User Profile: jnfomo

jnfomo

Member Since: April 09, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [45] February 25, 2015 at 2:51pm

    @Dog,
    Your lack of knowledge on the subject matter renders your opinion useless.

  • [148] February 25, 2015 at 2:11pm

    I love how Israel’s government is intertwined with Judaism. Perhaps if our government were to get back to it’s Judeo-Christian roots, our country could be restored.

    Responses (5) +
  • [7] February 24, 2015 at 7:57pm

    Your statistics are off. 69% of the jewish vote went for Obama in 2012, but since they only represent less than 2% of our population, they are hardly to blame for his reelection.

    These groups are why Obama is in office:
    *54% of Catholics – (which make up about 25% of our population)
    *45% of Protestants/Christians – (which make up about 53% of our population)
    *73% of other faiths – (which make up about 7% of our population)
    *75% of unaffiliated – (which make up about 12% of our population)
    http://www.pewforum.org/2008/11/05/how-the-faithful-voted/

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] February 23, 2015 at 8:40pm

    Comingunglued,
    I get what you are saying, but there’s a lot of other ways to make sure your kids aren’t treated like babies. They don’t have to be left at home alone to prove that point. And, just because an 11 year old could babysit doesn’t mean they should. I would not use an 11 year old babysitter, nor would I put my 11 year old child in a situation to be responsible for another child alone in someone else’s home. With that said, 11 years is a great age to be given more responsibilities, but they are still very young and need guidance. Supporting them, but knowing when to step back (which is different for each child) creates independent, confident and hard-working teens. Pushing them into situations before they are ready will only serve to set them up for failure. That’s been my experience.

  • [-1] February 23, 2015 at 7:30pm

    I would not leave my 11 year old home alone, either, Sarge.

  • February 23, 2015 at 6:41pm

    I guess I’d be the seventh. I’m not sure what article you are reading, Rook, but what exactly do you interpret as Ms. Swartz’s personal opinion? She cited quotes from other people, with differing points of view. That’s called reporting. You must get some help for this pathological obsession with her – it is really quite creepy.

  • [2] February 23, 2015 at 4:48pm

    You’d be surprised at the number of conservative breasts out there that nurse for extended periods of time(; However, 8 years is a really long time!

  • [7] February 23, 2015 at 12:37pm

    Chishti stated, “I have since changed my views.” But he did say that he “dislikes” people who support “an occupying force that has been condemned in several United Nations resolutions.”

    I was hopeful, but wary when I read everything preceding this quote in the article. After reading the quote, it is clear where Chishti stands and this leads me to believe the motives were self-serving, so Muslims do not get a back-lash from the Jewish targeted shootings. Of course, time will tell, won’t it?

  • February 22, 2015 at 10:30pm

    Sap,
    Clearly, you did not read or watch ding-a-ling Larry’s links before commenting, which made you miss the point.

  • [13] February 22, 2015 at 2:26pm

    Obama is getting bolder and more dangerous.

  • February 22, 2015 at 8:12am

    Nich,
    Yes, you are right. Obamacare is unbearable. Just wait until the 20 somethings realize that it is they who will have to foot the bill…

  • [1] February 22, 2015 at 8:06am

    militant,
    Why are you asking a question when you know the answer?

  • [27] February 22, 2015 at 8:04am

    Bo,
    I did say, “let ‘em burn”. I did not say, “they’re not entitled to nothing” – that was not my quote.

    They are immigrant criminals – most likely ILLEGAL immigrant criminals and have not contributed to our society in any positive way. If they want to uprise and intentionally start fires because of their dissatisfaction with the free medical care, free food, free library full of books and computers, free TV, etc., that I am paying for as a taxpayer, then yes, we should let them burn themselves up. It’s called consequences for choices – a theme the rest of non-criminal Americans have to follow. We shouldn’t be paying for them in the first place – they should have been returned to the country they came from because they chose to commit acts of crime instead contributing in a positive way to society. And, we sure the heck shouldn’t be negotiating with them.

  • [19] February 21, 2015 at 11:46pm

    Bo,
    Where did I say they should die because they are not of the same nationality? Clearly, you have comprehension issues.

  • [27] February 21, 2015 at 8:10pm

    I wouldn’t have wasted my time interviewing him. His rudeness and intolerance is all I would need to know about his character.

    Responses (1) +
  • [40] February 21, 2015 at 8:06pm

    I agree. I love how he retorted, “You should ask the president what he thinks about America” to the Associated Press.

    Responses (1) +
  • [260] February 21, 2015 at 5:29pm

    “They’re upset with medical services and refused to perform work duties.”
    They are entitled to nothing. Taxpayers shouldn’t even be paying for their imprisonment – they are flipping illegal criminals! I say let ‘em burn.

    Responses (6) +
  • [24] February 21, 2015 at 5:24pm

    Yes, God did. And these parents chose not to abide by the grace and teachings of God, but rather to abuse and abandon their children. It’s called free will. and now they must deal with the consequences of their choices. God gives us free will to choose him, or not. We can avoid a lot of hardship by knowing and following Him. He will use these parent’s poor choices to provide a better path for these children. And that is called faith.

  • [36] February 21, 2015 at 1:15pm

    I find it hilarious that Dems think their bedrock values are fairness, equality and opportunity. They conveniently leave out an intregal part of their belief; In the Dem’s mind, these values do not support the individual, but rather the collective, and they can only be determined by government.

    Responses (2) +
  • February 21, 2015 at 8:20am

    I’m not buying it. Obviously, the new sterilization protocol wasn’t followed since the seven patients ended up with CRE. This is concerning and disturbing, and the only cases we are usually aware of are the big ones that we read about. It makes me wonder how many funguses, bacteria and viruses which are less life-threatening but definitely health threatening are spread through improperly sterilized surgical scopes and equipment.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love