User Profile: LetUsReason


Member Since: January 22, 2011

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

123 To page: Go
  • March 6, 2014 at 6:56pm

    @ plentyalotandgood

    You forgot Genesis 1:26: “Let US make man in our image…”

    Us? Not to be flippant, but God is not schizophrenic. God, Jesus Christ, and the Holy Spirit are separate. Yes, “They”. One purpose.

  • March 6, 2014 at 6:46pm

    This 3-in-1 God without body, parts, or passions is so far from what actually is the truth. Don’t you remember in Luke 24 where Christ eats with the disciples? He says “Handle me and see for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have.” And yet, “Christians” today forget this and think that the resurrected Lord has (for some unknown reason) since that time become a mystical 3-in-1 incomprehensible, unknowable being. I will never understand the willful ignorance of some of those who profess to follow truth. And then, when you claim that God has a body like we do, they hiss, “Anthropomorphism!”. Ha! Tell that to those who walked, talked, ate with, hugged, and worshipped the Lord Jesus Christ after he rose from the grave. 3-in-1? Hardly.

    “Don’t touch me,” he said, “For I have not yet ascended to my Father.” Ascend to whom, you ask? Himself? His 3-in-1 incomprehensible, “without body, parts or psasions”, unknowable self? Please people. This is basic doctrine. Eyes to see, but are blind, indeed.

  • March 6, 2014 at 5:59pm

    @ Bronco Guy

    You’ve presented several points. Unfortunately, none of them show any evidence of the Trinity. In fact, they only support what we’ve already pointed out above, if you’ll kindly reread the remarks.

    Let me explain it this way. In Mark 10:8, Christ teaches this: “AND THE TWO SHALL BECOME ONE FLESH; so they are no longer two, but one flesh.” Now, this is in relation to marriage. If we didn’t know better, wouldn’t we think that marriage somehow makes two people become one person? That’s what He is saying, right? But we do know better. We know good and well what he is talking about. A husband and wife are supposed to unite in perfect union to be “one”. He is teaching the same thing about Himself and the Father, and how His will is swallowed up in the will of the Father.

    You seem to indicate that unless one believes in the Trinity, then they are polytheists. This is nonsense. The polytheistic religions of today and yesteryear show various gods of various delights, emotions, and intents. God despises this. Not because there are many, but because they are not “one”. God would have ALL of us be like Him. Perfectly like Him. Like how His Son is like Him. Christ’s mission was to show us how to become ONE with the Father. Look deeper into the scriptures, and you will see the doctrine of the Trinity is 100% man-made malarky. A bogus doctrine that the early Christians did not believe. Neither should any of us.

  • March 6, 2014 at 4:29pm

    Seek4Truth is correct here. The Trinity is man-made belief that is not found in the Bible. In fact, it is quite clear from the text that the opposite is truth. That is, that the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost are separate and district personages, albeit ONE in purpose. This is what Christ meant when he said they are one. Christ also prayed that his disciples may be one, even as He and the Father are one. If you believe in the Trinity, then this sentence makes it seem like Christ wants his disciples to merge into a single body. Not so. Being “one” is a well-known imagery used then AND now to indicate complete unity in mind, desire, and purpose.

    The idea of Trinity can be easily refuted by using the Biblical text itself. Christ’s baptism, the Mount of Transfiguration, Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane, and other key times show that the doctrine of the Trinity is a farce. Stephen saw Christ standing at the right hand of the Father. How do you stand at the right hand of yourself? Why would Christ pray to Himself? Why would John hear Christ’s voice come from Heaven and testify of His Son (himself?) while the baptism is being performed? And while he also descends upon Himself in the form of a dove? It seems ridiculous because it is. They are separate individuals who have completely united themselves in purpose.

    Clearly, the doctrine of the Trinity is untruth. It was never founded in truth, and it persists today by corrupt professors of religion who frankly should know bett

  • January 21, 2014 at 11:26am

    Agreed. Good kid. It’s just weird that he’s wearing the mark of the beast on his forehead. I think Monster is marketing that way on purpose. Strange, though.

    (In case you don’t know what I’m talking about, look up how 6 is written in Hebrew).

  • January 21, 2014 at 10:44am

    My assault barrel gun has a 400 bullet clip magazine in it! All I have to do is yank on the stock trigger to turn the safety on Go, and then it’s pretty much ready to shoot as many shells as my automatic rifle gun can make go.

    Responses (1) +
  • January 21, 2014 at 10:33am

    “I would not let my grown-up, adult, think-for-himself son make his own decisions and run his own life. I would control him, choose for him, and hold his hand through life for the sake of his safety and never wanting him to experience pain, discomfort, or disappointment of any kind. That’s how good of a father I would be to him. I would make all his decisions. Isn’t that nice of me? No freedom for him.”

  • January 21, 2014 at 10:11am

    I pray that you’re using sarcasm.

  • January 21, 2014 at 10:08am

    You got that right. And didn’t you love Glenn’s “debunking” of Sandy Hook. What a bunch of nonsense that was. Although I like Glenn and generally agree with him on most things, his treatment of 9/11 and Sandy Hook was atrocious. When he gets too close to the full truth, he gets scared.

  • January 21, 2014 at 10:03am

    It’s not on the agenda.

    There actually were no shooters. No blood. No holes. No shells. No glass. No victims. No tears. No truth.

    As for the guy in camo, let’s call him the stage director.

  • January 21, 2014 at 9:55am

    It’s true. They never died. They are completely safe, which is why the parents couldn’t conjure up any tears during their oh-so tragic interviews. They are con artists, and Robbie Parker is a CIA disinfo agent. Sorry, all you believers, you’ve been tricked.

  • January 21, 2014 at 9:47am

    Bodies buried in the ground?! Hahahaha….did you get a chance to see them? I didn’t think so. Did the parents? Nope. Did anyone?! No, sir. But, but, but…the funerals!

  • January 21, 2014 at 9:44am

    So who’s paying you to have a Tea Party avatar and act conservative? I’m sorry that the facts upset you. You can either attack me….OR….you can prove me wrong. Go on, I’ll wait.

  • January 21, 2014 at 9:40am

    @ hpyagl

    You dingbat. I’m so tired of all this talk about how the govt couldn’t properly execute this website, so how could they pull off a complicated false flag. “They” never WANTED to create a successful website. Do you honestly think they couldn’t create a working website if they wanted to? Do you really think they WANT to save the economy? That they WANT healthcare to be affordable? It’s all a sham, and people like you listen to Hannity and buy into the incompetence theory. They know exactly what they are doing.

  • January 21, 2014 at 9:36am

    Well said, Cavallo. But I’m afraid that no matter how many times you say this, you’ll be battling the same people the next time a story like this appears.

  • January 17, 2014 at 3:31pm

    @ IheartIsrael

    Killing isn’t wrong. Murder is wrong. Rape is wrong. Killing is not.

  • January 17, 2014 at 2:47pm

    10. Why were there Facebook pages created to raise funds for the victims families BEFORE the event even happened?
    11. Why was FEMA operating drills that SAME day in the SAME area for the SAME type of disaster? Coincidence, right?
    12. How come nobody knew Adam Lanza? Neighbors had never seen him. He had no recent classmates. His death certificate pre-dates the shooting!
    13. If Adam Lanza was about to go on a massive shooting spree, why would he spend the time and energy destroying his laptop first? What purpose would that serve him?
    14. How come the families of the “victims” are so smiley and contented about the tragedy?
    15. Why are so many photos of Emilie Parker proven to be tampered with and photoshopped?
    16. How come ambulances were prohibited from pulling up to the school in quantities sufficiently representative of a mass shooting? Also, so many people shot, and yet no airlifts to the hospital?!
    17. Is it strange that Adam Lanza’s father and James Holmes’ father (Aurora theater shooting) are implicated in the same financial scandal?
    18. Why is nobody in the aerial footage of the shooting seen hurrying or urgent? Instead, they are walking around like zombies in circles. PS….where is the security footage??
    19. Why were pagesthat were set up for fund-raising purposes for the victims caught using photos of other LIVE children and mislabeled as Sandy Hook victims?
    20. Why the intensive agenda push immediately following the event?

    It ALL stinks, and it’s

    Responses (2) +
  • January 17, 2014 at 2:32pm

    Some points to consider:
    1. There has NEVER been one shred of evidence brought forth to prove that this ever happened…only a bunch of media hype and propaganda.
    2. There is not ANY genuine emotion from any of the “parents of the victims” that can be seen from any interview.
    3. The school nurse heaped accolades upon Nancy Lanza for her excellent work teaching at the school. Why would she say that? Nancy never worked there.
    4. Gene Rosen’s story doesn’t make sense and is riddled with inconsistencies and inaccuracies. He is an actor and fakes emotion while lying about meeting survivors of Ms. Soto’s class. There were supposedly NO survivors from her class.
    5. Why is there so much media hush, community silence, covered up evidence, and now…a bulldozed school?
    6. The medical examiner was extremely unorthodox in his procedures of the “crime scene”. His bizarre interview betrays his real emotions.
    7. Why did they think that Adam Lanza was originally Ryan Lanza? The two hadn’t seen each other in years! How did Adam get Ryan’s valid ID? Why has Ryan never been interviewed?
    8. Why is there no shattered glass at the school? Bullet holes that are supposedly caused by Lanza have rust around them…how?
    9. What about the “other shooter”? A man in camo seen running from the school into the woods. He was apprehended and placed in a cop car. They said he was an off-duty officer from another district. How did he get there so fast? Why was he in camo? Why would he run?

    Responses (2) +
  • January 17, 2014 at 2:20pm

    Thank you. It boggles my mind that people still believe this.

  • January 17, 2014 at 2:19pm

    Come on, everyone. Surely, you know by now that Sandy Hook never happened….at least not in reality. If you still think some punk kid shot up the school, then I’m afraid there’s not much I can do in a single comment to help you. Please do your research. It’s a fake.