User Profile: kryss187

Member Since: August 31, 2010


  • May 5, 2016 at 9:16am

    Nope…creating a new species by crossing two separate species (IE a duck and crocodile to get a crocoduck) does not fit within the theory and if possible would disprove the theory. Maybe people need to know what a theory is? To break it down, people notice something. In this example, people noticed animals evolving. Then the question is becomes “why?” We give it our best guess (hypothesis) and then collect data. Then we construct a reason based on that evidence. (theory). That theory is constantly tested as new data is found. (genetics) and updated as needed. Today’s theory on evolution looks nothing like Darwin’s.

  • [9] May 4, 2016 at 2:33pm

    It’s the banana guy who thinks because we cant produce a hybrid animal evolution is false. Sorry, cant take him seriously. A hybrid animal would actually disprove the theory of evolution.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 20, 2014 at 2:43pm

    Where did this Ishtar reference come from? I was always taught it was Ostara and that the traditions of this feast was absorbed by the church to help conversion.

  • March 14, 2014 at 9:51am

    As an atheist, I dont see why they are making such a big deal. If it take group prayer to get people more involved on the streets…so be it. I see a community leader embracing the community beliefs and using it to make positive change. Whether you want to believe it or not. He isnt forcing people to embrace religion, so I dont see how this can be a complaint. As an atheist, I would actually be involved in this. Maybe not to pray, but to promote better community. Which, is what truly is needed to combat crime.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 28, 2013 at 1:35pm

    not true. we see evolution at work around Chernobyl. We see remnants of past evolutions. legs on whales. we have reversed evolution in chickens and grew scales instead of feathers.

  • March 27, 2013 at 8:25am

    You cannot disprove something that has no evidence to test. An example, there is a teapot flying through space at this very moment. It just passed Mars. Now, disprove my statement. You cannot. I would have to provide evidence that the teapot is there and then you can examine the evidence and try to disprove my statement.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 22, 2012 at 2:48pm

    “are they in well-regulated militias? For the vast majority – the answer is no”
    well, if we, the militia, are not able to shoot well…just means we need more practice. unless he doesnt know what he’s talking about… :) that couldn’t be it.

  • June 25, 2012 at 8:09am

    while it could be plausible, there is as much evidence for this as with the bible. its he said she said.

    Responses (2) +
  • June 14, 2012 at 11:50am

    and the big question should be “why are these resources on the internet?” hello??!! unplug.

    Responses (1) +
  • June 9, 2012 at 4:42am

    The weight of legal and historical authority indicates that the term “natural born” citizen would mean a person who is entitled to U.S. citizenship “by birth” or “at birth,” either by being born “in” the United States and under its jurisdiction, even those born to alien parents; by being born abroad to U.S. citizen-parents; or by being born in other situations meeting legal requirements for U.S. citizenship “at birth.” Such term, however, would not include a person who was not a U.S. citizen by birth or at birth, and who was thus born an “alien” required to go through the legal process of “naturalization” to become a U.S. citizen.

    His mother was a US Citizen, so he might be legal. however, if he were born abroad he would not have a birth certificate. he would have a Consular Report of Birth Abroad. And the FAQ states:

    If my child is born abroad, is my child a U.S. citizen?
    Your child may be a U.S. citizen if you meet the requirements of the Immigration and Nationality Act to transmit citizenship. Please consult our citizenship chart for a simplified version of these requirements.

    What are the requirements to transmit citizenship?
    If the child’s parents are both U.S. citizens, a foreign-born child would be a U.S. citizen if:

    at least one of the parents resided in the United States or a U.S. possession prior to the child’s birth; and,
    the child was born in wedlock.
    If one parent is not a U.S. citizen, the U.S. citizen parent m

  • June 4, 2012 at 8:57am

    All apes and humans are desceneded from a single proto-ape species that lived millions of years ago and no longer exists. Thus humans can be said to be closely related to the other apes, but we are certainly not descended from them.

  • June 1, 2012 at 5:54am

    I understand that the school has a measure in place to include a prayer if the class votes on it. I agree , then, that the kid is in the right. I was under the impression that the student speaker decided to say a quick prayer as part of their speech. What if the class decided to pray a non christian god? Would the Christians not be upset at this? I say they would be and thus this should not have been allowed. This is why the government is supposed to be neutral.

  • June 1, 2012 at 4:38am

    Being an atheist, I know it can feel awkward being forced into a religious ceremony. But, it was a classmate praying. I take it for what it is. A person trying to do good. I would have stood there and it wouldn’t have bothered me. We are protected from laws based on religion, not from being subjected to someone wanting to pray. If the school forced everyone to say the prayer, then he might have a gripe. But he doesn’t here.

    Responses (10) +
  • March 21, 2012 at 7:50am

    Seems like a retelling of Battle Royale.

  • September 23, 2011 at 3:07pm

    I did a quick google search of the J-1 Visa program and found..

    Im wondering…did they ever call for help? What was the response? or did they just go straight to the strike mentality?

  • September 20, 2011 at 10:22am

    if you can show cross species transformation you would disprove evolution.

  • September 20, 2011 at 10:18am

    Wow…A theory is an explanation based on FACT. it take a very long time and allot of evidence before a theory is written. Then it goes under a massive pier review before published. The further scrutiny before excepted. It is always questioned and either updated or retired based on new evidence when found. I dont understand how people can’t understand this.

  • September 20, 2011 at 9:22am

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”

    Wouldn’t laws giving tax exemption fall under this? Just saying. :-D

    Responses (2) +
  • August 17, 2011 at 3:37pm

    even if you reduce it to genus, its way too small. you need food for everything…for a year. and water.

  • August 17, 2011 at 2:07pm

    oops…7 pair of clean 2 pair of unclean…so 14 clean and 4 unclean.