User Profile: justangry


Member Since: June 10, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • May 1, 2016 at 8:54pm

    I’ve never voted for a Keynesian central planning technocrat, then whined about what they did. Nor do I claim to be pro-life but give the state a pass on killing people. If that makes me stupid, so be it.

  • May 1, 2016 at 4:38pm

    Bush 1 gave us Agenda 21 and raised taxes despite reading his lips, Bush 2 Expanded the government 46% and shredded the BoR’s Reagan… well

  • [-2] May 1, 2016 at 3:57pm

    Ok, government funding supports abortion. Government funding, at this point, comes from deficit spending and counterfeiting currency. So if you want to get rid of government funding for abortion, you need to stop the deficit spending and counterfeiting. Unfortunately, you need deficit spending and counterfeiting to carry a big stick too, which in essence is an anti-life position, since the big stick is used to kill people. Problem is neoconservative principles don’t recognize this as having your cake and eating it too, so nothing is going to change.

    Responses (2) +
  • [10] April 30, 2016 at 10:54pm

    I got curious about who owned Comedy Central, and that’s a rabbit hole I wish I didn’t look at. Viacom owns it and a whole bunch of other crap. Viacom was founded by Tom Freston, who is board chairman of the One Campaign, with funding from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. CEO of the One Campaign is Micheal Elliot, who was an executive for Time and the “Economist”, a rag with 50% ownership by the Rothchilds. Go figure the stank of this comes from the NWO, all of whom are slave masters posing as humanitarians. I gotta go make a tinfoil cap!

    Responses (1) +
  • [7] April 30, 2016 at 3:40pm

    State force used to keep the children safe. WTF could possibly go wrong there?

    Responses (2) +
  • [26] April 30, 2016 at 11:09am

    Isn’t setting the ivory on fire counter-productive? Reduce the supply and increase the demand. Now it’s even more profitable to poach elephants. Government smart…. /sigh

    Responses (4) +
  • [2] April 29, 2016 at 10:54pm

    The SCOTUS is as corrupt as the rest of government, so I’m not really getting your point. I thought you were a religious fella anyway, who believed rights come from God, not government? As for Cruz being better than Paul, they only differ on three votes. The Freedom Act, fast-tracking the TPP, and auditing the Fed. Cruz voted for the first two and skipped the last. Paul voted no on all three. Advantage Paul.

  • [-4] April 29, 2016 at 8:38pm

    Rights are only rights if they’re universal. The states ratifying the BoR’s, and the states that later entered the union accepted these amendments as rights. The 14th amendment was unnecessary because you can’t call something a right and have it not be universally applied. At least that’s how I see it.

  • [16] April 29, 2016 at 8:11pm

    He’s not the constitutional purist so many here make him out to be. He’s obviously not right with the 4th amendment, I highly doubt he’d end indefinite detention, or get rid of all the federal policing agencies that violate the 10th amendment. It sounds like he’d turn us back the right direction in some areas, and I believe he’s the best candidate, domestically, the Republicans have running since Paul dropped out, but there’s 100 years of progressive BS that too many people are accustomed to for anyone to be 100% right with the original intent of the constitution.

    Responses (6) +
  • [8] April 29, 2016 at 4:37pm

    Clarify mental illness, and there’s no conspiracy. Seems half the people in the country are on or have been on an anti-depressant. Every veteran who has nightmares could meet such a broad term. Anyone with a little anxiety too. These people pose no danger, but are about to lose due process to exercise a right with no recourse.

  • [4] April 29, 2016 at 3:48pm

    OK think for yourself. Using the broad term mental illness, the government could deny due process to anyone that’s ever taken a Xanax. There’s a difference between someone with a little anxiety or nightmares from PTSD, and a paranoid schizophrenic, or psychopath.

  • [3] April 29, 2016 at 2:19pm

    Ain’t none of these clowns going to get rid of the estate tax, so they’re all guilty of that.

  • [5] April 29, 2016 at 1:44pm

    I’ll chip in for LibertarianSocialist’s woman card.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] April 29, 2016 at 5:11am

    Really? Red Dawn, Hunt for Red October, Rocky 4, Rambo 2&3, War Games, Firefox and every Vietnam War movie ever made disrespected communism. Did you miss the 80′s? Now, you have the Hurtlocker, American Sniper, 24, Blackhawk Down and on and on where Muslims are the enemy.

  • [-1] April 29, 2016 at 5:03am

    Come on people, how can Ferrel, as an actor, turn down any role? He’s been type-casted as a halfwit. It’s not like I’m going to waste any money to see it. I don’t think he’s funny.

  • [2] April 28, 2016 at 10:22pm

    Wonder why a principled feminist, such as Hillary, would attend a known misogynist daughter’s wedding? Either the money he gave her was just too sweet for her to stick to her guns, she’s not really a feminist, or Trump’s not a misogynist. You’d think the crackerjack staff at MSNBC would catch on to that if they were paying attention. I wish the people bashing Trump 24/7 would do so for the right reasons instead of making **** up.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] April 28, 2016 at 8:08pm

    Let’s TPTB know he’s kewl with domestic spying and CIA involvement within the US.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-5] April 28, 2016 at 8:02pm

    The man’s just doing his job. Not sure why anyone would get worked up about that.

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] April 28, 2016 at 7:04pm

    Perhaps that’s the point. It’s hard for me to take unprincipled people at their word.

  • [17] April 28, 2016 at 5:48pm

    Damn it, Janet… It’s not like Bernie’s a proponent of peace either. In fact every dumb idea he has is backed by force and ultimately death for anyone who doesn’t comply.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love