TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying JohnnyMidknight's 10 most recent comments.

• Angry Clinton Explodes at Questioning on Libya Protest: ‘We Have Four Dead Americans…What Difference at This Point Does It Make?’

  January 23, 2013 at 5:03pm

  In reply to gardenerme.

  Hey CBROWN,

  “We have to figure how to stop this from happening again regardless of the reason why terrorist want to harm us.”

  The terrorist hate America. They hate our support for Israel, hate the fact we are not Muslim, and hate the “cesspool” of sin and debauchery. Not to mention they blame us for arming people like Saddam Hussein in the struggle vs the Middle East and Communist Russia.

  These are not moderates. Nor do the moderates need to be calmed down through an ad campaign. True moderates would have been offended at the film and offended at the violence. You are acting as if everyone in the Middle East is dumb. That is an elitist attitude that the progressive portray.

  You think majority of the Middle East doesn’t understand right and wrong? You really think that the moderates were calling for blood? That would be an extremist reaction, not a moderate one. Check your talking points before posting please.

  The extremists hate America for a mixture of reasons. And if 50 years of terrorism is not long enough to figure out why they hate us and how to stop it, what would figuring out this one attack all of a sudden be the big eye opener?

  We know the reasons, we fundamentally do not agree. We, as a nation, talk about tolerance. What does Al Jazeera and the News in the Middle East say? What does the governments say (especially the Muslim Brotherhood)? What do the Terrorists say?

  Death to America… that’s what.

• Angry Clinton Explodes at Questioning on Libya Protest: ‘We Have Four Dead Americans…What Difference at This Point Does It Make?’

  January 23, 2013 at 1:03pm

  In reply to gardenerme.

  Another difference it makes is that the administration was looking to actively go after the creator of the film. They want to impose on the 1st amendment rights of a citizen because he made something offensive. And Hillary is the one who said they would go after them.

  While you are at it go after Bill Maher, Hillary. He is extremely offensive. Does it take four dead citizens for freedom of speech to be a crime? The Dem’s party platform of gay marriage, abortion, and defamation of religions is equally responsible for the hatred by many religious zealots of the Muslim faith that become extremists and look to America as a bastion of sin and as the devil.

  So is Sandra Fluke responsible for the protests as well? Is Obama’s stance on gay marriage?

  What is more important you silly progressives? You claim you stand for freedom, but do not take responsibility on the fact that this is why we are hated by the Muslim extremists. Then you have the audacity to pander to them with a witch hunt that was manufactured. That is the difference that it makes.

  You are setting up the precedence to arrest people for invoking their first amendment rights for invoking violence to which they did not suggest or asked for. How long before they link Glenn Beck, Rush, or any outspoken conservative.

• Angry Clinton Explodes at Questioning on Libya Protest: ‘We Have Four Dead Americans…What Difference at This Point Does It Make?’

  January 23, 2013 at 12:44pm

  In reply to gardenerme.

  The scariest thing is that Hillary expects us to believe that they did not want to mess with the information the FBI and other sources where acquiring at the time as to not jeopardize there methods.

  However, the administration released information that was not true. They released it as a known fact, however, she makes it sound as if at the time it was unknown. That point makes a difference, Sec Clinton. An administration that jumps to conclusions and releases it as fact on national News is a serious issue.

• Huh? Jill Kelley’s Twin Sister Hires Gloria Allred

  November 20, 2012 at 6:15pm

  In reply to .

  I got it! She is going to allege that Herman Cain propositioned her for sex too!

• Violence In Occupy’s ‘Romneyville’ Accounts for Tuesday’s Only Arrest

  August 29, 2012 at 10:22am

  In reply to Lordcsmith.

  Your words are so true. Life is a balance of all things. Too much on one or another will lead to ruin. What is required of each individual is responsibility for ones own actions. However, many blind and protective parents are quick to say, “Not my child. They would never do that.”

  How many children are not learning discipline and respect of others. Taking ownership of ones choice and the outcomes there of (good or bad). Instead we blame the bank for the loan we did not read or sign. We blame the police officer for the ticket we got when we were speeding. We blame the government and society when we are unwilling to do the labor ourselves.

  Mind you, this is not everyone in America. However more and more are passing the buck. Heck even the President. We need leaders who stand strong and assume the responsibility and demand it from the people they govern. Or else Progressivism will win.

• Can You Spot What’s Wrong With This Picture of Obama?

  August 22, 2012 at 3:53pm

  In reply to NewfDawg.

  And here I thought this was a dyslexic version of Y-M-C-A. But then again, this kids probably went to Public School where they all get gold stars and awards for attending.

• Move Over Big Bang, Now Some Scientists Suggest a ‘Big Chill’ Created Universe

  August 21, 2012 at 6:31pm

  In reply to teddrunk.

  @ MAProg

  ummm… Your points are well noted, but you are under the delusion that G_d is a person. It would be a poor modifier, because physicality alone creates flaws in the theory of what is G_d. It is a verb, not a noun. It is the force of creation that must be present for things to exist. It is all things, yet not one single thing. Because if it was absolutely one thing, it would not be another.

  Not to mention that when you say “‘someone’ or some naturalistic process”, you are assuming that they are entirely different things. However, G_d would be natural if it was the force (like gravity) that allows matter to condense, attract and expand (much like matter de-accelerating for the speed of light). Does light not exist? Or, is it a barrier between existence. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

  Nor does one theory ultimately cancel another when it comes to what we comprehend as G_d. Sheer words would only create a poor descriptive statement for something that can only perceived in concept. It exists where math succeeds and fails. Please be open to possibility, otherwise you limit yourself and your potential.

  The only difference I see between those you poke at and you, is a simple denial of you to accept a possibility of something you can not prove. Then again, unicorns do not exist (at least that we know of on this Earth and what we have explored – there may be parallel universes according to science in which they do).

• Move Over Big Bang, Now Some Scientists Suggest a ‘Big Chill’ Created Universe

  August 21, 2012 at 6:28pm

  In reply to wouldubelieveit.

  @ MAProg

  Your points are well noted, but you are under the delusion that G_d is a person. It would be a poor modifier, because physicality alone creates flaws in the theory of what is G_d. It is a verb, not a noun. It is the force of creation that must be present for things to exist. It is all things, yet not one single thing. Because if it was absolutely one thing, it would not be another.

  Not to mention that when you say “‘someone’ or some naturalistic process”, you are assuming that they are entirely different things. However, G_d would be natural if it was the force (like gravity) that allows matter to condense, attract and expand (much like matter de-accelerating for the speed of light). Does light not exist? Or, is it a barrier between existence. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.

  Nor does one theory ultimately cancel another when it comes to what we comprehend as G_d. Sheer words would only create a poor descriptive statement for something that can only perceived in concept. It exists where math succeeds and fails. Please be open to possibility, otherwise you limit yourself and your potential.

  The only difference I see between those you poke at and you, is a simple denial of you to accept a possibility of something you can not prove. Then again, unicorns do not exist (at least that we know of on this Earth and what we have explored – there may be parallel universes according to science in which they do).

• ‘A Difficult But Necessary Letter’: Shocking Alleged Letter From a Father Disowning His Gay Son Goes Viral

  August 10, 2012 at 12:16pm

  In reply to Anton Phibes.

  @ HappyStretchedThin

  You really need to read Ayn Rand. ALL HUMANS are driven by SELFISHNESS. Even the religious. You give because it feels good. You do what is right to go to Heaven. It is the pure motivation of humans to be selfish.

  It is the basis of capitalism. It works in the confines of HUMAN MECHANICS. LMAO

  Rarely, if ever, do people give simply give because it is in their heart. It is also a gift to allow other the freedom to choose beyond that which you would accept yourself.

  The real issue is, you are too lazy to promote your values to your kids. You are afraid of the availability of desires that may lead them astray. So you would like to banned it. That my friend is OPPRESSION. So long as a person is not due ill to another by removing right to life, liberty or property they should be in the confound of legality in a SECULAR society. Your are only justifying rights to determine what is moral based on your faith, which many do not share. As I stated, if you can justify that, then it justifies another doing the same to you.

  I stand for NEITHER of you doing that to each other. I pray you see the truth and remove the wool from your eyes.

  It is each persons responsibility to face temptation. Otherwise, let us make gambling, all drug usage and drinking illegal. Let us not stop there either. Let’s outlaw smoking, fatty foods, salt, and anything that could be consumed in abundance.

• ‘A Difficult But Necessary Letter’: Shocking Alleged Letter From a Father Disowning His Gay Son Goes Viral

  August 10, 2012 at 12:07pm

  In reply to Anton Phibes.

  @ HappyStretchedThin

  You are such a Homophobic Bigot!

  Like most bigots you do not accept it either.

  LMAO

  You said NO CONSERVATIVE wants to make a law against sexual acts… I prove you wrong. Then you go on a rant about RAPE? You sure jumped the shark you degenerate progressive hack!

  You set up strawmen percisely against what I WROTE and attack me on that premise. I sorry you have a limited attention span and pass the blame on to me as changing the words. I have not once changed the position of my stance. Nor is it appropriate of you to fill my words with falsehoods.

  I agreed sex with children does damage and should be illegal. I also made it clear that it should be CONSENTING adults. That would directly EXCLUDE rape from a LEGAL act.

  You are not being honest with me or the readers of these posts. You are attacking to defend your stance that you are right even at the point of LYING and misdirecting. You obviously have done limited research and only accept what fits your mind frame. That is the definition of IGNORANT.

  Also, you are homophobic. You directly point to gays and removal of sexual taboos as the downgrade of society. You also back it up with theories based on opinion not facts. I support information with verifiable DATA. Read Kurtz report and it says just that. Then you use it to defend the family!