TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying IspytheGov's 10 most recent comments.

• ‘We Love This Country’: Mysterious ‘Misha’ Friend of Boston Bombing Suspects Reportedly Speaks

  April 28, 2013 at 11:57pm

  Sorry Don’t believe a thing he says, as the infidel we should expect to be lied to period.

• Poll Results: Blaze Readers On Guns And The Second Amendment

  January 14, 2013 at 1:14am

  In reply to Conservative Democrat.

  I see that the character limit strike again, and I missed the follow on post.
  My Bad
  Bad Spy….

• Poll Results: Blaze Readers On Guns And The Second Amendment

  January 14, 2013 at 1:07am

  In reply to Conservative Democrat.

  1. We do not allow people to own an Abrams tank, or even a machine gun. Those were banned from ownership back in the days when gangsters used them.

  Um you would be wrong on point 1 machine guns are allowed by paying the very high tax stamp, and people do a few tanks I know a guy that has a working Sherman.

  2. High capacity clips. They are not necessary for the public. They are for the military. Cop killer bullets? No! Eliminate those from the public. Assault weapons those are for the military. Not for the public

  It seem that here again you are mistaken no where in the 2nd will you fine the word need, and no weapon can assault any one by its self, laws of physics an object at rest stays at rest. and no body armor can handle a standard 30-06 but round made for that purpose are restricted to law enforcement.

  3. As for adding cops or armed security at schools, that is no guarantee that it solves the problem. Two kids were shot in school in California yesterday and that school had armed cops on duty.

  Lets see the president kids oh yeah 11 heavy armed men.

  4. But I never considered trying to overthrow the government because a majority of the people voted them in twice
  5. The answer is not stock piling an arsenal to overthrow that government, but to offer policies that people want. Elections matter.

  4 is ok but as for stock piling its a free market and you can define my need.
  6. One word “Reloading”

• Poll Results: Blaze Readers On Guns And The Second Amendment

  January 14, 2013 at 12:44am

  In reply to Sensible_Centrist_Democrat.

  To you point about tanks and stuff, I would say no as written the 2nd is clear about bear and carry, I believe the terms them selfs place the limit on what the people, as no one could bear a tank, also I would concur that an RPG is not a firearm, that being said the words “Shall not be infringed”are very clear and that any federal legislation baring the ownership of any bearable firearm is unconstitutional, we may agree that full autos should be restricted, but that would require an amendment to add that langage to the 2nd.

• Poll Results: Blaze Readers On Guns And The Second Amendment

  January 14, 2013 at 12:29am

  In reply to Flashydave.

  My point exactly, we loose if we adopt the language of the left, so don’t.

• Poll Results: Blaze Readers On Guns And The Second Amendment

  January 14, 2013 at 12:25am

  In reply to IspytheGov.

  Again no rifle commits the assault, an action only a person using it to assault another, the term was made up in 1998 by an anti gun group, prior to that it did not exist but the AR platform has been with us from the 60′s.

• Poll Results: Blaze Readers On Guns And The Second Amendment

  January 14, 2013 at 12:13am

  And really everyone quit using the word “Assault” it is a verb and implies action taken a rifle is a rifle, although you could assault some one with any rifle, single shot bolt action, we don’t call them assault Bow’s now do we but I have read the new where an Assault was committed with a bow.

• Poll Results: Blaze Readers On Guns And The Second Amendment

  January 14, 2013 at 12:09am

  In reply to Sensible_Centrist_Democrat.

  Did you even read what to typed? “The principles of the 2nd amendment for self defense would not be substantially eroded.” so do you think it would be ok to not substantially eroded the first? fourth? tenth? just where dose any eroding stop?

• Which Democratic Freshman Is Opposing ‘Extreme’ Gun Control? Find Out Here

  January 6, 2013 at 7:38pm

  In reply to banjarmon.

  Well that depends on where you are of the view of incorporation or not, if you are then yes every ton law is unconstitutional and if your view is that the constitution is only applies to the Federal Government then states could pass whatever gun laws they see fit but there could be no federal gun laws .i.e. the 1969 firearm control act.
  This question has not really been addressed by the courts as ruling’s have gone both way in the past, and pose major questions over all types of laws.

• Atheists Get ‘Soles’: The Clever (and Vulgar) Way One Shoe Company Is Targeting the Godless

  December 27, 2012 at 11:36am

  In reply to South Philly Boy.

  And just ugly looking too.