User Profile: lanimilbus


Member Since: March 14, 2012


  • [6] July 21, 2015 at 11:11am

    Wow, Blaze editorial staff. Because you piggybacked off the NY Daily News for the article, you didn’t do any actual journalism. That’s why you use a stock photo of a white guy instead of the actual photo of the young black man – the red flag was, “whose father is a police officer in Jamaica”. Was this an attempt to make it appear as if this individual issue of police misconduct was perpetrated on a Caucasian? Does The Blaze do any actual reporting themselves or have your just turned into a conservative Huffington Post, an aggregate news site? If compared side by side, I don’t even know if there’s an original word in The Blaze’s version. Looks like you just copy/pasted different parts of the News’ real journalism to create the illusion of an original piece of work.

    Responses (6) +
  • July 7, 2015 at 10:19am

    This article, in comparing reactions to Sharpton and Duke’s respective Presidential runs, completely ignores the different media environment. Instant media – Twitter, Facebook, camera phones, YouTube – changes everything. A David Duke running today would get the same vitriol as Trump; Sharpton would be even more of a gadfly candidate if he ran again – all this is because of the instantaneous nature of the media today.

  • [3] July 1, 2015 at 4:11pm

    Given that nothing in the recent SCOTUS decision overturned Reynolds v. United States, the lower courts can’t grant him the additional marriage license.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] June 26, 2015 at 4:58pm

    Yeah, she was there.

  • [-7] June 26, 2015 at 4:56pm

    How is that censoring free speech? You’re still free to make the speech. The newspaper, with it’s own First Amendment rights, is free to determine the content of their newspaper. Do you not believe the newspaper has the right to editorialize and decide the content of its periodical? What you’re proposing is to censor Freedom of the Press.

  • [1] June 26, 2015 at 4:54pm

    And if the newspaper were somehow required to print these stories, would Freedom of the Press be dead too? No one’s Free Speech rights have been infringed, only a newspaper, using it’s own First Amendment rights to editorialize and decide what they want in their newspaper.

    Responses (1) +
  • [6] June 26, 2015 at 2:04pm

    What about Bristol Palin?

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] June 26, 2015 at 12:27pm

    Reynolds v. United States

  • [4] June 26, 2015 at 10:39am

    I really hope you don’t have any tattoos.

    Responses (1) +
  • [10] June 25, 2015 at 9:09pm

    I don’t think she’s apologizing for choosing to have the baby. I think she’s apologizing because she preaches abstinence-only education and the concept of waiting-for-marriage, something she is clearly incapable of doing herself. And shame on you for advocating, albeit I assume jokingly, for people to commit suicide. A real Christian would never advocate, even in jest, for someone to commit a sin.

  • [11] June 24, 2015 at 9:07pm

    Fact: different movies have different trailers. I’d imagine that after the 2nd or 3rd trailer attached to a horror movie would be a little different than that of a Pixar movie. Should’ve been able to figure even before the movie started.

    Responses (1) +
  • [1] June 16, 2015 at 3:21pm

    He’s also lying in his Facebook post.

  • [1] June 13, 2015 at 12:11am

    Given that the sentence was 14 words, why change the title of the article but not the content?

  • [1] June 12, 2015 at 4:00pm

    Ironic, considering it was a plane built for Vietnam Airlines.

  • [12] May 23, 2015 at 12:46pm

    So only opposite sex couples who plan on reproducing should be able to be married? Your plan would criminalize marriages for any woman over 45 or any man with a vasectomy.

  • [1] May 23, 2015 at 12:44pm

    Unless you’re requiring civil unions for all couples, opposite sex and same sex, then it smacks of separate but equal.

  • [6] May 23, 2015 at 12:42pm

    How do you think segregation would poll in the Deep South? Forget private businesses, I’m talking public schools, parks, etc. – do you really think desegregation would’ve passed? If you’re of the belief that this is an issue of equality, should we be putting equality up for a popular vote?

  • [12] May 22, 2015 at 5:46pm

    What else is there to do but speculate? They only reported it to the police AFTER the statute of limitations expired; and when Josh was confronted by law enforcement, it was by a State Trooper who’s now imprisoned for possession of child pornography. Molesting your sister is not worthy of a “stern talk” that the Duggar’s believed appropriate. It’s worthy of a jail sentence, or at the age of 12-14, juvenile center until 21, with court mandated independent counseling.

  • [7] May 22, 2015 at 5:42pm

    No, he didn’t admit it – he was caught, then told to pray in the corner. He only resigned from his position because a magazine started to run with the story; who tipped of InTouch remains to be seen.

    No, they didn’t seek out law enforcement; they sought a family friend, himself now in prison for possession of child pornography. And he wasn’t charged b/c it wasn’t brought to the attention of the police until after the statue of limitations had run out.

    And when you say there’s zero evidence of repeated abuse, all we have to look at other sex offenders. The reason we have sex offender registries is b/c of the high propensity to repeat. Every statistic shows sex offenders, particularly those with young victims, have the highest recidivism rate of any criminal (the lowest is actually murder).

    While I care more about the possibility that there are other victims, which all the statistics would say is quite possible, you’re defending a pedophile merely b/c he feigns G-d’s forgiveness.

  • [24] May 22, 2015 at 2:48pm

    And it’s borderline criminal for the Duggar family to sweep this under the rug and allow him continued contact with young children. A larger question is, was he born with this predilection or was this learned behavior? Is there still an unknown pedophile still in the Duggar House?

Restoring Love