User Profile: lanimilbus


Member Since: March 14, 2012


  • [2] August 2, 2016 at 1:25am

    Well, well, well…

    Responses (1) +
  • [-3] July 30, 2016 at 5:53pm

    Captain Khan was KIA before the Ft. Hood shooting.

  • [-5] July 30, 2016 at 5:52pm

    Doesn’t matter if the family’s loss was being exploited – they were. What matters is that Donald Trump can and will go off message at the slightest provocation, bogging down his campaign down and hurting down-ballot conservatives. Instead of talking about growing radical Islamic violence abroad, instead of talking about a sluggish economy with only more mediocrity on the horizon, and instead of talking about how limited government inspires economic ingenuity – were talking about how Donald Trump attacked the parents of a fallen soldier. Makes one wonder, does he actually want to win? Is this some sort of Machiavellian move by the Clinton’s to ruin the GOP? His actions are not those of a candidate who wants to win.

    Responses (4) +
  • [-3] July 30, 2016 at 5:35pm

    Trump’s DiMaggio-like streak of hurting himself whenever he opens his mouth continues.

    Responses (1) +
  • [-1] July 18, 2016 at 10:19pm

    Which voters? Republicans? Or the Democrats and unaffiliated voters who pushed Trump to a plurality? Closed primaries are a good thing – if you can’t take the time to register in a party, why should you have a say in the nomination of that party’s candidates? Should granola munchin’ hippies that are too liberal to consider themselves Democrats be allowed to sabotage GOP primaries?

  • July 15, 2016 at 8:32pm

    Obama’s faults aside, what you’re suggesting is treason.

  • June 11, 2016 at 12:04am

    Proof that Trump is trying to lose: name a candidate, for any office, that would publicize and brag about being endorsed by convicted rapists, Mike Tyson, and a convicted murderer, Don King? And realistically, when convicted of serious crimes like rape and manslaughter – reduced from 2nd degree for stomping a man to death, shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

  • [6] June 8, 2016 at 11:38pm

    If anyone thinks Trump believes anything he says, you deserve President Clinton Part Deux. He was pro-choice before he wasn’t; pro-gun control before he wasn’t; pro-Libya intervention before he wasn’t; pro-Iraq War before he was against it; pro-Hillary before he was against her; pro-Obama stimulus before he was against it; pro-Planned Parenthood before he was…no, he still defends pap smears and mammograms in one room while ignoring murder in the next; pro-progressive taxation before he was…no, still supports it and opposes a flat tax; and pro-eminent domain for private development before he was…no, he even defends it. This is also the same guy who fired active military from his businesses by counting their service obligations as “absences”; kicked veteran vendors from trying to make a living in front of his building; and compared avoiding The Clap to fighting in Vietnam. You get what you deserve.

  • June 5, 2016 at 1:38am

    Only one of them thought/thinks avoiding The Clap is the equivalent of fighting in Vietnam. It’s also the same guy who thinks attending a high-priced private military boarding school in the NYC suburbs, including earning the meritorious “medals” for keeping a neat and clean bed/footlocker, is the same as serving in the military. Also the same guy who fired, then paid off with non-disclosure enforced payoffs, active reservists from his various businesses b/c their service to their country conflicted with service to the company. And it’s the same guy who thinks Saudi Arabia should have nuclear weapons. Yeah, nothing bad could happen.

  • [1] June 4, 2016 at 2:57pm

    Please reference where I said that Trump was responsible. I’m having trouble finding it. Merely pointing out that Deferment Donald thinks avoiding The Clap was equivalent to fighting in Vietnam.

  • [56] June 4, 2016 at 1:52am

    Whether you agree with it or not, when Ali dodged the draft, it was out of conscience. When Trump deferred his way out of the draft, it was out of convenience for the son of millionaire real estate developer.

    Responses (7) +
  • [1] June 3, 2016 at 5:12pm

    There’s a key difference Apatow fails to realize. There’s a difference between critical of Hollywood’s inability to come up with an original idea and hating a movie purely because it has female-centric cast. And I use the word “female” specifically. I’m talking about chromosomes. You know how you end the bathroom controversy? Start putting XX and XY on the doors. Even if you accept the ridiculous argument that gender and sex aren’t synonyms, that gender is a social construct, there’s nothing “Caitlyn” Jenner can do to get ride of the Y chromosome; there’s nothing “Chaz” Bono can do to add one. For the handful of true transsexuals, with genetic birth defects that make them XXY, they are the ONLY ones that can have any sort of grievance.

  • June 3, 2016 at 10:11am

    Are we really making fun of people for having glasses? Is that how far political debate and public discourse have fallen? The mere fact that you can’t list grievances in a constructive way is an indictment on you.

  • [1] May 28, 2016 at 5:05pm

    He was concerned the money would go to actual veteran’s organizations, like the one supporting veteran vendors who were kicked out of in front of Trump Tower. “While disabled veterans should be given every opportunity to earn a living, is it fair to do so to the detriment of the city as a whole or its tax paying citizens and businesses?”

    Responses (1) +
  • May 28, 2016 at 5:00pm

    He’s a publicity whore, that’s why he would want to.

  • [2] May 21, 2016 at 4:59pm

    Scott Brown: b/c conservatives weren’t already skeptical of the formerly pro-choice, pro-gun control, pro-Hillary, still pro-eminent domain and anti-flat tax Trump, why not another moderate from Mass?

  • [1] May 21, 2016 at 4:54pm

    And yet you continue to read and post on the site, driving up web traffic, which drives up advertising rates, which gives profits to Beck.

  • [3] May 20, 2016 at 4:33pm

    Instant runoff expects a lot of political literacy on behalf of the voter.

  • May 20, 2016 at 4:17pm

    But what happens in a 60/40 Republican district where 4 conservatives split the vote evenly against 2 liberals splitting their vote? You get a general election with 2 liberals in a red district.

    Responses (3) +
  • [21] May 20, 2016 at 4:15pm

    And yet most of his hotels are “gun free zones”. There’s also that annoying thing called his record: “I support the ban on assault weapons and I also support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun,”

    Responses (3) +