User Profile: Jude 4

Jude 4

Member Since: March 19, 2011

CommentsDisplaying Jude 4's 10 most recent comments.

  • In general, his “advice” is pure flesh, and appeals to the soulishness of this woman. The wife is unable to forgive for 2 possible reasons; 1. the husband has not truly repented, and she doesn’t have the heart full of mercy and the will of God, which hopes and prays , but that he does repent, and is reconciled to God and her. 2. She is void of the divine nature (the continual inspiration of the Holy Spirit, and therefore is not looking for her reward from Jesus in eternity, but has placed her hope and well being in a person or thing (the husband/marriage). The saints won’t depend on man, bu ton Him who “judges in righteousness”. They realize that they belong to Jesus, and they will not depart from his will, no matter the persecution; even from a spouse. The only ‘love’ that scripture describes as ‘saving’, is the love that “suffers long” (goes the entire distance), and that “does the will of God.” Without that holy love within the soul, a person can torment you immensely. Pat’s words are typical of the false prophet, which leaves his hearers with more unanswered dilemmas, and a powerlessness that is unable to conquer sin, the flesh, and the evil one.

  • This woman’s twisting of Jesus words in the acount of John’s gospel is fundamentally erroneous. You can choose to imagine anything you want to about the testimony of scripture, but the evangelsists speak as they are led by the Holy Spirit, and Jesus really meant that the Jews, ‘in spirit’ where “of their father the devil”. Note that she cited “adultery” as one of the “minor” crimes that the Romans punished with death. Not advocating the death penalty, but scritpure places adultery as equal, and spiritully speaking, greater than murder as a crime. When the Roman emporer beheaded Paul the apostle, he didn’t murder his soul, probably only his own. Adultery usually destroys at least 2 souls, which would preclude it from being classified as a “minor” crime. I would stick with the authority of scripture, rather than this woman’s heretical imagination

    And others had trial of cruel mockings and scourgings, yea, moreover of bonds and imprisonment: They were stoned, they were sawn asunder, were tempted, were slain with the sword: they wandered about in sheepskins and goatskins; being destitute, afflicted, tormented; (Of whom the world was not worthy:) they wandered in deserts, and in mountains, and in dens and caves of the earth.
    (Heb 11:36-38)

  • Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
    (Gal 5:19-21)

    Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God. (1Co 6:9-10)

    “abusers of themselves with mankind” is specifically referring to sodomites, and they are among the list of all the immoral, as those that absolutely will not inherit the promise of eternal life. They can be “purified from all unrighteousness” if they choose to repent, and call upon the name of the Lord Jesus.

  • Tell tale sign of a lost soul; rejoicing in the death of the wicked. Ted reveals a ‘merciless’ nature by his comment. The young man is clearly a murderer, a crime which scripture describes as the utmost wickedness. God revealed to Noah that this was the only sin that demands the life of the perpetrator. That being said, it doesn’t mean that this man cannot repent and make reconciliation to the utmost of his ability, before he forfeits his life. Is murder out of the reach of the gospel atonement? Sexual sin, especially adultery, is commonly named right along side of murder, as one of the more fatal to the soul (ending in eternal perdition). Surrendering ones life to civil justice is necessary for the crime of murder, but those who remain in the land of the living, should regard such a fact with soberness and introspection. Ted shows no regard for the soul of the person, a disposition which has a dreadful ending. Whoever shows no mercy, will recieve ‘judgement without mercy”. Mr Nugent’s ‘status’ will be worthless in that day. If he doesn’t repent and follow Jesus, he will end up among those he despises; outer darkness, and the fire & brimstone lake, where the worm dieth not.

  • There is no authority in scripture for a ‘mental illness ministry’. The true doctrine that Jesus taught wil supernaturally “open the eyes of one’s understanding”, and renew the mind. Without affirming the true gospel of the new birth, there is no real hope for those who are tormented in their mind. Mr Warren is a false prophet, and teaches “another gospel”. He is therefore “accursed” unless he repents for perverting the right way of the Lord.

  • The ‘TV’ “preachers” that are named are obvious to pagans. The more deceitful and dangerous are those that have “turned the grace of God into lasciviousness”, and assure their fleshly listeners that sin will not send to eternal damnation, as long as they have ‘prayed a prayer’ at some point in the past. They constantly affirm (faslely so), that Jesus perfect righteousness is a ‘covering’ for ones personal unholiness. Not one word is spoken in the whole book of God to support such blasphemy. These false prophets should be denounced, but as stated before, the pagan knows they are phony. This is similar to the abortion and homosexual debate, sins that the irrational animals testify against, yet defending the right for a human being to live, and that marriage and family consists of a man with a woman in a lawful covenant, joined by God, is considerd as bona fide christian. True ministers will always affirm the necessity of ‘denying yourself’ (soul), taking of the cross, and following (obeying) Jesus until the end. “He that overcometh..he that overcometh..he that overcometh” Jesus says. Only the ‘conquerers’ shall wear the crown.

  • The Mormon ‘doctrine’ is an anti-christ teaching, and cannot save anyone. Very sad when someone like Glenn, who is very emblematic of western “christianity”, believes he is able o converse with the blessed Jesus trough his soul. As long as anyone remains unregenerate, God doesn’t acknowledge their ‘prayers’. God only hears a sinner when he is broken and contrite, begging for mercy and forgiveness. The only other prayers that God will hear are from His Holy Spirit filled children, who worship Him “in Sprit and in truth.” God wont be a means to anyones end.

    The man answered and said unto them, Why herein is a marvellous thing, that ye know not from whence he is, and yet he hath opened mine eyes. Now we know that God heareth not sinners: but if any man be a worshipper of God, and doeth his will, him he heareth. (Joh 9:30-31)

  • Then it would be conceivable that a man who owned a similar accomodation, would be forced to rent a room to a man who had his own daughter with him, and intended to take her to the room. The “law” has equated physical traits with the willful choice to committ sin. Forsaking the righteous law of God, always vindicates the scriptures to the letter;

    Run ye to and fro through the streets of Jerusalem, and see now, and know, and seek in the broad places thereof, if ye can find a man, if there be any that executeth judgment, that seeketh the truth; and I will pardon it. And though they say, The LORD liveth; surely they swear falsely. O LORD, are not thine eyes upon the truth? thou hast stricken them, but they have not grieved; thou hast consumed them, but they have refused to receive correction: they have made their faces harder than a rock; they have refused to return. Therefore I said, Surely these are poor; they are foolish: for they know not the way of the LORD, nor the judgment of their God. (Jer 5:1-4)

  • The West has turned away from the righteous law of God long ago. All manner of abominations are no longer considered shamful, though they are deemed eternally fatal according to scripture. The masses will not be prepared when the Lord Jesus comes to “take vengeance”. Most of the country are ‘professing’ christians, but in deeds the deny Jesus, and continue to fill up the measure of their sins, therefore, ‘wrath will come upon them to the uttermost’. God “respects NO MANS PERSON”, and His words are in full force to all who qualify;

    For Jerusalem is ruined, and Judah is fallen: because their tongue and their doings are against the LORD, to provoke the eyes of his glory. The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves. (Isa 3:8-9)

  • Mr Hamilton may already have a lawful covenant wife named Maria Souza. Not sure if Laird was her first husband, but Maria is his first wife. If they both were each other first spouse, then all he is doing now is committing adultery, and so is Ms Reece. This is the word of the Lord, and one Word from him is final. Most people will reject this truth in preference for remaining in sin, but so it was in the days of Noah.

    Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery. (Luk 16:18)

    This also expressly states that “whosoever” (any man living) that would “marry” Maria Souza, would be “committing adultery” by doing so, since she is still Lairds lawful wife. ‘Lawful’ meaning ‘joined by God into one flesh’. Unlawful “marriages” may be civil and ‘legal’, but God won’t join a man and woman that has a living covenant spouse, which is why such “marriages” are adulterous.