Yes it is outstanding and how amazing is it that 100s of physicist have spent their careers trying to prove Einstein wrong about theories he came up with without the instruments, computers and tools they have available to test his theories and try to prove him wrong. That’s what is huge. That he came up with this stuff without the benefit of technology to direct him in any particular direction.
You are absolutely right, that is pretty amazing when you think about it. I suppose that's why "Einstein" is pretty much synonymous with "genius."
 February 11, 2016 at 4:38pm
Right and an awful lot of it was revealed to his people in the Old Testament. You know the one’s who thought the earth was flat and the universe revolved around it. Or do you have a good reason why God would have not told them that the earth was round and that there was life on other parts of the earth?
February 11, 2016 at 4:34pm
kate give it a rest and stop milking the exaggerated controversy to get cheap hits on your post.
[-20] February 11, 2016 at 4:29pm
The couple has chosen not to have sex until marriage. So did either of them have sex with someone else out of marriage. Cause if that is true the post and the accolades are both wasted.
Oh for goodness sake, JRook! . . .People change and grow all the time.
You are judging them because . . . why?
Because they are trying to get it right this time? Because they are more mature and realize what may be at stake?
By all means, lets withhold our "accolades" until they behave like Jada Pinkett Smith and her hubby -- who have an "open" marriage.
Cuz THAT celebrity coupling is so much more healthy!
Jr Ook, Is that like retreading an old prostitute? Shove in a 10 lb ham then pull out the bone.
Damn and to think of all the shat I get for the things I say.
Not fair! Not fair at all! (:
Being that her Ex boyfriends where the rappers Future and 50Cent, I don't think I could do it. Kinda like don't change on me now sweatheart that im saving myself wouldn' t work being if i know you dated those two idiots.
Did they suspend ProV1, RJ?
JRook...Funny you should bring that up. This is a “special case”..Wilson’s “fiance” previously slept with most of his Seahawk teammates while married to another teammate...that makes their future nuptials “special”...
He was married and she has a child. So I'm guessing they've both had sex before.
RJ, you filthy SOB, fantastic!
I don't know you, but you sound bitter and unable to celebrate people growing and reaching for a higher ring.
If they are false, then so be it, but until you know their heart as you know your own, celebrate them trying to reach for a healthier life.
 February 11, 2016 at 4:28pm
Anybody else remember when GB was pushing people to buy Gold when it was almost $1,600 an ounce. It will stay low based on the price of oil. And for the record precious metals will hold no value if the world’s economic system falls apart. Or did you miss the part where it is valued in currency.
The currency we use isn't money rookie it's all based on a ponzi scheme. Gold and silver are money and they're listed in the constitution as the only thing to be regarded as money.
You say IF the world's economic system falls apart? LMAO You don't have a clue rookie because it's when ALL fiat currencies go to zero and when that happens your fiat currency will truly be worthless and my silver and gold will have a hell of a lot more value Your problem is and you have many is you think currency is money and it isn't it's just a promissory note. Gold is a store of value and currency has lost 95% of it's value since 1913 and every fiat currency ever created has gone to zero and you think the dollar will somehow escape the same fate? Like i said you don't have a clue rookie.
 February 11, 2016 at 4:24pm
1930 Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act 2 republicans by the way. And most actually believe the Great Depression was a little more complicated than simply a response to a tariff bill the Hoover actually was against. Seriously, the only one that knows less about economics and finance than the staff here is GB himself.
 February 11, 2016 at 4:20pm
“What do you expect from Government Motors.” Not sure what to expect from them. But do expect people to actually read the post and see the statement “To our knowledge the valet remains an employee of the vendor,” which clearly means he does not work for GM.
Right, they cancelled his contract, told him he's no longer welcome working on GM property.
When operating under 21st century employment agreements, that's what rational people refer to as being fired from the job site.
Irrational people play word games.
 February 11, 2016 at 4:19pm
“To our knowledge the valet remains an employee of the vendor,” How does someone write a post with this line in it and not realize it means he is a contractor and not a GM employee. And due to that not do 5 minutes of research and find out exactly who might have fired him. But hey the post title got some hits so its worth it.
Right, they cancelled his contract, told him he’s no longer welcome working on GM property.
When operating under 21st century employment agreements, that’s what rational people refer to as being fired from the job site.
Irrational people play word games...
But I guess that depends on what the definition of is, is...
Sounds like they have a no weapons policy and was fired for violating it. Both me and my wife's work have the same policy.
[-8] February 11, 2016 at 4:14pm
Actually his tweet was directed at her computer and not her. On the other hand her confronting him and throwing a drink on him like some spoiled brat is in fact a low level form of assault.
“She raised her voice and she threw her drink on him,”
Imagine if it were the other way around - a black guy coming into a place shouting at a white guy and throwing a drink on him....Then the white guy shoots the black guy....These same people defending her assault would approve of a violent gun response.
Okay, so how should a young lady respond when threatened? And you say he was simply threatening to hurt her computer, not her?? So if someone threatens to destroy your car, you would be okay with that? Really?? JRook, a lefty responding using violence against a woman? You are okay with that??
Well I guess that gives him the right to shove her. JRook your a troil. Probably a black one.
It is amazing to me how people just flat out cannot understand that multiculturism is a failure.
I guess only when you or one of your family members gets raped and killed by one of them you will understand.
Reference – “Actually his tweet was directed at her computer and not her.”
That was stupid. Considering he could smash the computer over her head!
Not only that. What about respect for private property? ..You remember that. – Not only that. Is this one of the places that requires students to purchase said computer from the education system? Hence she is still on hock to pay it off. And she still may be…
What about all the information on said computer. All the time, labor, and possible essays or other research. What happened if she also had a job and she needs it for that. Hence there is an actual dollar value to that computer and information. That may never be recovered.
You really need to get back into 2106. And stop thinking in the stone age.
By the way…we are sure you would fill the same way if that person didn’t like your car…your home, or say your ‘Art Work’, or your piece of life saving medical equipment. Because it wasn’t about you!?..... Right….
get the point.
But what is funny is how much you missed the fact that the individual was willing to go to extremist for inanimate object.. Sorta like Muslims with pictures.
February 11, 2016 at 4:10pm
Love to see how many of them go to church every Sunday and claim to be good christians.
 February 11, 2016 at 4:09pm
“If they would be objective, instead of so biased, maybe we could find out some truth about the universe, how things are put together, and physics.” Seriously, you actually present yourself as someone who can critique let alone question Einstein…. Take your meds.
 February 11, 2016 at 4:06pm
But of course God the gravitational waves out there so we would invent an instrument to measure them.
February 11, 2016 at 4:05pm
Why because she points out what anyone with a fully functional brain knows. Cruz is a liar and has a habit of hiding them inside some BS exaggeration. But the angry mob likes when he exaggerates because they are against anything that makes sense or actually improves the quality of life. And by the way. Medicare is the most effective and efficient health care insurance in the US, without exception. And guess who runs that? And for a population that the private health insurers don’t want. This is what Trump said for those who can actually read. “But for the most it’s going to be a private plan and people are going to be able to go out and negotiate great plans with lots of different competition with lots of competitors with great companies and they can have their doctors, they can have plans, they can have everything.”
If you think that Medicare is the most effective and efficient health care insurance in the US, it would be good for you to put down whatever it is you are smoking and let the cloud clear. Simply because you believe this to be true, doesn't make it true. However, as for Trump, even if his idea is just to provide care for those who cannot afford it, that is still not a conservative initiative. It is wrong to take one person's property without their consent and give it to another. That is immoral.
 February 11, 2016 at 3:58pm
Again, not to preach to the lowest level of intelligence which is M. Bachmann, but what does tithing to the church have to do with paying for roads, schools, national defense, etc?
@ JROOK - if American Christians practiced tithing, there would be no need for MANY government sponsored programs which translates into reallocating federal monies to the types of purposes of which you speak. I posted a few links to informative articles elsewhere in this discussion.
JRook---There is a lot you don't know.
@ JRook-there is a lot you don't know.
 February 11, 2016 at 3:56pm
“The rich shall not pay more and the poor shall not pay less than the half shekel, when you give the contribution to the LORD to make atonement for yourselves.”
The tithe is 10%, no matter how much or how little.
And you know what I will accept a flat 10% tax, no deductions on every dollar above the poverty level and also for corporations. Because the 35% tax rate is BS as the only companies that pay it are stupid small businesses. Heck most of the largest corporations illegally hide money overseas to avoid paying even 10% here.
All corporations, large and small, have depreciation and other deductible business expenses making the 35% tax rate BS. D's and R's both had a hand at writing the tax code. The write off's are INCENTIVES to invest and spend. Now they are called loopholes.
If the corporations are doing something illegal, why are they not prosecuted? Gosh, even the Clinton's hide real estate in trusts to avoid taxes.
[-8] February 11, 2016 at 3:53pm
Instead politicians say, ‘Oh no, no. Your neighbor is rich, because he stole it from you.’” Actually no one says that. So as usual M. for moron Bachmann tries to make her point via a lie. She is right about one thing though, we should have a VAT tax instead of income taxes, sales taxes and sin taxes.
[-2] February 11, 2016 at 3:49pm
I would think the best policy is for individuals to go where their parts match. Having said that, don’t see why this is an issue for many students as the bathrooms are so dirty from budget cutbacks, kids with any sense of hygiene wouldn’t use them anyway.
[-1] February 11, 2016 at 3:42pm
“The people that work for NASA can say Jesus anytime they want.” You are correct but the publication is a workplace vehicle, not a public one, nor one owned by a singular individual. Like any workplace situation the employer can limit communications, particularly those unrelated to work in any manner they choose.
An employer CAN limit what is printed in a corporate publication, but that has absolutely NOTHING to do with the amendment they are attempting to invoke!
The amendment in question protects us from government control regulating public discourse on, and practice of, religion and free speech.
Got that? If not, let's try again . . vewy, vewy sloooowwwwly.
The First Amendment is there precisely to protect "the people" in their free discourse.
Not really in any manner they choose. If that was the case, there would be no article, and we would not be commenting on it.
[-1] February 11, 2016 at 3:40pm
Exactly and that’s what their employees should be focused on. Not spending time using an in-house publication to spread their faith.
 February 10, 2016 at 2:55pm
“If we had a real leader in the Oval Office instead of a maybe-Muslim Insurgent, everything floating with an Iranian flag would “Mysteriously sink” overnight.” Ah yes just what we need more empty bravado that led us into Iraq, cost us over $1 trillion and yielded us nothing. “Conservatives Without Someone To Demonize Are Speechless”
Easy to avoid that "war" you so fear, JTroll.
Steal a page from BLM's handbook. When the mad Mullaha's scream accusations about their missing shipping Just smile, shrug your shoulders and declare "I Dindu Nuffin".
"Truth to a Liberal (Troll) is a s Salt to a Slug"
I don't see how that empty bravado is any different than Obama's empty bravado about Obamacare. And that costs us over $1 trillion every year and has yielded us nothing.
JRook won't even be alive when the Muslims come. He'll be hanging from a construction crane, or be dead at the bottom of a pile of stones after he was tossed off a building for being gay.