User Profile: lanimilbus


Member Since: March 14, 2012


  • November 27, 2015 at 10:01pm

    Wrong, wrong, wrong. Just because you’re willing to cede war powers to the Executive Branch doesn’t mean we all should.

  • [4] November 27, 2015 at 10:00pm

    In the world on online shopping, does anyone actually buy anything from the department store websites? The ability to instantly compare prices almost guarantees the lowest price won’t be from a department store.

  • [-3] November 23, 2015 at 9:41pm

    Did O’Reilly support Hillary Clinton, universal healthcare, and gun control too? I love how the Trump supporters completely ignore his blatant flipflops. And anyone that endorses Eliot Spitzer for Governor (both families are heavily involved in NYC real estate) isn’t a true conservative.

    Responses (3) +
  • November 14, 2015 at 9:33pm

    Debt is rising. People are dying. Threats are growing. And this is news?

  • [15] November 8, 2015 at 9:43pm

    I can be pro-Israel and not support building settlements in disputed territories; I can be pro-peace and still support Israel bombing Gaza when Hamas rockets are fired, even if the rocket launcher is on top of a school or a hospital.

    Responses (3) +
  • [24] November 1, 2015 at 4:12pm

    The review doesn’t even need to be immediate. Given that it’s the last play of the game, there’s really no reason why the ACC couldn’t just declare Duke the winner because the official’s mistake.

    Responses (2) +
  • [1] November 1, 2015 at 4:06pm

    The many faults of Congress aside, you’re confusing the US Congress for your local Town/City Council or State Legislature. The US Congress has never voted on any smoking ban.

  • [-10] October 31, 2015 at 5:26pm

    Because the police murdering someone for being weird/freakish is laugh out loud funny…the loss of life is never funny. You must be pro-choice?

    Responses (3) +
  • [1] October 25, 2015 at 8:23am

    You mean the decorated West Point graduate with a 100% rating from ProLife Lousiana and an A from the NRA? A demonstrated willingness to stand up for what he believes in despite national party pressures – sounds like more character than you likely, certainly more than the admitted sexual predator. It’s people like you, on the left and the right, who care more about party label than a person, that are ruining the country.

  • [16] October 16, 2015 at 1:51pm

    Child or adult, I still don’t understand where Cain and Able’s wives came from.

    Responses (22) +
  • October 15, 2015 at 2:52pm

    Google Preet Baharra – already took down former NY Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver and State Senate Majority Leader Dean Skelos – one D, one R. He’s also investigating Cuomo.

  • [4] August 26, 2015 at 10:42am

    Yeah, he follows Leviticus.

  • [18] August 19, 2015 at 11:16am

    You do realize you pay school taxes irrespective of whether you have kids and whether or not they go to public school?

    Responses (3) +
  • [2] August 13, 2015 at 10:45am

    His feet were on the wall and the tarp when he made the catch, making it an OUT. After his momentum led him into the stands, off the wall and the tarp, the ball is dead and the runner advances one base. Not all that complicated.

  • [1] August 8, 2015 at 8:50pm

    Ronald Reagan would disagree.

  • [6] July 21, 2015 at 11:11am

    Wow, Blaze editorial staff. Because you piggybacked off the NY Daily News for the article, you didn’t do any actual journalism. That’s why you use a stock photo of a white guy instead of the actual photo of the young black man – the red flag was, “whose father is a police officer in Jamaica”. Was this an attempt to make it appear as if this individual issue of police misconduct was perpetrated on a Caucasian? Does The Blaze do any actual reporting themselves or have your just turned into a conservative Huffington Post, an aggregate news site? If compared side by side, I don’t even know if there’s an original word in The Blaze’s version. Looks like you just copy/pasted different parts of the News’ real journalism to create the illusion of an original piece of work.

    Responses (6) +
  • July 7, 2015 at 10:19am

    This article, in comparing reactions to Sharpton and Duke’s respective Presidential runs, completely ignores the different media environment. Instant media – Twitter, Facebook, camera phones, YouTube – changes everything. A David Duke running today would get the same vitriol as Trump; Sharpton would be even more of a gadfly candidate if he ran again – all this is because of the instantaneous nature of the media today.

  • [3] July 1, 2015 at 4:11pm

    Given that nothing in the recent SCOTUS decision overturned Reynolds v. United States, the lower courts can’t grant him the additional marriage license.

    Responses (1) +
  • [2] June 26, 2015 at 4:58pm

    Yeah, she was there.

  • [-7] June 26, 2015 at 4:56pm

    How is that censoring free speech? You’re still free to make the speech. The newspaper, with it’s own First Amendment rights, is free to determine the content of their newspaper. Do you not believe the newspaper has the right to editorialize and decide the content of its periodical? What you’re proposing is to censor Freedom of the Press.

Restoring Love