User Profile: LIBERTYorDEATH1776

LIBERTYorDEATH1776

Member Since: October 05, 2012

CommentsDisplaying comments newest to oldest.

  • January 16, 2014 at 8:55am

    haha agreed. I’d like to see any progressive statist try to take on Wilkow on any topic, especially economics. He would smash the argument to pieces in two seconds because progressive economics is an oxymoron.

  • December 29, 2013 at 3:48pm

    Your a UFC fighter? What’s your name?

    Responses (1) +
  • October 25, 2013 at 7:42am

    You need to chill out you end of days over the top nutjob. You are the type of dude that give the right a bad rap

  • October 22, 2013 at 3:54pm

    It’s funny how some of you guys consistently talk about the government encroaching on your freedom but seek to impose your own moral authority on everybody else.

    Responses (1) +
  • April 30, 2013 at 9:29am

    Actually, there are not limits to the right of free speech. Banning the yelling of the word fire in a crowded theater has absolutely nothing to do with the first amendment. The first amendment deals with the content of speech. When you enter into a theater to watch a show/movie, you are entering into a contract in which you buy a ticket to enter onto private property and agree to follow certain rules. Yelling fire in a crowded theater causes hysteria, which is disturbing the peace. The reason you cant yell fire in a crowded theater is because it disturbs the peace and breaks the contract you agree, as well as interrupting the performance that everybody else paid to see. If I’m with my girlfriend and she comes back to the bathroom and asks what happened, I can say to her, “oh so and so lit that on fire” blah blah blah with no repercussions. Obviously what is unlawful here is not the content, but the repercussions of certain actions that disturb the peace on private property.

  • January 30, 2013 at 9:57pm

    a lottttt of hate for a group that supposedly believes in individual liberty. Making real conservatives who value liberties look bad. You people believe in selective liberty, when its convenient for you.

    Guess what? Your irrelevant.

    Responses (5) +
  • January 17, 2013 at 7:43pm

    Then don’t read it. He owns TheBlaze, he could post picture of his pube shavings if he wants to

  • December 22, 2012 at 11:00am

    Michael Moore has a right to his free speech. But he’s is irrelevant. He is nothing but an anti-capitalist, progressive, statist, big government, hypocritical ideologue who has acquired wealth through capitalism himself. Sweet Moore, your fat as pr*ck and you run around like an anti American, root for the bad guys, treasonous b*tch. There’s my free speech. We need the government out of the lives of citizens and the private sector to restore the identity that made us great.

    Oh and all you religious zealots commenting on this site that want your religion taught in public schools but call yourselves conservatives. Maybe you should retread the constitution yourselves before you start pushing your beliefs on everyone else in this country. The constitution doesn’t only apply when it’s convenient for you

  • November 1, 2012 at 12:14pm

    ILIKEPEOPLE,

    you are a fundamentalist nutjob. Stop pushing your own judgement and faith onto other people. She was making a comparison of the efficiency of government compared to private church’s based on the income they take in. Enough with your psycho “autism is caused by sin” or whatever nonsense your preaching. How about have faith in whatever religion you practice (a right defined by our 1st Amendment) and lead a good life. Your comments are just as divisive as the Left’s class/race warfare.

  • October 15, 2012 at 4:59pm

    if your going to start calling people stupid, you might want to take note that you spelled “conservative” wrong.