TheBlaze Books Give You More!

CommentsDisplaying kadster01's 10 most recent comments.

• Bill Maher Mocks Tea Party Victims With Fake IRS Questions: State the ‘Approximate Location of Your Trailer Park’

  May 18, 2013 at 4:55pm

  Well, when Maher is targeted, like his similarly politically affiliated buddies at the AP, he won’t be cracking himself up so much. It always means more when it happens to you, and it eventually will. Useful idiots…

• Charles Krauthammer: IRS Scandal Could Be a ‘Fatal Problem’ for Obama

  May 18, 2013 at 4:48pm

  In reply to Chromo200.

  “Syndicated columnist Charles Krauthammer on Friday said the Internal Revenue Service’s targeting of conservative organizations could be ‘fatal’ for the Obama administration if it turns out that anyone in the White House was aware of it.”

  I think we pretty much all know that the White House WAS aware of it. Whether or not that fact is reported in the press is the question, but even then, I don’t think this guy is sinkable.

• Sarah Palin Posts Pic of Alaska Snow: ‘Global Warming My Gluteus Maximus’

  May 18, 2013 at 4:45pm

  OK, OK, it was only the mention of Sarah’s gluteus maximus that got me to click the link for this story…

• S.E. Cupp vs. Michael Moore on Guns: ‘I Just Happen to Be Informed’

  May 18, 2013 at 4:00pm

  Moore got schooled, but it doesn’t matter. He speaks the language, so facts are irrelevant.

  That said, “[T]he government is not in the business of intimidating me away from my Second Amendment rights.”

  Actually, Cupp, yes they are, and that is the problem.

• Network Releases Statement on Pat Robertson’s Controversial Advice to Cheated-On Women

  May 17, 2013 at 6:11pm

  In reply to Cavallo.

  @BADDOGGY
  “Christians believe you become one flesh and many like me believe in no divorce even for spousal cheating.”

  Then you are actually going against Biblical principles.

  Matthew 5:32 says, “But I tell you that anyone who divorces his wife, except for marital unfaithfulness, causes her to become an adulterer, and anyone who marries the divorced woman commits adultery.”

  It’s exclusionary, but suggests that infidelity puts the “cheated” spouse in the position of being an adulterer/adulteress.

• Teacher’s Aide Could Lose Job Over…Her Homemade Lunches

  May 17, 2013 at 4:25pm

  In reply to RaydocX.

  You MUST eat with the Collective. That includes eating only what the Collective eats, and is approved by the USDA.

• Network Releases Statement on Pat Robertson’s Controversial Advice to Cheated-On Women

  May 17, 2013 at 4:16pm

  “As a first step in the process, Dr. Robertson stated that she should stop dwelling on the cheating. Next, he recommended that she remind herself of all the reasons she fell in love with him in the first place so that she might try to fall back in love with him all over again.”

  “Lastly, his point was that everyone is human and there is much temptation outside of the home, so she should do whatever she can to strengthen their home and relationship. His intent was not to condone infidelity or to cast blame. We regret any misunderstanding,”

  Nope, I understood it perfectly the first time. If the man can’t keep it in his pants, it must be the wife’s fault and the burden to fix it is placed on her shoulders. I don’t think SHE was having a problem remembering what, or whom, she fell in love with. She isn’t the one who cheated. Perhaps HE is the one who needs to do the remembering.

• The Scathing Speech That Just Got a Standing Ovation During the IRS Hearing

  May 17, 2013 at 2:12pm

  Yeah, yeah, Americans love it when the villain gets a good talking to, but nothing ever comes of it! Words have no effect on these people. Obama “fires” someone who was already retiring and promotes the main perpetrator to Head of the Obamacare Gestapo!

• New Energy Secretary Named With Unanimous Confirmation

  May 17, 2013 at 10:04am

  In reply to Amazingoly.

  Dude looks like a lady….

• Artist Trying to Sell Super-Secret Photos of NYC Residents: ‘An Outrageous Invasion of Privacy’

  May 17, 2013 at 10:03am

  In reply to HaleStorm87.

  Shouldn’t this fall under the “Peeping Tom” laws? As long as you’re taking pictures and selling them, then it’s OK?