User Profile: KevINtampa

KevINtampa

Member Since: January 24, 2011

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [42] February 7, 2016 at 9:14pm

    It seems the pro baby murderers now are completely against ultrasounds altogether.

    They sure are a backwards lot.

    Responses (1) +
  • February 7, 2016 at 1:48am

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kHYiyv68q2o

    LMAO, I went back and read the click bait again. I guess I’ve become immune to the Blaze’s over the top “look, quick look over here” publishing style.

    But after re-reading it, yes, I can easily see where you thought that.

  • [-1] February 7, 2016 at 1:42am

    Did it on purpose???

    Yeah, like they knew Carson was going to ice up.

    Cruz handled it well though.

    Never go full retard. Even Sean Penn figured that out…
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X6WHBO_Qc-Q

  • [17] February 7, 2016 at 1:38am

    As recent as 1/31/16 Trump has said he supports a single payer system, except of course for the uber rich:

    Trump Insists on Single-Payer, Universal Healthcare System
    http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/trump-heart-healthcare-everybody/2016/01/31/id/712069/

    *Note
    Newsmax.com has donated $200,000 to the Donald Trump campaign.
    Newsmax Media $201,073
    http://presidential-candidates.insidegov.com/l/70/Donald-Trump

  • [21] February 7, 2016 at 1:33am

    Freddy’s son, Fred III, spoke at the funeral, and that night, his wife went into labor with their son, who developed seizures that led to cerebral palsy. The Trump family promised that it would take care of the medical bills.

    Then came the unveiling of Fred Sr.’s will, which Donald had helped draft. It divided the bulk of the inheritance, at least $20 million, among his children and their descendants, “other than my son Fred C. Trump Jr.”

    Freddy’s children sued, claiming that an earlier version of the will had entitled them to their father’s share of the estate, but that Donald and his siblings had used “undue influence” over their grandfather, who had dementia, to cut them out.

    A week later, Mr. Trump retaliated by withdrawing the medical benefits critical to his nephew’s infant child.

    “I was angry because they sued,” he explained during last week’s interview.

    At the time, he attributed their exclusion from the will to his father’s “tremendous dislike” for Freddy’s ex-wife, Linda. She and Fred III declined to comment on the dispute.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/03/us/politics/for-donald-trump-lessons-from-a-brothers-suffering.html?_r=3

    Wow. That’s telling. But Trumpets are more concerned with the Cruz campaign stating an obvious eventuality – that Carson doesn’t have a chance.

  • February 6, 2016 at 7:00pm

    …so I guess I mean to say…

    The reason why we would need to force women into the fight is because we do not have enough men and women rightfully inspired to defend their country’s cause and place in the world. Why would men not want to defend their country? Maybe because too many men look at their country and do not find it in righteous standing or perhaps worse, the men of the country no longer really know what their country stands for.

    Nazi Germany didn’t fail because the German’s were less advanced or their numbers were lower. Nazi Germany lost because fascism didn’t evoke the inspiration to preserve itself in its people as greatly as love of God and freedom did in the hearts of the allies, namely the Americans. A people fights harder, and never loses, when it’s on the right side of God. I guess I should stipulate that by “God” I mean that belief that there are things greater than oneself that are worth sacrificing everything to preserve.

  • February 6, 2016 at 6:45pm

    Frost, I too will be blunt, a society that forces its women to defend it’s values is a society I would like to see fail.

    A society that celebrates sodomy, the taking of human life before it has a chance to levy its first choice, a constant taking from Peter to pay Paul, persecutes the Godly, and forces it’s women to defend such a monstrosity isn’t a society I would fight to defend; it’s a society that I would sacrifice everything to see an end to it regardless of the colors on its flag. That, at least to me, is why America is in such peril. As a country we used to fight to end such immoralities, which is why we always came out on top. I truly hope this country isn’t now finding itself defending such ugliness, because these are not causes that inspire the human soul to do what’s necessary to preserve itself. History proves that. Society’s on that side of the coin burn in epic, even biblical, manner.

  • February 6, 2016 at 6:27pm

    According to science, life on Earth was created because of the bonding nature of the carbon molecule. So what created the carbon molecule? And when you tell me what created the carbon molecule, tell me what created that…

    Fact is, with religion or science, one can use their entire life contemplating the answer to the above question; and waste their entire life. So do I place 100% belief that the world was created in 7 days by a white bearded being, nope. Do I place 100% belief that mankind developed it’s humanity over several billion years going from pond scum to what we are today? Nope. Therefore, I cannot say I have faith in either. I can be happy knowing that. And so long as I lead a life that helps rather that hurts people, I find I can be content and do something productive with my life today. And to me, that’s why I’m here; and really, that’s all I have 100% belief in and therefore I suppose it’s my only one true faith. But I do also subscribe to the philosophy of to each their own. If you want to believe a philosophy set against itself as science is, great. If you want to believe in a God that says you a here to serve and be a betterment to your fellow man, even better.

  • February 6, 2016 at 6:25pm

    City-zen, that’s a great way to see, we think alike.

  • [1] February 6, 2016 at 6:09pm

    Fact, I’m an atheist.

    By my own nature it seems I lack faith.

    Mostly, I lack faith in scientists.

    Time after time they have proven themselves to be mistaken; after all isn’t that the goal of science?

    Oh, I do no believe that those that subscribe to anthropogenic climate change are atheists. They have their God, they just don’t refer to it as God. But they do place faith in something they can not see, taste, feel, hear, or smell. Their philosophy is no different then our ancestors that chucked virgins into a volcano to stave off floods or demanded the tribe dance to stave off drought.

    The same goes with evolution. Fact is, even if the “missing link” is ever said to be the “discovered link” one would have to place faith that it isn’t simply anecdotal evidence.

    Now do I believe that mankind isn’t stagnate? Of course, because I can see that while I have similarities to my parents, I am not parents. If you want to call that evolution, fine. But to say that mankind developed self awareness knowledge and a sense of morality by evolving from a chimp into something similar to what we are today, I do not have faith in that.

    That said, I am far happier in a room full of Christians than a room full of so called atheists, which is why I go to church. Christians have a far more developed philosophy on morality, conscience, and sense humility than 99% of the atheists that supposedly have no faith but believe every word in this month’s Science Digest or Richard Dawkins’ last rag.

  • February 6, 2016 at 5:33pm

    Mons Venus because Joe Redner is the Donald Trump of Tampa?

    http://www.democracyforamerica.com/campaigns/2498-joe-redner-for-hillsborough-county-commission-district-5?lastmod=2012-11-20+11%3A44%3A46+-0500

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtY3AM04okY

  • [10] February 5, 2016 at 5:58pm

    I think McMahon Said it best.

    Ladies and gentelmen, the next President of the United States of America!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vVeVcVBW_CE&feature=youtu.be&t=5m
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZ1L013k5Hw
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGUNPMPrxvA

    Trump 2016!

  • [4] February 5, 2016 at 5:44pm

    You had your break today in the middle of your 12 hour shift, it was called lunch.

    At some point the millions of victims sitting in a publicly paid for home, eating publicly paid for Doritos, and waiting for their publicly paid for phone to ring so they can complain to someone about how unfair it is that people won’t give them a raise to sit at home and eat Doritos need a break.

    So stop being lazy, get back to work, and pay for their break.

  • [53] February 5, 2016 at 4:58am

    Freddy’s son, Fred III, spoke at the funeral, and that night, his wife went into labor with their son, who developed seizures that led to cerebral palsy. The Trump family promised that it would take care of the medical bills.

    Then came the unveiling of Fred Sr.’s will, which Donald had helped draft. It divided the bulk of the inheritance, at least $20 million, among his children and their descendants, “other than my son Fred C. Trump Jr.”

    Freddy’s children sued, claiming that an earlier version of the will had entitled them to their father’s share of the estate, but that Donald and his siblings had used “undue influence” over their grandfather, who had dementia, to cut them out.

    A week later, Mr. Trump retaliated by withdrawing the medical benefits critical to his nephew’s infant child.

    “I was angry because they sued,” he explained during last week’s interview.

    At the time, he attributed their exclusion from the will to his father’s “tremendous dislike” for Freddy’s ex-wife, Linda. She and Fred III declined to comment on the dispute.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/03/us/politics/for-donald-trump-lessons-from-a-brothers-suffering.html?_r=3

    Wow. That’s telling. I guess that’s why he wants universal healthcare. He knows what it’s like to pull the rug out from under someone. What a vindictive little man he showed himself to be here.

    Responses (6) +
  • [-1] February 3, 2016 at 4:04pm

    Name me evidence of any species making the leap to become another species.

    Not just monkey to man. Hard evidence of a rabbit becoming a chicken. A fish becoming a bat. A dolphin becoming a hedgehog.

    The theory that all life on the planet at one point crawled out of our oceans and on to land is not a fact, it is in fact a theory. A theory that some place faith in and others do not. Belief in evolution requires faith, and to subscribe faith in the theory is no different than placing faith in any other religion.

    In today’s vernacular scientist is nothing but another word for priest.

    Responses (15) +
  • [3] February 3, 2016 at 3:45pm

    Frost,

    That is true.

    But those families voluntarily made that decision as is their right. To force that on people is wrong and concedes far too much authority to our federal government.

    And if we were to lose a war because we didn’t force our women to fight, it’s a war we would lose anyways.

    The fracturing of Christianity in America is a far greater threat. No longer will men be inspired to fight for God and country, rather men now fight for sexual choice and welfare; that’s dangerous.

  • [4] February 3, 2016 at 3:38pm

    WWII our women did serve the country with out being forced into the military.

    They ran our factories, raised our children, and served bravely and in proper context.

    By saying we should draft our women, you are basically conceding that at a time of war, such as the likes of WWII, we should hand over all governance, liberty and management of business and society over to the military industrial complex.

    There is no other way to see it.

    And when a woman has a husband, son, brother, or uncle that is serving that woman DOES have skin in the game. To suggest otherwise is an immoral and disconnected argument.

    People saying women should be eligible for the draft largely only believe so because of the spite the left, namely the femi-nazis, has driven them into. Arguing that women should be forced into war away from their families is a flippant argument.

  • [2] February 3, 2016 at 3:31pm

    And mewnani,

    Not all parents would want their kids to go to grandparents or aunt’s or uncle’s. Many, I would think most, wouldn’t want anyone other than themselves watching their children. In such cases, who decides?

    The only answer is the state.

    But there’s a simple solution, don’t draft women.

    Only a weak, misguided, and incredibly demoralized society would demand that its women be sent to fight its battles.

  • [4] February 3, 2016 at 3:27pm

    Also who is left to attend to much needed jobs at home? Senior citizens?

    Such designations would be left up to the state to sort out no doubt.

  • [3] February 3, 2016 at 3:24pm

    Well then tell me, Jackie Treehorn, who would decide the fate of children who’s parents are both designated to go off to foreign lands to fight our war?

    To answer your inquisition, being as stupid as I am is quite nice as I rarely find myself behind an eight ball. My question to you is, what’s it like being so myopic?

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love