User Profile: knowbodyknows

knowbodyknows

Member Since: January 28, 2013

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [10] May 3, 2016 at 12:36pm

    Confiscation without conviction. Thank the war on drugs for this precedent. It didn’t even slow down the use of drugs but it’s certainly speeding up the loss of liberty.

  • [4] May 2, 2016 at 12:43pm

    Society has no right to steal from me to provide social welfare or healthcare to ANYONE. Regardless of whether or not it’s “their own fault” in the eyes of anyone else. Why should I have to pay for the alcoholic? Because the government god says alcohol is ok? What about the guy that gets hurt on a motorcycle or the hiker that gets stranded in the wilderness? Who decides what actions are reckless enough to be cut off and what risky actions are acceptable for help? The government god? Why is it bad to pay the healthcare of a drug addict but ok to spend billions incarcerating them? Because the government god says so? You’re still stealing my money to do either. Why doesn’t that make the supporters of the great government god thieves? Why not get government out of welfare and let natural law decide the results of acting recklessly instead of pretending to be or speak for God?

  • [12] May 2, 2016 at 11:33am

    The anti-capitalist demonstrators?
    Why protest something that doesn’t exist? The world exists in various stages of socialism which is nothing more than a transition to communism. Which is why conditions never improve in socialist countries. Central planning never has and never will work.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 28, 2016 at 1:38pm

    Same can be said of all bureaucracies. Especially the behemoth in DC called the federal government.

    In reply to the contribution The Hypocrisy of Big Labor's Politics

  • [1] April 27, 2016 at 3:52pm

    Give it ten minutes and there’ll be an article with Obama talking about how great the economy is.

    Responses (1) +
  • [52] April 27, 2016 at 12:32pm

    The cops should be charged with false arrest and assaulting citizens. They should lose their badges and their civil rights and go to prison just like “regular” people would.

  • [3] April 27, 2016 at 1:17am

    They are all friends in DC. They act like WWF wrestlers to fool voters into believing they’re making a choice. Republicans are as conservative as democrats are pro 2nd amendment. Anyone elected president will have 2 choices. Keep to the status quo or knock down the house of cards and deal with the resulting riots. We have fiat currency and baseline budgeting. Both are designed to keep government growing or collapse it into chaos if a president ever decides to change coarse. It’s the same theory of mutually assured destruction that is supposed to prevent nuclear war only in this case it’s to prevent any return to constitutional government. Both policies were also put in place by republicans. Nixon did fiat currency and Reagan did baseline budgeting. The idea that republicans are conservative is just that, an idea. It has no basis in reality. We already went over the cliff. May as well have a few laughs during the fall because the landing is going to hurt.

  • [4] April 27, 2016 at 12:39am

    Who is peddling a constitutional republic? It’s not republicans or democrats.

    Responses (3) +
  • [3] April 26, 2016 at 11:52pm

    For Cruz to win it would have to be up to the delegates.

  • [-5] April 26, 2016 at 11:46pm

    Did I hurt the humorless socialists feelings? Do you need a safe space now or are you already curled up under the bed? :(

  • [2] April 26, 2016 at 10:51pm

    Thanks. I laugh every time I watch it. I need to stop now before I fall off my chair and hurt myself.

  • [5] April 26, 2016 at 10:42pm

    With socialists in office. Just like all other elections. It’s pretty tough for them to lose considering they are the only ones running.

  • [41] April 26, 2016 at 10:34pm

    Good. Now start doing more anti-Hillary ads. The one with her barking was hilarious.

    Responses (3) +
  • [9] April 26, 2016 at 10:08pm

    ” they just want to begin the anti-democrat cycle.”
    They’ve been waiting since 08. How long till they figure out they’ve been had?

  • [15] April 26, 2016 at 9:53pm

    It’s amusing that republicans bash Trump for being liberal as though the republicans they’ve been voting into office for decades are conservative. What’s fiscally responsible about baseline budgeting or constitutional about the war on drugs? Republicans and democrats are different sides of the same socialist cow pie.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] April 26, 2016 at 8:39pm

    Not sure what you’re ranting about. I never suggested Trump couldn’t be sued. I was asking why we can’t sue congress for doing exactly the same thing. Why do you believe fraud is OK as long as the government is doing it?

  • [18] April 26, 2016 at 8:23pm

    The lawsuits claim Trump misrepresented what the Trump University program truly offered.

    So does congress with every bill they pass. Why can’t we sue them?

    Responses (2) +
  • [3] April 26, 2016 at 5:55pm

    Sanders would probably win as an independent. Hillary isn’t winning the primary, it’s being handed to her. A lot of disenfranchised democrats are likely to not vote or even possibly vote Trump. If Sanders ran independent the election would be between him and Hillary. Without the shenanigans of the primaries, Sanders would mop the floor with Hillary. Not that it matters. Elections now are just two socialist parties running against each other. Obviously socialism will win until we collapse or become communists then collapse or government commits genocide, we become communist and then collapse anyway. Socialism always ends. It just never ends well.

  • [2] April 26, 2016 at 5:09pm

    Unfortunately the police state is loved and supported by both republicans and democrats. It will never be a voting issue. It’s all about how that power can be used against the other side not about the government not having the power to abuse. Just like a government powerful enough to give is powerful enough to take away, a government powerful enough to legislate morals according to one sides wishes is powerful enough to swing to the other side. The question should never be about whether or not a war on drugs or on poverty is moral or good or righteous. It should be about whether or not it’s constitutional. Since both parties want to use government as a boot in the neck of the other side neither party will ever scale back the powers of government or give any more than lip service to the constitution. Simply because doing so would bring all of their own “special powers” into question as well. The police state is nothing more than one of the milestones of socialism as it brings us closer and closer to communism.

    Responses (1) +
  • [15] April 26, 2016 at 4:45pm

    You have to create a crisis to take advantage of a crisis.

123 To page: Go
Restoring Love