User Profile: KrishnaDas

Member Since: March 29, 2011


  • [58] January 14, 2016 at 1:36pm

    Leftists are not against guns.. They are just in favor of guns being in the hands of the state and used to implement their ideology, which no one would voluntarily ever submit to.

    Responses (1) +
  • October 24, 2014 at 7:40pm

    It’s idiotic to compare Canada to the US. Even if Canada didn’t have gun laws, it would less violent. Canadians are different.

    I live in New Hampshire, and we have lower crime rates and gun violence than most western European countries yet we have a very high ownership of firearms. How do you explain that? Your comparison falls flat on it’s face.

  • September 21, 2014 at 1:45pm

    What did the socialists use to provide light in order to read before the candle? Electricity.

  • [2] September 15, 2014 at 10:44am

    Kind of like the idiots who told us, before 9/11, to sit calmly and abide by the demands of hijackers.

  • [3] September 11, 2014 at 10:59am

    Tell that to the interventionists in both parties. I see conservatives still clinging to the idea the Iraq was a good idea because to admit that it wasn’t would be to admit that team red is wrong or has been wrong. The interventionists are certainly going to try to run the show here too. They count on the short memory span of the average voter who becomes even more forgetful the more fearful they become. The interventionists don’t want you to think about the price-tag either. What’s 1.7T in the Iraq debacle when the debt is 17T? Whats another 17T? They have a printing-press and an anesthetized electorate. Anything goes.

  • [7] September 11, 2014 at 10:31am

    Why? Because he stated a fact- that by removing secular dictators, we ended up with even worse theocratic terrorists to fill the vacuum? He’s right. You can’t talk about ISIS and the like and exclude the full story of the US government’s blunders in foreign policy.

    Responses (2) +
  • [5] September 6, 2014 at 11:01am

    Some times, they do get it right. Don’t just assume because they are leftists, which I’m not fond of, that everything they do is bad. They have taken sides in issues that affected liberty of those who you would assume they would never advocate for:

  • August 23, 2014 at 11:19am

    smelly – gah, not enough caffeine yet.

  • August 23, 2014 at 11:19am

    The fact it’s only two people makes me suspect some freegans or other smell hipsters.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] August 23, 2014 at 11:17am

    For a good price, he could go down to Home Depot in the morning and hire some hombres – about 5 of them – and ask them to help him deal with this problem. Some dinero up front, some dinero quando la problem es no mas.

  • January 7, 2014 at 9:13am

    Kelly Ayotte, without even reading the article, who I knew would support Yellen. I need to call a tea-party state senator and beg him to primary against her.

  • January 6, 2014 at 10:47am

    And that’s a collectivist statement, lumping a group of individuals together and proclaiming they all are the same is a fallacy on top of ad hominem. What evidence do you have to support your statement? Why is it so hard to view people as individuals? That this has to even be explained on this site demonstrates that some individuals who purport to be “conservatives” don’t realize the essentials of individualism.

  • December 17, 2013 at 10:21am

    I enjoyed Bryan Suits (war veteran) show when I lived in the Seattle area. Good for him.

    Responses (1) +
  • December 11, 2013 at 10:31am

    Other parts like Detroit? Or how about Oakland? Newark? Philly? Broke-a-fornia? ****-clog-hole? Looter-ville DC? New York? Whatever their views are, the opposite of I will assume are the correct views. And the reality of these places is a testament to this.

  • December 4, 2013 at 3:40pm

    Any time a leftist utters the word “invest”, you better hide your wallet.

  • November 28, 2013 at 11:04am

    man, and this was making the rounds on facebook. Something about it seemed to be hype-ish

  • November 25, 2013 at 2:44pm

    As Ayn Rand said, a gun is not an argument. Banning something is the same thing as using a gun to say “no, you can’t do this” says the state. “Why?” asks the individual “Because, I said so, and this gun backs up my decision” says the state.

    Wouldn’t you rather win with ideas and persuasion?

    Responses (4) +
  • November 21, 2013 at 8:04pm

    “Racism is the lowest, most crudely primitive form of collectivism. It is the notion of ascribing moral, social or political significance to a man’s genetic lineage—the notion that a man’s intellectual and characterological traits are produced and transmitted by his internal body chemistry. Which means, in practice, that a man is to be judged, not by his own character and actions, but by the characters and actions of a collective of ancestors.

    Racism claims that the content of a man’s mind (not his cognitive apparatus, but its content) is inherited; that a man’s convictions, values and character are determined before he is born, by physical factors beyond his control. This is the caveman’s version of the doctrine of innate ideas—or of inherited knowledge—which has been thoroughly refuted by philosophy and science. Racism is a doctrine of, by and for brutes. It is a barnyard or stock-farm version of collectivism, appropriate to a mentality that differentiates between various breeds of animals, but not between animals and men.

    Like every form of determinism, racism invalidates the specific attribute which distinguishes man from all other living species: his rational faculty. Racism negates two aspects of man’s life: reason and choice, or mind and morality, replacing them with chemical predestination.” Ayn Rand

  • November 21, 2013 at 8:01pm

    Just like the 20th Century Motor company. Go ahead, try that, and see how they’d produce nothing.

  • November 20, 2013 at 8:14pm

    You ought to keep it for yourself. You owe nobody anything except non-aggression. Unless of course it makes you happy to give it away. Ultimately, a person’s happiness and rational self-interest is the highest moral and not what the ethics altruism demand: that a person must sacrifice themselves, being a slave to society or ghost in the heavens, and not be happy in oneself.