User Profile: justangry

justangry

Member Since: June 10, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [3] July 29, 2014 at 2:58pm

    Rabid dogs, eh? Not people? It’s nerve racking when militant rulers collectively dehumanize an entire group of people.

    Responses (3) +
  • [5] July 29, 2014 at 1:03pm

    Can’t get any dumber smoking weed than you can watching O’Reilly defending progressive policies. He’s a punk-ass statist.

  • [6] July 29, 2014 at 10:55am

    I’d actually have more respect for him if he were a racist rather than a flipp’n statist telling us to trust brutes. Can’t think of one founder that used the phrase “benefit of the the doubt” when referring to government.

  • July 28, 2014 at 2:28pm

    I’d say, by definition, paganism is a form of mysticism. I do not know if you’re a government-loving statist though.

  • [2] July 28, 2014 at 1:05pm

    “There are two kinds of teachers of the morality of death, the mystics of spirit and the mystics of muscle, whom you call the spiritualists and the materialists. No matter how loudly they posture in the roles of irreconcilable antagonists, their moral codes are alike and so are their aims. In matter the enslavement of man’s body. In spirit the destruction of his mind. Do you think they are taking you back to dark ages? They are taking you back to darker ages than any your history has known. Their purpose is to deprive you of the concept on which man’s mind, his life, and his culture depend: the concept of an objective reality.” Ayn Rand

    Seriously, read Atlas Shrugged.

  • [5] July 28, 2014 at 12:11pm

    The spiritualists and the materialists. Both mystics. Both government loving statists. I have no use for either.

    Responses (2) +
  • July 27, 2014 at 10:13pm

    Curious that I haven’t seen one prayer for peace from the Blaze’s evangelicals since this all started.

  • [4] July 26, 2014 at 9:20pm

    Yes progressive temperance style laws brought about 100 years ago have firmly gave collectivism a foothold here in this once great republic. BTW, does medicare pay for name brand Vicodin?

    Responses (4) +
  • [5] July 26, 2014 at 9:18pm

    When has the GOP ever actually stood for smaller government? Conservative means having a big enough centralized government to enforce God’s will around the world here amongst the socialist security junkies.

    Responses (2) +
  • July 22, 2014 at 1:14pm

    Perhaps because the SCOTUS already said it was legal. As for recent rulings, they refused to hear arguments regarding indefinite detention. What else is there to say? Flipp’n court is too busy to weigh in on a right we’ve had since the Magna Carta? That’s lunacy. The system is broke. Has been for a while. We’re just seeing it’s climax.

  • [19] July 22, 2014 at 10:51am

    There’s always a higher court that says the government can do whatever the hell they want.

    Responses (9) +
  • [1] July 22, 2014 at 10:49am

    How much ya reckon it costs for the pharmaceutical companies to push a drug through the FDA?

  • [6] July 21, 2014 at 9:54pm

    I don’t really think you get the gist of my objection to modern LEO’s. They carry out the arbitrary whims of communists. They tear families apart for victimless crimes. They seize property, when it’s the government’s job to protect it in a free capitalist society. They are becoming increasingly militaristic and aggressively policing rather than passively maintaining the peace. They even infringe on the 2nd amendment… The videos just add salt to injury.

    As for social workers, what era did most of their programs start, and who was lobbying for them? Yes, they’re miserable progressives, every last one of them.

  • [1] July 21, 2014 at 5:59pm

    Well, your premise that Bush and Cheney went too far is only half correct. The establishment of both parties was unanimously in favor of setting up the American Stasi. Ron Paul spoke out more than any other against it. Massie, Amash, and a few other libertarian leaning R’s, along with a few decent reps across the aisle have introduced/co-sponsored legislation to rid of us this crap. The establishment of both parties has shot them all down. It really isn’t a partisan issue.

  • [10] July 21, 2014 at 5:48pm

    I don’t know, man. I guess I know they exist, but it seems they’re the minority. At least today. I reckon some of the old timers here seem fairly principled. (RJJ, BryanB, perhaps you, etc.) On the other hand, I’m sick of the abuse we keep seeing practically every day. This country has been subverted by fascists/commies/socialists. They deserve no loyalty, yet receive it from the folks thoughtlessly enforcing their whims. The only semi-legitimate reason for government to even exist is to protect property and individual rights, and the only legitimate use of force is against those that initiate it’s use. Everything else is just thuggery. Seems if your statement were accurate, those dedicated to protecting and serving would stop the hyper-aggressive thugs we see on Youtube holler’n “stop resisting” while beating the crap out of someone out of anger or adrenalin. Pretty crappy job of policing yourselves, really. Either they hop in the fray, go after the guy filming their crimes, or simply tune it out/justify it somehow. I guess it would be easier to swallow if there were actually more cases of good cops putting bad cops behind bars for irrationally initiating/escalating the violence.

    Responses (4) +
  • [22] July 21, 2014 at 12:54pm

    “One of the things that does annoy me … is when people who are successful don’t appreciate how they got there, you meet a guy who is very rich but hates capitalism,” he said, “well, how are you going to tell the next guy you want to destroy the system that gave you that opportunity?”

    That’s awesome. I’m not sure it will be well-received by the cronies running the show, however.

    Responses (4) +
  • [1] July 20, 2014 at 4:12pm

    I care less about immigration than I do about altruism as an “American value”.

  • [1] July 20, 2014 at 2:56pm

    Your champion of conservatism is talking about the needs of others as an American value like any other run of the mill socialist. So piss off! Legal is just a bureaucrat deciding how many numbers we take from each country, and if you want to criticize me for my public education you might want to learn when it’s appropriate to capitalize ‘you’. Ass hat.

  • [29] July 20, 2014 at 1:50pm

    “These children, while they’re here, we need to care for them well, we need to demonstrate American values.”

    Like?…

    “Give me your tired, your poor,
    Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free;
    The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
    Send these, the homeless,
    Tempest-tossed to me
    I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

    Seems we’ve found ourselves in a pickle regarding our American values. Or an outright philosophical contradiction. Of course those wanting to breathe free can’t do so while being dependent on the government. My suggestion would be to end the welfare state. In the end that is the real problem.

    Responses (7) +
  • [17] July 19, 2014 at 4:57pm

    @Monk, Laws are just the whim’s of men. In this case an international body. We all know what the sanctions after the Desert Storm caused. If you can’t discern from history what the nature of the beast really is, and have to rely on the written edicts of others to form an opinion, you’re not really being intellectually honest with yourself. People starve to death due to sanctions. It is indeed an act of war. Reason trumps law because law is rarely formed by reason. When countries’ economies are stifled, enforced by a military, you can’t even call it an act of war? A = A, dude.

123 To page: Go