accuse the conservatives of making up have proven to be correct time after time, and you guys have proven to be complete morons, yet you still laugh and make fun like retarded blind 3rd grade school girls.
Funny how you say conspiracy theories when that fall in line everyday. Turn off MSNBC and read some books might learn something.
We'll check back to see how much you're laughing the day after the election, loser!
Another Media matters implant spewing non factual rhetoric. Go back under the rock from which you came.
Wow this painting is really getting under the skin of Liberals isn't it? Everything in that painting has been written about on numerous new sites. Oh that's right; the average liberal cannot read. Put it in a picture and all of a sudden they understand. Typical.
Just pretend for a moment that it was all true, that would make for one really bad POTUS right?
And learn how to laugh! Hahahaha!
August 17, 2012 at 12:20pm
Oh man this looks excruciatingly bad.
August 16, 2012 at 9:11pm
You realize that the taxes from those “liberal” state subsidize all the poor, “conservative” states right? You conservatives are moochers off the liberal dime.
August 15, 2012 at 8:12pm
So two adoptive parents are not really the child’s parent? You are an idiot.
August 15, 2012 at 6:37pm
Good! If Lisa Miller ever steps foot in the US again, she should be arrested for kidnapping and the child should be returned to the parent who is not a criminal!
She is not that child's parent. Despite what the LGBT folks would like us to believe neither two women nor two men can have a child. It's biologically impossible.
So two adoptive parents are not really the child's parent? You are an idiot.
I don't care what is done in a court. It's not natural and it's not healthy for the child. The sick women continued to try and indoctrinate the child with her perversion. If she wants a child so badly she should go get artificially inseminated and have her own child just like her ex-partner did. Instead she would rather take another woman's child out of hatred and spite. That to me is the most disgusting part. She only wanted the child to make a point to prove her sick lifestyle was superior. Nature isn't behind her and that is what truly ticks gays off. They know they aren't natural, that is why they want to force their mental illness on society.
Jmcclena - She didn't even adopt her and she's not the biological mother, so why should that sicko be anywhere near Miller's daughter?
Let us break this down Barney style for the dumb people like you. Had the biological mother not been homosexual, and had she lived (shacked up) with a man that was not her husband, was not the father of the baby, nor had he adopted the baby. If the real mother decided that he was not fit to be around her child any longer, and she moved. No court in the nation, would take this baby away from the biological mother, and give it to the dude that she has shacked up with.
This is exactly what is happening here. The court is going to take a mothers legit child, and give it to the sick, lesbo, dyke that she has shacked up with. The lesbo has no blood relation to the child, and she never went to court, and adopted the child. this is all about apeasing the sick twisted liberal homosexual crowd up in Vermont. I hope the people that support this evil choke to death on their own tongues.
YOU are an idiot for even imagining the plaintiff has ANY legitimate claim under "natural" law.
Let's illustrate the absurdity. We keep on this slippery slide of "anything goes" morality. Next, polygamy wins legal status.
Soon after that, pedophilia/child molestation becomes legal, as long as the child doesn't object (U.N. "Rights of the Child"). Then marrying the molested child becomes a "right" demanded by pedophiles. The legality of homosexual marriage serves as the precedent, so it passes into law.
So it logically includes men marrying little boys, while their parents are sued for conspiring to violate the pedophile's "rights".
Then, bestiality. A woman marries her dog. After being artificially inseminated, the woman gives birth to a human. She then divorces the dog. Lawyers for the dog (from PETA) demand visiting rights for the dog, not to mention alimony.
If you see this as a society to be desired, you bear the guilt of causing the decline and eventual destruction of what has been the greatest nation in history.
Get a glimpse of what it will look like: messianic-literaryDOTcom/sodomDOThtm
Posted on August 16, 2012 at 2:14am
YOU are an idiot for even imagining the plaintiff has ANY legitimate claim under “natural” law.
Let’s illustrate the absurdity. We keep on this slippery slide of “anything goes” morality. Next, polygamy wins legal status.
The only absurdity is your debunked, bigotted slippery slope argument, another hold over from the arguments made against Loving v. Virgina. We are talking about two consenting adults, children and animals are not consenting adults. Its that simple logic test that Conservative Christians fail.
Encinom - If anybody is bigoted, it's psychopaths like you. You act like the courts have a right to tear apart a child from her biological mother, who has done nothing wrong. The other woman is not her biological mother nor did she legally adopt her.
You're also a hypocrite for not supporting polygamy and yet you claim that marriage is a civil right.
August 9, 2012 at 9:10pm
Obviously you are confused. I am a straight person. That said, I don’t hold hate in my heart for people who are different than I. I feel sorry for people like you, it seems like such a burden to live life with such darkness in your heart.
August 9, 2012 at 9:08pm
@GIT-R-DONE No, no they are not. I’m sure that you are used to 1-2 minutes of robotic thrusting in the missionary position, but just because some people have a more “exotic” sex life does not make them sexual deviants. A sexual deviant is someone who preys on children, or animals, or a rapist. That is a sexual deviant. Two loving, consenting adults are not sexual deviants.
August 9, 2012 at 8:29pm
Jeez you are just hilarious. You write at almost a 5th grade level!
August 9, 2012 at 8:22pm
No one is asking to have anything they want. Where are you getting your information?