Amen! God have mercy. God will not be mocked forever!
September 7, 2012 at 8:26am
Lets see, the dem party wants to remove God and supports killing the unborn at any stage, They support gay marriage. They took out God and other things in their platform. Put it back in even tho they voted clearly to leave it out. Who is this party?
The rep party supports life, keeps God in and marriage between a man and a women. This party is not without problems, but when it comes down to who to vote for its a no brainer.
We are going to collapse if something isn’t done soon. Time is running out.
June 6, 2012 at 1:57pm
@cofemale: Correct. They should give up their citizenship and move.
June 6, 2012 at 1:55pm
Add your comments
June 6, 2012 at 1:29pm
Way to funny. This is Democracy! They also forget to mention the amount they spent from the very beginning, Money from union dues to force a recall. I’ happy the common sense voters sent them a clear message. Way to go Wisconsin!
June 6, 2012 at 1:22pm
I was laughing to. They neglect to mention how much of the union dues they have spent on this from the very beginning. Not just on this but other elections as well.
May 23, 2012 at 9:41am
May 23, 2012 at 9:40am
They can debate all they want. The fact is, you can’t change gender. God’s plan is not for men to have sex with men or women with women. They can not have children.. This desire is purely a sin of the flesh and no good can come from it. You can not make what is a lie a truth! You can claim to be born that way all you want, the same can be said for murders, thieves, pedophilia s, or any other dysfunction. But that doesn’t mean its right or you have to act on it.
"The fact is, you can’t change gender."
Clarification: by the scientific definition, gender is defined by society and sex is defined by your biology. You can change gender. You can't change sex (actually, even this can be argued; if your chromosomes make up your sex, or your anatomy does. Even chromosomes leave some people out in the cold, as there are those with neither XX or XY).
Locked - If there's something wrong with their genetic chromosomes or reproductive organs, there are treatments for that.
The ones who have nothing wrong with their genetic chromosomes or reproductive organs have something wrong with their mind.
Not sure of your point. How does that impact the definitions of gender and sex?
gender isn't defined by society, It's defined by the sex of the individual. You can't change gender any more than you can change sex.
You can change perception of gender and or sex but that is an illusion. Perception is only a reality to those who live in fantasy. A man who has a medical sex chnage can neither have children or go a monthly visitor that women do. He just a man with a mangled penis and fake breast....Nothing more.
Medical science could graph fins,flippers and gills ona man ...but he's not a fish and he can't breath underwater.
And no matter how many times he say it he's a fish throw in the water and he'll drown. You are what you are no matter what you say or someone else says
"gender isn’t defined by society, It’s defined by the sex of the individual. You can’t change gender any more than you can change sex."
Merriam-Webster Medical Dictionary definition:
"the behavioral, cultural, or psychological traits typically associated with one sex"
Gender is fluid and changes as behavior changes. It's the difference between saying "act like a man" and "you have male chromosomes/anatomy." The fact that you have certain beliefs about the topic doesn't matter.
My original response to @Jmjss is because people so often use sex and gender synonymously. They are related but different and people frequently mix the two up. As you did.
You do realize that a dictionary is not static. It reflects current usage and/or science (& politics nowadays).
You also went to a medical dictionary. It does not reflect what the majority of people have thought the word gender has meant for the last 12,000 years or more.
3. informal the state of being male, female, or neuter
4. informal all the members of one sex: the female gender
I just saw an article on the next Eurovision to be held in Baku. It was very disturbing. I for one want no part of the gender benders. I will separate myself from them. Be careful who you get in bed with. You might not like it after a while.
"You also went to a medical dictionary..."
... and you expect something different when I specifically said "by the scientific definition, gender is defined by society and sex is defined by your biology"?
"3. informal the state of being male, female, or neuter
4. informal all the members of one sex: the female gender"
And this echoes exactly what I said in response to @Johnjamison:
"My original response to @Jmjss is because people so often use sex and gender synonymously. They are related but different and people frequently mix the two up. As you did."
Sure, you want to make an argument that 12,000 years ago gender and sex were used as exact synonyms? Go for it; that's not discussing what it means right now, which is the topic at hand. It's interesting to note that some indigenous people have literally equated gender and sex, where "masculine" women were considered men and could marry women. The Kootenai, living in what is now Canada, were one such tribe. But I digress. Fact of the matter is that according to our modern language and culture, sex is biological and gender is a mixture of behavioral and cultural. That's what I originally wanted to clarify.
Locked loves playing word games.
Word games? No. But the nice thing about the internet is that words are the most common way to communicate - and they remain up and visible. You're accountable for what you say, and when you reword something or try and claim someone said something else, it's easy to call people on it.
I'm not sure if calling people on their errors or catching them in lies is a game. I do find it fun though :-)
Easy RIGHTSOFBILLY....you'll get "rainman" LOCKED started. "Rainman" minus the indiot savant brilliance of course.
Locked just rocked your all.
And the creed of the loser, "You're just arguing semantics!". Well yeah... that was his point from the beginning. When someone corrects you that 2+2 does not equal 5 don't cry, "You're just arguing mathematics!" because that's trivial.
There would be no argument if you would have realized your error in the beginning instead of grasping at straws to salvage your point.
Now shut up and thank the man for setting you straight.
... I love it when a little intelligence surfaces on this site.
Or we get you, who will lie through his teeth in one breath, insult people with the other, and dance around a topic all night without giving an answer on topic :-) I'd prefer being accurate and honest than off-topic and dishonest like you, little buddy!
May 23, 2012 at 9:28am
This is hateful. They clearly have no understanding of the Catholic Church. If they wanted to be really fair they should have had someone from the Church to explain. Instead they spin it the way they want to those who have no clue on Church beliefs. First of all birth control is not a health issue. It prevents pregnancy. Last I checked, having a baby is a gift, not a disease. This is easily preventable by refraining from sex. But I guess that can’t happen because we are out of control animals with no free will when it comes to sex. Second, this is not really about birth control but freedom of religion.
They want to take away consequences and conscience. Once we have a society without those 2 things, we need a government to control us.
Excellent post, JMJSS!! :D
Yes very well said indeed. Monkey DNA is 99% identical to human DNA. One thing that separates us from monkeys is self control (free will) Liberals (and even some "christians") have worked very hard to convince people thatwe are just animals and it isn't possible to control our sexual urges, that there is no way anyone can remain chaste and that we are all slaves to our flesh (in bondage) Some "Christians" even teach that things like artificial contraception, sterilization, IVF, masturbation and even abortion are not only necessary but in some cases are the "christian" thing to do. There is a (very dangerous) trend emerging where "christians" are compartmentalizing their faith in Jesus and saying that we can follow Jesus and still be in favor of things like abortion and gay marriage because our "politics" are separate from our faith and we are already "saved". It's good to be a Christian in church but even more important to be a Christian OUTSIDE of Church. Not everyone who calls Lord Lord will enter the Kingdom but ONLY those who DO the will of the Father in Heaven. As Christians we have to ask ourselves honestly if things like masturbation, gay sex, sterilization,IVF, contraception and abortion lead us closer to the Lord? As Christians are we supposed to do everything possible to live for this life or lay down our lives for Jesus in the hope of resurrection? Lord have mercy Eph 5:3-12.
May 23, 2012 at 9:14am
I wonder what Harry Reid thinks of this?
May 23, 2012 at 9:08am
I’m so sick of these people. They clearly don’t promote the word of God nor do they follow in the foot steps of MLK.
May 9, 2012 at 1:09pm
I’m grateful for those who are taking a stand. I hope they protest this in numbers.
May 9, 2012 at 1:07pm
Very disturbing. This President has not brought unity.