User Profile: Lestrad

Lestrad

Member Since: January 18, 2011

Comments

  • August 12, 2012 at 11:51pm

    Sex is deviant?

  • April 18, 2012 at 5:41am

    Yeah. If only we didn’t have to make a show of haveing these Libs on our shows. Yeah I know we picke the dummest ones we can find, just like we pick the smartest Consies we can find, but what a burden. Let us get on with the Program God has entrustred us with to shape the mindsof our fellwo citizens, for Chrissakes.

  • April 2, 2012 at 9:48am

    “All they have to do is change their names” ?? Wouldn’t they have to change their ownership, too?

  • April 2, 2012 at 4:31am

    Somebody needs to explain to me what the big deal is and why Obama should not have said what he said for public consumption. Before you respond, just in case you don’t know it, the Cold War is over and we would really be fools if we let ourselves be sold another one. Or as Bush, Jr. said, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.”

  • March 5, 2012 at 8:50am

    You’re surprised at people responding to professional promoters of hate and intolerance with hate and intolerance? “Okay for us but not for you,” is it? Well, it’s not okay. Never was, never will be. Not for people who are legitimately disgusted, and especially not for those who do it for money and/or political gain.
    Go to church and pray to your God, ask forgiveness, and keep the hate and hypocrisy hidden in your heart. If you want a more human world, contribute to it.

  • February 8, 2012 at 3:07am

    But the civilians are the enemy. Aren’t they?

  • February 8, 2012 at 3:05am

    This is for USNPops: “Right on. Our problem is that we have Iran, with a goal of world domination of their religion, based on 6th century laws, but now gaining possession of 21 st Century Weapons to further their goal.”
    Stop drinking the Kool-Aid Pop, Pops. The only country with a goal of world domination is the US (and its NATO allies) with its PNAC. Look it up. Iran has been at peace with the world for 200 years and would still be had the US and Britain not overthrown their legitimate leader, Mossadegh – who was non-religious and Western-oriented (London educated) – and put the brutal Reza Pahlavi in place, leading eventually to the Islamic revolution of 1979. Now they’re surrounded by NATO bases.
    “What people do not realize is that the next Nuke war is not going to be a Hiroshima, or a Nagasaki, but one of small tactical Nukes strategically launched and detonated at 400 KM, shutting down an entire country in minutes. Iran is now setup with that capabilityy in Venezuela,..”
    That Kool-Aid is plenty strong. What you claim (I won’t even bother to ask you for references to sources) doesn’t even make sense in its own terms. You say Iran has nukes in Venezuela and missile subs now patrolling off the US (next you’ll report Iranian Navy officers spotted in a McDonald’s in Galveston), but that they’ll “use those nukes if they get them.” They got ‘em, but they’ll get ‘em?
    Israel, however, does reportedly have nuke subs patrolling off Iran. Maybe you meant that…

  • February 2, 2012 at 2:21am

    Les again. “So” at the end was meant to read: “Sources: Wikipedia”
    Have a good one.

  • February 2, 2012 at 2:19am

    “Liberal”, “progressive”, “OWS”, “anarchist”, etc. – all these are only terms of vilification that a certain segment of the population has a consensus on. That consensus is actively abetted by the mainstream media.
    Anarchism is generally defined as the political philosophy which holds the state to be undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, or alternatively as opposing authority and hierarchical organization in the conduct of human relations. Or: “Get government out of our lives.”
    Liberalism in fact means a system under which government withdraws all obstacles to business doing what it wants with no interference. And since business by definition seeks profit above anything else, business does not respect basic human rights. Neo-liberalism is that same approach extended on a global scale. Result: American jobs to Central America, China, Indonesia, etc.
    OWS started as a protest of the big giveaway in 2008 – “socialism” for the banks. Think about it. OWS preaches non-violence.
    As for respect for life, UNICEF estimates that 500,000 children died as a result of US sanctions on Iraq up to 2003. All for oil. Half the civilian deaths in Pakistan from drone attacks have been children (drone attacks started up again on 01/10/2012).
    But I agree that dropping condoms on Catholic girls, if true, is silly. Catholics aren’t even allowed to use condoms. For centuries they’ve relied on CI and non-******* forms of intimacy as means of conception control.
    Have a good one.
    So

    Responses (1) +
  • January 30, 2012 at 4:03pm

    The sponges? Oh you mean the bank executives who took 3 trillion of the taxpayer’s money and gave themselves multi-million bonuses.

  • January 30, 2012 at 11:44am

    Obama is a communist? And John D. Rockefeller was a Bolshevick. LOL. Obama is as much for the Big Money as any of your Republicans, who are traditionally defenders of Big Business. He’s just as much Wall St.’s man as any of ‘em. Now you want an Army guy. When are we going to elect a real working Man as President, that has really known what it’s like to have calluses on your hands and respects hard work, not these parasite politician welfare cases who never learned any trade or profession other than twisting the truth? When are we going to stop being taken in by them? The more money is at stake, the more they lie.

  • January 18, 2011 at 11:06am

    Agreed. The way the question was asked was obviously baiting, and she fell into the trap at the very end when she said that she was against violence “unless it’s … a big part of your strategy.” Yet the strategic use of violence she mentioned consisted in allowing violence to be used against you, not in using it yourself. So on balance she is definitely not advocating violence. Unfortunately a lot of the people who have commented on the videos are advocating violence. So where do they get off criticizing her?

    Read the article, people.

  • January 18, 2011 at 10:42am

    Nowhere do you give a link to what this woman actually wrote. Do you mind doing that so that we can read it for ourselves?