User Profile: justangry


Member Since: June 10, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [7] May 24, 2016 at 7:33pm

    So that’s 33 male and 1 female fascist?

  • May 24, 2016 at 1:31pm

    Nor has any Christian I know of advocated more fiercely for laissez-faire capitalism and individualism than Ayn Rand.

  • May 24, 2016 at 1:29pm

    Well, let me take that back. Many Christians extrapolate altruism from the bible. Altruism, of course, being the foundation of socialism and fascism. The Pope is a commie. The Bishop of Canterbury is a commie, and who could forget Rev. Wallace singing the Soviet National anthem. Does the Bible teach that altruism is a virtue? You betcha it does. Jesus sacrificed himself for the common good of mankind. Of course there’s also Matthew 19:24, where Jesus said, “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God”. Something you might hear at an occupy rally. Then onto Acts 4-34-35 where Jesus said, “Possessors of the lands or houses sold them and brought the prices of the things that were sold and laid them down at the apostles feet: And distribution was made unto every man according as he had need.” which sounds very similar to… “From each according to his ability to each according to his need” Karl Marx 1875. Never mind the fact that many neocons flocked to support a national socialist for president. Now, I’m not saying every Chrisitan is a socialist. Or they’re unable to separate personal altruism from government policy. Nor, am I saying that many, so called, atheists don’t draw inspiration from an abstract concepts, such as the common good, to project their socialist morality, but I will say, there’s no one here that’s more of a capitalist than this atheist.

  • May 24, 2016 at 12:44pm

    BS! Religiosity has nothing to do with economic preferences.

  • [2] May 24, 2016 at 12:41pm

    By law abiding you mean submissive to the arbitrary whims of the oligarchs.

  • [2] May 24, 2016 at 11:56am

    Public property is more of a socialist construct than being an atheist.

    Responses (7) +
  • [10] May 23, 2016 at 9:46pm

    Even better… “Democracy is the road to socialism.” Karl Marx

  • [6] May 23, 2016 at 8:36pm

    “The Struggle” is always violent, eh, Bernie?

  • [6] May 23, 2016 at 8:36pm

    Democracy was the excuse the court used to subvert the constitution during the progressive era, but yeah, the US has become an oligarchy.

  • [1] May 23, 2016 at 4:40pm

    Her ugly ass bug eyes are enough to warrant 24/7 shade use.

  • [10] May 23, 2016 at 4:16pm

    Dear lying war pig. America is already broke, stupid.

    Responses (1) +
  • [20] May 23, 2016 at 9:37am

    Could care less, but screw princesses and royalty all together. Monarchies suck.

    Responses (3) +
  • [4] May 23, 2016 at 7:48am

    There’s no need. Logically, if you believe one has the right to life, then you must except his right to defend it as a consequence. Unless you’re foolish enough to think that the state defends life.

  • [7] May 23, 2016 at 7:43am

    Come on. Even you lefty trolls know this woman is a war pig, and a war pig doesn’t care about the right to life, which is evident by her desire to deprive the individual of the right to defend his/her life.

  • [6] May 22, 2016 at 12:09am

    The leading cause of death in the 20th century was democide, yet most people still think government is necessary.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] May 22, 2016 at 12:04am

    They’re going to continue this no matter who wins. Every time there’s a shooting, you are going to hear cries for gun control. Hell, I wouldn’t put false flags past these people. I guess all that really matters is that Americans are ready to tell to piss off when the time comes. Of course then you’ll be a terrorist. It would be easier to tell them to piss off if R’s didn’t love them some police state.

  • [3] May 21, 2016 at 5:06pm

    Well that part is bipartisan. Forcing women to register for the draft is in the 2017 NDAA. R’s have the majority in both the Congress and Senate.

  • [11] May 21, 2016 at 8:56am

    “Our campaign of course believes in non-violent change and it goes without saying that I condemn any and all forms of violence, including the personal harassment of individuals,”

    Really? What would happen if he won “the struggle” and I didn’t want to “pay my fair share”. Would he be opposed to violence then? Yeah, I didn’t think so. Government is violence.

    Responses (1) +
  • May 20, 2016 at 4:34pm

    There isn’t an authentic libertarian running. None of the three embrace the core tenet of the ideology.

    Responses (2) +
  • [6] May 20, 2016 at 1:17pm

    The state and the church were one at the time Galileo was tried as a heretic. Now science and the government are one. In both cases, there’s a conflict of interests where preserving the status quo is the ultimate goal, and censorship of any kind is wrong.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love