Hey, Blaze editors, your title for this article is grossly misleading. How about the following? “Cruz condemns Trump’s 2005 eavesdropped, sex-talk rant, stands by Trump to defeat Clinton.”
September 7, 2016 at 11:20pm
The only person to blame for that is Donald Trump.
September 7, 2016 at 10:48pm
Oh, flyoveryou, why did you have to out me?
September 7, 2016 at 11:49am
Way to Go, eyes, in doing your part to make conservative reunification much more difficult after this crap buffet of an election. #NeverTrump folks are not spineless. They disagree with you. Is that a bad thing in your America?
 September 7, 2016 at 11:39am
Mark Levin will not criticize Glenn Beck or any #NeverTrump person. Mark continues to respect those conservatives who will not vote for Trump. He has been on the same page as Glenn in saying that those who believe in the Constitution must be able to unite after the election. Mark continues to say that the people responsible for a Trump loss are 1) Donald Trump and 2) Trump’s unquestioning sycophants.
There are true American conservative patriots who will vote for Trump and who will not vote for Trump. Will you be ready to unify with all of these patriots after the election? DO NOT scorch the earth with recriminations; it will not get you anywhere.
What Levin does or says is his own business
However, if you are NEVERTRUMP normally vote republican then you are essentially helping Clinton. It isn't debatable. Levin realizes this. He refuses to do the work of Clinton and decided to put his big boy pants on and make the better decision of a strictly binary choice.
For the record I was prepared to do the same with Cruz who wasn't my first choice or even my second choice or even my third when it came to the Republican nomination but when it comes to Hillary there is no choice at least for me
 September 7, 2016 at 11:37am
Try to keep some perspective. There are true American conservative patriots who will vote for Trump and who will not vote for Trump. Will you be ready to unify with all of these patriots after the election? DO NOT scorch the earth with recriminations; it will not get you anywhere.
You are defending the prophet of doom by saying those who are frustrated with his anti-Trump nonsense, all of which is for show, should not "scorch the earth with recriminations?" Seriously? Glenn Beck, the guy who told evangelicals they were listening to the wrong God if they were supporting Trump? The guy who has spent 90% of his radio show airtime since Trump got the nomination bashing him to cause his prophecy to the beckbot collective that there is no way Trump can win to come true?
There has never been a more scorched earth, divide the conservative base pundit than the prophet of doom and the beckbot collective mindlessly follows his lead. In private, I think Beck will vote for Trump because in his heart he has to know that Cackle Clinton would be the second worst president in the history of the U.S. and having the worst and second worst back to back will likely spell the end of the nation. However, to protect his wealth and media empire, he continues to shill for hill.
 September 7, 2016 at 11:34am
Levin did not sell out. He disagrees with you about the best course in a terrible situation. He did not “abruptly change course.” Since May, he’s been saying he’ll probably end up voting for Trump, but that he would never spout Trumpist propaganda, and he hasn’t. But if you want to make a conservative reunification and revival impossible in the USA, just keep trashing real American patriots like Mark Levin.
If a person who says they are a patriot betrays the freedoms and principles of a nation, they are no longer a patriot.
Plus ole nasal talker is boring and for old bitter people anyway.
 September 7, 2016 at 11:31am
Mark Levin continues to respect those conservatives who will not vote for Trump. He has been on the same page as Glenn in saying that those who believe in the Constitution must be able to unite after the election. Mark continues to say that the people responsible for a Trump loss are 1) Donald Trump and 2) Trump’s unquestioning sycophants.
Read this article written for the intellectuals who are neverTrump like a Bill Crystol by one of the intellectuals under an anonymous name:
Oh, flyoveryou, why did you have to out me?
 September 7, 2016 at 11:28am
The title of this article is false. *Anybody* who has listened to Mark Levin since May knows that there was no “abrupt course change” in this decision. From the moment Cruz suspended in May, Mark has said that he would probably end up voting for Trump to block HRC, BUT that he would not cheerlead for Trump and that he would put Trump’s feet to the fire. On these, Mark has maintained his integrity.
Shame on The Blaze for this error, assuming it was through negligence.
Mark Levin continues to respect those conservatives who will not vote for Trump. He has been on the same page as Glenn in saying that those who believe in the Constitution must be able to unite after the election. Mark continues to say that the people responsible for a Trump loss are 1) Donald Trump and 2) Trump's unquestioning sycophants.
 September 2, 2016 at 10:11am
Don’t think anyone here thinks the points are bad points. Most think that Trump is a pandering liar who is in bed with the same leftist crowd he ran with for 40 years. He changes his line based on his audience, which really doesn’t seem to bother Trump supporters. So far, the only basis you have for trusting Trump is that he demands, every other sentence, “BELIEVE ME!” He has been caught in lies – and then lies about his lies.
 August 30, 2016 at 12:39pm
Why does a proud Zionist Jewish man, a staunch supporter for Israel, marry a Muslim woman with close family ties with the Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR; a woman who edited a sharia journal? Anthony Weiner was a perfect patsy and beard to cover for Huma Abedin’s background. Just as the Clintons married for power and Hillary’s ideology, I believe that Anthony Weiner’s marriage to Huma Abedin was politically arranged. Abedin is an influential part of the Clinton machine and connects them to the Arab world, specifically the Arab financial world. Weiner was an ambitious, leftist narcissist with a sexual expression problem who was tailor-made to be manipulated.
jm: You pose a very good question and support it with facts. That being granted, I have the direct answer for you. I want you to carefully consider it....
Weiner is a "Self Hater."
Playing armchair psychologist here - perhaps to exact revenge (in his twisted mind) on all of the Jewish girls who likely rejected him in his youth? As a very general rule, men tend to age out of awkwardness. If this ugly SOB is his "improved" older self, imagine what he looked like back in the day (shudder...)...and he was likely at least as arrogant and nasty back then as he is now, perhaps more so.
 June 16, 2016 at 10:55am
Supporting Trump in 2016 means electing Clinton – almost every polled metric shows that Trump cannot win against Clinton. Democrats (incl. unions, welfare recipients, etc.) will vote Democrat no matter what; polls show they will not cross over for Trump even if they agree with his policy proposals. At the same time, Trump has alienated much of the GOP conservative base and they WILL NOT come out to vote for him. The ONLY way Clinton loses is to someone who is NOT Donald Trump. That can happen if the delegates nominate someone other than Trump at July’s GOP convention. If you keep pushing Trump, you are pushing Hillary Clinton. So, wait for the convention and see what emerges.
 March 3, 2016 at 11:52am
Hannity has been in the tank for Trump since the summer. Hannity complains that other (left) interviewers throw softballs to their interviwees. He throws Trump nothing but softballs. After the second debate,Trump said outright, in front of the cameras that W. had lied about Iraqi WMDs. The next evening, Hannity had trump on his show and asked, “Donald, did you really mean that George Bush lied about.” Trump’s response: It was a mess. What a terrible war.” Hannity just lets it go. No follow-up; no “how could you say that and not expect to be called on it?
jmjaffe Nah Hannity backs Cruz. Most likely Hannity believes that Rubio is in the way of Cruz getting even close to or maybe even surpassing Trump. So Hannity would want Rubio out of the way. For instance with Hannity's help if Rubio were to take a drubbing in Florida. He's done. That would essentially make it a 2 man race because the also ran types like Carson although he is not dropping out. Carson is scaling back to the point where he might as well drop out. Kasich is just barely staying in to see if he can win Ohio and if not he's done. Rubio and Cruz are essentially battling for the same voters and so they are canceling each other out. That said when Jeb dropped out Trump got a big bump in the polls.
 January 15, 2016 at 5:40am
Cruz is my guy, but the “New York values” crack was just a stupid thing to say. Unnecessarily divisive. Cruz does not have to resort to a social stereotype to make his point that Trump is no conservative. First time in the campaign I thought Ted exercised poor judgment.
 December 11, 2015 at 4:24pm
Actually, Cronkite was also a leftist ideologue, whose commentary and biased reporting, including the decision to, for the first time, show body bags filled with American casualties on prime-time news, horrified the nation and shook the resolve of the US to win the Vietnam War. Remember, in Cronkite’s day, there was no alternative to the evening news and the New York Slimes.
 December 8, 2015 at 9:12am
Not often the Donald is the more restrained and reasoned voice in the room… Don’t think I’ve ever watched “Morning Shmoe” for more than 5 seconds at a time. I always think it’s an infomercial.
 April 7, 2015 at 5:17pm
Archer is part of Cartoon Network’s “Adult Swim” time slot, and no children should be watching Cartoon Network or anything else at that hour. Besides, “Archer” rocks and it’s all about mocking James Bond, the original lecherous anti-hero.
OK, so you like it.
Do you think that every subscriber to cable should PAY for it?
Archer is part of the late night programming of FX. It is not on Cartoon Network.
James Bond,the original lecherous anti-hero? I don't think so.Far from it.
I know, it mocks spy films in such a funny manner.
But there ARE children who are up at that hour, and there are teens who are up at that hour, and they do turn on Cartoon Network, and because it's CARTOONS, they think it's okay to watch it. Shows like that should be left to channels that have to be subscribed to and paid extra for. JMO
You're thinking about Frisky Dingo, not Archer, both are by Adam Reed.
Archer is put out by Fox on the FX Channel. Not Adult Swim. But you are correct in that Archer is an awesome show.
[-2] January 15, 2015 at 2:32am
Franklin Graham’s presence was one continuous non-sequitur. What the hell was he doing there? Confirming Muslim propaganda that Christians want to conduct another crusade? Is Hannity placing equal weight on mass conversion of Muslims to Christianity as a serious solution? A true disservice to his other two guests – and to viewers.
I agree. While it is the rightful place of Mr. Graham to preach the gospel. I do very much appreciate that. A mass conversion of the Arab nations is not a realistic solution to the problem. People better snap out of the spell and realize that there are real differences among the races of man and youre allowed to acknowledge that. I could go into the origin of races, the identity of Israel, false Israel, curses upon fathers and nations/races etc, but that would put most people in a tizzy. Those sort of things were wiped out of every church about 2 generations back and are now deemed heresies by the Biblically illiterate (among them “scholars” in every Christian institution).
Yawn....another Christaphobe opens his yap. Preachers preach, that's what they do. To expect anything less from them is foolhardy. Oh, by the way, the Crusades were fought to drive back barbarous invading swarms of Muslims. Of course that's not how you learned it eh?
 January 10, 2015 at 8:04am
Edited or not, Shlep came across like an insecure 8-year-old. I would like to hear the minute that preceded the clip, to understand the context of Erlanger’s comment. He said “We need to be careful,” not “You should be more careful.” Sounded a lot more like a general journalistic truism than any criticism of Fox News. Keep Shep far, far away from prime time. 2:00AM would be a fitting slot.
January 10, 2015 at 8:00am
I didn’t get the impression that Erlanger was directing the comment at Fox News. In fact, I think he said the comment wasn’t directed specifically at Fox News.