When you provide absolute proof beyond any doubt to a liberal progressive that they have lied, they simply repeat the lie and claim they are still right. We saw that with Obama, and the rest of them just follow his example lock-step.
Of course Obamacare was designed to fail at which time they would “Progress” to the soviet health care system (governmen.)
We have a real shining example of how that would work, it’s called the VA.
 October 24, 2016 at 10:23pm
I don’t think he quite qualifies as a sociopath, but he does have some real problems.
Still, the person he is running against is a vessel of death.
Voting for Trump is like jumping on a grenade to save others. It dirties our own soul, but may save many lives.
I don’t think Trump is evil, I think he is just an egotistical jerk. On the other side, I see true evil. Someone who is ok with infanticide. How many more babies will die if Clinton gets in as compared to Trump? Can I live with myself if I wake up November 9th and Clinton has won and I haven’t done everything I could to avoid that? No, it looks like I am back to voting for Trump no matter how that makes me feel. Too many lives at stake.
The grenade analogy is a good one, and I am in agreement with every word you wrote on this post. I'm not happy at all about our nominee, and if November brings us president-elect Trump, I will not be celebrating, but I will be relieved that Clinton isn't going to be in the oval office, for all the reasons you listed.
Still playing fast and loose with the truth, I see.
Hilary supports the practice of abortion in some circumstances.
She has never said or shown that she is in favour of infanticide, which is murder of an infant. A fetus is in no way, an infant, nor a baby...
Such hyperbole is in extremely bad form.
You are stretching words to match your beliefs. Abortion is not infanticide. Abortion is not murder either. Anti abortion folks should not try to stretch the meaning of words to suit their beliefs as it makes them look like fools or liars.Vessel of death is also an absurd use of the word vessel. Your thinking is by its very nature as precise as your vocabulary.A blue bird is not an animated flying display of color. It is simply a blue bird.
 October 24, 2016 at 5:49pm
This election is already hurting my finances! No more sales at gun stores because everything if flying off the shelves without the aid of sales. A couple of months back, my inbox was always loaded with great deals. Now with the gun-grabber in the lead, everything is back to retail prices.
LOL. As a skinny useless Marxist says repeatedly, "elections have consequences" and there will be many bad consequences should Hillary "Mao" Clinton win.
October 21, 2016 at 2:07pm
At least the squirrels will be well fed. (Except her)
 October 21, 2016 at 1:07pm
How much did Jeb spend on the Primary?
I think in this one case, the numbers are over-rated. Elections have pivoted from TV to online content, so the $$$ are not as critical, as much as who and how you are reaching out.
I disagree in light of the Project Veritas info that has surfaced this month. FUnd raising is ground zero for the activists who must be paid! It takes money to pay the vagrants to show up at Trump rallies and start fights you know!!!!
 October 18, 2016 at 5:16pm
“Twenty-three percent of millennials would prefer a global chatostrophic event over Clinton or Trump”
But, they’re all the same thing! (?)
 October 17, 2016 at 11:06pm
Article is a little harsh on him. Yea, it makes sense once you think of the word for a second, but it wouldn’t be a word in the front of the vocabulary of a Libertarian as the core belief is that each state should have it’s own laws, and the fed should just be there for common defense and to settle disputes between the states. Although I like the idea myself, it’s very “Federal” in concept, and the only time I like the word Federal is when I’m buying ammo.
Look at whom they have been nominating for offices around the country. Drug addicts, nose pickers, conspiracy theorists & illiterate fools.
Well, reciprocity has been a major component for the gun debate for years. A component in discussions of sales and concealed carry for 20 years now. This gaff is inexcusable.
Not so sure the feds ought to be involved in reciprocity....simple state laws should do the trick.
States rights only supercede federal rights where said rights are not dictated by the constitution. Fortunately, “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” is federal and no branch of any government, federal or state, has the right to violate that. Any laws infringing on our right to keep and bear arms at either the state or federal level are unconstitutional and I believe we all know how the founders fealt about unconstitutional laws, especially Thomas Jefferson.
The feds should be involved in reciprocity to the extent that they are involved in protecting other rights of citizens. A state should not have the legal authority to restrict protected rights of American citizens. Reciprocity is essentially guaranteed by the second amendment. The problem is the lawyers, especially when they pretend to be representatives.
What WAS I thinking...I hate being dead wrong.
The federalist papers from which so called modern Libertarianism is culled were appropriate and effective during the time of Jefferson, Jay, Madison, Hamilton.
But this is a time of crony MSM where political bias and political correctness are used as weapons to subjugate engaged exceptionalism.
As long as Beck omits Wikileaks stories, or selectively chooses which ones to post in TheBlaze, the bond of public trust remains broken.
TheBlaze is not a taxpayer funded government agency. It is, or was, a capitalist endeavour designed to PROFIT and advance conservative principle.
Today’s Libertarianism is a void.
No Hamiltons, Madison’s or Jays.
Just Johnsons, Welds, Becks and Kristols that keep banging their collective heads on a door that will never open.
Reciprocity is generally used these days in gun rights discussions but the meaning and usage go much further. States have reciprocal agreements with each other all the time, and sometimes they are rescinded because certain requirements are not met. As stated, the 2A is in fact a FEDERAL statute codified in the Constitution. This is why marriage shouldn't be forced between the states as it recently has been because it's a 10thA right not a federal.
As to Wikileaks, they are far from on our side. The only reason Assange is after her is she went after him. The two are in near total congruence as to their political ideology so any effort to help Trump is only out of personal animosity. Assange is playing us and we're eating it hook line and sinker.
As to LibTs being crazy. Johnson is an incompetent nose picker that dose more dope than Willie Nelson, then you have Jesse Ventura, enough said there, then this Weld freak that openly hates guns & has shown himself to be just as ignorant as his running mate on every issue.
The real gaffe is that he said they don't have concealed carry. Yes, he does in his state. That's just stupid.
Driving is a privilege yet my license is honored in every state, however, bearing arms is a right guaranteed by the constitution and if they are going to infringe upon it with the use of a silly permit it also should be honored like my license to drive. Driving being a privilege and having a gun on my person and absolute right.
 October 16, 2016 at 9:31pm
“Sanger later started the American Birth Control”
ABC ? Makes sense
 October 16, 2016 at 7:14pm
Usually the polls are correct, but this is not a usual election. In the past, the roads were blanketed with political signs. Very few this year, and most of them are for local races. I would not be surprised if the polls were right, but I would also not be surprised if they were wildly wrong. I’ve seen the crowds at Trump rallies, and the small controlled photo-ops at Clinton rallies. It sure looks like an enthusiasm gap, but then again, Bernie had the huge crowds, yet somehow Hillary won. I guess in the end, the progressive zombies come out and vote. (That would be the correct term for the dead leaving their graves for the night, right?)
Yea, John, I have noticed the same thing in my area also. The few signs that are up are just for local and a few state races and no presidential race signs. There is a strange undercurrent this election cycle... fear and loathing for the whole thing and yet an intense scrutiny. Reminds me of people on a freeway slowing down to get a good look at the horrible accident where you just know someone died.
I've seen a few "Hilary for Prison" signs.
A Maryland man's Trump sign was burned, igniting the surrounding trees.
I've seen 2 videos of people attempting to steal Trump signs.
I just saw a photo of a firebombed GOP headquarters.
Seems if you put out a Trump sign, some deranged democrat is going to steal it, burn it or harm you.
A month before a Presidential election and here in NJ I have seen one house with a Clinton/Kaine lawn sign, a few dozen Trump/Pence signs, one "Stronger Together" bumper sticker and a few Trump/Pence/MAGA bumper stickers. On top of that there very few local election lawn signs. There appears to be a huge burn out for all politics. Even the congress critters are laying low.
 October 13, 2016 at 8:00pm
“Now if they’d only do Hillary as Miss Piggy…..”
Oh! I though that’s who she was playing.
Good comic relief !
 October 13, 2016 at 2:59pm
8 We must help people in poverty to overcome it. Government must provide a basic safety net for Americans unable to support themselves. Its programs should help people to overcome poverty, rather than simply survive it.
—– There is nothing in the constitution that prevents us from setting up a social safety net.
10 National defense is a primary federal government responsibility. Our national security requires unmatched military and economic strength, and a commitment to the cause of liberty.
—- How is this “unconstitutional”?
11 All Americans should have access to affordable, quality health care. The best way to improve Americans’ health care is to encourage competition and innovation. Our health care system must be responsive to patients, not simply insurers and bureaucrats.
— Competition is the core of commerce, No talk of universal health care here.
JOHN, " There is nothing in the constitution that prevents us from setting up a social safety net."
Your view is 180 degrees out of wack. There is nothing in the USC that gives the federal government the authority to set up a "social safety net". If it is not specifically in the USC it is not authorized.
National defense is completely different than "national security". So-called "national security" is just code for meddling in the affairs of other nations with full spectrum dominance.
Where in the USC is the federal government given authority to involve itself into seeing to it that every American has access to health care?
Clear non-tapping dance vitriolic-free emotion arguments simple policies. Rs and Ds could not stand for this.
 October 13, 2016 at 2:52pm
Watched the interview, then stuck around and watched the interview with his running mate on “Pat & Stu.” Finally, a candidate that I could vote for without selling my soul. Would take an “Act of God” for them to win, but we could be seeing the birth of the party that will replace the ex-conservative republican party. I went to the McMullin website and the policy list really hit home! About time! I do fear it is a little too late this election, but enough votes could set the stage for 2020. (If we live that long.)
Why not Darrell Castle? http://www.constitutionparty.com/
TURK, exactly. The Constitution Party's platform is about 98% of what Christian Constitutional Conservatives claim they stand for and yet the CCC do not support it.
Bzzzz. You sold your soul. You're working for Hillary.
Incredibly naive. Once Hillary wins - thanks to McMullin - you really think the Repubs will have a slight chance for 20 or more years?
And what do we actually know about the unvetted, untried, unmarried, unproven McMullin who has never run for or held office.
 October 13, 2016 at 12:44pm
Caught the interview on Beck with Evan McMullin this morning (and just now with his running mate.) Yea, I know, it would take an act of God to get them elected, but if we are really interested in restoring Liberty, and returning to the Constitution, then this is the way yo go. It’s time for a third party since the Republican party has gone Progressive. Maybe a bit of a showing now will wake people up. If not, well than at least I feel I truly voted for my beliefs.
 October 12, 2016 at 10:23pm
I was wondering how low this election campaign season could get. Guess I underestimated them all!!
Good lord, can you imagine what the rest of the world will think of us by November 8th?
This is beyond a banana republic slime flinging contest. The hits just keep on coming.
You have to ask yourself, why would Hillary, the democrats, the media and the RINO republicans resort to this? I think the answer is because they have committed many crimes they know that an outsider like Trump would prosecute them all. They are willing to do just about anything to win.
IF you look carefully at the polls, their polling samples include about 2X the amount of democrats as would normally vote in an election with almost no independents included. IT’s the only way they can get Hillary to be in the lead. Polls become self-fufilling prophecies. People want to vote for the winner. IF they don’t believe Trump has a chance they will vote third party or not vote at all. And most of the undecideds always swing for who is ahead in the final polls. Trump is dominating but the tactics they are using to demoralize Trump voters can be very effective if people don’t know it’s all faked by the Clinton media and passed along by well meaning republicans that aren’t as excited about Trump.
They are willing to sacrifice their reputations and credibility to win this election because they will cover it up afterward.
This is an election we are proud to have our children watch.
@John 1776 ---- You have got to be joking! Have you taken a look at the rest of the world lately? Have you looked at France, have you looked at Great Britain and Germany? How 'bout Sweden or the Netherlands... or name any country in the Middle East. What the hell is wrong with your brain. ---- It's politically correct, whining little hand wringers like you, sitting around self-flagellating and worrying about what everybody else thinks that got us to this damn place to begin with, you fool. People like you make my hair hurt!
@1776... When Trump is elected on Nov. 8, they will respect and revere the USA again.
Who cares about the rest of the world right now? The globalist are coming for the country that you love, and to enslave it and it's citizens..........
I'm thinkin' our ears have yet to pop, nowhere near the bottom!
 October 10, 2016 at 8:10pm
I am voting for Trump, even though I don’t like him. It has NOTHING to do with what either candidate has said in the debates or what their campaigns are about. Why?
Because Obama and Clinton are hell-bent on starting a war with Syria for “humanitarian reasons”, just like they did with Libya. The difference is, Russia has one of their biggest naval bases in Syria and were a long term ally. Attacking Syria would be the same as Russia attacking England, our long term ally. It would start WWIII. We have NO business attacking countries that are not a threat. ISIS, yea, attack them, but not Syria. For this reason alone, I equate Hillary with the “end of the world.” Trump has no desire to attack Syria.
@John 1776 - Right, he just wants to kill their wives and children.
 October 10, 2016 at 2:26pm
I find that poll a little whacked. I’m not a big Trump fan, but he hit this one out of the park. She was expected to be on the offense but ended up on defense the whole 90 minutes. Trump had the appearance of a predator circling the downed prey (Clinton) and waiting to pick the last meat off the bones.
It was that dramatic. So… Who were the people responding to this poll, and what debate did they watch?
Obviously they only asked registered democrats and no one in flyover country. Out here, we are more worried about spending and turning this country around to make it great again. Big surprise, the little liberals are more concerned with what trump said ten years ago instead of Hilary's bullying of bills sexual assault victims and his trips to fantasy island with underage girls!
These polls are rigged by Democrat media. I don't think anyone pays much attention to them. The actual viewer polls are all heavily in favor of Trump.
You don't realize that debating is not all about making unfounded accusations and whining throughout, or wandering around the stage when the other person is talking...the Donald looked like his normal buffoonish self, and people don't want that in a President...
 October 9, 2016 at 11:25pm
Why just blame Bush, when you can push your blame all the way back 150 years to the first Republican ever.
 October 9, 2016 at 11:24pm
Not a big supporter of Trumps, but he mopped the floor with her tonight.
And this is why people like Trump:
He told the truth
I have never heard a political type say that before. They always try to pretend they are “one” of the same mind with their VP. It was brutally honest.
Bush and Cheney did not always agree.
It's a good thing to have different perspectives.
True. For the most part, at this point in time, I agree with Trump.
But we don't know what the future looks like, and there is no perfect answer to the mess.
Thanks Odumbio & Hillary for smuggling arms and starting ISIS...and WW3.
Glad Trump did better on this one. Git-T-Done
Well you stuck it to her Trump, I am proud of that.
And said that she should be in jail….most of America seems to be on the same page.
It’s worth something, you have accomplished what we all want say to that witch….you called her out.
As flawed as you are, consider that an accomplishment and and a compliment.
Seems you are starting to learn how to Man Up, keep it up, you have grandchildren watching.