User Profile: knowbodyknows


Member Since: January 28, 2013


123 To page: Go
  • [21] June 24, 2016 at 11:39pm

    Why bother having the people vote in the primaries if the delegates are not at any point bound to the will of the people? This guy is trying to set a legal precedent that will nullify the will of the people in the primaries. I guess Jeb still has a chance.

    Responses (3) +
  • [9] June 24, 2016 at 11:34pm

    Virginia law states: “Delegates and alternates shall be bound to vote on the first ballot at the national convention for the candidate receiving the most votes in the primary unless that candidate releases those delegates and alternates from such vote.”

  • [1] June 24, 2016 at 11:31pm

    House Panel Uncovers Possible Violations

    So. The house has proven it’s ineffectiveness at investigating violations. Why waste taxpayer money on another one. The house should dissolve all their panels and stop wasting the time and money.

  • [3] June 24, 2016 at 7:59pm

    Sounds like a set up for Parliament overriding the vote and staying. They’ll use the drop in stocks to scare the people into begging Parliament to save them from their own “recklessness”. They’re fools if they fall for it. The EU is a sinking ship. No one who stayed on the Titanic survived.

  • June 24, 2016 at 2:54pm

    The grey stands for “no vacancy”. It’s not that we’re anti- immigration it’s just that we’re already overpopulated. Sorry, but I’m sure you understand.

  • [1] June 24, 2016 at 2:44pm

    “It’s not the U.K. referendum that would make Europe fall apart,” he said. “It’s the lack of solutions to problems, whether its low wages, high unemployment or the terrorist threat.”

    So true. Once the rest of the EU sees the UK doing better the exit will accelerate. Fear of the unknown will no longer hold it together. Europeans will figure out that central control fails because one size fits all solutions don’t exist. Now if Americans would wake up perhaps they would understand the the federal government has become our version of the EU and demand it return the states powers or just dissolve. The anti-federalist were right. Federalism is socialism wearing lipstick and is more dangerous than any perceived danger of not having a federal government. If the states can’t come together to defend each other without a federal government then we were never united to begin with. Trading liberty for security results in neither regardless of how it’s done. Todays federal government is proof positive of that. The constitution is a complete failure at keeping government in check. It has no teeth and is easily disregarding by the individuals in DC. Start hanging politicians for violating it and maybe it will have some effectiveness. Otherwise it may as well be tp.

  • [5] June 24, 2016 at 12:42pm

    Merrill said that Clinton “has always made an effort to be transparent since entering public life, whether it be the release of over 30 years of tax returns, years of financial disclosure forms, or asking that 55,000 pages of work emails from her time of secretary of state be turned over to the public.”

    What about the transcripts of her speeches to wall street? Or were we supposed to forget about those?

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 24, 2016 at 12:36pm

    The next president can only be a disaster if he or she goes along with congress. Hillary definitely will and Trump likely will. That would make the status quo in congress the problem. Obama only gets to be a dictator because congress allows it. Likely because he is advancing the agenda the RINOs want. Hillary will be even more popular with the RINOs because she is a warmonger too. Since I always vote independent, I like the idea the of one being electable this year but doubt it will happen. My only point is that congress is a much bigger problem than the presidency at this point. That being said the idea that Trump would be a bigger disaster than Hillary is absurd. He can only buck the establishment or get along. So he can either be as big of a disaster as Hillary or less of one. I encourage republicans to go independent but understand that without dumping the republican party forever, nothing will be fixed. As long as your voting republican your telling the likes of McCain and McConnell that you like what they’re doing. If you don’t believe me then go back and look at their reactions to 2010,2012 and 2014 congressional election results. The republican party is as progressive as the democrats. Your not going to unrot a bushel of apples by tossing in a fresh one. The president can only sign legislation passed by congress. There is no way congress will pass legislation a non progressive wants. Being independent this year and republican in 2020 won’t fix anything.

  • [8] June 24, 2016 at 11:45am

    They fake attacks overseas. Why would this be a surprise?

    Responses (1) +
  • [26] June 24, 2016 at 11:41am

    The UK could flush the 350 million pounds a week down the toilet and get more for it than dumping it into the EU.
    Same could be said of the money we dump into the UN and NATO. The global fiat currency system run by the central banks is a one way ticket to Greece. The Brits were wise to dump it even if they didn’t understand what they were doing. We should be so lucky here.

  • [4] June 23, 2016 at 9:56pm

    More likely they’ll remember mom getting arrested for spanking them. Next time it will be the kids that call the police. It may have been them who called this time.

  • [11] June 23, 2016 at 5:51pm

    Osama never had any problem acquiring guns. He was well connected to the black market. Just like buying drugs. Want some? No problem. Even if you are currently in prison.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 23, 2016 at 2:33pm

    If the graph is accurate then the country is doomed since it shows that at least half of America is willing to allow government to change or ignore the constitution at will. It’s “shall not be infringed”, a legal amendment to the constitution or the document means nothing.

    Responses (1) +
  • [20] June 23, 2016 at 12:06pm

    Maybe if democrats stood for something they would get more respect.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 23, 2016 at 11:27am

    I guess the AP hasn’t sent Glenn the story yet.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] June 23, 2016 at 10:18am

    They can vote however they like. They are not going to be allowed to leave. Their own rulers will make sure of that.

  • [14] June 23, 2016 at 10:13am

    Politicians are no longer even trying to hide the fact that they view themselves as rulers, not representatives. Sadly, the people accept it and support it. Things will only get worse until we hit bottom. Then we’ll stay there for a hundred years or more. At least we did it all “for the children”.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] June 22, 2016 at 10:37pm

    Why? Let them sit there until election. It’ll prevent more damage. Anything worth passing would never get through either chamber or be signed by the president anyway. They should let the democrats sit there and give we the people a break from anymore “pass it to see what’s in it” legislation more a few months. Who knows, it might make congress more popular.

  • [7] June 22, 2016 at 4:09pm

    Young people use the internet for Facebook and possibly shopping. Neither is very useful for being informed.

    Responses (1) +
  • [8] June 22, 2016 at 12:41pm

    It would be more effective to simply outlaw insurance. The same way the 30 mortgage allowed housing costs to skyrocket, insurance allows health care to skyrocket. Insurance is nothing more than privatized socialism and leads to the same result. Eventually the system runs out of other peoples money. That’s why insurance must be mandated to get everyone involved. Just like fully socialized countries like N Korea must force people to stay to continue to have a population.

    Responses (1) +
123 To page: Go
Restoring Love