Liberty University

User Profile: JoeShawler

JoeShawler

Member Since: January 19, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] October 22, 2014 at 5:09pm

    marc, I think most of us understood it was satire. The problem is, the Progressives will be pushing this. In Great Britain, a homosexual couple wanted to be married in the Church, and are considering suing because the Church refused them. Just the other day there was an article about a town fining and possibly incarcerating a Christian couple if they refused to preform same sex marriages.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] October 22, 2014 at 4:59pm

    I would love to laugh at this article. It is funny, but it is also true… at least if the progressives get their way. They are experts on taking away your freedoms. It starts with something little… “who could object to that little change”? Then… “well, how about we take just a tiny bit more? That won’t hurt anyone”. And then… and then… and then… and then they have their way. They did it to the American Indians… lying and cheating them out of their lands whenever they thought they could profit from it. As I recall, one tribe was promised the land they were given “until the sun no longer shines, until the grass no longer grows” (I am paraphrasing), Then, when they discovered that there was gold on the land… send in the Calvary and force them out!!!
    Progressives do not work on a 2 year plan. No, they know the public would be up in arms if they tried that. They work in 20 and 30 year plans. Look at how they are trying to make kids today terrified of firearms. In 20 or 30 years, when these kids are grown, something will happen and they will ban firearms altogether. And the kids… now adults will remember how “evil” the firearm was when they were young and allow it to happen. Progressives…. worse than a snake in the grass… worse than LAWYERS!!!

  • [5] October 21, 2014 at 11:18pm

    Talk about the pot calling the kettle black… Typical Democrat… do as I tell you to do… not as I do. Apparently in Missouri… you are considered GUILTY until proven innocent… at least if you are a white police officer that shot a black man. I am not saying the police officer was in the right… I am only saying let the facts talk for themselves.

  • [2] October 20, 2014 at 11:16pm

    eh… what is the big deal??? Progressive Democrat strategy … vote early… vote often….. no story here… move along folks… move along…nothing to see here… move along…

  • October 20, 2014 at 9:28am

    Second time I saw you anxious to bash Rush Limbaugh. Guess your only answer to everything is slam someone else. Why don’t you grow up and start living in the real world? There are extremists on both sides of the fence and it is time you admit it. Michael Moore seems to be your hero or idol so defend him by bashing someone on who’s opinion you disagree with. What are you – 10, 12 years old?

  • October 17, 2014 at 9:09am

    I have mixed feelings about this situation. The would be felon (who should NEVER have been back on the streets) got what he deserved… sort of. Mr. Lawler did what he believed was the right thing… he stopped the attacker. However, when the scumbag gets out again… he will most likely not give his next victim the opportunity to defend him / her self.

  • [5] October 16, 2014 at 12:44am

    Forget all your jokes and attacks. This man acted like a man and even if he is a Democrat, he may actually (and apparently does) believe in the Second Amendment. We should acknowledge that even if we disagree with his party’s platform… perhaps he is still a Democrat worth voting for. I will be doing research on his voting record and his core beliefs. I am an Independent and open to folks that stand up for what they believe.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 15, 2014 at 12:46pm

    Be right back… gotta go change my shorts…

  • October 11, 2014 at 9:50pm

    They say you can’t fix stupid… you can only hope stupid eventually fixes itself…

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] October 11, 2014 at 10:36am

    Why is everyone so surprised that a Democrat takes this approach to win an election? This is S.O.P. for them.

  • [20] October 9, 2014 at 11:59pm

    ok… you do have a point.. I will give you that. BUT… even if is just a cup of water… assault is assault. Take the citizens word for it… issue a warning (the officer did not see him violate any law) and then arrest her for assault (the officer DID witness that). I believe the officer was trying to reason with the woman, pointing out that they BOTH violated the law, but that he did not want to ticket or arrest anyone… but she insisted on justice. As the officer said… riding on the sidewalk is NOT an arrestable offense… but battery IS. Write the cyclist a warning… arrest her

    Responses (2) +
  • [53] October 9, 2014 at 11:53pm

    Simple… give the young man a ticket for riding on the sidewalk as he should… the ARREST her for BATTERY…. justice served on both counts…

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] October 9, 2014 at 10:45am

    This young man will now be ridiculed by Progressives… he has actually been recognized for doing the right thing. He didn’t play the “knock out game”… he didn’t mug anyone… he didn’t even steal anything! No…. Instead he saved the life of a Senior Citizen. How DARE he!!

  • [3] October 9, 2014 at 10:29am

    Read it again Don. She was not trying to “mess” with their policies and culture. She sent in a resume’. On the resume’ she included her EDUCATION. They are the ones that pointed out that they did not agree with the stance against homosexuality that the college she attended has taken. Further, if I refused to give someone a job based on their, race, religion, sexual preference or their sex… My butt would be in court so fast my head would be spinning.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 8, 2014 at 11:13pm

    I definitely would have given the man my pistol.. but it would have been empty. I would have emptied the magazine into his torso…

  • October 6, 2014 at 5:26pm

    The NRA? Think about this. A few years ago, people could smoke where ever they wanted (I personally have never smoked in my life… not even one drag on a cigarette). Then… “Ewwww … don’t let them smoke in the same room when I am eating. Ewwww… don’t let them smoke in the same restaurant. Ewwww… don’t let them smoke in the same building… Ewww… don’t let them smoke outside in public… and so on and so on and so on. The NRA is there to see to it that this government does not do to LAW ABIDING GUN OWNERS what they did to smokers… the American Indians… Drinkers… or did you forget about Prohibition? It is NOT for the safety of others that the government wants to do these things… it is all about CONTROL. Wake up pal.

  • [1] October 6, 2014 at 5:26pm

    Good little Socialist. Drink your Kool-Aid and try and help them lead America down the path of destruction. What do you think made this country what it is… well… with your Socialist cronies in power… what it was? Preach against God… you have no morals anyway… Look at what is happening in the world today. MUSLIMS of FAITH are murdering people. How many Christian religions teach jihad? How many Christian groups have beheaded people? Are all Muslims evil? No… but according to your ilk… all Christians are evil.
    Preach against guns… God and guns do NOT go hand in hand, but one of the main reasons the Japanese did not want to invade America during World War II, too many citizens had guns and would fight them every step of the way. Again, it is the EXTREMISTS that want to murder, rob, terrorize and bully others into submission. It is getting scarier out there every day: Kids running wild – punching the elderly for kicks, robbing people at random, shooting people just for the fun of it. My wife is 5’4” and if a 6’2” person approaches her with intent to do harm… what chance does she stand? Well actually she stands a pretty good chance… once he empties the magazine into his torso.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] October 6, 2014 at 4:59pm

    The very first problem I see… the group’s name… “Freedom From Religion”. I have never seen those words in our Constitution, The Declaration of Independence or The Bill of Rights. I do recall seeing “FREEDOM OF RELIGION”, but not “from”. Then again, with the way Progressives like changing the meaning of words… maybe they changed the word “from” to the same as “of”. As a (sarcasm on) once “great” President of the United States said… (sarcasm off)… “it depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is…”

  • October 3, 2014 at 11:45am

    You just can’t fix stupid… but… stupid does eventually fix itself.

  • [1] October 3, 2014 at 11:38am

    uh-uh…. remember… they DID NOT BUILD THAT BUSINESS… (sarcasm off)

123 To page: Go