Here’s another idea. Instead of boycotting(or maybe just before), EVERY male who goes to Target with a female family member needs to walk right in the female restroom right behind his family member and just post up by the counter and wait for them to do whatever they went in there to do. Then dare Target to say anything about it. They created the environment that makes it unsafe for females, it’s the job of every husband/father/brother to ensure the safety of their family member. If Target management has a problem with it, kindly tell them you won’t be coming back until the policy changes or that you’re simply going to keep doing it. If it doesn’t matter what equipment you have when entering the ladies rest room to use it as a rest room, then it shouldn’t matter if you’re in there protecting family. After all, Target says “Everyone deserves to feel like they belong. And you’ll always be accepted, respected and welcomed at Target.” Let’s put that to the test.
 April 25, 2016 at 3:44pm
Will someone please try to get a Muslim catering company to cater a pork BBQ? Will someone please try to get an African American owned bakery to make a cake with the Confederate Flag, a noose and a whip on it? Will someone please try to get a Jewish baker to make a cake that says “Go Hitler!!” with a picture of some ovens and rail cars on it? We can solve this whole thing real quick. Nobody would ever expect any of those people to make any of those cakes or provide that service, yet for some reason we expect Christians to make cakes for gay marriage. Will someone explain to me how any of those are any different?
That's all PC sanctioned discrimination. Of course you would never actually hear the PC crowd use the term "discrimination" to describe their position there.
"Will someone please try to get a Muslim catering company to cater a pork BBQ?"
Muslim catering companies don't serve pork to anyone. They don't have to offer a product they don't usually serve.
And no, a 'gay wedding cake' is not a different product.
don't forget the beer.
You are in BIG trouble. We will see you at morning formation in the "Re-education Camp". I'm calling dibs on top bunk. (not as many lice).
Nobody can tell you what to make or sell, but whatever you do make or sell you have to sell to whoever wants to buy it. A wedding cake is a wedding cake. It doesn't become a different thing based on who wants to buy it. A cake with an offensive or derogatory message is not the same thing as a cake that says Happy Birthday or Congratulations, and nobody can force you to make one.
 April 25, 2016 at 3:12pm
You’re right that the two things are very similar. There are some significant differences though. The RIGHT to keep and bear arms is a Constitutionally protected right, the right to pee in the wrong bathroom isn’t. Additionally, laws about the bearing of arms don’t fly in the face of biology. The whole “trans” argument is ridiculous anyway. One either has a Y chromosome or they have two X’s and all the surgery in the world isn’t going to change that. It’s just window dressing. All the hormone pills/shots aren’t going to change it either. Let a fully converted “trans” stop taking those pills/shots and watch how fast their body reverts back the gender assigned at birth. If they were truly a “trans” then they wouldn’t have to take those hormones for the rest of their life. In the same way we all laughed at Rachel Dolezal because everyone knows you can’t change your race, those of us who haven’t been brainwashed by the PC culture know you can’t change your sex and are laughing at those who think you can. You simply can NOT change your chromosomal or genetic coding, no matter how much you “feel” like the other sex, you will always be whatever you were born as. You can change what you look like on the outside, but just like Michael Jackson and Rachael Dolezal, you will still be whatever you were born as.
Thank you for that stirring and enlightening diatribe.
It only proved one thing. You know nothing about transsexuality.
Or the Constitution.
 April 21, 2016 at 9:47am
“We believe that everyone — every team member, every guest, and every community — deserves to be protected from discrimination, and treated equally,” Says Target. Well, newsflash, it’s NOT discriminatory to make men use the men’s room or ladies use the ladies room. I’m actually really glad Target has publicly stated this is their policy, now I know where NOT to shop.
April 17, 2016 at 11:20pm
Wrong on all counts. A person either has two X chromosomes or an X and a Y. If you are XY you are a male. If you are XX, you’re a female. Your physiology(from Webster: Full Definition of physiology:
: a branch of biology that deals with the functions and activities of life or of living matter (as organs, tissues, or cells) and of the physical and chemical phenomena involved
A persons physiology doesn’t change because they got their plumbing changed. There is no such thing as transgender. It can’t be done. You CAN’T change your gender. You can take all the pills/shots you want, have all the operations there are to get, but at the end of the day, you still have XX or XY and your body is always going to try to be that. Stop taking all those pills/shots and see what happens. A blood test will always identify you as whatever you were born as. Additionally, if you had a physiology that was truly different than your plumbing and an operation was all it took to change your gender, why does a “trans” person HAVE to take so many pills/shots in order to “trans”ition? Oh, that’s right, because your physiology DOES match your birth gender, you just may not want it to. But what you want, doesn’t matter. This is a mental disorder, and should be treated as such. If someone said they identified as a camel and wanted to have surgery and take pills to be a camel and live like a camel, we’d lock them up in a second, or medicate the crap out of them. How is “trans”gender-ism any different?
 April 1, 2016 at 9:41am
Nobody would think a thing about it if an African American baker refused to make a cake that had the Confederate flag and White Power written on it. Nobody would think a thing about it if a Jewish baker refused to make a cake with barbed wire and a Nazi Swastika on it. Nobody would think a thing about it if a Muslim catering service refused to cook a pig for someones backyard BBQ. So why is it always such an issue when Christians refuse service to gay people? How is it any different? Someone explain that to me.
Because Jesus is the ONLY way to reconcile with God.The Humanists hate that and must block that path whenever they see a chance.
Right versus wrong. Light versus dark. Good versus evil. The age old struggle.
Because it’s supposed to be stupid. It’s supposed to not make any sense. Psychopathic people have no desire to be rational and logical. When somebody plays the “victim card”, that is not an appeal to reason, it is an appeal to emotion. It is the method of operation employed by spoiled brats who don’t get their way.
All I can say to people like this is "If you want discrimination and hate crimes, I will give you REAL discrimination and REAL hate crimes. Not this meaningless piddly crap."
It depends on why you are declining a customer. The example you gave of declining to bake a cake with barbed wire and a Nazi Swastika is acceptable. You are declining the cake based on the message you are writing on the cake. Much like a cake shop can deny someone that wants "Christians are the psychopaths" or a giant F word. You would deny that cake to a black person, white person, gay person, straight person, muslim, christian, etc. You aren't denying the product based on the currently protected characteristics.
What you can't do is have a product that you offer to the public, but deny it based on race, religion, national origin, and now in some places sexual orientation. If you had a normal wedding cake that you are willing to sell to any customer, but deny to provide it to a customer based only on one of the characteristics you are violating protected rights.
This is why you can have things like "No shirt, no shoes, no service". That would apply to any customer. What you couldn't do is "No shirt, no shoes, no service. Unless you are white then you can wear whatever you want". You have to apply you rules equally across the board. When you deny based on a rule for everyone that is fine. When you deny based on the customer and those above characteristics, it is not.
Because our path is narrow. There are many many wrong ways to do things but only one right way.
People should search out gay owned businesses, and book events that are anty gay. And force them to like it. If they make them feel uncomfortable even in the slightest, sue them into oblivion.
Jumper, you already know the answer. This is, indeed, an age old battle between evil and goodness. Evil people are not content to practice wickedness, they must compel everyone else to condone it, cater to it and bless it. This is not about “equality” or fair treatment or discrimination. My husband and I never feel the need to parade our intimate relationship in public. We observe a basic decorum that assumes others would rather us keep that private. Being adults, we do not feel threatened or treated unfairly just because decency calls for us to behave that way.
Make no mistake, homosexuals are not worried about being mistreated. We are all sinners, but homosexuals are WALLOWING and rejoicing in their sin. Most of the rest of us, feel guilt and sorrow when we sin. Romans chapter 1 discusses the downward slide into depravity.
I would like to humbly suggest that those of us who are financially able to, find a persecuted Christian business and do everything we can to support them. Those of us who do not have the resources to do that should pray FERVENTLY for these persecuted believers. I am sure we will all face this sooner than later.
Refusal of service because you are a bigot that hates gay people is not the same thing as refusal of service because you are not a bigot who hates black people.
March 28, 2016 at 2:57pm
Hey Cadbury, Nestle and the rest of you Christian hating, spineless corporate weasels, we all call BULL****!!! Not good enough. We don’t buy it(and WON’T buy) the load of junk you’re now selling. Nestle spokes-liar said there was “no deliberate decision” to remove the word Easter from the packaging. So what happened? Did the label making machine just re-program itself and take that off the label after decades? Change it back, and we might consider buying your products again. You aren’t the only people making chocolate eggs and bunnies.
 March 15, 2016 at 12:00pm
You can bet that if you spray an oncoming motorcycle cop in the same way, the charge will be attempted murder.
Okay I stand corrected. Switch to lap top. And watched full screen. I see it now. Nothing less then criminal charged will satisfied me in this case
 March 15, 2016 at 11:52am
SHE’S NOT a guy. Stop playing into her delusion.
 March 15, 2016 at 10:49am
I could see him facing disciplinary action for trying to arrest someone outside of his jurisdiction, but trying to rescue a mother and her two kids???!!!??? I wouldn’t care of he was outside of his own state!!! Good for him!! I know that Police SUV’s(and regular cruisers) aren’t cheap, but they cost a lot less than human lives. Can anybody say PRIORITIES???!!!???
Actually human lives and memories with that person are PRICELESS. SUV costs more.
 March 14, 2016 at 9:05am
I’m getting really fed up with the “Let’s film it all but do NOTHING” people in this world. If you are going to to stand there and film this sub-human animal-beating worthless excuse for a human being, but do NOTHING to stop her, you might as well go get in a few licks on the poor dog yourself. It’s time we all stopped whipping out our cell phones and started doing something. There were two of you there. One film, the other, PHYSICALLY MAKE THE BITCH STOP BEATING HER DOG!!!!
It would also show some intelligence if they would, I don't know, get a face shot. It, I assume, would be helpful. Considering that from the Beck she looks like any other ratchet.
 January 26, 2016 at 12:05pm
I’m just astounded that anyone in Boston has a gun left after those nancy boys rolled over and let the cops take them all after the Marathon bombing.
 January 25, 2016 at 10:49am
How low they will stoop. I’m not even a Cruz fan, but using a video of an 18 year old, who’s clearly joking, against him is just pathetic. What 18 year old guy didn’t want to be in a tit flick(a la 1988 style) and think he could take over the world? If that’s all they can come up with, they’re in trouble and he’s doing well.
 January 21, 2016 at 9:25am
Is anybody surprised by this? First, she’s a Demoncrap, so liar. Second, she’s the head of the DNC, so liar. Third, it’s Debbie Wasserman-Schultz, so HUGE liar. Everything she’s ever said is a lie. If I was standing outside in July, with the sun directly overhead, casting a shadow straight down and she told me it was noon, I’d still check my watch.
 January 15, 2016 at 10:47am
Hey Sean, you met with Saddam, now with El Chapo. How about going for the hat trick and going for an interview with ISIS? I’m sure they’ll be really nice to you…………
I was thinking he could join that folk singer that is going to croon ISIS into submission!
 January 15, 2016 at 9:58am
I’m NOT a Cruz supporter, something about him is just off-putting. Now, with that out of the way, let me say he was right last night and Trump, a New Yorker,(who I also don’t support) was wrong. People from NYC are typically some of the rudest, most obnoxious, overly prideful, self-important people you’ll ever meet. Nobody cares that you’re from NYC, but YOU. The rest of us, AREN’T impressed. It was great to see them manage to pull together after 9/11, but Trump was wrong when he said that no other city in America could have done that. EVERY other city in America could, and would, have done exactly the same thing. We’re all Americans, we would/will all react the same way to being attacked. That’s part of what makes us Americans, we help each other out, and if you mess with us, you’ll regret it. Most people I talk to are getting really tired of New Yorkers acting as if they have a lock on coming together after a tragedy. It’s downright insulting to the rest of us in America. Have you been to a town in the Midwest that’s literally NOT THERE ANYMORE thanks to a tornado? Or a town down south that’s COVERED IN SAND up to your waist thanks to the latest hurricane? Or along the southern Mississippi where people’s HOMES ARE UNDERWATER and they’re driving past stop signs IN BOATS? All of those communities are pulling together just like you did after 9/11 and the rest of us are SICK AND TIRED that y’all keep acting like you’ve got a lock on that just because you’re “New Yorkers”.
January 12, 2016 at 2:21pm
“It violates the first ten words of the Bill of Rights (‘Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion’) and it violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA),” he wrote.
Oh, bless your heart. You’re too stupid to understand the written word. Where did you get your law degree? Your Doctorate? News flash, Cracker Jack boxes don’t count. Having “In God We Trust” on the money, doesn’t establish a State religion.
Additionally, I’ll give you a thousand dollars if you can find the words “Separation of church and State” in the Constitution.
Can you please explain to me how having “In God We Trust” on the money gives me an advantage? I’d love to know so I can start exploiting it to my actual advantage. As far as I can tell, it’s never given me any extra of the offending paper, I don’t get to pay less for anything just because I believe what’s written on it. How, EXACTLY, do I get an advantage?
Lastly, can you explain to me, EXACTLY, why something you claim not to believe in causes you such a problem? If God doesn’t exist, as you atheists claim, why does it bother you so much? It’s just words. What if the money said “In One Eyed One Horned Flying Purple People Eaters We Trust”? Those actually don’t exist, and ignoring the fact that that’s entirely too wordy to put on the money, if it were, would you be raising the same argument then? Somehow I doubt it. Your problem is less about it being on the money than it is with God and those of us who believe in Him.
[-1] January 7, 2016 at 12:42pm
Whether or not people who are attracted to the same sex have a choice is still up for debate, but genetic scientists haven’t been able to find a “gay” gene. I’m no scientist, so I can’t really say more than that, and that’s as intellectually honest as I can get. People DO, however, have a choice whether or not to ACT on those attractions. That is indisputable. There are Priests, Nuns, Monks and who only knows what else, all over the world who CHOOSE not to act on their attractions everyday.(Please don’t bring up the Priests who abuse little boys, that’s a whole different conversation) Does anybody really think that Priests, Nuns, Monks, etc., aren’t attracted to people sometimes? Their chosen professions, or whatever you want to call those lifestyles, may prohibit marriage and/or sexual activity, but they’re still human beings with all the associated desires. Homosexual people may or may not have a choice in who they’re attracted to, I simply don’t know. I do know they don’t have to act on those urges.
 January 7, 2016 at 12:11pm
BWAHAHAHA. This guy ACTUALLY thinks that the sycophant Loretta Lynch is going to indict Hillary. And, apparently, that Obama would go along with that. That’s the best joke I’ve heard in a while. There’s more chance of a snowball surviving Hell than Hillary getting indicted. Does this guy think that either Obama or Loretta Lynch give a flying poop about any upset over at the FBI? Sure, about as much as they care about his going around Congress with his phone and his pen. Give me a break.