User Profile: KJGreen


Member Since: July 03, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [18] February 5, 2016 at 12:43pm

    Not sure what is in your mind @Dattebayo, but I don’t think this is simply because a black president was elected. The issue isn’t whether the president is black or white (or female). The issue is whether the president foments divisiveness as our current president and his minions have done over the last seven years.

    The so-called “uniter” is nothing of the sort.

    Responses (2) +
  • February 5, 2016 at 12:33pm

    If only their outrage was as vociferous on the other side. This rag is just as disingenuous as the rest of the left in demanding restraint before labeling acts of Islamic terrorism as such. Yet they want to get out the bright light and shine it on acts which may or may not be Islamophobic.

    And I suppose they will be verifying all of these events before publishing them to the world?

  • [1] February 4, 2016 at 10:15pm

    Here we go … same song, different chorus. Instead of being racist when we criticize the president (or Hillary), we will be sexist. Never mind that the criticism levied will never be addressed, just like Hillary didn’t address the real issue that Sanders raised. What does her gender have to do with whether she is part of the establishment or not?

    What a crock.

  • [20] February 4, 2016 at 9:54am

    When I saw the headline starting with “Another air bag problem,” I thought that Bloomberg had officially announced getting into the presidential race.

    Responses (5) +
  • [1] February 1, 2016 at 2:04pm

    My boss used to tell me it is a lot easier to tell the truth … that way you don’t have to keep track of all the lies you’ve told!

    Oh what a tangled web we weave, when first we practise to deceive! (Sir Walter Scott; Marmion, 1808)

  • [1] February 1, 2016 at 1:58pm

    Need more debates to get their total debate viewership up to two digits.

  • [2] January 29, 2016 at 5:18pm

    Your tagline is right on the mark. Obama’s assertion “The typical woman who works full-time still earns 79 cents for every dollar the typical man does,” does not mean anything to me. (Even ignoring his own hypocrisy on the matter).

    Please describe in more detail these so-called “typical” people. And, when you report your pay statistics, please be sure to compare the exact demographics, including type of job, level of responsibility, number of hours worked, total compensation (e.g., accounting for differences in non-dollar compensation) and any other attribute that makes it a credible comparison.

  • [3] January 27, 2016 at 12:07pm

    I propose that medical facilities post a daily scorecard to inform patients as to whether their provider is having a good day or bad day. Maybe they can do a range of smiley faces.

    I sure wouldn’t want this doctor treating me on one of her bad days.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] January 26, 2016 at 7:43pm

    OMG. Can you imagine what he would do with an even bigger pen and phone?!?

  • [6] January 26, 2016 at 7:40pm

    I’m curious if Trump has a master plan to test how outrageous he can be while still retaining his support (reference his “I could shoot someone” and still be popular comments from a few days ago). While I like his bravado and lack of fear in saying a lot of things that are on many people’s minds, I can’t deal with it any more.
    Your last sentence nailed what has been nagging at me for a while. Obama has been a detestable, narcissistic, divider during his tenure to-date. And this was after he campaigned as a “healer”. I didn’t buy it when he was campaigning and he proved me out. Unfortunately, I don’t see Trump taking any different path. (And this doesn’t even get into considering whether he is a wolf in sheep’s clothing anyway).
    It will be interesting to see how many more sharks the Donald can jump.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] January 26, 2016 at 3:34pm

    Like Obama several years ago, Hillary doesn’t care if the results of her tax strategy are negative or if they collect less revenue. She only cares if the tax system is more “fair”.

    Progressive definition of equality … make everyone equally miserable.

  • [16] January 26, 2016 at 11:16am

    Wow, this article has so many windows into the liberal mind:

    “it is “too early” to draw conclusions from the stabbing death of a female aid worker…”
    But if it were something that matched your narrative / policy position, you’d be concluding all over the place.

    “Many of those young people who come to Sweden have had traumatic experiences and there are no easy answers”
    Wouldn’t want to shine a light on the issue that maybe bringing them in to the country wasn’t such a good idea after all. Plus, this statement reeks of rationalization or acceptance of this behavior as a necessary byproduct of their policy.

    “She was a person who wanted to do good, who wanted to be good…”
    This is a tragic event and I feel bad for the family and their loss. However, wishing the world were a less dangerous place doesn’t make it so. Thinking that you can change the behavior of more than just a few of these people is fantasy.

    “We’re dealing with more incidents like these since the arrival of so many more refugees from abroad…”
    Let’s implement our feel-good policy first and worry about the consequences later.

    “Swedish police have been instructed to refrain from informing the public about the key identifying details of criminal suspects, including skin color, ethnicity and nationality in order to avoid being labeled racist”
    Yes, we wouldn’t want to publish facts that might help solve a crime or apprehend a suspect, would we?

  • [6] January 25, 2016 at 7:38pm

    “I don’t know what being lied to means.” How Clintonesque. (what the meaning of “is” is). Although, I suspect she does know what being lied to means — like the guy at the bar who told her she was hot.

  • [2] January 25, 2016 at 4:22pm

    Exactly what I was thinking … if someone can’t reach the bar, then lower it.

  • [15] January 25, 2016 at 2:58pm

    Wonder if the media will run with a “headline story” about Hillary’s break for water like they did with Rubio in 2013 … doubt it.

  • [6] January 22, 2016 at 12:04pm

    Nice strategy by the attorneys. Raise a ruckus about all those whose judgment is “tainted” by comments of Trump (or anyone else for that matter), thus tainting all those who had not heard such comments.

    Also, Bergdahl’s attorneys may want to look up the legal definition of “defamatory”. Most legal definitions include the concept of “intentional false communications”. I’m not seeing too much “false” in Trump’s comments.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] January 20, 2016 at 1:02pm

    Is anyone as weary as I am of these pols who have to tell us how rational (e.g., “common sense”) their actions are?

    Of course, the implication is that if you don’t agree with them, then you must not have common sense.

  • [3] January 19, 2016 at 3:07pm

    I don’t think they’ve really thought this one out.

    So … the religion of peace (and honor killings) is going to permit their youth to be educated in the finer details of sexuality, addressing the “acute need for knowledge about everything from sexually transmitted diseases and condoms to abortion rights, gender equality, legislation and LGBTQ rights.” And this doesn’t even include the concept of respecting women.

    I can’t wait to see how this works out.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] January 18, 2016 at 10:29pm

    Does anyone else see the irony in Hillary commenting on this situation? Let’s juxtapose her comments from January 23, 2013 with this situation:

    “With all due respect, the fact is we had” [some very sick people]. “Was it because of” [incompetence] “or was it because of” [some government bureaucrats] “out for a walk one night who decided that they’d” [go and poison some citizens]? “What difference at this point does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator…”

    Not trying to minimize or rationalize the water crisis in Flint, however, this is yet another great example of Hillary’s standard for others being different than the standard for herself.

  • [5] January 18, 2016 at 10:14pm

    Great explanation of the problem and its timeline. Thanks for sharing.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love