User Profile: knowbodyknows

knowbodyknows

Member Since: January 28, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • July 27, 2014 at 8:31pm

    The government doesn’t read law, enforce law, or even obey law. So your points while well taken are moot. Your ability to read and understand English makes no more difference than my ability to do the same. The only real topic of the day should be “How do we bring accountability to government” because talking about the effects of a government run amuck will in no way change anything. I still take issue with calling forced economic activity a tax but as you can tell from reality my opinion doesn’t matter either.

  • July 27, 2014 at 5:02pm

    I saw that documentary.

  • [8] July 27, 2014 at 11:04am

    If having then raising a minimum wage is so effective in fighting the war on poverty, why hasn’t it worked yet? Instead of trying the same thing over and over while actually expecting a different result why not try something different. Lets cut the federal government and see if that helps people afford life easier.

    Responses (2) +
  • July 26, 2014 at 12:07pm

    What about google?

  • July 26, 2014 at 11:58am

    I don’t think the torture is relevant. I think we should be paying attention to the debacle. The government wants to control every aspect of your life. They even claim their better at making your life choices than you would be. This, however, is just another example of government at it’s best. They can’t even execute someone with out screwing it up. People should remember this story next time the government is asking for more power. Do you really want these idiots running your healthcare, your retirement accounts, your education, your living standards, or anything else for that matter?

  • July 26, 2014 at 11:14am

    Yes it would appear news media is as interested in reporting news as the government is at solving problems.

  • [-2] July 25, 2014 at 10:40am

    re·li·gion [ri-lij-uhn] Show IPA
    noun
    1. a set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the creation of a superhuman agency or agencies, usually involving devotional and ritual observances, and often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs.
    As you can see God is not in the definition of religion. Since governments believe they are the super human agency that creates everything and should control all life then government can be considered a religion. Hence, yes religion is at the base of all war. Don’t forget atheism has also been deemed religion by our courts.

  • [92] July 24, 2014 at 7:23pm

    If you like your…….. you all know the rest.

  • July 24, 2014 at 5:37pm

    Don’t forget Obamacare.

  • [17] July 23, 2014 at 11:18pm

    Private citizens have done time for just lying in one of these hearings. Why are government employees exempt from that? We’re not becoming a two class system based on the rich and the poor. It’s based on the rulers and the ruled. Apparently laws are just for us common folk(the ruled).

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] July 23, 2014 at 5:37pm

    Like all criminals, they don’t feel bad for what they’ve done they just feel bad they’ve been caught.

  • July 23, 2014 at 5:33pm

    Urban deer are nothing new. They’re so bad in some towns that the fish and game officers end up thinning them. The deer have nothing to fear during hunting season because they live in town all year. Very common problem.

  • [2] July 23, 2014 at 5:27pm

    Sorry there should be a “while” before screaming to reference screaming back to the police. I would hire an editor but I haven’t seen any evidence on news sites to suggest they do any better.

  • [26] July 23, 2014 at 4:16pm

    All cops in America should watch this video and take note. That’s what resisting arrest looks like. It’s not five cops dog piled on an eighty year old women who’s already in cuffs screaming Stop Resisting, Stop Resisting.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] July 23, 2014 at 4:00pm

    The reason for Obama care is simple. The government has already established the practice of being able to control behavior based on “cost to the public”. It is the basis for all victimless crimes(the public becomes the victim) and most regulation. Examples:
    “You can’t do drugs because when you ruin your life the state has to pay for you”
    “You have to have car insurance because if there are unpaid medical bills from an accident the public gets stuck with the bill”
    “You have to have health insurance so the state doesn’t get stuck with your medical bills”
    Of coarse no one ever considers that the states involvement might be the problem in the first place.
    None of these things cost the public anything if the public isn’t enabling the bad behavior in the first place. What people should be asking is Where does it stop? Now the government can outlaw any behavior that “might ” increase your medical costs exactly as though you were a junky. If you think New Yorks banning of foods and drink were crazy, hang on. That’s just a taste of what’s coming. Remember the precedent has already been set. There is no court battle here this practice has already been allowed for decades.

  • [4] July 23, 2014 at 3:34pm

    They should try it on two conditions.
    1 if any crime takes place involving a gun after the law passes it is repealed instantly.
    2 If the law repeals then Donald Berwick uses a gun to kill himself proving guns kill so he doesn’t die a liar.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 23, 2014 at 3:14pm

    It’s easy for we the people to understand the constitution we simply read it. It’s written in English you know. It’s all the idiots in congress that disregard it. They try to use the phony elitist piglatin language
    taught in ivy league schools to argue about the meaning of words like “is” so they can pretend to be following it. Simple fact of life is reality trumps everything. At this point in time when it comes to all things constitutional. At this point what difference does it make? The constitution is simply a document(no one in congress has read) the uses to beat us over the head with when they want their way. Then when it no longer serves them they simply ignore it to get their way. It doesn’t matter what the constitution says or means. If it does serve the government it will be ignored anyway. It’s given great lip service but in reality is treated the same as all other laws. It’s either used against we the people or ignored entirely.

  • July 23, 2014 at 12:23pm

    That will get employers motivated to hire people.

  • [14] July 23, 2014 at 12:24am

    Why do we call it road rage. Millions of people drive their whole lives while managing to keep their cool while the idiot in the next lane is ticking them off. Why can’t we admit road rage doesn’t bring out the worst in drivers. These drivers just suck as human beings. I’m sure there are a lot of instances where these same people fly off the handle where better people just handle it. Driving is privilege, it’s time to start taking it away from those that can’t handle the responsibility.

    Responses (2) +
  • [2] July 23, 2014 at 12:15am

    I didn’t know usually meant “almost never”, guess I need a dictionary. Maybe I’ll look up the word “is” while I’m at it.

123 To page: Go