And we(meaning you folks at The Blaze) seem to STILL not be mentioning the rape that occurred before she was killed. Bill O’Reilly didn’t mention it last night in his segment about the case, and neither did Liz Wiehl or Kimberly Guilfoyle, who were his quests on that segment.
I'm not sure, but I don't believe they know for sure if she was raped or not. Not trying to start an argument, but I live in Indy and have been following the story since it happened. One outlet reported the rape, but then it disappeared.
"Despite reports Blackburn was sexually assaulted, Prosecutor Curry said there was "insufficient evidence" to file sex assault charges in this case. Prosecutors do plan to evaluate a possible enhancement charge because Blackburn was pregnant when she was murdered."
[-2] October 28, 2015 at 9:34am
This whole argument can be over in a matter of weeks. We need someone to find a Muslim butcher, or caterer, or something similar, and order some pulled pork BBQ, wrapped in bacon. We all know that we don’t dare offend the sensibilities of the worshipers of the pedophile prophet. If they can’t be forced to handle pork on the basis of their “religion” , then neither can a Christian be forced to supply a cake for a gay wedding. There would be absolutely no difference, case closed.
 October 19, 2015 at 11:17am
I don’t think they’d get any UN troops to come here for that purpose. They’re dumb, but not that dumb. I don’t think any would even get on the plane.
Oh yes they would if they thought it was their chance to collect a slice of the American pie.
That's what you get for doing your own thinking.
The vast majority of the world want a one world government. The only way for that to happen is through the destruction of the American Middle class, how is that going? And the dis-arming of the American people. What ever that takes will happen.
 October 14, 2015 at 11:27am
If you like to grocery shop on Tuesday at 3:0PM, you’re more likely to get hit by lightning.
If you prefer to fill your tank at pump number 8 than pump number 2, you’re more likely to get eaten by an alligator.
WTF?? Seriously, some people just like different things than others. Oh my goodness, we’re not all the same!! Who’da thunk it ?!?!?!? There, there’s your study, and it didn’t cost millions of dollars.
 October 13, 2015 at 10:43am
So this weeks Darwin award goes to this chick. Just glad she didn’t kill anyone. Maybe while she’s in jail she can get a hysterectomy so she can’t pass on that Darwin gene. The gene pool is shallow enough already.
Life’s hard. It’s harder when you’re stupid. __John Wayne
 October 6, 2015 at 11:02am
This is what it takes, and it would work all over the country if people had the balls to do it. Collectively stand together and say “We don’t care whether you(Freedom From Religion Foundation, and like groups) like the fact that we pray at public events or not. We have a right to freedom of speech and that includes religious speech. We don’t care what a minority of people who don’t believe in God think, there’s more of us, lots more, and we’re going to worship as we see fit. Additionally, just because we’re doing it at school, that doesn’t violate any separation of church and state. The fact that they ALLOW us to do this, doesn’t mean that they(the school/school district) ENDORSE or even APPROVE of it. There is a huge difference between ALLOWANCE and ENDORSEMENT. Look it up!”
The same goes for all the city/county buildings that host nativity scenes around Christmas time. Just because they ALLOW a nativity scene to be placed there, doesn’t mean they ENDORSE what the nativity stands for. It’s no different than ALLOWING a State Fair to be held on State property and serve pork BBQ. Would we let Muslims(or Hindus if it were beef BBQ) protest and say that because the State(whichever one, any of the 50) ALLOWS people to eat pork on State property that they ENDORSE eating pork? NO. It doesn’t mean that, and no one in their right mind would think that that’s what it meant. It simply means that they ALLOW people to do it. If lawyers would make this point, all this would dry up, quickly
 August 28, 2015 at 10:37am
Run for the hills!! Run for the hills!! The world is about to end!!
Someone at MSNBC actually had a moment of intellectual honesty and it made it on the air!! Some one at MSNBC actually criticized Hillary AND Obama, in almost the same breath, and the censors at the most liberal network on TV actually let it get put out over the airwaves.
This is surely a sign of the end of days.
It's not intellectual honesty. They have no morals. They probably see conservatives as terrorists too. They just know that their champion, Hillary, is drowning. They have thrown her too many lifelines but the ***** can't swim and it's time to cut her loose. That's all that's happening here. They don't have a lot of time and they need to put somebody up who can win, basically another liar and a thief but without ties so easy to unravel. They don't care what comes out after the election.
Someone said in the comments the other day, "they can forgive her for lying but not losing points in the polls." - SO TRUE!!!
 August 28, 2015 at 9:37am
They should have beaten him way more than they did. Don’t hit women, scumbag!!!!!
[-1] August 26, 2015 at 10:55am
It’s time for people to elect judges who won’t cow-tow to this and similar groups and for people to just say “NO”. Nancy Reagan, made fun of as she was, got it right, “Just say NO.”
So you want judges to kowtow to you and ignore the constitution. Typical conservative.
 August 26, 2015 at 10:52am
Good for him. If the local law(it will have to be local law, the Feds would never do it) would start arresting the employers who hire illegal aliens and prosecuting them to the fullest extent of the law, they would quit hiring them. If the little border jumping felons can no longer get work, they’ll quit coming. I think it should be a $10,000 a day fine for each illegal, for each day they work for you, as well as a mandatory sentence of one year in jail. I doubt many employers would see that as worth the risk.
August 17, 2015 at 3:09pm
Once again the Left proves it’s all about tolerance. They’ll tolerate you, as long as you agree with them.
 August 13, 2015 at 12:43pm
Stop talking about it Haji, and start doing it already. The sooner you start, the sooner we can all be rid of you.
 August 11, 2015 at 12:16pm
Maybe we’ll actually call this thug, a thug. But maybe not, we might start seeing pictures of him when he was 10 years old, or he’ll get some cutesy little nickname like “Chicken Wang”, and his mom will come on TV telling all of us how good a kid he was.
As a side note, look beside his right knee in the picture where he’s sitting on the couch. That looks like a bag of Skittles underneath that fruit punch(and another on the floor), the only thing mising(from the picture) is some cough syrup…….looks like he was having himself some “purple drank”….juuust saaaayying
I'm glad I've found someone as attentive as I to photos. Scroll up.
Shrewd observation. Watermelon snapple on the floor.
Lil sizzurp. Get crunk. Get killed.
 August 11, 2015 at 11:59am
I am sure they have plans to enact a “criminal element enablement tax” next…
What do you mean next? That’s exactly what they just did, they just called it something else, for obvious reasons….
August 11, 2015 at 11:30am
I think everybody is missing the point here.
The article says “A federal judge previously issued a schedule for the State Department to release a certain amount of emails each month; officials already came up short at the end of July because of trouble screening the records for classified information.”
Wait a second, Hillary said she didn’t send any classified information from that server, so why do the emails need to be screened? Just release all of them, if there’s classified info there, too bad for her. We all know she’s a lying hag anyway, it’ll sure be nice to have the proof. What’s the darn hold up? Oh, I know, they’re screening them so the classified ones can be culled out and we can never be told/shown/have it proven that she’s a lying hag. I mean seriously, does anybody think, bad blood or not, that this administration is going to out one of their own? They (Hillary and Barry) may not like each other, but they’re both Demoncraps and both have the same agenda. Does anybody actually think that the “Justice” Dept. is going to file charges against her? Get real.
 August 6, 2015 at 11:52am
It’s great to bring everybody to the table, as long as they are supposed to be at the table. No, Mili, you simpleton, they didn’t HAVE to move. They could actually stay where they were and fix their stinking cesspool of a country and not come to ours illegally!! They aren’t just immigrants Mili, they are ILLEGAL ALIENS. They are felons just by virtue of being in this country. And don’t give that crap about trade policies, we’ve shipped so many jobs to Mexico that it’s a miracle the ones who are here aren’t going back to get those jobs.
 August 6, 2015 at 11:40am
Everybody in that town ought to just stop doing anything that the council says. The entire town. Until those two border jumping illegals are off the council and out of the country, where they belong. Then, vote every single one of them out of office.
Put your property taxes in escrow accounts to be paid when these people leave the country or go to jail for being illegals. If your county gets any other kind of tax money from you, put that in the escrow accounts too. See how long the continue without any revenue.
August 6, 2015 at 11:37am
It already is a felony.
 August 5, 2015 at 9:46am
 July 29, 2015 at 1:42pm
Let’s all just start referring to UNH as Oceania and this “Bias-Free Language Guide” as Newspeak. This is so Orwellian that poor old George is probably asking God if can come back and sue for theft of intellectual property. This is absolutely about control of speech and, by extension, thought.