User Profile: john vincent

john vincent

Member Since: June 09, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [2] November 26, 2014 at 1:24pm

    -@blind

    No, he anti-fraud

  • [3] November 26, 2014 at 1:13pm

    Where is the yawn button?

    Strange thirdeyeblind, is it, that the simple dove associates with a mate, and has done so for oh lets see, over 5k years and hasn’t evolved to live his own life APART, seeking a better way, ya know, the progressive way without a mate.

    Appears he didn’t get the memo to evolve.

  • [5] November 26, 2014 at 1:03pm

    And what sane person could deny there is a devil after seeing such maligning of a good man.

    They act as if Kirk’s beliefs are insane, meanwhile, what do the godless atheists offer that is anywhere close?

    http://thenakedtruth2.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/do-you-have-a-primitive-belief/

    Responses (1) +
  • November 16, 2014 at 4:42pm

    ;)

    Hi

    MM

    I’m with ya

  • [16] November 16, 2014 at 9:28am

    -by way of the cross
    u would think that a name like viadolorasa would loosen the rope that u tie on others.

    Ever heard of g.r.a.c.e ?? Ever heard of freedom and liberty in Christ?

  • [144] November 16, 2014 at 8:32am

    Kirk will be maligned personally,

    His film will be mocked

    His spirituality will be doubted

    Oh yea, it will done right here, today, at this site. Ye who find fault and complain: what are you doing with what God has given you? Leave him alone. Now go find your own cause, so others can criticize you for doing what God called you to do.

    Thumbs up Kirk.

    Responses (5) +
  • [6] November 3, 2014 at 2:20pm

    Lib-

    If you were paying for your comment, I would have to give you a refund in good conscience; as my reference was simply about common sense.

    Sure there are aberrations in nature as you point out, like the albino deer who is a pariah and dies off for its strangeness, as he brings danger to the herd, but please do not try to say that homosexual activity is natural, as you will lose this argument 100% of the time.

    And natures God? Yea, since he made male and female. I’m going with his opinion that such acts are devious.

    The ruling on the field stands-

  • [6] November 3, 2014 at 1:53pm

    Seems kind of strange to question right from wrong in a place that is supposed to question right from wrong.

    The essence of law is to be able to adjudicate using a standard; God forbid people would be dogmatic and say there is a difference between night and day, male and female, cold and hot, winter and summer, and in this instance:

    There is a palpable difference between a man seeking a woman, and a man seeking a man. Hmmmm, let’s see, which one seems odd? Hmmm, tough choice. Aw heck, I’ll stick my neck out and say that two men entering into a relationship together, is ah, well, er, ah, ah, ahem, ah, Strange.

    There I said it. I’m going with the law of nature, and nature’s God as my witness, and while I’m here, I’ll call upon common sense also. Some law school!

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] November 3, 2014 at 11:40am

    Luther was correct about justification by faith, but was wrong on other things. He took a stand, which resulted in bringing the scriptures to the light of day. Who could argue with this?

    As to Mary, there have always been opposing views. Question is: What does
    God’s word say, and is His word enough? Five essays may shed light.

    http://thenakedtruth2.wordpress.com/2014/02/16/mary-worthy-of-worship/

  • [34] November 2, 2014 at 9:14am

    A razor sharp knife and a ton of practice and skill-

    Well done

  • [29] October 28, 2014 at 11:29am

    ‘Take off ur NRA hat,’

    said the lady wearing the O-bam tee shirt

    ‘You are making a political statement with that hat.’ Yea, lady, its called ‘voting.’

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] October 28, 2014 at 9:35am

    Don’t know what to make of this, but I do like this:

    —–Holding faith, and a good conscience; which some having put away concerning faith have made SHIPWRECK—-

    Paul
    to Timothy
    —–

  • [10] October 24, 2014 at 11:40am

    ‘Big debate whether to marry same sex couples?’

    Well, they who advocate such a thing are at an extreme disadvantage, for there is no argument if you only apply common sense.

    Any christian or rabbi who has mettle, would say ‘sorry, no can do, take your business elsewhere.’ And it is no longer a matter of tolerance, but simply, what is right.

  • [9] October 23, 2014 at 10:57am

    This is really a no brainer.

    Go find a magician to perform the impossible union of two of the same sex. There is no way on earth that a person of faith can pronounce ‘husband/ and husband’ or ‘wife/ and wife’ with a straight face and clear conscience.

    Then again, Houdini probably could not perform that impossible trick either.

    Responses (1) +
  • [11] October 23, 2014 at 8:40am

    Ok I’m apologizing up front:

    Waking up is kind of a miracle.

    Many people spend their entire lives asleep; need proof? They voted for O______

  • [1] October 22, 2014 at 7:51pm

    sorry harry-

    I just don’t see the humor at all, in any lingo-
    as a matter of fact…………….

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] October 22, 2014 at 7:41pm

    GBTV-

    It’s not really off topic. Things like that NEVER happen on the MSM.

    It’s a media miracle……..
    (end sarcasm)

  • October 22, 2014 at 3:37pm

    Keres-

    I gave u thumbs up because what’s fair is fair- Some do find it interesting.
    ;)

    I wish u all the best, and we will talk again. You seem quite thoughtful, and it’s nice to meetcha

  • October 22, 2014 at 2:24pm

    jj-
    .
    You said ‘ ——————–you claim that people cannot be emotionally moved without a belief in your god. Shame on you.———————-’

    That was your interpretation. I never said that. Of course ANYBODY can be so moved………. I was speaking simply of the designer.

    It is careless reading like this that will not allow a person to see clearly about other things.

    As to MY alleged veiled threat. First, it is not MY threat u should be concerned with. I am nobody. Second, if there is any valididity to thid God I speak of, then perhaps you would agree that in spite of the indifference shown toward Him, he is quite patient.

    Would not then this quality appeal to your sense of fairness?

  • October 22, 2014 at 1:57pm

    I’m sure u are. But have u examined the seemingly contradictions? Only when every argument has been met with solid answers will you see imprints of a divine hand through the ages.

    It is the most fascinating of studies, really, and I say this with the greatest respect.

123 To page: Go