Your comments tends to support evolution more than creation: Earth wasn’t placed in the perfect position to support the life on it, rather the life on it evolved as it did because Earth is exactly as it is. You’re putting effect before cause.
 January 21, 2016 at 8:17am
On the contrary, scientists try to find explanations as to how and why things exist, while Creationists believe that everything literally came from nothing. Maybe you’re just more anti-science than you are pro-God.
 January 21, 2016 at 8:14am
Randerson, you have to realize that to people like him, if God showed up and introduced Himself, He wouldn’t be up to their expectations and they would hold out for better. Unless God is EXACTLY what they consider Him to be, they will always deny Him. Modern believers refuse to accept the truth unless it fits perfectly within their construct of reality.
January 19, 2016 at 5:39pm
LOL…you’re blaming the Jews?
July 10, 2015 at 11:17am
Are you nuts? Before guns, there were no wars! Everybody was living in harmony until 1911 when, all of a sudden, everybody started killing a murdering and raping because they had the gun! There is a great movie about this, Zardoz, or something like that.
Look, people are stupid, and when critical mass is reached most of them will die, as nature intended. Now, if you will excuse me, I have to go sharpen my hammer.
 March 25, 2015 at 2:53pm
Not the same as without proper cooling, hydrogen bonds won’t form. I agree we have a lot of lost knowledge to regain, but this isnt one of those times.
 February 23, 2015 at 8:13pm
Well, he says it poorly at best.
 February 23, 2015 at 8:12pm
I can’t be the only one to see irony in a racially exclusive group sueing another group for not being diverse enough.
This makes my brain hurt just trying to comprehend what is happening here.
In a related story..MSNBC teleprompter sues Al Sharpton...
Not many whites at BET TV...
Quoting al, “Slandered I’m being by some courthouse interlopers!”
Boggles the mind doesn't it. How is this allegation proven? Frivolous lawsuit for attention?
I doubt anyone with a brain who keeps track on what goes on in the media would think that Sharpton was employed by reason of talent.
““Despite the notoriously low ratings that Sharpton’s show generates…”
They’re going to get a lot lower. Ole Al is being moved to Saturdays only… LOL
I wonder if this is the reason?
I sure would hate to be in Sharpton's shoes when Judgement Day comes and he has to explain his life.......ouch
When Liberals eat each other. Most entertaining. When is the Government going to sue Al Sharpton for not paying his fair share? Liberal Hypocrites...God Bless Them.
Time/Warner is the company that brought you "cRap music". Oh yeah - they bragged about promoting it, and when a rapper went mega with his "cop killer" rap, Time/Warner defended it.
Eat your cRap and die, Time Warner. As for Comcast,and the ever growing reports of customer disservice, this ought to put an end to putting money ahead of ethics first - at least for those two.
Hehe! Think about it...these two companies are being sued, basically for keeping a low-down (to use ghetto vernacular) about certain issues which might be debated as "race-based", much like how Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton have avoided prosecution and jail for so long.
I would just pay the 29 billion to not be embarassed by the buffoon.
democrats could never make it being honest or following the rules. democrats are scams, cons and frauds. The lowest people you'll ever meet. The most immoral people to smile and say "Trust me", They cheat on partners and on life, they have no self esteem and they're the smartest Stupid people you'll ever meet.
Why doesn't the IRS attach his wages....what a concept. I bet he'd quit faster than you could believe.
Kind of subtle...like a whore in church....it's reverse discrimination of the worst sort.... Sharpton, Jackson, and the rest of the poverty pimps graduated from small ball to Chicago style larceny using the threat of racial protest to squeeze hundreds of millions out of corporate entities throughout the USA. It is almost a billion dollar industry now....far exceeding any black poverty program instituted by government during the past 40 years.
I never suspected that racist illiterate morons were lacking in most media companies. I suppose they need a voice, too, so Sharpton's found his niche.
 November 24, 2014 at 6:04pm
Unless Jar Jar makes a comeback, it can’t be worse than Lucas’ butchering of his own franchise.
That was absolutely painful watching Jar-Jar. Really destroyed any enjoyment of that movie. Don't think that I ever touched my Binks air brush again.
Indeed. I liked the first three movies, but some of the redos were very poor quality. Some of the stuff in the first two "prequels" stunk.
I didn't bother to watch the last movie.
Usually people's craft gets better with age, but not in the case of Lucas.
Having someone like Abrams, who has caused most Star Trek fans to lose interest in Star Trek, do a Star Wars movie, is silly. You don't put someone that turns away customers in charge of something.
 November 23, 2014 at 5:07pm
Haven’t you seen the new targets for DHS and local LE? They are of seniors, pregnant women, children, etc. And no, this isn’t a joke. Google “dhs no hesitation targets” if you want to see who the government is training its agents to shoot.
So can I still go to their restaurant?
I've dated Hispanic ladies before so I'm not a racists right?
You also learned that a mustache is racist.......
I thought those were Armenians coming through the window.
If you like your mustache, you can keep your mustache
Apparently, so is Islam in today's Amerika! Heil 0bama!
Mexican is a NATIONALITY not a race.
Race is not what they are. It's what they do. Race right across the border to get all the benefits "We the People" get to pay for. -- Have a Great Thanksgiving! -- Stay Well, Safe & Free
The average Mexican's DNA is somewhere between 75 to 90 percent European Spanish (White). The Mexican government doesn't even use a racial classification. As a whole, Mexican are considered an ethnicity and certainly multicultural. So much for La Raza.
the things you learn from the media are simply astounding
Somos de la raza cosmica!!
Sure Mexican is a race ;) just like African is a race. People are so uneducated these days, that they think being an American is a race. They don't know the difference between race and nationality.
The average Mexican cannot be 75-90% European-"white". I dont know where you got that number from. If you posted the source right here, I still call it absolutely bogus. Residing in Europe does not make you European-"White". Consider this: If I moved to China, do I become ethnically Chinese? If I had a child there by a Chinese woman is he then completely Chinese? Or is he partial/mixed? Ethnicity is the result of migration and mixing. Most Italians are 75% European-white at best, with a mix of Mid-Eastern, N African, and Asian influence, and your average Italian looks much more like the collective European peoples than a Mexican does. Like the Italians, the Spanish were a mix to start with, they then mixed yet again with the natives of central America. What you consider to be 100% Euro-"white" from the start is not. There is no doubt that some Mexicans have more European in them, but you'll never convince me that most Mexicans are 75-90% European-"white". What are they comparing that against? Modern Spaniards?
If this upsets anyone, deal with it. Its just plain stupid to design classifications for people where one group designates many different peoples who look nothing alike, have very different customs and yet are called the same thing. Im sorry...that I cannot apologize for my practicality and sensibility.
 November 20, 2014 at 7:35pm
Maybe it should be a new law that for each citizen killed by an illegal, members of the federal legislature, judiciary and executive branches are to draw lots…the “winner” to be executed in a live streaming event online.
Now that sounds like something that may get some action.
It would be a lot like mandating that whomever it is on the parole boards can let people go free early, so long as they, their spouses and children, all have to live in the same fenced-in neighborhood with the people they let out on early release.
 November 18, 2014 at 11:22pm
Well, two Wongs do make it white.
 November 13, 2014 at 11:56am
And to prove they’re serious, the first 72 callers will receive 1/10th gram of pure silver, worth nearly 5 cents!
 November 12, 2014 at 2:23pm
Not to be a jerk, but they would be correct. He was crossing in an area he should not have been. While the care shouldn’t have taken the chance of making that turn, you can see him correct course when he realizes the pedestrian is standing there, putting him in the path of the truck longer than originally calculated.
 November 10, 2014 at 11:39pm
Don’t forget about non-Christian teachers! They should all be fired also! And teachers that don’t agree with Gay marriage…fire them too! And heaven forbid there be a teacher that isn’t an open feminist! I say we start cleaning house! Get rid of all those coloreds and Jews too…YEEHAW!
But seriously, as a fellow Texan, I say this from the bottom of my heart: take your thought police mentality and please, move out of my state ASAP.
 November 10, 2014 at 11:27pm
I think the girl should have been arrested for making an illegal recording. Once it was out, I don’t think the league should have had the authority to force the sale of his team, especially when it was co-owned with his estranged wife. That whole situation was fubar.
I’m’ sorry to see you side with liberals who think free speech should only be allowed when it doesn’t offend. No, I wouldn’t want my kids in this classroom, and so I would make a call to the school and change that. But you are talking about the government controlling someone’s speech, outside of work. You are actually calling for government to control speech. In case you miss my point, YOU ARE CALLING FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO CONTROL A CITIZEN’S SPEECH!
The Constitution allows people to do and say things you don’t agree with. This is the problem with a 2 party system; both camps want a government that can control what you do and say and think, just so long as what they allow aligns with what you want to do and say and think.
Seriously, man, rethink your stance on freedom; right now, you’re on the wrong side of the law, of liberty, of the Constitution.
 November 10, 2014 at 5:39pm
You make a great point that school teachers should not be government employees. Schools should be privately run and if taxes for their existence must be levied, then a voucher program is certainly called for.
Secondly, as a government employee (local/state government, that is), her employer is the government itself. If we allow government employees to have their social lives monitored/controlled by their employer, then we are allowing the government to control their actions, speech, thoughts, etc.
This seems like a very dangerous shift toward an Orwellian future. Don’t fall for it. Let the parents work this out with the school itself.
 November 10, 2014 at 5:31pm
Yes, she is an employee of the school district, and if this was done while at work or from a school computer, yes, fire her. If, however, this was done from home or on her phone while off the clock, then again, we must be very careful when coming to a determination regarding her termination.
If we allow employers to fire people for what they do when not at work, we are effectively giving employers the ability to control all aspects of our lives. If she is a government worker, then we are giving the government the power to control all aspects of our lives!
No, I would not want my child in her class. And a single phone call to the school will fix that problem. And when every parent has called and expressed the same opinion, then she can be fired for the inability to perform her job. But I don’t have a child in her class, nor do you, so we are not the ones to make this call.
I am simply warning everyone that this is EXACTLY the type of speech protected by our founders, as unpopular and disgusting as we all know it to be. Condemn her if you want, I certainly have, but do not allow this government to claim itself as a righteous warden of everyone’s social life. Surely you can see the line that would cross.
 November 10, 2014 at 5:16pm
I was agreeing with an assessment as to the reasons for the outrage, not with the validity of the threatened actions against this woman.
We have freedom of speech. Only recently has “speech” come to mean seemingly everything but speech itself. This woman made a statement that was available to the public. She also works in a right-to-work state, so she can honestly be fired for any/no reason. But to fire someone for expressing their opinion, while breaking no laws, is wrong.
She said something stupid and racist, and her quality of work should be questioned and reviewed, but to fire someone because their ideology is different than that of an employer is a very dangerous bridge to cross.
What if your employer decided that you voted the wrong way, so fired you? Or if you were overheard in a restaurant talking about religion and it was a different viewpoint than your employer? Should you be fired then?
What I am saying is that freedom of speech specifically protects unpopular opinions. If it only protected popular opinions, the expressed right of free speech would be entirely unnecessary.