First off honey, don’t hide behind living in the public eye and all that mistakes are amplified crap. You CHOSE to live in public life, knowing full well that you were giving up a fair measure of privacy doing it. Secondly, you’re plenty old enough to know that the American flag is NEVER supposed to touch the ground, with or without your dogs’ rear end on it. Every first grader in the country knows this, it’s not a mistake, it’s just plain stupidity.
""Secondly, you’re plenty old enough to know that the American flag is NEVER supposed to touch the ground"""
Well i am glad you have been specific on if it was an American Flag, so now if this is just a Beach Towel and two bandana's we can all settle down.
You fool. We haven't cared what the left teaches our kids for a very long time
They sure as he'll do not teach them respect for the flag. I don't even think it is a flag
It isn't glossy enough. Typical conservative instead of simply and easily correcting
Her you tear her apart but when it comes to confronting liberals you/we run...
Actually I doubt most people know basic flag etiquette anymore. Actors don't necessarily choose to live in the public life, either .They choose to be actors, and for some, that comes with a fanbase and public exposure. It's not her fault that people on the internet would rather burn somebody at the stake for making a mistake than use the opportunity to teach them something.
 July 6, 2016 at 9:35am
Tell you what Matt, you can try the whole confiscation thing, as long as I see YOU PERSONALLY trying to take guns from Americans. And son, don’t believe your own hype, you ain’t Jason Bourne. Until then though, I’d suggest you shut the gaping maw under your nose.
July 5, 2016 at 9:41am
I find it odd that I’m agreeing with a felon rapper, but I have to say, he’s making a good point. While I don’t think that people will “turn” gay, which I don’t think Boosie thinks either, his point is taken. There is a seriously disproportionate amount of homosexuality on TV. Mr. Jerome Trammel has a point too, there are gay people in the world and they should be represented on TV. I would just like them to be represented in proportionate numbers. Homosexuals make up about 2-4% of the population, but, depending on the network and/or the show one happens to be watching, homosexual characters make up between 15-25% of the entire cast. That’s not an accident Jerome, that’s social engineering, and it’s NOT happening by accident! Boosie is right, we never saw that much homosexuality growing up, especially not on TV. It’s being done to make us think it’s normal. And to your silly point about us seeing heterosexuals kissing and how is that any different. Yes, it is. Heterosexual relationships are normal, homosexual ones aren’t, they’re abnormal, a mutation. When any part of a group represents such a small part of a whole, and can not perform the function that keeps the group from self exterminating, it’s abnormal, it’s a mutation. Yet it’s being foisted on us as if it was all perfectly normal and we should just accept it, love it, embrace it. WHY? If we were all like you Mr. Trammel, there wouldn’t be ANY of us in very short order. Kudos to Boosie for having the courage to speak up
 June 22, 2016 at 2:37pm
Really? This from a bunch of people with law degrees, most of whom are well into their 50′s and 60′s? All they need now are some pacifiers and some blankets. Y’all just go ahead and roll over and kick your feet and pound your hands on the floor. Poor little Demoncraps, you didn’t get what you wanted so it’s temper tantrum time. Bless your little hearts.
It is 1960's deja vu for these radical leftists. Anyone who didn't live through the 1960's or wasn't old enough to remember, take a look. They are old geezers now but still using the same tactics. Aren't they lovely?
June 22, 2016 at 10:09am
I can’t believe the guy recording this let him get so close and then raise a pair of scissors so close to his neck. I’d have knocked that doctor on his tail as soon as he invaded my space.
 June 22, 2016 at 9:58am
It’s disgusting how nobody blames Ford, Chevy or Dodge for the thousands(more) people who die every year from automobile accidents, particularly at the hands of drunk drivers, or how nobody blames Estwing or Stanley for the thousands of people who are beaten to death every year with hammers, or how nobody blames Spalding or Louisville Slugger for the thousands of people beaten to death every year by baseball bats, but boy oh boy, let somebody get shot and everyone wants to blame the inanimate object. We didn’t ever have to have legislation to protect the aforementioned companies from lawsuits because their product worked exactly as it was supposed to, but we did for guns, ridiculous! It’s completely transparent crap, they don’t want us to have guns, but can’t come take them all away because they know we’ll never go for that. So it’s incremental-ism, couched as “common” sense controls, a little at a time until we have no more guns at all. Every Congresscritter who is proposing any kind of gun control is violating their oath of office to protect, defend and bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution and should removed from office.
 June 20, 2016 at 8:39am
Turn in your man card Kuntzman. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a better example of a Beta in my life.
 June 15, 2016 at 4:10pm
I’ll be happy to be detailed. The problem is that the NRA, and Hitlery, and this administration, and, it appears, you, are willing to take away(and a suspension falls into this category) someone’s Constitutionally protected rights WITHOUT DUE PROCESS! I don’t care if someone is “on a watch list” , unless and until they’ve been convicted of a crime you can’t just arbitrarily take away their rights. If they’re on a watch list, then whoever is the investigating authority should know if they buy a gun, at which time additional scrutiny can and perhaps should be applied, but we are opening a serious can of worms here by trying to out do Tom Cruise a la Minority Report . Who gets to be the deciding authority about how, when and if you get your rights back once the investigation is concluded? How is anyone even to know if they’re on a watch list? As I write this, none of know if we are or not, and the government will not tell us. I’m shocked so few people can’t see the size and depth of the rabbit hole we’re opening here. This is a recipe for tyranny. We live in a somewhat, free society, that comes with risks. Benjamin Franklin once said: “Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.”. AND HE WAS RIGHT!!!
 June 7, 2016 at 2:29pm
 June 7, 2016 at 2:28pm
I think you’re missing the point. I don’t know if it’s on purpose or not, and I’m not accusing you of doing it on purpose. In this case though, her wardrobe is a perfect example of the hypocrisy of her policies, do as I say, not as I do(because you’ll go to jail(email), but also of the larger story of who Hillary is. A complete liar who cares about herself and not the country.
Right, instead of saying 'does this make me look fat' she says 'does this make me look middle class'.
June 6, 2016 at 10:31am
Hey Musk, STOP WATCHING THE MATRIX!!!! It was a mooovie. Yes it was pretty good. Yes the special effects were AWESOME. Nonetheless, it was just Hollywood make believe. What the heck is this guy smoking?
 June 3, 2016 at 10:40am
First let me say I hope the DA doesn’t charge him. We can’t see it in the clip but according to news reports I heard the killer was taunting him.
Secondly, DANG that was impressive leap. He’s not a small guy and very nearly cleared that whole table!!!!!I say we invent a new Olympic category: The “I’m gonna crush you” table leap, and give this guy the gold medal.
 June 1, 2016 at 12:23pm
Granted, it was a lawyer that got his charge reduced. Thing is though, he wouldn’t have needed that lawyer if a different lawyer, the District Attorney, hadn’t charged him in the first place. What kind of idiot charges a guy who whoops or, yes, even kills his wife’s rapist/ attempted rapist in the first darn place? The DA should have complimented him on his form and sent him on his way.
Do you really believe that? What if it was the wrong guy? What if it was consensual and the wife fabricated the rape? Everyone should get their day in court.
Youdopes is right. Even assuming that everything happened exactly as the woman claims, it appears from the video as if the threat had ended, and if that is the case then the husband cannot reasonably claim that it was self-defense; it looks more like a revenge attack.
I understand the husband's actions, and would probably have done the same in his shoes; that doesn't make it legal.
 May 25, 2016 at 10:35am
So it sounds like a fat girl wore some yoga pants and got teased about it. She then went and whined about it and now the school board is collectively acting like none of them has ever said to their spouse, while walking around the mall or Wal Mart, “That woman should NOT be wearing yoga pants” We’ve ALL thought it, most of us have said it to whoever we were with at the time. Let’s not pretend that we’re such good people that the sight of a 250 lb sack of cellulite stuffed into some brightly colored yoga pants lumbering down aisle 3 hasn’t caused us think “EEEWWWW”. NEWS FLASH LADIES: if you’re 5’3″ and your weight is a 3 digit number that starts with a 2, don’t wear yoga pants in public, NOBODY wants to see that!!!!!!!!!!! Not to mention the fact that this school board has apparently forgotten that you can’t make teens not tease each other, it’s what they do, it’s part of being a teen and of growing up. This rule likely will have the opposite effect actually, because all the girls who aren’t rolling balls of jelly will be mad at not being able to wear those kinds of clothes anymore. Where’s that going to lead? MORE teasing.
Simple solution. Mass public disobedience. If people simply refuse to play along with the mentally disturbed trannies and the edicts from the most progressive administration in our history, this problem will sort itself out. Target is already noticing that the vast majority of the people in this country don’t want to put up with this kind of crap.
 May 16, 2016 at 10:31am
I can’t understand what was wrong with the dress. It may be a little on the fancy side for a weather report, but that’s certainly better than the other way around.
Her first impressions… “What? … I look like… a librarian now.” Great comeback!
As she later explained she did have another dress but it didn’t work (for whatever reason). She said this one was a “loaner” or a backup. But bare arms is an issue?
The dress did look good on her but not nearly as extreme as compared to other TV personalities. So what if she dressed like she was ready to go to a formal dinner afterward?
And did you notice the hemline? It was just above the knees! When have you ever seen in recent times a nice dress with a hem that conservatively low?
 May 12, 2016 at 10:13am
I’ve said it a hundred times if I’ve said it once, if ANYBODY thinks that KilLIARy is going to get indicted and/or prosecuted, they are completely deluded. If you think that there aren’t special rules for high level politicians, and the super rich, particularly for the former First Lady, you’re out of your mind. ANY of the rest of us would ALREADY be in jail, and charges would have already been brought against us. They’ll come to some BS conclusion that what she did doesn’t QUITE rise to the level of criminal activity and she’ll “take responsibility”, apologize, and go about her merry way. Let’s get real folks, there’s no way the wife of a former President is going to go to jail. Even though it’s abundantly clear she should.
 April 25, 2016 at 4:11pm
Here’s another idea. Instead of boycotting(or maybe just before), EVERY male who goes to Target with a female family member needs to walk right in the female restroom right behind his family member and just post up by the counter and wait for them to do whatever they went in there to do. Then dare Target to say anything about it. They created the environment that makes it unsafe for females, it’s the job of every husband/father/brother to ensure the safety of their family member. If Target management has a problem with it, kindly tell them you won’t be coming back until the policy changes or that you’re simply going to keep doing it. If it doesn’t matter what equipment you have when entering the ladies rest room to use it as a rest room, then it shouldn’t matter if you’re in there protecting family. After all, Target says “Everyone deserves to feel like they belong. And you’ll always be accepted, respected and welcomed at Target.” Let’s put that to the test.
 April 25, 2016 at 3:44pm
Will someone please try to get a Muslim catering company to cater a pork BBQ? Will someone please try to get an African American owned bakery to make a cake with the Confederate Flag, a noose and a whip on it? Will someone please try to get a Jewish baker to make a cake that says “Go Hitler!!” with a picture of some ovens and rail cars on it? We can solve this whole thing real quick. Nobody would ever expect any of those people to make any of those cakes or provide that service, yet for some reason we expect Christians to make cakes for gay marriage. Will someone explain to me how any of those are any different?
That's all PC sanctioned discrimination. Of course you would never actually hear the PC crowd use the term "discrimination" to describe their position there.
"Will someone please try to get a Muslim catering company to cater a pork BBQ?"
Muslim catering companies don't serve pork to anyone. They don't have to offer a product they don't usually serve.
And no, a 'gay wedding cake' is not a different product.
don't forget the beer.
You are in BIG trouble. We will see you at morning formation in the "Re-education Camp". I'm calling dibs on top bunk. (not as many lice).
Nobody can tell you what to make or sell, but whatever you do make or sell you have to sell to whoever wants to buy it. A wedding cake is a wedding cake. It doesn't become a different thing based on who wants to buy it. A cake with an offensive or derogatory message is not the same thing as a cake that says Happy Birthday or Congratulations, and nobody can force you to make one.
 April 25, 2016 at 3:12pm
You’re right that the two things are very similar. There are some significant differences though. The RIGHT to keep and bear arms is a Constitutionally protected right, the right to pee in the wrong bathroom isn’t. Additionally, laws about the bearing of arms don’t fly in the face of biology. The whole “trans” argument is ridiculous anyway. One either has a Y chromosome or they have two X’s and all the surgery in the world isn’t going to change that. It’s just window dressing. All the hormone pills/shots aren’t going to change it either. Let a fully converted “trans” stop taking those pills/shots and watch how fast their body reverts back the gender assigned at birth. If they were truly a “trans” then they wouldn’t have to take those hormones for the rest of their life. In the same way we all laughed at Rachel Dolezal because everyone knows you can’t change your race, those of us who haven’t been brainwashed by the PC culture know you can’t change your sex and are laughing at those who think you can. You simply can NOT change your chromosomal or genetic coding, no matter how much you “feel” like the other sex, you will always be whatever you were born as. You can change what you look like on the outside, but just like Michael Jackson and Rachael Dolezal, you will still be whatever you were born as.