User Profile: KyleD


Member Since: February 04, 2012


123 To page: Go
  • [2] August 30, 2014 at 7:24pm

    I think it’s partially due to new technologies. Younger people aren’t going to casinos for fun, if they have excess money to spend it’s going towards that new phone, a new tablet, a new computer, a 3D printer, any of the kickstarter programs, etc…there’s just so much stuff to buy now it seems more logical to spend your money on something you can hold in your hand for months or years (depending on how long you hold onto stuff) rather than blow it on a weekend in a casino.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] August 29, 2014 at 3:18pm

    The simple deadbolt already has a simple method to get around it, a shotgun. That said, the whole idea of the shotgun is to blow the entire locking assembly and handle off so they would both be defeated by the same device. Personally I liked the device the blaze showed a couple months ago that attached to the door closer. Though, I imagine you could shoot the entire door closer off but it would probably take two shots rather than just one.

    Schools have created this environment, anyway. There wouldn’t be so many school shootings from bullied loners if they hadn’t emasculated the schools.

  • [1] August 29, 2014 at 7:12am

    We’re not talking about one driver but a whole fleet of drivers, probably moving with traffic. I don’t know if you live in an area with heavy traffic but there’s always a few people weaving through the lanes of people who are all going pretty much the same speed…whether it’s stop and go or everyone’s going the speed limit I’m of the opinion that while you might get to your destination a few minutes faster weaving about it’s not worth putting yourself and those around you at risk. Next time leave sooner or get a job with a boss that doesn’t hassle you for being 10 minutes late and lower everyone’s risk of dying a little.

  • [2] August 26, 2014 at 11:12pm

    Monkey see, monkey do. The kids are only reflecting what they see in the parents…they just have better technology to do it.

  • [2] August 26, 2014 at 1:59pm

    Seriously, all he’s doing is feeding the trolls. With types you just ignore them and they eventually go away.

  • [33] August 25, 2014 at 4:53pm

    What a piece of work. He instigates these riots and then when he finds out the kid was a thug who left the cop no choice but to kill him he blames everyone else.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 23, 2014 at 7:36pm

    As a dumb kid I was dared to eat something out of the trash…it worked out so well I’d continue doing it every once in a while that school year. It was idiotic for the worker to do it but it certainly wouldn’t have killed her unless they have a habit of throwing away anthrax along with it…people are making a much bigger deal out of it than it actually is simply because the current social construct labels trashed items as inedible. Anyone remember the Seinfeld episode? It’s not that big of a deal, especially if it was just thrown away and still in the box (which we don’t know).

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] August 23, 2014 at 7:30pm

    Why would anyone throw away a slice of pizza?

  • August 22, 2014 at 4:15pm

    There are teenagers out there who have paid more taxes than you and I ever will in our lifetimes. How about, come back in 20 years, when you’ve gained more perspective? That seems like a more valid argument.

  • [4] August 21, 2014 at 6:18pm

    I can’t believe people are getting all crotchety about personal drones…if anything they should be celebrating them. Drones give the public far more freedom than we would have otherwise…they’re a huge tactical tool that can be used to keep the government in check. As for spying on each other, that’s nothing people couldn’t have done anyway. The guy on his high rise patio is “creeped out” by a drone with a camera meanwhile the 5 other high rise buildings around him have 50 apartments each that could have a camera pointed at him and he can’t even see them…drones are visible and destructible…someone spying from their window is not.

    Responses (2) +
  • [8] August 21, 2014 at 2:33pm

    Correction, liberals love wealth, but only when held by a few liberals.

  • [1] August 21, 2014 at 3:06am

    No dreams allowed!

  • [11] August 21, 2014 at 2:54am

    Britain tried to ban most knives, including kitchen knives, a couple years back. I don’t think the rank and file liberal actually knows how far their paranoid leaders actually intend on taking gun control. That’s the problem…bring up the next stage in their leaders’ plans and they think you’re paranoid…a few years down the road they’ve already been brainwashed into thinking that next stage is the only way forward and they’ve forgotten you warned them about it.

  • [4] August 20, 2014 at 11:21pm

    It’s not actually a picture of the beheading, it’s just a picture of the man with a knife to his neck, not even any blood.

  • [3] August 20, 2014 at 7:54pm

    Going to parrot what everyone else has been saying. While Maher is definately vocal of his loathing of all things religions he is very strong of the opinion that Islam isn’t even comparable to the rest – despite his atheist peers insisting they’re all the same.

  • August 20, 2014 at 5:50pm

    To better answer the question of “Why did hackers attack the nuclear agency and not the nuclear reactors?” It’s because US nuclear reactors are protected by a data diode, a piece of hardware that allows one-way flow of data. It’s physically impossible to hack because the diode only allows data to leave it, not enter it. The only way you can hack a nuclear power plant is to physically be there…it might be possible to do it with a USB drive but that depends on their protocol…they might even just use CDs, since those can only be written once, giving the hacker exactly one chance to infect it before being used and I’m sure they’re both super careful when they make the CD and then double or triple check it afterwards to make sure it’s clean.

  • [5] August 20, 2014 at 5:28pm

    The difference is Idaho gets a lot of precipitation every year (relatively) whereas California does not. It relies on its reservoirs as a buffer between wet and dry years but there’s been several dry years in a row and the reservoirs are running lower than they have in a long while.

  • [5] August 20, 2014 at 5:23pm

    No amount of environmentalists can stop rain from falling.

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] August 20, 2014 at 5:16pm

    It wasn’t even ice water, it was ice. Ice falls off and is no longer cold. Ice water soaks you and you remain cold.

  • [3] August 20, 2014 at 1:34pm

    What I find strange is several key colonies of the British Empire weren’t included…the 13 colonies, which would mean the US should have been included as well.

    Responses (2) +
123 To page: Go