@making – so let’s try this little math problem on….only 12-13% of the pop is black – so where is ebt, welfare, unwed mothers more rampant?
 April 24, 2015 at 1:08am
True that – sadly too many think they can be “good or do good ” enough…sorry – but before a Holy and Righteous God – we cannot…thus the need for a Savior – who paid the price for our inability to do “enough” – Jesus paid it all…it really is that simple
 April 24, 2015 at 12:39am
The really big story would be IF a Clinton ever told / spoke anything that was TRUE….liars all of them – when you mince words by saying “it depends on what the definition of is ….is”
Oh Dear Lord God Almighty – how can we be so stupid (oh wait – serpent – Eve….cigar – Bill – same difference – unless you are a democrat who boo’ed God 3 times)…….
OMG, I forgot that one Kaydee... Booing God...Wonder if God was offended. YES! God has a long memory....
 April 24, 2015 at 12:29am
Don’t be too quick with your presumptions – remember “they” are only trying to “set the table” for the next progressive…and with each progressive they get “progressively” worse
 April 24, 2015 at 12:25am
@ Montana – No…
 April 24, 2015 at 12:20am
 April 23, 2015 at 11:23pm
Uh – there should be NO WHERE in the USA that permission is needed to do anything…
News flash – the constraints are to be upon the agents of the Govt – not upon We the People…the Constitution is to hog tie the government not us…We the People cannot act Unconstitutionally – Only Government and her agents can act Unconstitutionally..
Correction: on my private property you would need permission for some d-bag liberals to say anything. Outside of that… you are correct.
"the Catechism of the Constitution..."
Excellent comment. Just excellent.
Maybe, since they already got verbal permission, they should go and get written permission? The rules are the rules after all.
Hey mod rep your fascism is showing.
If it was a muslim group, ya'll would be giddy with delight. I agree they shouldn't need any sort of permission on state university grounds, but I doubt the vast majority here would agree if it wasn't something they didn't agree with. Kudos to those of you that don't draw that line.
greystreet...ya beat me to it....dang muslims.
- Black shirt? Check.
- Neo-Nazi skin head haircut? Check.
- Violating an oath and the constitution? Check.
- Does not give a hoot about right and wrong? Check.
Doesn't everyone just want to sing the praises of the government monopoly union run law enforcement industry? Not if you are an American, Christian/ law abiding, and believe in the constitution.
This incompetent, ineffective, abusive, nihilist death cult is coming to a neighborhood near you soon.
The punk Republicans have already surrendered the Constitution, Now The red Muslim President owns everyone.
“She also said that the students were prohibited on the public campus from initiating conversations with their peers.”
What the hell kind of place is this?…..really?….they are prohibited from initiating conversations with their peers?
I am not a lawsuit kind of guy,....but I completely agree with the initial post,.... it is time for an attorney to step in and sue the hell out of this so called “university” on behalf of these students.
Most if not all universities do the same thing. Campus administrators want to make sure your activities are disruptive towards other students, such as handing out fliers for the KKK in a building hallway before classes. College students get all sorts of ideas, and the school wants to be sure they aren't disruptive and everybody's rights are respected.
Pretty simple really.
If the kkk were handing out fliers, are you compelled to take them? No, you can ignore them. If this conservative group were linking arms and blocking doors, like leftists like to do, then that's a problem. I don't care what kind of group they are, the first amendment belongs to every citizen.
Amp, you don't get it. It's the disruption of campus activities that you don't get. The street in front of your house is public property. How would you like people parking in front of your house and standing in the street blocking traffic as they hand out those KKK fliers. Public property, First Amendment. How about a parade that blocks people's way to work? Public property, First Amendment?
No, you missed the point. Organized activities on campuses simply need to cleared to be sure they are not disrupting other students. These guys could have easily gotten permission but they chose not to in order to make a point and get on the news. I think that's awesome, that's what college is all about. But, still, just like you not wanting a Hillary Clinton meet and greet barbeque in front of you're house, colleges want to make sure that the rights of most students aren't interfered with. Hence, you have to get permission.
You missed the point entirely. These students could have collected
Unbelievable, did you not read my post? I said if they were blocking people off from their campus business then you would be right. But handing out fliers and spreading ideas is not disruptive, unless you're a fascist. If you were a Student at this school and some conservative asked you to take a flier you could just tell them to beat it. If that conservative had friends linked arms in front of the doors then that would be wrong, GET IT?
 April 23, 2015 at 11:09pm
@mind – really – you can make that statement after 7 yrs of 0bama?
And you really want to act like things were worse under Bush than NOW? Really? Really?
If that is the case – you are even more deluded than I ever imagined… Good luck in your La La Land….reality will still jump up and bite you in the behind of course since your head is squarely up there – not sure how you will notice….
 April 23, 2015 at 9:58pm
Mostly due to anecdotal info from my own life experience (also known as inductive reasoning) – including other inductive reasoning that has experience with most polls…
No one I know voted for 0Bama..
And when the poll question might be – which would you rather have – a root canal without anesthesia OR Rubio or Jeb for Pres…color me skeptical.
I have actually been polled via phone call from those “scientific” bastions – most of the questions – I could not give an answer since the choices were ALWAYS straw men or false equivalencies…as illustrated with my root canal / Rubio example – and since there is never none of the above…
Inductively reasonable – I am skeptical
 April 23, 2015 at 9:37pm
People can say whatever they want about his (GWB) policies – agree or disagree – and however misguided he may have been in some of his choices, I NEVER doubted that GW Bush loved America.
And I never wondered to whom he bended his knee everyday seeking guidance…
There is more Honor in the dirt under GWB's toenail than in all of BH0!!
- Apr. 23, 2015 at 9:37pm .
"People can say whatever they want about his (GWB) policies – agree or disagree – and however misguided he may have been in some of his choices, I NEVER doubted that GW Bush loved America."
Ah yes, but unfortunately it is his policies that matter the most.
Soy you have got to shovel sh!t in your mouth!
@mind - really - you can make that statement after 7 yrs of 0bama?
And you really want to act like things were worse under Bush than NOW? Really? Really?
If that is the case - you are even more deluded than I ever imagined... Good luck in your La La Land....reality will still jump up and bite you in the behind of course since your head is squarely up there - not sure how you will notice....
Nobody said that things are better under Obama…..I dont know where you pulled that from.
I didn't like everything GWB did. In fact, there were times I was throwing pillows at my TV over things being reported and things he said. But, compared to BHO, GWB is a saint.
 April 23, 2015 at 8:09pm
Oh give me a break – there are people being beheaded because they are Christians, babies being killed by the millions, bakers, florists and venue owners being forced out of business…
And leftists want to whine about a slight to a fictional character?
Hey leftist cry-babies…wake up, get your noses out of facebook, tmz, kardashian’s twitter feed and face LIFE…
News FLASH – the world DOES NOT revolve around YOU (or the Kardashians)
 April 23, 2015 at 8:01pm
LOL – thanks for the giggle
 April 23, 2015 at 7:58pm
oh – pluuuleaze…while Rubio is a far better choice than Jeb or any other elite / beltway choice, Rubio is not “it” either…
Nice guy – but wrong on many fronts and wishy-washy on things that should be concrete…principles do not change based upon the audience…TAKE note GOP of that statement – let me repeat – principles do not change based upon the audience
You may not "trust" Fox anymore, but they are hardly the only one polling Rubio or Bush as front runners. Almost every poll is, and it's usually Bush as front runner, and that includes Conservative polls.
This might be the real story about Rubio
Rubio says one thing to the Anglo's and another to the Spanish speakers. Which do you believe?
The answer you get to a question is subject to who you ask.
Most of us wrote Rubio off long ago when he buddied up with those reptiles McCain, Graham & Schumer.
If the GOP nominates Jeb Bush, I'm finished with them. I'll march straight to the courthouse, change my registration to Independent, and I'll vote for someone else. I've had it with the Bush family, and the Slick Willie Family of scums. They are as bad as the Kardashian family of sluts and whores. They'll follow anyone as long as the money is right.
Rubio is tied with the combined group of don't know and somebody else. Others trail that group.
Rubio's record seems decent from what I've seen but he ain't my favorite. I think I prefer Jindal at this moment.
 April 23, 2015 at 7:54pm
I hardly need the debates to know who NOT to vote for… :)
 April 21, 2015 at 10:26pm
Sorry Dana – while I applaud the sentiment – Dingy Harry is but one of a myriad toss-up – the list is long….
It would be a shorter list to find those who aren’t abhorrent (there are only a handful -sad)
OK - now I have read it...worse than I thought - so Jeb is good with increased spying on me and my 70 + year old harmless parents?
All the more reason he should scurry under the nearest rock or pile of debris as the vermin he is
 April 21, 2015 at 7:29pm
Funny you should mention this….I was watching re-runs of Bar Rescue over the weekend…at the beginning of the show they give the average income of residents in the area where the rescue is ocurring and then give the nat’l salary average….in 2011 (could be 2012) the Nat’l average income was $53k…by 2014 the nat’l average was $51k…….I can’t remember another time in my life where wages went backwards….- thanks 0bama and progressive thieves
@ibbolton - LOL and sad that choomer-in-chief is so true - what an "accomplishment" to be proud of ...[sarc]
We went through the "Great Recession" beginning in 2008 and worsening in the early part of 2009. It was not the first time there had been a contraction of the per capita income. The same thing happened under the Reagan Administration in the early 1980s. "Real wages" never recovered to what they had been before the Reagan Recession. Real Wages are recovering some but they are still lower than they were 50 years ago, if expressed in "Constant Dollars". The people you really have to thank are the Republicans who gave huge tax breaks to the wealthy and increased spending on Bush's wars without paying for them with tax increases or spending cuts in other areas. Ronald Reagan's budget deficits put the National Debt over $1 Trillion for the first time in our history. Every President since then has had to double or triple it, just to keep things going. Clinton had the remarkably successful program called "Pay-Go" which created budget surpluses and would have paid down the debt if the program had been maintained. George W. Bush and the Republican controlled Congress let the program lapse. They also got rid of Glass-Steagle in 1999 which took away the legal barriers between investment banks and commercial banks-which sparked the "housing bubble" and the "mortgage crisis" that ruined the economy. Maybe you should pay better attention to financial news instead of watching Bar Rescue.
April 21, 2015 at 7:02pm
Oh – please……what kind of suggestive imagination do you have to have to see anything other than shadows?
Even trying to see something “spooky” I still see nothing…I guess that means I am immune to leftism…what a relief :)