User Profile: Joisey

Member Since: September 16, 2010


123 To page: Go
  • April 1, 2013 at 9:46am

    So, Obama goes to another racist church that hates whites and conservatives, and he gets a total pass by the media. Incidentally, I’m catholic and my priest saw fit to put a throw away line in his homily during the Easter Vigil mass that he was upset that Congress has not re-enacted the assault weapons ban. So, this guy isn’t the only one talking politics from the pulpit.

  • April 1, 2013 at 9:42am

    I wasn’t going to see this movie, but now I think I will.

  • April 1, 2013 at 9:15am

    Another act of corporate cowardice. Perhaps also an act of cowardice by the Dutch government, because originally LEGO rejected the claim. They only ever seem to have courage when it involves insulting Christians.

  • March 29, 2013 at 12:59pm

    Most Judges these days follow their own personal agendas and are not honest brokers about the Constitution, let alone about God. I hope this guy knows that the hardest task for him will be to find an honest Judge, and not one who will want to throw a victory to the Darwinists because it is the PC thing to do.

    Responses (3) +
  • March 22, 2013 at 1:43pm

    And if these local police forces asked DHS for some of their ammo, I wonder what the answer would be? Is the DHS Ammo Blockade intended for local police too?

    Responses (1) +
  • March 21, 2013 at 7:40pm

    There is a creepy parallel in what this professor asked this student to do and what the villians ask the main character to do as part of their indoctrination in C.S. Lewis’ book, That Hideous Strength. In Lewis’ book, the protaganist is also expected to stomp on the face of Jesus to become a “full equal” in the Bad Guy club (my words, not Lewis’)

  • March 20, 2013 at 2:00pm

    Sure, it’s a “mitzvah”…..IF you can stand the stench of evil that surrounds the guy! And I’m not talking about the cloud of flies that follow him around, either.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 19, 2013 at 1:39pm

    There are no coincidents with this Regime.

    Responses (1) +
  • March 19, 2013 at 10:08am

    Federal Judges also swear to uphold the Constitution. The intellectual dishonesty of the Judiciary we have today was not anticipated by the Founders, except in vague fears of “factionalism”. The Judiciary was designed to be the fail safe protection from Executive and Legislative abuses, and it has utterly failed.

  • [1] March 19, 2013 at 10:04am

    I believe many people are now reticent to admit they own guns, and view with suspicion anyone who asks about it. The fear of gun confiscation has never been greater. Once I hear “Chicago” and “University”, I’m not telling the guy on the other end of the phone anything.

    Responses (2) +
  • March 11, 2013 at 12:04pm

    Obviously, Lorne Michaels got a call from the White House. Equally obvious, King Baracka didn’t like his buddy Hugo getting dissed, so he ordered his toadies in at NBC to bury their own opinions. It’s good to be the King, eh?

  • March 8, 2013 at 4:49pm

    You can be sure that when the tax actually goes into effect, it will be a lot higher than they are admitting to now (just like with Zerocare). They always start out promising a teensy, tiny tax, and it always grows bigger every year after it is enacted.

  • March 8, 2013 at 3:24pm

    One issue that everyone else seems to have missed is the incredibly burdensome and intrusive infrastructure the government would have to create to enforce this tax. Anyone using email would have to let a taxing authority monitor their communications. Even if they don’t look at content (which you know would be abused) they would still be tracking where you are, the size of the file you are sending, who you are sending to, and who you are receiving from. And from here, it would be a small matter for the government to start taxing your downloads. Then to pay the tax, everyone would have to have online accounts that the government would have access to make automatic withdrawals from, like an EZ Pass account. Once the tax is in place, government can ratchet it higher and higher to discourage the people from freely communicating with each other.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 7, 2013 at 12:04pm

    I wish our American ammo manufacturers, who don’t need the government’s money anyway, would take a stand and refuse to put in a bid on any more DHS orders.

    Responses (4) +
  • January 30, 2013 at 11:56am

    Does this mean the Statute of Limitations has finally run on blaming George W. Bush for everything that goes wrong?

    Responses (1) +
  • January 25, 2013 at 3:11pm

    By the time Comrade Obama is done with his purge of the military generals, the only ones left will be his toadies who will have no qualms about following orders to confiscate guns and shoot citizens.

  • January 9, 2013 at 4:55pm

    Why should there be? They are all steroid cheaters.

    Responses (1) +
  • January 8, 2013 at 12:30pm

    How come no news stories about how this virulently negative gun stance by Democrats in Iowa will hurt their future electoral chances?

    Responses (1) +
  • January 6, 2013 at 10:55am

    How about we just keep using “Islamo-Fascist” instead?

  • January 4, 2013 at 2:23pm

    The back alley “gun shows” where the criminals buy their guns will proceed without interruption, as they ignore all these laws and decrees anyway. No background checks, no waiting periods, no limits.

    Responses (16) +
123 To page: Go