User Profile: judyaz

judyaz

Member Since: April 07, 2011

CommentsDisplaying judyaz's 10 most recent comments.

  • The newsletter was published Sunday evening and picked up by the postal service probably between noon and 1 p.m., which would have been 2-3 p.m. in Oklahoma. Since before 1992, as the newsletter is mailed, a prophecy which is transcribed within it occurs at that time, which is later reported in the news.
    Why? Perhaps so that we can know that all that is written in our many scriptures is real. Perhaps so that we can see a sign of the truth of scriptural prophecies, and believe, when we aren’t listening to our Father ourselves? Perhaps so we can turn to Him and pray, so much more can be averted because our Father listens to our prayers.
    I don’t think God did this; it is a natural event. Only the timing takes place in keeping with His words, so we might believe in Him.
    Remember, the Revelation was given by God to Jesus who sent a messenger to John to reveal “what must happen shortly.” These prophecies are what can happen, if man doesn’t change his ways, before the Messiah comes. It is that important and loving a message. Which shall we choose?
    (At least, that’s my best understanding. No one can speak for God, or the Messiah, or even the angels He sends to prepare a way for his coming. Only they whom God sends, who listen to Him and give only what He tells them.) Remember, Jesus said, no one knows the exact day or hour, not even the Son of man, nor the angels, only the Father.
    So, consider it a reminder of what has already been written?

  • Or the El Nino driven weather events could be seen as a time for this nation to pray that disasters be averted, as we remain “one nation under God,” honoring the Ten Commandments given in a covenant, that our Father be our God and we be His people, we of all faiths who have freedom of religious choice.
    See pages 2-4 at https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzyT3fgGxb4-OUJ6VmxUelpidVU/edit?usp=sharing
    And pages 1-17 and 10 at https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BzyT3fgGxb4-X05VeHFNNlJDRDQ/edit?usp=sharing
    It’s a different explanation than global warming.

  • Or you can charge your cell phone while you walk. http://youtu.be/plws14A7-1E
    Or ride a bicycle. http://youtu.be/cZkHBmyBrG4
    Or use oranges to power an iPhone. http://youtu.be/9_LLj4_3ZRA

  • A more primitive form is a solar cooker made from a satellite dish. Depending on which design you use, you can burn wood, boil water, cook a hamburger all at or near the focal point of the parabolic mirrored surface. This is cooking without fuel, simply the sun. http://youtu.be/1s_u0Y8Ywe4
    (There are many on YouTube to see.)

  • “Are you a ZIonist?” Then in support of the Muslim Brotherhood and Palestinian cause, we enforce Clause 34(?) of Arafat’s Palestinian Charter for Statehood written in 1974. After numerous treaties with Israel where peaceful jihad was done, because it is acceptable to lie when working toward building a Caliphate, Israel gave away it’s land for peace. But the Palestinian Charter never removed the promised wording to “abolish Zionism,” which can be interpreted, drive the Jews into the sea. Thus the IRS questionnaire in in favor of one religion over others, rather than freedom of worship guaranteed in the Constitution. It favors the U.N. and U.S. President and Secretary of State’s act of removing the country, Israel, after the capitol, Jerusalem from their website. Does the IRS questionnaire thus favors U.N. rule over U.S. law, in a new world order?

  • What may look like terrorism to those who were on Bill Ayers’s side during the 60s, and who had free love, were anti-establishment, anti-pigs and Government, who were often themselves on watch lists for participating in protests — those who attended the big rock concerts and got high on LSD and mescaline? “Who are you? Who, who, who who?”

  • Remember several years ago when “terrorism” was redefined to include those who obstruct women from entering abortion clinics, and wasn’t a doctor murdered?
    Remember how the FBI handled Waco, as though they were terrorists because they were said to own guns, I think? Remember the prosecution of Mormon offshoot groups living in isolated places who had polygamy? Religious cults? Then there’s skinheads, and survivalists living in remote places, playing paint ball. Remember when attention was turned away from foreign terrorists and toward these kinds of American citizens? It apparently is being enforced more than the news reported. But what a fine line for anyone to appropriately judge. No crimes were usually committed.
    Woodstock was allowed.

  • Ok. So why would seven chemical engineers and recent grads from several States that sponsor terrorism trespass after dark in a restricted area? If it’s not terrorism, or checking out the defense’s weaknesses or responses, which was commonly done by terrorist while planning an act, then why were they there? Don’t tell me this is just a lead-in to a joke? Then what’s the punchline?

  • Do you see the message? After Marines were not allowed to intervene and protect the American Ambassador and other Americans in Benghazi, who were attacked right after the Turkish liason left after dinner, the Marines were then asked to hold umbrellas over the Turkish Ambassador and Obama’s heads. Does it show U.S. military honor or submission to Turkey and the Muslim Brotherhood, but no value to America lives? This kind of “messaging” happened before, right after Benghazi. Americans were told to stand down and allow our Ambassador to die, but then a video by an Egyptian Coptic Christian who’d fled the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood to America was blamed, again showing honor and deference to the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood’s values over Americans lives. In Egypt, Christian human rights are being violated as the Muslim Brotherhood rules with Sharia Law after the Arab Spring. So blaming a Coptic Christian’s video would be pleasing and demonstrate siding with the Brotherhood, not American values and freedoms. Both Presidential symbolic gestures are probably not coincidence, but planned communication to the world. A new world order?

  • Truly “taxation without representation.”