User Profile: Kupo

Kupo

Member Since: July 03, 2012

Comments

123 To page: Go
  • [1] September 22, 2014 at 3:57am

    Exactly what I was thinking.

  • [1] September 20, 2014 at 9:52pm

    What do you mean? Washington has pretty lenient gun laws, especially for a blue state. In fact, I’m pretty sure that it has the least restrictive gun laws out of ANY blue state.

  • [1] September 20, 2014 at 9:38pm

    SovereignSoul

    Just because someone has the right to own a gun doesn’t mean that they should own a gun. I didn’t see 8Yrs say that he should lose his rights.

  • [3] September 19, 2014 at 9:47pm

    Yep, which is a completely rational statement to make based on a 30 second youtube video.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] September 19, 2014 at 4:15pm

    Sorry, but this does NOT have universal support. What Obama means when he says that we have to change the way we think about sexual assault is that sexual assault has to be redefined to include things that are absolutely NOT sexual assault. This has already been happening for many years now and Obama wants to ramp it up to 11.

    People who support this are doing far more harm than good.

  • [3] September 19, 2014 at 2:54pm

    Quincy

    It’s Latin, and is a rule that really has very little place in English.

  • [3] September 19, 2014 at 2:42pm

    Grammar Myths #1: Is it wrong to send a sentence with a preposition?

    http://blog.oxforddictionaries.com/2011/11/grammar-myths-prepositions/

  • [6] September 19, 2014 at 2:38pm

    That is an unfortunately pervasive grammar myth. It is completely acceptable in English to end a sentence with a preposition. If your teachers taught you otherwise then they taught you wrong.

  • [9] September 19, 2014 at 12:41am

    This really is a new low in reporting here on The Blaze.

    Breaking! I burnt my toast this morning! Go ahead and send in the camera crews.

    Responses (1) +
  • [11] September 19, 2014 at 12:34am

    That’s what the blindfold is for. It’s not going to attack with that thing over its head.

  • September 18, 2014 at 9:55pm

    Louis Nisenbaum should be disbarred for no other reason than that he displayed such a fundamental and glaring failure to understand the first amendment.

  • [5] September 18, 2014 at 6:46pm

    It’s already illegal for courts to impose religious law.

  • [5] September 18, 2014 at 3:29pm

    Not to defend Islam or anything, but Muslims make up less than 1% of the population. Courthouses don’t have verses from the Koran etched into the walls, towns aren’t displaying huge crescent moons on water towers, politicians aren’t pushing for Sharia law, dioramas displaying Koranic scenes aren’t being shown on public land, etc.

    Don’t get me wrong now, I think that having the 10 Commandments on courthouses is fine, as well as crosses and nativity scenes on public land, etc. I’m just trying to illustrate the the FFRF (who I can’t stand) focus on Christians because Christianty is by far the dominant cultural religion here. If Islam was more predominant then I have no doubt that FFRF would target them.

  • [1] September 17, 2014 at 6:38pm

    Then he really shouldn’t give a damn about any of this.

  • September 17, 2014 at 5:48pm

    Pretty cool, but after you’ve lived on an aircraft carrier for years they kind of lose their luster.

  • [10] September 17, 2014 at 5:29pm

    Again, Glenn is absolutely wrong. This is the kind of stuff that should be left to law enforcement to handle, not hired social justice warriors. Shaming a company into purging their “undesirables” is also a hypocritical move, since unless I’m losing my mind I could swear that he was outraged when Phil Robertson was axed from his show and also when the Mozilla CEO was forced to resign for supporting Prop 8.

    Glenn, if the NFL isn’t lining up with your values then simply DO NOT WATCH. Don’t try to force them to conform to your values because you end up looking like just as much of a whiny baby as any leftist.

    Responses (2) +
  • [220] September 17, 2014 at 4:53pm

    She is way too full of herself. I especially liked the part in the interview where she was sharing her views on how the cop should have approached the situation. She thinks he should have been like, “excuse me ma’am, you seem like a respectable person, but we received a call and…”

    Lady, getting your freak on in broad daylight in an open car doesn’t fall under any definition of respectable that I’ve ever seen!

    Responses (6) +
  • [2] September 17, 2014 at 3:36pm

    The only idiot I’ve seen is the person who wrote this article. While Orient is indeed a rather outdated term nowadays I would never classify it as offensive. And if someone is offended by it then he is simply far too sensitive.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] September 17, 2014 at 5:23am

    Maybe enot the best analogy now that I think of it, but my main point still stands. True freedom of speech isn’t possible without a corresponding freedom of religion.

    Responses (1) +
  • [38] September 17, 2014 at 5:21am

    Anyone who knows anything realizes that freedom of religion is simply one aspect of freedom of speech. You can’t have free speech without also having freedom of religion. It’s just not possible. So asking someone which is more important is like asking which is more important: your car or your car’s engine.

    Responses (14) +
123 To page: Go