User Profile: Joy M

Member Since: January 15, 2011

CommentsDisplaying Joy M's 10 most recent comments.

  • Hi All. I’ve read many of your comments. Some say stay away from Anon as they are anarchists, others say maybe they have the right idea to expose corruption at the highest level. Most of us are powerless if the government wants to harass us. Most of us can’t afford to defend our selves in a corrupt court system where the only real rule is to buy a good enough lawyer who knows how to play the game to win. But if the government can’t convict you, they can sure harass you enough to put you in the poor house.

    I don’t know anything at all about Anonymous, but I read the full script of their latest demands of the Judicial Branch. They claim they want to get rid of the corruption in the Judicial system or they will expose those who are wheeling and dealing in the background. They acknowledge there are those in the system who are honorable, however there may be collateral damage if they send out the encryption key to the “secret” files. Perhaps they are lunatics, playing out their video fantasy in the real world. I don’t know. But if you read the full text below, maybe they’re onto something:

    http://www.zdnet.com/anonymous-hacks-us-sentencing-commission-distributes-files-7000010369/

  • Lucky Texas who actually has a right to secede:

    “Notice the secession petitions flooding the White House lately from 20 states, on 13 November 1835 Texans
    officially declared their independence from Mexico.
    In the treaty that joined Texas to the United States, Texas reserved the right to secede.

    And on 13 November 1860 South Carolina’s legislature called a special convention to discuss secession.
    On 20 December 1860 after deliberating three days, the Convention adopted the Secession Ordinance by a vote of 169 to zero.

    I reckon nowadays, post-election so to speak, secession doesn’t look as crazy as y’all thought, does it?”

    Argentum et aurum comparanda sunt —
    Silver and gold must be bought.

    — Franklin Sanders, The Moneychanger

  • Thank You, Chamber. I was a bit peeved at being called stupid (maybe it’s one of my fears ;-), but later my thoughts went where yours did. The government already knows everything about me. So maybe we should stand up and take a stand. Isn’t that what Glen has been advocating? Anyway, thanks for validating my own thoughts on this issue.

  • A few months (weeks?—I’m having a hard time keeping the time lines because there is so much to follow) there was a joint Russia/US training exercise for Homeland Security at the Denver airport. It involved several thousand troops. Not much was made of it in the media.

  • And yet, the constitution protects their right to worship and believe how their faith dictates. Oh, by the way, it also supports your right to believe what you want. Ain’t this a wonderful country! Why are you so angry that you want to control them? They didn’t invite you to their meetings.

  • “Where two or more are gathered together”… constitutes a church. Not the location or the building. It doesn’t matter how many are in attendance at his house. He’s stated he built the game room, 2000 sq ft, with all applicable permits. If he wanted to have a game night every week in his game room, he could. There would be no limit to the number of people. He stated also elsewhere that the cars were all parked on his property (over 4 acres), there was never a complaint about noise or traffic congestion, and that it was only open to family and friends. And as for obeying all government laws, surely there’s no one reading this post that believes that ALL laws are moral or that even ALL regulation carries the weight of law. Besides that, the apostles, when told to quit preaching, they stated that they must obey God rather than men. This is simple religious discrimination brought on by a neighbor who didn’t want a “church” in her neighborhood.

  • You know, this subject is scary. I realize that piranhas are banned in California for very good reasons, but this isn’t about truly dangerous breeds of pigs. It appears more to be about control (again!). Recently there’s new regulation about anyone under 16 working on the family farms. But you all already know about what the government (actually, the bureaucrats) are trying to do to America.

    What I’d really like to comment on is the actual reporting in this article, the journalistic expertise of Liz Klimas. I’ve had communication with Michigan’s Governor’s Office on this subject. I’ve read their damage control talking points. I’ve spoken with the Governor’s office where they have a person dedicated to refuting the misinformation going on in the blogs. And although it’s very frustrating that both sides are not telling the whole story, I just want to say that the journalist who wrote this article did an EXCELLENT job of reporting. Everything she says is accurate as far as my own research indicates. WELL DONE!

  • Gonzo–it would like Nashville, TN when they were flooded. There was very little national coverage, but all the folks there just pitched in a cleaned stuff up and didn’t belly ache because the feds didn’t help or the news folks didn’t praise them.

  • Oh yes. Let the go hungry while we get our papers in order! When man’s rules interfere with God’s commands, who should we obey?