User Profile: KP74

Member Since: October 03, 2012

CommentsDisplaying KP74's 10 most recent comments.

  • He is 14, which is a minor. In the big cities it is a crime to report the name of a minor accused of a crime.

    It is about time to allow the naming of the suspects, especially for the youth gangs, etc.

  • The artificial insemination was actually a side issue. As they taught us in Catholic school having sex (and its consequences) is a sin, as is having a child out of wedlock.

    Was there a reason that Ms Dias did not ask what the church teachings were (since the article states that she is not Catholic)?

    An yes, it appears that it was the money.

  • Just wondering what would happen if Issa sent out a tweet right now stating “There is absolutely no proof at this time that David Plouffe is involved in the child pornography ring.” Technically, it is as accurate as Mr. Plouffe’s statements and just as misleading (I have no knowledge of Mr. Plouffe being involved, by the way).

    Remember also that Harry Reid, per reliable sources, has not paid state income taxes for at least the past decade. He has consistently failed to produce his state income tax records to refute the charge.

  • Here I thought that Moses, when GIVEN the laws, went down the mountain and promptly broke them on purpose.

    Moses then went back and got a replacement set of ten laws which he CARRIED back down the mountain.

    Mr. Holder has admitted breaking laws, so he is like Moses in that part.

    Mr. Holder could not even carry the 74,000 pages just in the tax code (a single law) so he is not like Moses in his strength.

    Mr. Holder has never given anyone a law, the AG is charged with enforcing the law. Whichever university granted Mr. Dyson and Mr. Bashir their degrees should issue a recall immediately as they are showing either a willingness to not tell the truth or just plain ignorance (choose one or both).

  • “fracturing her humorous”

    How funny is that, it would be worse had she fractured her humerus instead.

  • In the article there are a few errors. For Mr. Alexander, there is no such thing as a “former” five-star general. That rank is given for life (and even after, as the last person to achieve five star rank was George Washington in 1976).

    The President does not render a salute, ever. He returns the salute when it is rendered, Mr. Alexander.

    With military protocol, there is one instance where an inferior rank may be rendered a salute, that being rendered to a recipient of the Congressional Medal of Honor.

    Much as I do not like the current administration and our dear leader this instance looks like an honest error rather than a deliberate slight.

  • Mr. Carney is, as usual for this administration, showing either ignorance or duplicity.

    Having worked with many employees of the IRS (including my wife) Mr. Carney is seriously demented in stating that the IRS is an independent agency. Per statute, it is a part of the Treasury Department. Perhaps he may consult with the members of the cabinet (aside, when was the last cabinet meeting with your boss held, Mr. Carney?) to find out what other delusions that you may hold which are not true.

    The IRS Inspector General should not have informed the White House counsel of ANYTHING. I realize that the delusional Mr. Carney may be of the opinion that the IRS is an independent agency so he may well be ignorant of the difference between the TREASURY IG and the IRS IG. FYI, Mr. Carney, the investigation is being done by the TREASURY IG as the PARENT of the IRS.

  • 5.In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.

    This is what they used in the case of Richard Nixon. There are others used against RMN which are also applicable.

  • History lesson, Article 2 section 5 states:

    “5.In disregard of the rule of law, he knowingly misused the executive power by interfering with agencies of the executive branch, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Criminal Division, and the Office of Watergate Special Prosecution Force, of the Department of Justice, and the Central Intelligence Agency, in violation of his duty to take care that the laws be faithfully executed.”

    From the articles of impeachment against Richard Nixon. Deja vu, all over again.

  • Just wondering if you know what the charge is against the surviving Boston Marathon bomber? Specific charge is the use of a weapon of mass destruction.

    Just wondering if you know what the charge was, and the conviction was obtained, for the two who sought to attack the Military Entry Processing Station in Seattle? Conviction was for planning the use of weapons of mass destruction.

    Both of these were terrorist attacks (or planned attacks) under the Obama administration and federal charges were under the Justice Department of Mr. Eric Holder. Seems like they have a different view of WMDs than you, but their view is an official one sanctioned by the court system, yours is what it is.