User Profile: knowbodyknows

knowbodyknows

Member Since: January 28, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] January 25, 2015 at 11:45am

    You give them way to much credit. They would cut off the horns and leave the rest.

  • [26] January 25, 2015 at 11:27am

    It has been tested. Farmers have injected CO2 into greenhouses for decades to improve plant growth. It never causes any issues with overheating the greenhouses.
    If CO2 is so potent that a fraction of a percent can destroy life on earth then experimenting in a small closed environment should be playing with death. The only result however is better plant growth.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] January 25, 2015 at 11:15am

    Hypocrisy at its best. In politics cheating to win is not only acceptable but something to brag about. Even though politics affects our future and our childrens future. Football is simply a distraction for people while they wait around for someone else to solve all their problems for them. Same as booze, drugs and pornography. Cheating in football is inconsequential, unlike sports everyone gets paid just like grade school when everyone gets a participation trophy.
    I have no doubt however that a large majority of Americans want the government to take over management of football to ensure everything stays fare. Americans believe the government solves everything. I would prefer my tax dollars go to more useful purposes but in America the government would find an equally useless purpose for it anyway.

  • January 25, 2015 at 4:04am

    Obama has yet to even get the US a reach around in his negotiations. I’m sure our relations with Cuba will be equally one sided.

  • [5] January 25, 2015 at 3:57am

    What’s easier to believe a this point?
    1: The TSA actually confiscated this stuff
    2: The TSA got this stuff from police evidence lockers and says they confiscated it to justify their existence.
    I believe 2.

  • [18] January 25, 2015 at 2:49am

    Michaels Jesus (Obama) hides in DC and indiscriminately kills families with drones.
    When is Mike going to call Obama a coward.

  • [29] January 25, 2015 at 2:45am

    The kids have to fear suspension just as much as the teachers need worry about being fired. It’s the result of zero tolerance rules.
    Since as a society we don’t believe in accountability we really have no right to expect any better.

  • [3] January 24, 2015 at 11:36am

    The obvious answer would be that the fix is in and Bill had to get in bed with government to get big. Now since he owes all his success to socialism he backs it 100%.
    Obamas “you didn’t build that” could actually pertain to giant companies traded on the exchange. I don’t think a single one of them would ever have existed or not have gone bankrupt had it not been for government intrusion. The biggest problem with socialism is it replaces natural law with mans desires and therefore has zero chance of working.

  • [7] January 24, 2015 at 11:26am

    Yes, but in DC the constitution is tp so it doesn’t matter.

  • [8] January 23, 2015 at 1:51pm

    Does the constitution say the government has the right?
    No, well then there is your answer.
    The founders didn’t know about radar you say.
    Then call a constitutional convention to amend the constitution until then the answer is still no, the government does not have the authority.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] January 23, 2015 at 1:35pm

    Kudos to the SWAT team. They were at the right house, they didn’t kill all the residents and they treated an innocent like an innocent.
    Good job.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] January 23, 2015 at 1:24pm

    Once you give the government power they tell you. Just like marriage is now for any couple that wants it. Once you put enforcement in the hands of government you lose control and the government will take that new found power to create what government wants.
    Giving doctors the right to choose whether or not they want to perform abortions and stopping the “glamorization” of abortion will go further to curb it than mandating government to protect fetuses like humans.
    People are so caught up in the emotion of this that logic is being thrown out the window.
    When has more government involvement helped anything? It is unbelievable to me that after all that has happened in the last decade people still can’t see the danger in granting so much power to the government. Anyone who believes government controlled pregnancy will not be the natural end to government protecting fetuses as human is very very naïve.
    No worries though. I’m a guy so I don’t fear government controlled pregnancy at all. I’m not the one who will go to jail for violating a government rule while pregnant. I’m not weighing in on the morality of abortion. I’m warning of the dangers of trying to use government as a solution.

  • [1] January 23, 2015 at 1:02pm

    Prison is a warehouse with a revolving door. Most people come out worse than when they went in.

  • [-1] January 23, 2015 at 12:43pm

    Nice straw man but it skips the point. The question I’m simply trying to get people to ask is. Do you want the government regulating pregnancy?
    Simple question. Your answer doesn’t even actually matter to me. The question is for you. You see what the government is doing with marriage do you want the same for pregnancy?

  • [7] January 23, 2015 at 12:36pm

    Exactly, there should be no amendments. If a bill can’t pass on it’s own, there’s probably a good reason for it.

  • [16] January 23, 2015 at 12:26pm

    I would love to see news organizations throw these stories back in the faces of politicians that speak of the importance of law.
    Subjective laws are only useful to tyranny and are the enemy of justice.

  • [2] January 23, 2015 at 12:23pm

    “New”. America has been this way for as long as I’ve been alive.

  • [16] January 23, 2015 at 12:18pm

    Well, I’m for keeping the government out of where it doesn’t belong. What this man suggests would open the door for government controlled reproduction. If you give the fetus “human rights” then you give government the mandate of overseeing pregnancy. Drinking or smoking while pregnant becomes felony assault. Becoming pregnant will be like starting a business. You will have to give up all human rights to the regulatory power of the government.
    The religious wanted the government involved in marriage at one time too. How’s that turning out for them?
    God wants us to spread his word not force it down people throats. If you can’t make an effective argument against killing children then what’s wrong with you? People will do as they please regardless of mans law anyway.
    This is why I see no difference between Rs and Ds anymore. They both think all our solutions will be found in bigger government. The only real difference is the Ds state it proudly while the Rs try to hide there feelings behind lies and innuendo.

    Responses (6) +
  • [4] January 22, 2015 at 8:13pm

    “The Republicans’ bill would also prevent the Federal Communications Commission from making its own net neutrality rules, countering any actions the FCC might be planning to take.”

    How is a republican bill going to stop unconstitutional agencies from making up laws when the constitution itself failed to do it?
    Wouldn’t dismantling the agencies have a better chance of being effective?

    Responses (1) +
  • [5] January 22, 2015 at 8:08pm

    With this lineup democrats win. Even if they ran Biden.

123 To page: Go