User Profile: lessoneleg


Member Since: October 18, 2011


123 To page: Go
  • [5] July 22, 2014 at 4:59am

    why CommonCore is being force fed is to allow greater influence by progressivies into the Public School System. Look at the mess the schools are in now. The Children are more savy on social engineering programs than honest to goodness necessity learning.
    The “activists Teachers” are bored with fundementals. The meat in the Public Schools is the influencing the minds of easily mislead children. That’s where progressives cut their teeth. Instructing this mindless “redistribution” scheme is the New & Improved Education.
    When describing to young impressionable kids that we need to take some marks from the Smart Kids to give to the Lower Marks Kids. Only then does reality strike. Hey Man? Those are my marks man. Really now, but it was OK to take from the Rich Family their hard work to give to the Poor. That’s OK wasn’t it? Yeah Man, they didn’t earn it Man.
    CommonCore is all about dumbing down education and raising the level of incompetence to Higher Education Standards. We don’t want to often those underachievers do we. It might hurt their self esteem.
    The fact is, the Teaching Profession want encroaching socialism into the Public Classrooms. And they will rename it to whatever useful Banner they can fly. Why? Because socialists own Public Educational Boards of Education, and they know it.

    Responses (1) +
  • [3] July 22, 2014 at 12:36am

    Same tactics as was used by progressives going to Tea Party gatherings. Same darned thing. A wolf in sheeps clothing.
    Social Activists within the Democratic Party needed 10 second sound bite media image feeds to make the Tea Party out as racists.
    Please remember, an image says a thousand words, and low information people get hooked on the image and not by the intent of the fakery social activists will do to sell their points of view.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 21, 2014 at 9:46pm

    Gee Bob, and how you don’t sing the song of progressivisms approach to sexuality which is pressing its game play on “Age of Consent”. Maybe Bob can sing about young girls as young 9 marrying an Old Man in an arranged marriage. Or reducing Age Of Consent could easil hide the Jerry Sandusky criminal case because, hey it’s none of our business what happens between consenting people of the same sex. Huh Bob?
    Yes, the sadness of what happened in the Catholic Church is awful. But then again, the Catholic Church put itself into a difficult spot by not allowing its Priests to marry. The choice of selection of Priests gets kinda thin looking for Single Men who want to live their whole remaining life around other single Men, and including Choir Boys.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 21, 2014 at 9:37pm

    wierd, but this fella can’t enjoy a duck, but Obama will permit thousands of infected, infested Illegals into the Country, ship them to strategic locations without any local government knowing.
    But runs roughshod over this Vet.

    How strange the dealings with liberals in power.

  • [1] July 16, 2014 at 7:40am

    Isn’t it great to know the Police, are excluded from basic public expectations when off-duty they can’t even be ticketed for the same laws and regulations we the public are routinely nailed on.

    And what the heck is the Fraternity of Police doing showing up at any roadside issue between themselves and a On-Duty Officer and an Off-Duty Officer.
    this was an issue of a Driver (who just so happens to be a Police Officer) breaking a common law in the Public. I don’t read of any LAW where Police are excluded from prosecution.

    Now we know why there are fancy funerals for Police, its a show of strenght that you people of the Public are NOT ONE OF THEM.

    Worst thing now, the young Cop will be vilified by likewise other Cops for not following the unwritten CODE amongst Police that Cops don’t ticket other Cops from any location, because they are members of the Loyal Order of Police.
    Shameful, just shameful that Police are excluded from laws.

  • July 15, 2014 at 1:13pm

    My exact comments to describing this pathetic so-called Church. I wish they would drop the word “CHURCH”, because any semblence to Christianity stopped ages ago.
    Likewise the United Church as well. Massive displacing conservative traditionalist members have been pushed out by progressives.

  • [1] July 15, 2014 at 12:25pm

    As you clearly state in describing “urban Vermont” composition of who makes up the State.
    Ontaro Canada is the same situation. Outside of the major cities, all rural and small towns are conservative people with liberatarian beliefs on social issues.
    Except, the Inner City Centres which carries the vote which matters to all people living in the borders.
    Warped inner city progressives have the populous Vote being concentrated in the City. Therefore rural people are dragged into the freaking mess these goofs want.
    The Golden Horseshoe of western Lake Ontario do the same thing, vote progressively left, but dragging down a whole province with liberalism.

  • July 15, 2014 at 11:45am

    Glen, you have to understand the location where Vermont is surrounded by. First, way out goofy New York City, then the worst of the worst places in North America— Quebec. That over coddled stink hole of leftists spills over easily from massively protected Quebec Canada.
    The Vermont warped attitudes are the protections Progressive Vermont people live in. Nothing surprises me from that region of North America at all. Over dosing on Maple Syrup and First Nations Rollies from Oka can do that to ya.
    But why does Vermont have the most per capita percentages of Pedophiles living in that State? Is it acceptable to be nuts protected by New York whacky liberals.

  • July 11, 2014 at 5:49pm

    gee what a wonderful fair weather friend huh?
    could it be he just so happened to decide to “return home” is because Cleveland got a very good 1st Round Draft Pick and a handful of other Top Draft Picks in a row.
    Naw, he went home because it was all about going HOME.
    Tell ya what, he went home because he wanted out of Miami. The Door wasn’t cut big enough for his Wallet and Head.

  • [2] July 11, 2014 at 12:28pm

    No she doesn’t. That or those images were well viewed over as to whom they were. Its the agenda of any of the liberal MSM to sell the story line, ISRAEL = Bad, Palestinian = Good. Aside from Fox, or Glen Beck’s bunch, all liberal media is massively anti Jewish. They’ll tell you stories of pure utter bull as fact, providing of course it fits the liberal agenda.

  • [2] July 11, 2014 at 8:13am

    what a joke, and typical of MSNBC. Firstly, why not slant the whole commentary as if “slavery” was the only topic. The Moderator and the two guests were fixated on “slavery”. And the discussion quickly degenerated from the facts to the fiction of the Host and his guest sidestepping what Dinesh was saying.
    The Female Guest was totally out of her league. But the Host, he couldn’t link a turd to a dog’s bum. Honest to goodness, he flipped and flapped, but couldn’t articulate a thought except to say, America was racist, and American’s were slave owners. Duh?
    I loved the analogy of the North American First Nations. they too wiped out their opposition no differently than European, Asian tribes wiping out their opponents. The US wave of European settlers didn’t do anything different than what First Nations North American Indians did to their own here, hundreds if not thousands of years earlier.
    But hey, this is MSNBC, its all about promoting the progressive revisionist agendas.

  • July 11, 2014 at 7:33am

    when US Democrats ran the story of Amnesty, don’t you think Dianne that the sound of the Amnesty in the US was a dinner bell to Hispanic Border Cheats?
    When or if you do read Dianne, maybe Central American countries aren’t your sort of wonderland of everything. But it is what it is according to the makings of Hispanic Central Americans who created and promoted their own local government. The fact they are as corrupt as hell, is their own makings. And is it not equally said, Democrats promoted this was the century of Hispanic South American Countries. They have preferred status by UN liberals. They get no penalties according to carbon, extremely cheat labour. Heck, even major Auto Makers flooded to South and Central American countries to build industrial and manufacturing. Stealing North American business.
    So what is this mass wave of immigration. Easy, the US is a target by Hispanic leeches to feed off the US economy and social services not present in Central America. It is a parasitic life of living in the US with Anchor Children, but remaining firmly devoted to Central American life.
    Just ask them. they have no intention of being an American.

  • [13] July 11, 2014 at 6:34am

    gesh, we Canadians should get free access and gift packs when crossing the Canada/US Border. Being that the crimes committed by Hispanics along the southern US Border to Mexico are in excess to 600,000 crimes. That’s a heavy toll on local Police Services, Holding Centres, and Court Dockets. Add it all up, and Canada is a bargain for US local people and business. Hey, Canadians even say “Sorry” for spilling sugar packs at Sonic.
    Maybe reducing Canada, US border necessity might be more prudent econonmically speaking for US Customs and Border Guards. Pour more resources at the Mexican corridor.

  • [2] July 10, 2014 at 4:58pm

    Well, so much for the “War On Women” line Democrats use huh

  • [2] July 10, 2014 at 11:39am

    weird, but these same radical feminazi’s go to Family Court and demand their significant other to pay up on Support. Even though they themselves are perfectly healthy to support themselves.

  • [12] July 10, 2014 at 9:08am

    Send a message right back at Mexico, all US Trade, Commerce, international deliveries, truck, train, Vacation travel will be denied to and from Mexico to US southern borders and all sources North until the Military person is delivered back to safe American territory.

  • [2] July 7, 2014 at 12:49am

    So liberal readers, we have an interpretation issue here.
    Really now.
    If a stranger jumps my fence, and enters my home, what do you class this situation therefore “as”?

    Please progressives, I want a clear answer, because I’m at a loss to figure out what to say or describe this event to the local police authorities. Could you please answer the question? If someone breaks the law, and steals from me. What or how do ” we all others ” describe to the police what event occurred to me or to my home?
    You seem to have all these self serving descriptives to deflect blame but laws are laws, and no matter what spin you place on the transgressor. A law may have been broken for all to see, but progressives are stymied to describe what that law was because it just might offend the Group liberals so easily protect. I’m sorry progressives, we live in a society of LAWS, and yes, blame or a tap on the shoulder of the law breaker may be required to enforce those laws.
    Likewise, illegal immigrants cheating the US federal Department of Immigration & Naturalization. Millions of good people apply legally for US immigration entrence regulations. Millions apply. Why should a good applicant be denied access when Cheaters Prosper?

    In reply to the story Is the 'I-Word' the New 'N-Word'?

    Responses (1) +
  • [10] July 7, 2014 at 12:23am

    I got 41/50 and have NEVER taken any US Government Civics Class. Now ask yourself. if a Canadian can answer these questions, getting 41 of 50 questions.
    What’s the problem with Democrats granting instant access citizenship to lying cheating skunk Hispanic Third World immigration ******.

    Responses (1) +
  • July 7, 2014 at 12:20am

    for a Canadian who has never taken a US Public School civics class.
    Now ask yourself American citizens.
    If a guy who just lives north of you can answer truthfully and without squib notes can answer 82% on your Citizenship questionaire,
    what the heck is so damned difficult for Americans to figure out, Canada, has to be your best freaking neighbor. Canada, of any place on this planet is your easiest Country to mutually respect our borders. Canadians, should be granted citizenship without a second thought or denial of any existing rules or laws of exclusivity for running for Public Office. We are no different essentially to a US State. I’m the darned closest thing to a Naturalized Citizen as you can get.
    Now, ask yourself, if you were to ask in a spot moment questionaire of illegal Hispanic cheats sneaking into the United States southern borders to answer these same questions. Could they answer 80% right smack dab correctly right now?
    Not a chance., Not a freaking chance, and never will.

    Responses (1) +
  • [4] July 6, 2014 at 8:57pm

    Progressives, even when they engage in fertility issues, they look for the “escape clause” when the deal between themselves and their partner is in doubt.
    Funny how the Female, The View, person tries to exit the issue with “not my responsibility” when the shoe is on her foot. Try that with some fella, who was in a relationship and the female spouse cheated on her Husband. The Family Court doesn’t care, it only wants cash. And normally the Husband get nailed for Support even though he may not have done anything wrong. The Courts say, YOU — the husband established a quality of life for the Spouse. So pay up. In this case, The View host, yes in a divorce situation, doesn’t want to pay up her share into the Surrogate Child Support situation. Sorry lady, you signed the deal. You bought a womb, and the costs for the child. You “established” a quality of life for the unborn. Oooops, unborn. does this mean in a liberal court, that protoplasm doesn’t have a right to exist? Best ask a Clinton.

123 To page: Go