haha agreed. I’d like to see any progressive statist try to take on Wilkow on any topic, especially economics. He would smash the argument to pieces in two seconds because progressive economics is an oxymoron.
Nice try, but no. Nobody here advocated using the power of government to change this behavior. If I missed it, show me where it is. What I see are people expressing their opinions regarding this behavior, and yes many of them are condemning it. But there's a big difference between people expressing condemnation of a behavior on a website and people using the power of government to eliminate that behavior. When people here start demanding that the government pass laws prohibiting college sex, then check back aand we'll talk.
By the way, speaking of imposing one's morals onto others via the power of government, I'm forced to recycle because of liberals forcing their morals onto me. I'm forced to use cruddy ethanol gas because of liberals forcing their morals onto me. I'm forced to pay for all kinds of junk that I'm opposed to because of liberals forcing their morals onto me. So how about you think about that a bit before accusing others. I guess it's not uncommon for people to project their own attitudes and behaviors onto others. Especially liberal people.
April 30, 2013 at 9:29am
Actually, there are not limits to the right of free speech. Banning the yelling of the word fire in a crowded theater has absolutely nothing to do with the first amendment. The first amendment deals with the content of speech. When you enter into a theater to watch a show/movie, you are entering into a contract in which you buy a ticket to enter onto private property and agree to follow certain rules. Yelling fire in a crowded theater causes hysteria, which is disturbing the peace. The reason you cant yell fire in a crowded theater is because it disturbs the peace and breaks the contract you agree, as well as interrupting the performance that everybody else paid to see. If I’m with my girlfriend and she comes back to the bathroom and asks what happened, I can say to her, “oh so and so lit that on fire” blah blah blah with no repercussions. Obviously what is unlawful here is not the content, but the repercussions of certain actions that disturb the peace on private property.
January 30, 2013 at 9:57pm
a lottttt of hate for a group that supposedly believes in individual liberty. Making real conservatives who value liberties look bad. You people believe in selective liberty, when its convenient for you.
You know what... try reading for once, It's not hate! Many of us posting are just tired of the public passion play being done because the LGBT are the ones who really haven't accepted themselves. The LGBT are sounding like sniveling little brats. They demand to be accepted by all to affirm their lifestyle is righteous.
Exactly right Paulhgreenbay ... the whole LGBTQ movement is about acceptance ... and if they can't convince the populace by using the victim-hood card, then they'll use the force of government sanction.
Same-Sex ‘Marriage’ and the Persecution of Civil Society
"Legalizing same-sex “marriage” (or civil unions) is not a stand-alone policy, independent of all the other activities of the state. Once governments assert that same-sex unions are the equivalent of marriage, those governments must defend and enforce a whole host of other social changes.
Unfortunately, these government-enforced changes conflict with a wide array of ordinary liberties, including religious freedom and ordinary private property rights"
Read more: http://www.ncregister.com/site/article/15099#ixzz2JWQXBh1S
Sniveling little brats? You guys are the ones with sand in your collective conservative va****s because of a little girl's post on tumblr LMFAO
Raif...your guilt is obvious. You don't need our approval for your perversion. Some of the nicest people I have ever met are gay. So what? I disapprove any lifestyle fixated with one issue. In this case it is sex. period. Life has much more to offer than lust....and that is all this is.
You're just stereotyping and it's already getting old. You don't know anything about my personal life or this girl's. The fact that we like the same gender says absolutely zero about us being fixated on sex or promiscuous.
January 17, 2013 at 7:43pm
Then don’t read it. He owns TheBlaze, he could post picture of his pube shavings if he wants to
December 22, 2012 at 11:00am
Michael Moore has a right to his free speech. But he’s is irrelevant. He is nothing but an anti-capitalist, progressive, statist, big government, hypocritical ideologue who has acquired wealth through capitalism himself. Sweet Moore, your fat as pr*ck and you run around like an anti American, root for the bad guys, treasonous b*tch. There’s my free speech. We need the government out of the lives of citizens and the private sector to restore the identity that made us great.
Oh and all you religious zealots commenting on this site that want your religion taught in public schools but call yourselves conservatives. Maybe you should retread the constitution yourselves before you start pushing your beliefs on everyone else in this country. The constitution doesn’t only apply when it’s convenient for you
November 1, 2012 at 12:14pm
you are a fundamentalist nutjob. Stop pushing your own judgement and faith onto other people. She was making a comparison of the efficiency of government compared to private church’s based on the income they take in. Enough with your psycho “autism is caused by sin” or whatever nonsense your preaching. How about have faith in whatever religion you practice (a right defined by our 1st Amendment) and lead a good life. Your comments are just as divisive as the Left’s class/race warfare.
October 15, 2012 at 4:59pm
if your going to start calling people stupid, you might want to take note that you spelled “conservative” wrong.